Résumés
Abstract
Using a qualitative case study research design, this study examined the phenomenon of program review at a mid-sized vocational college in British Columbia, Canada, and the experiences of five department leaders and program coordinators engaging in program review. The study sought to answer the following questions: What is the experience of faculty and program coordinators leading the program review process? Is the program review meaningful? Is the program review manageable? Can a program review process be both meaningful and manageable? Are the meaningfulness and manageability of program review in conflict with one another? Participants recognized the potential impact of program review in terms of creating space for analytic and critical reflection to interrogate the influence of reviews on institutional strategic planning, advocacy for departmental and institutional resources, and assessment of program viability within the broader academic mission of the institution. However, complex power dynamics at play within program review for improvement versus for accountability were highlighted as a point of tension and resistance that prevents the realization of the ideals of program review.
Keywords:
- faculty agency,
- post-secondary education,
- program review,
- strategic planning,
- quality assurance
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Barak, R. J. (2007). Thirty years of academic review and approval by state postsecondary coordinating and governing boards. State Higher Education Executive Officers. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED502182
- Barak, R. J., & Breier, B. E. (1990). Successful program review: A practical guide to evaluating programs in academic settings (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
- Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
- Bresciani, M. J. (2010). Data-driven planning: Using assessment in strategic planning. New Directions for Student Services, 2010(132), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.374
- Conrad, C. F., & Wilson, R. F. (1985). Academic program reviews: Institutional approaches, expectations, and controversies. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED264806.pdf
- Coombs, V. (2017, February 6). Institutions should link program reviews to strategic plans. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/call-action-marketing-and-communications-higher-education/institutions-should-link-program
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802756
- Davison, D., Patton, J., Eng, M., Hanna, K., Grimes-Hillman, M., Watson, I., Jackson, J., & Vazquez, U. (2009). Program review. California Community College, Academic Senate. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510580.pdf
- de Valenzuela, J. S., Copeland, S. R., & Blalock, G. A. (2005). Unfulfilled expectations: Faculty participation and voice in university program evaluation. Teachers College Record, 107(10), 2227-2247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.005
- Eastman, J., Jones, G. A., Trottier, C., & Bégin-Caouette, O. (2022). University governance in Canada: Navigating complexity. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
- Ebersole, T. E. (2009). Postsecondary assessment: Faculty attitudes and levels of engagement. Assessment Update, 21(2), 2–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/au.212
- Groen, J. F. (2017). Engaging in enhancement: Implications of participatory approaches in higher education quality assurance. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v10i0.4728
- Guzmán-Valenzuela, C. (2016). Connecting theory and practice in qualitative research. In Theory and method in higher education research (Vol. 2, pp. 115-133). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220160000002006
- Harlan, B. (2012). Meta-review: Systematic assessment of program review. US-China Education Review, A8, 740-754. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED536464
- Hoare, A. (2024). Ethic of critique. In A. Hoare, O. B. Osuntade, & R. Patel (Eds.), Ethical educational leadership: Untangling ethical dilemmas and imagining alternative futures. TRU Open Press. https://leadershipethics.pressbooks.tru.ca/chapter/ethic-of-critique/
- Hoare, A., Wagner, S., & Dishke Hondzel, C. (2024). Description of an approach for analyzing external program reviews to inform educational planning. Educational Planning Journal, 31(2), 39-50. https://isep.info/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Vol-31-No-2-Web-Version.pdf
- Hoare, A., Dishke Hondzel, C., & Wagner, S. (2022). Forming an academic program review learning community: Description of a conceptual model. Quality Assurance in Education, 30(4), p. 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-01-2022-0023
- Hoare A., Dishke Hondzel, C., Wagner, S., & Church, S. (2024). A course-based approach to conducting program review. Discover Education, 3, Article 5 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44217-023-00085-4
- Jarrell, L., & Kirby, D. (2024). Managing quality assurance at community colleges in Ontario, Canada: Experiences and perspectives of front-line quality managers. Quality Assurance in Education, 32(2), 274-290. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-11-2023-0194
- Jayachandran, J., Neufeldt, C., Smythe, E., & Franke, O. (2019). Practical measures for institutional program reviews: A case study of a small post-secondary institution. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 49(2), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v49i2.188229
- Jones, S. R., Torres, V., & Arminio, J. (2022). Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Essential elements and issues (3rd edition). Routledge.
- Kelchen, R. (2018). Higher education accountability. John Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.58123
- Kleniewski, N. (2003). Program review as a win-win opportunity. AAHE Bulletin, 55(9). https://www.aahea.org/articles/win-win.htm
- Lindauer, J. R., & Coward, P. A. (2021). Assessment of student learning in the arts, humanities, social sciences, and sciences. In J. R. Lindauer & P. A. Coward (Eds.), Exemplars of Assessment in Higher Education Diverse Approaches to Addressing Accreditation Standards (pp. 26–38). Stylus Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003444701-4
- Lock, J., Hill, S. L., & Dyjur, P. (2018). Living the curriculum review: Perspectives from three leaders. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 48(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v48i1.187975
- McGowan, V. (2019). Not too small to be strategic: The state of academic program review guidelines and instrumentation in public institutions. Administrative Issues Journal Education Practice and Research, 9(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1221214
- Mets, L. A. (1995). Lessons learned from program review experiences. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995(86), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.37019958608
- Merriam S. & Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.) Jossey-Bass.
- Ministry of Postsecondary Education and Future Skills. (2024, September). Quality assessment process and criteria: BC public postsecondary institutions. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/education/post-secondary-education/institution-resources-administration/degree-authorization/bc_public_institution_quality_assessment_handbook.pdf
- Mourad, R. P. (2017). Social control and free inquiry: Consequences of Foucault for the pursuit of knowledge in higher education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 66(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1379593
- Mussawy, S. A. J., & Rossman, G. B. (2018). Quality assurance and accreditation in Afghanistan: Faculty members’ perceptions from selected universities. Higher Learning Research Communications, 8(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1201352
- Neufeldt, C., Smythe, E., Jayachandran, J., & Franke, O. (2023). Cyclical program reviews at smaller post-secondary institutions: Can the time and effort be justified? The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), Article 9, https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.2.14417
- Openo, J. A., Laverty, C., Kolomitro, K., Borin, P., Goff, L., Stranach, M., & Gomaa, N. (2017). Bridging the divide: Leveraging the scholarship of teaching and learning for quality enhancement. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.2.6
- Senter, M. S., Ciabattari, T., & Amaya, N. V. (2020). Sociology departments and program review: Chair perspectives on process and outcomes. Teaching Sociology, 49(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X20970268
- Skolnik, M. L. (2016). How academic program review can foster intellectual conformity and stifle diversity of thought and method. The Journal of Higher Education, 60(6), 619–643. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981945
- Sonday, A., Ramugondo, E., & Kathard, H. (2020). Case study and narrative inquiry as merged methodologies: A critical narrative perspective. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940692093788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937880
- Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
- Sullivan, P. (2012). Qualitative data analysis using a dialogical approach. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268391
- Vettori, O. (2018). Shared misunderstandings? Competing and conflicting meaning structures in quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 24(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2018.1491786
- Weiner, W. F. (2009). Establishing a culture of assessment. Academe, 95(4), 28–32. http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2009/JA/Feat/wein.htm
- Whedbee, J. C. (2009). A narrative analysis using multiple case studies of nursing graduates who overcame academic adversity (Publication No. 1538) [Doctoral dissertation, Andrews University]. Andrews University. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/1538