Résumés
Abstract
Since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022, a range of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools have emerged to support students’ English academic writing, benefiting particularly English as an additional language (EAL) students. Previous studies have primarily focused on undergraduates’ knowledge, perceptions, and practices of GenAI use in writing. Research on postgraduates, especially EAL doctoral students’ engagement with GenAI remains relatively limited; yet, these students are expected to demonstrate a higher level of writing proficiency to effectively disseminate their research within the academic community. To address this gap, this study aims to examine how EAL PhD students engage with GenAI tools behaviourally, cognitively, and affectively in a thesis writing course. Data were collected from students through questionnaire surveys and focus group interviews. Findings reveal that most participants viewed GenAI as a valuable tool for assisting their writing. However, some expressed hesitation about using the technology due to concerns about academic reputation and the originality of their research writing. This study has significant pedagogical implications regarding: i) the support needed by EAL PhD students to effectively use GenAI in their writing; and ii) possible ways to integrate GenAI technology into academic writing courses.
Keywords:
- GenAI writing assistant tools,
- EAL doctoral students,
- academic writing,
- engagement
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Badenhorst, C., Moloney, C., Rosales, J., Dyer, J., & Ru, L. (2015). Beyond deEicit: Graduate student research-writing pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.945160
- Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to AI: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artiEicial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0
- Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
- Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difEiculties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Campbell, M. (2019). Teaching academic writing in higher education. Education Quarterly Reviews. 2, 608–614. https://doi.org/10.31014/AIOR.1993.02.03.92
- Casal, J. E., & Kessler, M. (2023). Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing? A study of research ethics and academic publishing. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100068
- Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, beneEits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
- Cheng, A. (2007). Transferring generic features and recontextualizing genre awareness: Understanding writing performance in the ESP genre-based literacy framework. English forspeci<ic purposes, 26(3), 287-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.12.002
- Cheng, D., Li, M., & Lee, T. (2025). Leveraging ChatGPT for research writing: An exploration of ESL graduate students’ practices. Computers and Composition, 76, 102934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102934
- Cheng, X., & Liu, Y. (2022). Student engagement with teacher written feedback: Insights from low-proEiciency and high-proEiciency L2 learners. System, 109, 102880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102880
- Cooley, L., & Lewkowicz, J. (1997). Developing awareness of the rhetorical and linguistic conventions of writing a thesis in English: addressing the needs of EFL/ESL postgraduate students. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 113-129). Berlin, Federal Republic Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Third edition. U.S.: Sage Publications.
- Dalati, S., & Marx Gó mez, J. (2018). Surveys and questionnaires. In M. Gó mez, J. and S. Mouselli (Eds.) Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment: Methodologies and Cases in Business Research (pp. 175-186). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4_10
- Đerić , E., Frank, D., & Milković , M. (2025). Trust in generative AI tools: A comparative study of higher education students, teachers, and researchers. Information, 16(7), 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16070622
- Dizon, G., & Gold, J. (2023). Exploring the effects of Grammarly on EFL students' foreign language anxiety and learner autonomy. Japan Association for Language Teaching Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 19(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v19n3.1049
- Dong, Y. R. (1998). Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two US institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00054-9
- Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023). AI-generated feedback on writing: insights into efEicacy and ENL student preference. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2
- Gazmuri Sanhueza, A. X., Spinelli, F., & Wijaya, D. (2025). L2 Spanish and Indonesian learners’ engagement with ChatGPT written corrective feedback. Proceedings of the International CALL Research Conference, 2025, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.29140/97817637116240-05
