Résumés
Abstract
Sustainability researchers and non-academic actors are working more closely than ever to drive deep structural transformation toward just and sustainable futures. This paper illustrates how embedded researchers in South Africa navigate the political nature of institutional spaces through transdisciplinary action research. We propose radical incrementalism as a guiding philosophy and analyse seven cases using a collaborative autoethnographic approach. The analysis identifies four strategic choices: whether to embed, how to engage critically, when to maintain distance, and how to sustain long-term commitment. These insights illuminate the ethical and political complexities of shaping—or failing to influence—policy change within government institutions.
Keywords:
- Embedded research,
- Institutional work,
- Radical incrementalism,
- South Africa,
- Transdisciplinary action research
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aklin, M., & Urperlainen, J. (2018). Renewables: The politics of a global energy transition. MIT Press.
- Allan, J. I. (2019). Dangerous incrementalism of the Paris Agreement. Global Environmental Politics, 19(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00488
- Anderson, L. (2023). Tensions in transdisciplinary research: A study of a climate research group (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Business Studies).
- Avelino, F., Hielscher, S., Strumińska-Kutra, M., de Geus, T., Widdel, L., Wittmayer, J., Dańkowska, A., Dembek, A., Fraaije, M., Heidary, J., Iskandarova, M., Rogge, K., Stasik, A., & Crudi, F. (2023). Power to, over and with: Exploring power dynamics in social innovations in energy transitions across Europe. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 48, 100758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100758
- Battilana, J. & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31-58). Cambridge University Press.
- Beaulieu, R. J. (2013). Action research: Trends and variations. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 14(3), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v14i3.99
- Beunen, R., & Patterson, J. J. (2019). Analysing institutional change in environmental governance: Exploring the concept of “institutional work”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1257423
- Brandt, P., Ernst, A., Gralla, F., Luederitz, C., Lang, D. J., Newig, J., Reinert, F., Abson, D. J., & von Wehrden, H. (2013). A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics, 92(C), 1-15.
- Cash, D., Clark, W., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., & Jäger, J. (2003). Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: Linking research, assessment and decision making. KSG Working Papers Series. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.372280
- Chilisa, B. (2017). Decolonising transdisciplinary research approaches: An African perspective for enhancing knowledge integration in sustainability science. Sustainability science, 12(5), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0461-1.
- Chipkin, I., & Swilling, M. (2018). Shadow state: The politics of state capture. Wits University Press.
- Coates, D., & Mickan, S. (2020). Challenges and enablers of the embedded researcher model. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 34(7), 743–764. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2020-0043
- Cockburn, J. (2022). Knowledge integration in transdisciplinary sustainability science: Tools from applied critical realism. Sustainable Development, 30(2), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2279
- Cvitanovic, C., Shellock, R. J., Mackay, M., van Putten, E.I., Karcher, D.B., Dickey-Collas, M., & Ballesteros, M. (2021). Strategies for building and managing ‘trust’ to enable knowledge exchange at the interface of environmental science and policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 123, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.020.
- Dashtipour, P., Gerard, N., & Rolo, D. (2024). Toward an ethics of ambiguity in critical work and organizational psychology: From ‘blank’ to ‘troubled’ subjectivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 197(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05760-6
- Dauvergne, P. (2024). Incremental progress or dangerous incrementalism? The case of tire wear pollution in global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2024.2425262
- Fazey, I., Schäpke, N., Caniglia, G., Hodgson, A., Kendrick, I., Lyon, C., Page, G., Patterson, J., Riedy, C., Strasser, T., Verveen, S., Adams, D., Goldstein, B. E., Klaes, M., Leicester, G., Linyard, A., McCurdy, A., Ryan, P., Sharpe, B., … Ducket, D. (2020). Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth: Visions of future systems and how to get there. Energy Research & Social Science, 70(6).
- Göpel, M. (2016). The great mindshift: How a new economic paradigm and sustainability transformations go hand in hand. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43766-8
- Hansson, S., & Polk, M. (2018). Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact. Research Evaluation, 27(2), 132-144.
- Hill, C., Bailey, R., Power, C., & McKenzie, N. (2021). Supporting communities in caring for Salmon and each other: Creek restoration as a site for multi-system change and wholistic re/conciliation. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 21(3), 72-94. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v21i3.479
- Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. M., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., Olfert, A., Walther, J., Schiller, G., & Brunnow, B. (2021). Transforming science and society? Methodological lessons from and for transformation research. Research Evaluation, 30(1), 73-89.
