Résumés
Abstract
Objective – This scoping review examines the library literature on popular reading collections at academic libraries at both the secondary and post-secondary levels, with a focus on collection practices and characteristics, use, and impact.
Methods – Researchers searched six databases for relevant literature from 1995 to the present. In addition to general article characteristics such as publication type, date, and location, the articles (both scholarly and popular) were analyzed for popular reading collection characteristics, activities related to popular reading collections, and implications for libraries.
Results – The search identified 2,140 related records, 106 of which were chosen for inclusion in this review. The review found that popular reading collections are maintained by academic libraries worldwide, though the majority of articles were published in the United States and Canada. Circulation statistics are a common measure to gauge success, and graphic novels and other genre fiction are popular with students. Implications of popular reading collections revolved around their impact on students, library workflows, and campus collaborations.
Conclusion – This study synthesized the library literature on popular reading collections, outlining their characteristics and impact on undergraduate students. Future research could help develop best practices for academic librarians working with popular reading collections.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Alsop, J. (2007). Bridget Jones meets Mr. Darcy: Challenges of contemporary fiction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(5), 581–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.05.004
- Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
- Aromataris, E., & Riitano, D. (2014). Systematic reviews: Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. AJN, American Journal of Nursing, 114(5), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000446779.99522.f6
- Bankar, R. S., & Patil, S. B. (2021). Bibliotherapy: A prototype model for academic libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 5484. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/libphilprac/5484
- Bordonaro, K. (2011). Recreational reading of international students in academic libraries. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 11(3), 269–278. http://hdl.handle.net/10464/5153
- Brookbank, E., Davis, A.-M., & Harlan, L. (2018). Don’t call it a comeback: Popular reading collections in academic libraries. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 58(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.58.1.6838
- Bull, A. C., & Kiciman, J. J. (2019). Building multiple literacies through fiction-based book clubs in the academic library. Alki: The Washington Library Association Journal, 35(2), 23–25.
- Camargo-Rojas, L. (2024). Promoción de la lectura recreativa y misión de las bibliotecas universitarias: Una revisión sistemática. Ocnos, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2024.23.1.388
- Cox, A., & Brewster, L. (2020). Library support for student mental health and well-being in the UK: Before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(6), 102256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102256
- Dewan, P. (2010). Why your academic library needs a popular reading collection now more than ever. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 17(1), 44–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691310903584775
- Dewan, P. (2015). Reading trends and college-age students: The research, the issues, and the role of libraries. Against the Grain, 27(1), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.6993
- Dewan, P. (2023). Leisure reading as a mindfulness activity: The implications for academic reference librarians. The Reference Librarian, 64(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2022.2156968
- Diers, B., & Simpson, S. (2012). At your leisure: Establishing a popular reading collection at UBC Library. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 7(2), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.18438/B84W4G
- Edmundson, M. (2004). Why read? Bloomsbury.
- Forrest, L. A. (2011). College book clubs: Collaborating for success. Journal of Library Innovation, 2(2), 16–21.
- Francis, M. (2011). Turning a One Campus One Book event into a Web 2.0 experience: The first two years. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 18(4), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2011.624948
- Freeman, J. M., Manci, C., Cruz, S., & Sheldon, K. (2023). “You have my sword.” “You have my bow.” “And my axe.”: Creating a popular reading collection through interdepartmental collaboration. Public Services Quarterly, 19(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2022.2133787
- Freeman, R., & Lemhouse, M. M. (2023). Adding color to our shelves: Creating a graphic novel collection at USC Lancaster. Technical Services Quarterly, 40(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2023.2226430
- Gallik, J. D. (1999). Do they read for pleasure? Recreational reading habits of college students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(6), 480–488.
- Gangwish, K., & Pietsch, L. (2010). A journey to reorganize the fiction collection. School Library Monthly, 26(8), 24–25.
- Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. Yale University Press.
- Gilbert, J., & Fister, B. (2011). Reading, risk, and reality: College students and reading for pleasure. College & Research Libraries, 72(5), 474–495. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-148
- Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
- Jansen, A. (2020). Rethinking romance: An argument for adding the genre to the popular shelf. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(2), 102100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102100
- Jolliffe, D. A., & Harl, A. (2008). Studying the “reading transition” from high school to college: What are our students reading and why? College English, 70(6), 599–617. https://doi.org/10.58680/ce20086370
- Kellermeyer, L., Harnke, B., & Knight, S. (2018). Covidence and Rayyan. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 580–583. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.513
- Kelly, K. E., & Kneipp, L. B. (2009). Reading for pleasure and creativity among college students. College Student Journal, 43(4), 1137–1144.