- Gopee, N., & Deane, M. (2013). Strategies for successful academic writing – institutional and non-institutional support for students. Nurse Educ. Today 33, 1624–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.004
- Gupta, S., Jaiswal, A., Paramasivam, A., & Kotecha, J. (2022). Academic writing challenges and supports: Perspectives of international doctoral students and their supervisors. In Frontiers in Education, 7, 891534. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.891534
- Hyland, K. (2018). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
- Hong Kong University Grant Committee. (2024). Non-local student enrolment (headcount) of UGC-funded programmes by institution, level of study, place of origin and mode of study. https://cdcf.ugc.edu.hk/stat/index.html#/topic/internationalisation
- Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1265–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
- Koltovskaia, S., Rahmati, P., & Saeli, H. (2024). Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement. Journal of Second Language Writing, 65, 101130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101130
- Larcombe, W., McCosker, A., & O'Loughlin, K. (2007). Supporting education PhD and DEd students to become conEident academic writers: An evaluation of thesis writers' circles. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 4(1), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.4.1.6
- Li, S. (2025). Generative AI and second language writing. Digital Studies in Language and Literature, 1(2), 1-31. https://x.com/ShaofengLi9/status/1932635724379222095
- Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2020). Teaching English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP): A review of language teachers’ pedagogical initiatives. English for Speci<ic Purposes, 59, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.002
- Lin, L. H. F. (2023). Assessing the role of vocabulary knowledge in developing EFL learners’ writing skills: Implications for intentional and incidental vocabulary learning. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 32(1), 105–130.
- Lin, L. H. F., & Morrison, B. (2021). Challenges in academic writing: Perspectives of Engineering faculty and L2 postgraduate research students. English for Specific Purposes, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.03.004
- Ma, L. P. F. (2020). Writing in English as an additional language: challenges encountered by doctoral students. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(6), 1176–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1809354
- Maher, M. A., Feldon, D. F., Timmerman, B. E., and Chao, J. (2014). Faculty perceptions of common challenges encountered by novice doctoral writers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 699–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863850
- Marzuki, U. Widiati, D. Rusdin, D. & Indrawati., I. (2023). The Impact of AI Writing Tools on the content and organization of students' writing: EFL teachers' perspective. Cogent Education (2), 2236469. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
- McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2011). Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators. Springer
- Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050
- Moore, T., & Morton, J. (2017). The myth of job readiness? Written communication, employability, and the ‘skills gap' in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 42(3), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1067602
- Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y. W., Wu, C.Z., Wu, M., Ho, T. Y. (2025). Generative AI tools and empowerment in L2 academic writing. System, 133, 103779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103779
- Nugroho, A., Andriyanti, E., Widodo, P., & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2024). Students’ appraisals post-ChatGPT use: Students’ narrative after using ChatGPT for writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(2), 499–511. https://doi-org.eproxy.lib.hku.hk/10.1080/14703297.2024.2319184
- Oka Agustini, N. P. (2023). Examining the Role of ChatGPT as a Learning tool in Promoting Students’ English Language Learning Autonomy relevant to Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Edukasia (Magetan), 4(2), 921–934. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v4i2.373
- Plano Clark, V. L., & Ivankova, N. (2015). How to use mixed methods research? understanding the basic mixed methods designs. In V. L. Plano Clark and N. Y. Ivankova (Eds). Mixed methods research (pp. 105–134). Sage Publications Incorporated. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398341.n8
- Qian, D. D. & Lin, H. L. F. (2020). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and language proEiciency. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 66-80). Routledge.