- Hoppe, R. (1999). Policy analysis, science and politics: From ‘speaking truth to power’ to ‘making sense together’. Science & Public Policy, 26(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782482
- Horcea-Milcu, A.-I., Dorresteijn, I., Leventon, J., Stojanovic, M., Lam, D. P. M., Lang, D. J., Moriggi, A., Raymond, C. M., Stålhammar, S., Weiser, A., & Zimmermann, S. (2024). Transformative research for sustainability: Characteristics, tensions, and moving forward. Global Sustainability, 7(e14). https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2024.12
- Huang, Y.-S., & Harvey, B. (2021). Beyond indicators and success stories: An emerging method to assess social learning in large-scale transdisciplinary research programs. Frontiers in Sociology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.649946
- Huang, Y.-S., Harvey, B., & Vincent, K. (2024). Large-scale sustainability programming is reshaping research excellence: Insights from a meta-ethnographic study of 12 global initiatives. Environmental Science & Policy, 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103725
- Jacobs, S. D. (2018). A history and analysis of the evolution of action and participatory action research. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 19(3), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v19i3.412
- Jacaobsson, S., & Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system transformation—Explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy, 34(3), 256-276.
- Kainiemi, L., Karhunmaa, K., & Eloneva, S. (2020). Renovation realities: Actors, institutional work and the struggle to transform Finnish energy policy. Energy Research & Social Science, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101778
- Koh, N. S., Wong, G. Y., & Hahn, T. (2024). Radical incrementalism: Hydropolitics and environmental discourses in Laos. Environmental Politics, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2024.2372236.
- Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M. & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(Suppl 1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
- Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 215–254). Sage.
- Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (Eds). (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge University Press.
- Lawrence, M. G., Williams, S., Nanz, P., & Renn, O. (2022). Characteristics, potentials, and challenges of transdisciplinary research. One Earth, 5(1), 44-61.
- Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4(2), 97-128.
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
- Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through.” Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677
- Löhr, M., Chlebna, C., & Mattes, J. (2022). From institutional work to transition work: Actors creating, maintaining and disrupting transition processes. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.12.005.
- Marshall, F., Dolley, J., & Priya, R. (2018). Transdisciplinary research as transformative space making for sustainability. Ecology and Society, 23(3).
- McGinity, R., & Salokangas, M. (2014). Introduction: ‘Embedded research’ as an approach into academia for emerging researchers. Management in Education, 28(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020613508863
- Nagatsu, M., Davis, T., DesRoches, C. T., Koskinen, I., MacLeod, M., Stojanovic, M., & Thorén, H. (2020). Philosophy of science for sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 15, 1807-1817.
- Newton, J., & Parfitt, A. (2013). Striving for mutuality in research relationships: The value of participatory action research principles. In A. Franklin & P. Blyton (Eds.), Researching Sustainability: A Guide to Social Science Methods, Practice and Engagement (pp. 71-88). Earthscan.
- Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity.
- Plummer, R., Blythe, J., Gurney, G. G., Witkowski, S., & Armitage, D. (2022). Transdisciplinary partnerships for sustainability: An evaluation guide. Sustainability Science, 17(3), 955-967.
- Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015). A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65, 45-56.
- Ravetz, J., & Funtowicz, S. (1999). Post-normal science-an insight now maturing. Futures - The Journal of Forecasting Planning and Policy, 31(7), 641-646.
- Riedy, C., Kent, J., & Thompson, N. (2019). Meaning work: Reworking institutional meanings for environmental governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(1), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1450230
- Scholl, C., de Kraker, J., Hoeflehner, T., Wlasak, P., Drage, T., & Eriksen, M. A. (2018). Transitioning urban experiments: Reflections on doing action research with urban labs. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(1), 78-84.
- Shrivastava, P., Smith, M. S., O’Brien, K., & Zsolnai, L. (2020). Transforming sustainability science to generate positive social and environmental change globally. One Earth, 2(4), 329-340.
- St-Laurent, O., Benessaiah, K., & Bennett, E. M. (2025). Pathways to transformation: Institutionalizing urban agriculture in a Montréal borough. Ecology and Society, 30(2).
- Strumińska-Kutra, M., & Scholl, C. (2022). Taking power seriously: Towards a power-sensitive approach for transdisciplinary action research. Futures, 135, 102881.
- Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 6(3), 374-385.
- Swilling, M. (2020). The Age of Sustainability: Just Transitions in a Complex World. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429057823
- Taylor, A., Pretorius, L., McClure, A., Lipinge, K.N., Mwalukanga, B., & Mamombe, R. (2021). Embedded researchers as transdisciplinary boundary spanners strengthening urban climate resilience. Environmental Science & Policy, 126, 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.002.
- Temper, L., McGarry, D., & Weber, L. (2019). From academic to political rigour: Insights from the ‘Tarot’ of transgressive research. Ecological Economics, 164, 106379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106379
- Thapa, K., Vermeulen, W. J., & Deutz, P. (2022). Science with society: Challenges of early‐stage researchers engaging with transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1562-1572.
- Touraine, A. (1981). The voice and the eye: An analysis of social movements. Cambridge University Press.
- Unger, R. M. (2000). Democracy realized: The progressive alternative. Verso.
- Van Breda, J. (2019) Methodological agility in the Anthropocene: An emergent, transformative transdisciplinary research approach. [Doctoral thesis, Stellenbosch University. https://scholar.sun.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3f0a3a9-68d5-425c-8655-fe77f79b9267/content
- Van Breda, J., & