Résumés
Abstract
Objective – This study was designed to identify the impact of standalone information literacy tutorials on student success indicators. The study was conducted in two different phases to compare findings across different modalities and to identify whether online, asynchronous delivery of substantively similar content affected outcomes.
Methods – Using institutional records from a mid-sized, Midwestern public university, and attendance and completion data from student participation in asynchronous library workshops, the authors used propensity score matching to construct a control group that mirrored library workshop participants based on like characteristics. Statistical analyses were then conducted comparing the GPA, semester completion, and retention rates between the two groups.
Results – Students who completed at least one information literacy workshop had significantly higher semester GPAs (M = 3.25, SD = 0.85, SE = 0.06) than non-participants (M = 2.99, SD = 1.13, SE = 0.07); significantly higher semester completion rates (M = 0.93, SD = 0.18, SE = 0.01) than non-participants (M = 0.87, SD = 0.27, SE = 0.02); and substantially higher odds (OR = 3.5) of returning to the university the following semester than non-participants.
Conclusion – The findings in this study provide evidence for librarians advocating for the benefit of information literacy instruction on student success, particularly for undergraduate student retention. Additionally, library instruction programs making decisions about where to focus resources will find the comparisons between outcomes for online and traditional methods of instruction informative.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Anderson, K., & May, F. A. (2010). Does the method of instruction matter? An experimental examination of information literacy instruction in the online, blended, and face-to-face classrooms. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(6), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.08.005
- Bordignon, M., Otis, A., Georgievski, A., Peters, J., Strachan, G., Muller, J., & Tamin, R. (2016). Assessment of online information literacy learning objects for first year community college English composition. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 11(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8T922
- Bowles-Terry, M., & Donovan, C. (2016). Serving notice on the one-shot: changing roles for instruction librarians. International Information & Library Review, 48(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1176457
- Cook, D. (2022). Is the library one-shot effective? A meta-analytic study. College & Research Libraries, 83(5), 739-750. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.83.5.739
- Gariepy, L. W., Peacemaker, B., & Colon, V. (2017). Stop chasing unicorns: Setting reasonable expectations for the impact of library instruction programs (and other library services) on student success. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-05-2017-0025
- Harder, V. S., Stuart, E. A., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019623
- Head, A. (2013). "Learning the ropes: How freshmen conduct course research once they enter college." https://projectinfolit.org/publications/first-year-experience-study/
- Hess, A. N. (2014). Online and face-to-face library instruction: assessing the impact on upper-level sociology undergraduates. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 33(3), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2014.934122
- Hill, L., Maier-Katkin, D., Ladny, R., & Kinsley, K. (2018). When in doubt, go to the library: The effect of a library-intensive freshman research and writing seminar on academic success. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 29(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2017.1372498
- Irwin, V., Wang, K., Jung, J., Kessler, E., Tezil, T., Alhassani, S., Filbey, A., Dilig, R., and Bullock Mann, F. (2024). Report on the condition of education 2024 (NCES 2024-144). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2024/2024144.pdf
- Jones, K. M. L., Asher, A., Goben, A., Perry, M. R., Salo, D., Briney, K. A., & Robertshaw, M. B. (2020). “We’re being tracked at all times”: Student perspectives of their privacy in relation to learning analytics in higher education. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 71(9), 1044–1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24358
- Jones, W. L. & Mastrorilli, T. (2022). Assessing the impact of an information literacy course on students’ academic achievement: A mixed-methods study. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30090
- Kot, F., & Jones, J. (2015). The impact of library resource utilization on undergraduate students’ academic performance: A propensity score matching design. College & Research Libraries, 76(5), 566-586. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.5.566
- Koufogiannakis, D., & Wiebe, N. (2006). Effective methods for teaching information literacy skills to undergraduate students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 1(3), 3–43. https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/76/153
- Kraemer, E. W., Lombardo, S. V., & Lepkowski, F. J. (2007). The librarian, the machine, or a little of both: A comparative study of three information literacy pedagogies at Oakland University. College and Research Libraries, 68(4), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.68.4.330
- Mao, J. & Kinsley, K. (2017). Embracing the generalized propensity score method: Measuring the effect of library usage on first-time-in-college student academic success. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.18438/B8BH35
- O’Kelly, M. K., Jeffryes, J., Hobscheid, M., & Passarelli, R. (2023). Correlation between library instruction and student retention: Methods and implications. College & Research Libraries, 84(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.84.1.85
- Robertshaw, M. B., & Asher, A. (2019). Unethical numbers? A meta-analysis of library learning analytics studies. Library Trends, 68(1), 76–101. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2019.0031
- Rosenbaum, P. & Rubin, D. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in the observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70 (1). 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335942
- Rowe, J., Leuzinger, J., Hargis, C., & Harker, K. R. (2021). The impact of library instruction on undergraduate student success: A four-year study. College & Research Libraries, 82(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.1.7
- Silk, K. J., Perrault, E. K., Ladenson, S., & Nazione, S. A. (2015). The effectiveness of online versus in-person library instruction on finding empirical communication research. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(2), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.12.007
- Soria, K., Fransen, J., & Nackerud, S. (2017). The impact of academic library resources on undergraduates’ degree completion. College & Research Libraries, 78(6), 812-823. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.812
- Vossler, J., Horton, J., & Heady, C. (2023). The questionable efficacy of one-shot instruction for first-year students: A scoping review. ACRL 2023 Conference, 446-454, 2023. https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/acrl/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2023/QuestionableEfficacy1.pdf
- Wegener, D. R. (2018). Information literacy: Diagnostics, interventions, and assessments. Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management, 47, 102–113. https://www.las.org.sg/wp/sjlim/information-literacy-diagnostics-interventions-and-assessments
- Wine, L. D., Pribesh, S., Kimmel, S. C., Dickinson, G., & Church, A. P. (2023). Impact of school librarians on elementary student achievement in reading and mathematics: A propensity score analysis. Library and Information Science Research, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101252
- Zhang, L., Watson, E. M., & Banfield, L. (2007). The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction versus face-to-face instruction in academic libraries: A systematic review. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(4), 478–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.03.006