- Rad, H. S., Alipour, R., & Jafarpour, A. (2023). Using artiEicial intelligence to foster students’ writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: a case of Wordtune application. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5020–5040. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170
- Rafi, M. S., & Amjad, I. (2025). The role of generative AI in writing doctoral dissertation: perceived opportunities, challenges, and facilitating strategies to promote human agency. Discover Education, 4(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00503-9
- Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artiEicial intelligence help for scientiEic writing? Critical Care, 27(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2
- Santiago, C. S., Embang, S. I., Acanto, R. B., Ambojia, K. W. P., Aperocho, M. D. B., Balilo, B. B., Cahapin, E. L., Conlu, M. T. N., Lausa, S. M., Laput, E. Y., Malabag, B. A., Paderes, J. J., & Romasanta, J. K. N. (2023). Utilization of writing assistance tools in research in selected higher learning institutions in the Philippines: A text mining analysis. International Journal of Learning. 20(11), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.11.14
- Seyyedrezaei, M. S., AmiryouseEi, M., Gimeno-Sanz, A., & Tavakoli, M. (2024). A meta-analysis of the relative effectiveness of technology-enhanced language learning on ESL/EFL writing performance: Retrospect and prospect. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7), 1771-1805. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2118782
- Sidman-Taveau, R., & Karathanos-Aguilar, K. (2015). Academic writing for graduate-level English as a second language students: Experiences in education. The CATESOL Journal, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/B5.36084
- Singh, M. (2023). Maintaining the integrity of the South African university: The impact of ChatGPT on plagiarism and scholarly writing. South African Journal of Higher Education, 37(5), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.20853/37-5-5941
- Son, J. B., & Park, S. S. (2014). Academic experiences of international PhD students in Australian higher education: From an EAP program to a PhD program. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 9(1), 26-37.
- Starfield, S., & Paltridge, B. (2018). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: Context, identity, genre. Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.10.002
- Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., Cruz, J., Hebert, M., Wang, J., ... & Olson, C. B. (2024). Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing. Learning and Instruction, 91, 101894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894
- Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge university press.
- Tardy, C. M. (2005). “It's like a story”: Rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. Journal of English for Academic purposes, 4(4), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.005
- Teng, M. F., & M. Yue. (2023). Metacognitive writing strategies, critical thinking skills, and academic writing performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Metacognition and Learning 18(1), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09328-5
- Tran, T. Q. (2020). EFL students’ attitudes toward learner autonomy in English vocabulary learning. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 86–94. https://Eiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1268364.pdf
- Wang, T., & Li, L. Y. (2008). Understanding international postgraduate research students’ challenges and pedagogical needs in thesis writing. International Journal of pedagogies and Learning, 4(3), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.4.3.88
- Wang, X., & Wang, S. (2024). Exploring Chinese EFL learners’ engagement with large language models: A self-determination theory perspective. Learning and Motivation, 87, Article 102014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102014
- Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies 28(11), 13943–13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
- Yao, Y., Sun, Y., Zhu, S., & Zhu, X. (2025). A qualitative inquiry into metacognitive strategies of postgraduate students in employing ChatGPT for English academic writing. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12824. https://doi-org.eproxy.lib.hku.hk/10.1111/ejed.12824
- Yeung, R. S. K., Tian, R., Chiu, D. K. W., & Choi, S. P.-M. (2025). University students’ perceptions on how generative artiEicial intelligence shape learning and research practices: A case study in Hong Kong. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(5), Article 103082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103082
- Yoon, C. (2011). Concordancing in L2 writing class: an overview of research and issues. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 10, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.003
- Zaheer, S., Ma, C., Zhu, Y., & Vasinda, S. (2025). GenAI in academic writing - Empowering learners or redeEining traditional pedagogical practices? A systematic review from 2019-2023. International Journal of Arti<icial Intelligence (AI) in Teaching and Learning (IJAITL), 1(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAITL.373582
- Zhang, F., Schunn, C., Chen, S., Li, W., & Li, R. (2023). EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101255
- Zhang, Z. (Victor), & Hyland, K. (2023). The role of digital literacy in student engagement with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on second language writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2256815
- Zhang, Z., & Xu, L. (2022). Student engagement with automated feedback on academic writing: a study on Uyghur ethnic minority students in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(8), 3466–3479. https://doi-org.eproxy.lib.hku.hk/10.1080/01434632.2022.2102175
- Zou, M., & Huang, L. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on L2 writing and expected responses: Voice From doctoral students. Education and Information Technologies 29, 13201–13219 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12397-x