Résumés
Abstract
Background: Residency programs across Canada evaluate applicants based on written applications, reference letters, and interviews. One key factor many institutions consider is “scholarly activity.” To improve transparency, the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) recently revised its program description pages, adding a dedicated section outlining expectations for research and academic work. This study examines whether these changes have made program criteria clearer for applicants.
Methods: For all 17 Canadian faculties of medicine, 2023 R1 entry, —internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, general surgery, psychiatry and anesthesiology—program descriptions were reviewed on the CaRMS website, looking for keywords related to scholarly activity.
Results: Although most residency programs now include scholarly activity in their CaRMS descriptions, several programs provide vague descriptions of this requirement. In 2023, nearly all family medicine (94%), internal medicine (100%), and pediatrics (100%) program descriptions referenced requiring or considering scholarly work as part of their selection process—up from 41%, 65%, and 71% in 2019. Programs commonly mentioned scholarly activity in two or three sections of their selection criteria, with key themes including active scholarly work, scholarly deliverables, and future scholarly potential.
Conclusion: Canadian medical schools should set clearer expectations for scholarly activity in residency applications to ensure transparency and equal opportunities for all applicants. Programs could also explain why research matters—whether as a core component of training or to develop critical thinking and initiative. Greater clarity would help applicants see research as more than just a “check-the-box” requirement, fostering genuine engagement in scholarly work.
Résumé
Contexte : Les programmes de résidence à travers le Canada évaluent les candidats en fonction de leur dossier écrit, des lettres de recommandation et des entrevues.. L’un des facteurs clés pris en compte par de nombreux établissements est l’« activité savante ». Afin d’améliorer la transparence, le Service canadien de jumelage des résidents (CaRMS) a récemment révisé les pages décrivant ses programmes, en ajoutant une section dédiée présentant les attentes en matière de recherche et de travail universitaire. Cette étude examine si ces changements ont permis de clarifier les critères des programmes pour les candidats.
Méthodes : Pour les 17 facultés de médecine canadiennes, les descriptions des programmes d’entrée en R1 en 2023 (médecine interne, médecine familiale, pédiatrie, chirurgie générale, psychiatrie et anesthésiologie) ont été examinées sur le site web du CaRMS, à la recherche de mots-clés liés à l’activité savante.
Résultats : Bien que la plupart des programmes de résidence incluent désormais l’activité savante dans leurs descriptions CaRMS, plusieurs programmes fournissent des descriptions vagues de cette exigence. En 2023, presque toutes les descriptions des programmes de médecine familiale (94 %), de médecine interne (100 %) et de pédiatrie (100 %) mentionnaient l’exigence ou la prise en compte d’activités savantes dans le cadre de leur processus de sélection, contre 41 %, 65 % et 71 % en 2019. Les programmes mentionnaient généralement l’activité universitaire dans deux ou trois sections de leurs critères de sélection, les thèmes clés étant notamment le travail universitaire actif, les résultats universitaires et le potentiel universitaire futur.
Conclusion : Les facultés de médecine canadiennes devraient définir des attentes plus claires en matière d’activité savantes dans les demandes de résidence afin de garantir la transparence et l’égalité des chances pour tous les candidats. Les programmes pourraient également expliquer pourquoi la recherche est importante, que ce soit en tant qu’élément central de la formation ou pour développer l’esprit critique et l’initiative. Une plus grande clarté aiderait les candidats à considérer la recherche comme plus qu’une simple exigence à cocher, ce qui favoriserait un engagement sincère dans l’activité savante.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Canadian Resident Matching Service. CaRMS data and reports. 2010. Available at https://www.carms.ca/pdfs/2010R1_MatchResults/Summary%20of%20Match%20Results_en.pdf [Accessed on Jul 2025]
- Canadian Residency Matching Service. R-1 main residency match. 2023. Available at https://www.carms.ca/match/r-1-main-residency-match/ [Accessed on Feb 2024]
- Lukings J, Bell A, Stobbe K, et al. Scholarly activity as a selection criterion in the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS): a review of published criteria by internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics programs. Can Med Educ J. 2020 Jul 15;11(3):e116–21. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.69094
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. The CanMEDS framework. Available at https://www.royalcollege.ca/en/standards-and-accreditation/canmeds.html [Accessed on Oct 2024]
- Lakoff J, Cofie N, Dalgarno N, Howse K, Heeneman S. Analysis of factors affecting Canadian medical students’ success in the residency match. Can Med Educ J. 2020 Apr 21;11(3):e43-e55. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.68981