- Kerns, K., & O’Brien, D. (2001). Recreational reading collections: A survey of Tennessee academic libraries. Tennessee Librarian, 52(2), 6–16.
- Khongtim, J. (2021). Trends in reading habits of students from school level to higher levels of education: Evidence from the review of literature. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 5170. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5170
- Kuhlmann, M., & Walker, L. (2019). Superheroes in the stacks: Halloween ComicFest and Wichita State University. Journal of Library Administration, 59(3), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2019.1583017
- Lacey, S., & Lomness, A. (2020). Better together: Assessing a leisure reading collection for an academic and public library partnership. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(1), 102023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.03.011
- Lely, J., Morris, H. C., Sasson, N., Camarillo, N. D., Livinski, A. A., Butera, G., & Wickstrom, J. (2023). How to write a scoping review protocol: Guidance and template. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/pu7ym
- Levine, S. L., Cherrier, S., Holding, A. C., & Koestner, R. (2022). For the love of reading: Recreational reading reduces psychological distress in college students and autonomous motivation is the key. Journal of American College Health, 70(1), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1728280
- Mahaffy, M. (2009). In support of reading: Reading outreach programs at academic libraries. Public Services Quarterly, 5(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228950902904267
- McQuillan, J. (2019). Where do we get our academic vocabulary? Comparing the efficiency of direct instruction and free voluntary reading. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 19(1), 129–138. https://www.readingmatrix.com/files/20-d7ceydef.pdf
- Moyer, J. E. (2007). Learning from leisure reading: A study of adult public library patrons. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 46(4), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.46n4.66
- Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
- O’English, L., Matthews, J. G., & Lindsay, E. B. (2006). Graphic novels in academic libraries: From Maus to manga and beyond. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.12.002
- Parlette, M., & Howard, V. (2010). Personal growth, habits and understanding: Pleasure reading among first-year university students. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 5(4), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8C61M
- Pollock, D., Peters, M. D. J., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Alexander, L., Tricco, A. C., Evans, C., de Moraes, É. B., Godfrey, C. M., Pieper, D., Saran, A., Stern, C., & Munn, Z. (2023). Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 21(3), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00123
- Proctor, J., & Barstow, S. (2013). Partly cloudy with a chance of entertainment: An academic library’s experience with a popular reading ebook resource. Journal of Library Administration, 53(7–8), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.882193
- Reno, L. (2017). Mistakes were made: Strict curricular focus and student retention in academic libraries. Codex: the Journal of the Louisiana Chapter of the ACRL, 4(3), 39–63. https://journal.acrlla.org/index.php/codex/article/view/135
- Ross, C. S. (1999). Finding without seeking: The information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 783–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00026-6
- Ross, C. S., McKechnie, L., & Rothbauer, P. M. (2006). Reading matters: What the research reveals about reading, libraries, and community. Libraries Unlimited.
- Sánchez-García, S. (2019). Lectura y rendimiento académico. Actuaciones desde la biblioteca universitaria. Anuario ThinkEPI, 13, e13b03. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2019.e13b03
- Slater, A., & Kardos, A. (2017). Graphic novels: Collecting, cataloging and outreach in an academic library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(2), 116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.01.011
- Szempruch, J. N., & Hinds, K. I. (2022). Virtual book club: Impactful library programming at a distance through co-curricular collaboration. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 16(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2022.2072047
- Thornton, G. A., & Carroll, H. (2006). The race for readers: A public library and an academic library team up to entice college students to read books. American Libraries, 37(9), 24–26.
- van den Hoogen, S., & Fleuren-Hunter, K. (2017). At Your Leisure pilot project: Providing leisure reading materials to a university community through an academic and public library initiative. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v12i1.3919
- Watson, E. M. (2016). The importance of leisure reading to health sciences students: Results of a survey. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 33(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12129
- West, W. L., & Nous, R. A. (2018). Out of the basement: Partnering to enhance the discovery and use of graphic novels. Collaborative Librarianship, 10(4), 267–281. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol10/iss4/6
- Young, B. (2014). Wham! Pow! Discussion of a graphic novel and comic book core collection in an academic library. Mississippi Libraries, 77(1), 9–11.