Résumés
Abstract
In science and education, research data is a valuable resource that can be utilized and repurposed for future use. Research data management is crucial for successful research, as it can generate reliable and advantageous results and facilitate accurate decision-making. The systematic review study followed the PRISMA Statement standards for reporting. Data regarding research data management from a Hungarian perspective was collected from SCOPUS, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases on January 5th, 2024. Forty-one records were identified from SCOPUS, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases. After screening, the remaining 13 articles were included in this study. The Hungarian authors discussed four distinct research data management activities. The activities included data sharing, data citation, data curation, and data storage. Several additional data-related concepts, such as data governance, data quality, data literacy, and research data service, were also examined in this study.
Keywords:
- research data management,
- data quality,
- data literacy,
- data governance,
- research data service
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Azeroual, O. (2020). Treatment of Bad Big Data in Research Data Management (RDM) Systems. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 4(4), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc4040029
- Bornatici, C., & Fedrigo, N. (2023). Data Citation: How and Why Citing (Your Own) Data (Vol. 19, pp. 1–15). Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences FORS.
- Carlson, J. R., Fosmire, M., Miller, C., & Nelson Megan R. Sapp. (2011). Determining Data Information Literacy Needs: A Study of Students and Research Faculty. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(2), 629–657.
- Eaker, C. (2016). What Could Possibly Go Wrong? The Impact of Poor Data Management. In L. Federer (Ed.), The Medical Library Association’s Guide to Data Management for Librarians (pp. 1–26). Rowman and Littlefield Publishing Group.
- Hanisch, R. J., Kaiser, D. L., Yuan, A., Medina-Smith, A., Carroll, B. C., & Campo, E. M. (2023). NIST Research Data Framework (RDaF). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1500-18r1
- Koltay, T. (2015). Data literacy: in search of a name and identity. Journal of Documentation, 71(2), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2014-0026
- Koltay, T. (2016a). Are you ready? Tasks and roles for academic libraries in supporting Research 2.0. New Library World, 117(1/2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-09-2015-0062
- Koltay, T. (2016b). Data governance, data literacy and the management of data quality. IFLA Journal, 42(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035216672238
- Koltay, T. (2016c). Digital research data: Where are we now? In Digital Information Strategies: From Applications and Content to Libraries and People (pp. 71–84). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100251-3.00005-6
- Koltay, T. (2016d). Facing the challenge of data-intensive research: Research data services and data literacy in academic libraries. Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 35, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-067120160000035008
- Koltay, T. (2017a). Data literacy for researchers and data librarians. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 49(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000615616450
- Koltay, T. (2017b). Research 2.0 and Research Data Services in academic and research libraries: priority issues. Library Management, 38(6/7), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-11-2016-0082
- Koltay, T. (2019a). Accepted and Emerging Roles of Academic Libraries in Supporting Research 2.0. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.01.001
- Koltay, T. (2019b). Accepted and Emerging Roles of Academic Libraries in Supporting Research 2.0. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.36702/zin.12
- Koltay, T. (2020). Quality of Open Research Data: Values, Convergences and Governance. Information, 11(4), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11040175
- Kovacs, M., Hoekstra, R., & Aczel, B. (2021). The Role of Human Fallibility in Psychological Research: A Survey of Mistakes in Data Management. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211045930
- Nass, A., Asch, K., van Gasselt, S., Rossi, A. P., Besse, S., Cecconi, B., Frigeri, A., Hare, T., Hargitai, H., & Manaud, N. (2021). Facilitating reuse of planetary spatial research data – Conceptualizing an open map repository as part of a Planetary Research Data Infrastructure. Planetary and Space Science, 204, 105269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2021.105269
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- Research Data Working Group in the Priority Initiative “Digital Information” of the Alliance of German Science Organisations. (2018). Research Data Management: A Guide for Researchers.
- Sarkis-Onofre, R., Catalá-López, F., Aromataris, E., & Lockwood, C. (2021). How to properly use the PRISMA Statement. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01671-z
- Tóth-Czifra, E. (2020). The Risk of Losing the Thick Description. In Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research (pp. 235–266). Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0192.10