- Chang Y, Ramnanan CJ. A review of literature on medical students and scholarly research experiences, attitudes, and outcomes. Acad Med. 2015; 90:1162-1173. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000702
- Melendez MM, Xu X, Sexton TR, Shapiro MJ, Mohan EP. The importance of basic science and clinical research as a selection criterion for general surgery residency programs. J Surg Educ. 2008 Mar;65(2):151–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.08.009
- Bernstein AD, Jazrawi LM, Elbeshbeshy B, Della Valle CJ, Zuckerman JD. An analysis of orthopaedic residency selection criteria. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 61(1–2):49–57. Available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12828380/ [Accessed on Jun 2023]
- Green M, Jones P, Thomas JX. Selection criteria for residency: results of a national program directors survey. Acad Med. 2009 Mar;84(3):362–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181970c6b
- Gorouhi F, Alikhan A, Rezaei A, Fazel N. Dermatology residency selection criteria with an emphasis on program characteristics: a national program director survey. Dermatol Res Pract. 2014;2014:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/692760
- National Resident Matching Program Data Release and Research Committee. Results of the 2014 NRMP program director survey. 2014. Available at https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/PD-Survey-Report-2014.pdf [Accessed on Oct 2024]
- Chambers LW, Bell A, Weera S. More research needed to understand medical students’ shift from exclusively clinical to scholarship. Healthy Debate. 2023 Jul. Available at https://healthydebate.ca/2023/07/topic/medicalstudents- clinical-scholarship/ [Accessed on November 2024]
- Rinard JR, Garol BD, Shenoy AB, Mahabir RC. Successfully matching into surgical specialties: an analysis of national resident matching program data. J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Sep 1;2(3):316–21. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-09-00020.1
- Pathipati AS, Taleghani N. Research in Medical School: A survey evaluating why medical students take research years. Cureus. 2016 Aug 18; https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.741
- Beres A, Baird R, Puligandla PS. Success in the pediatric surgery match: a survey of the 2010 applicant pool. J Pediatr Surg. 2011 May;46(5):957–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.030
- Gupta R, Norris ML, Barrowman N, Writer H. Pre-residency publication and its association with paediatric residency match outcome—a retrospective analysis of a national database. Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Nov 13;6(6):388–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-017-0383-8
- Simpson D, Yarris LM, Carek PJ. Defining the scholarly and scholarship common program requirements. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec 1;5(4):539–40. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00326
- Philibert I, Lieh-Lai M, Miller R, Potts JR, Brigham T, Nasca TJ. Scholarly activity in the next accreditation system: moving from structure and process to outcomes. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec 1;5(4):714–7. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-05-04-43
- Ledford CJW, Seehusen DA, Villagran MM, Cafferty LA, Childress MA. Resident scholarship expectations and experiences: sources of uncertainty as barriers to success. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec 1;5(4):564–9. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00280.1
- Robbins L, Bostrom M, Marx R, Roberts T, Sculco TP. Restructuring the orthopedic resident research curriculum to increase scholarly activity. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec 1;5(4):646–51. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00303.1
- Stoklosa K, Mazine A, Forgie K, et al. Opening the CaRMS black box: the importance of various aspects of the CaRMS application for cardiac surgery applicants. Can J Cardiol. 2021 Oct;37(10):S38–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.07.082
- Cirone KD, Akrout M, Pur DR, Vender R. Research productivity among Canadian first year dermatology residents: A 15 year analysis. JAAD Int. 2023 Dec;13:181–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2023.09.001
- Pak JS, Pagano MJ, Cooper KL, McKiernan JM, Badalato GM. Prevalence of research publication misrepresentation among urology residency applicants and its effect on match success. J Urol. 2017 Jan;99:5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.055
- Kistka HM, Nayeri A, Wang L, Dow J, Chandrasekhar R, Chambless LB. Publication misrepresentation among neurosurgery residency applicants: an increasing problem. J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;124(1):193–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.JNS141990
- Sater L, Schwartz JS, Coupland S, Young M, Nguyen LHP. Nationwide study of publication misrepresentation in applicants to residency. Med Educ. 2015 Jun;49(6):601–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12729
- Blackwell T. Nearly one in four Canadian medical grads may be fudging claims of being published on their resumes: study. National Post. 2015 Jun 3. Available at https://nationalpost.com/health/nearly-one-in-four-canadian-medical-grads-may-be-fudging-claims-on-of-being-published-on-their-resumes [Accessed on Oct 2024]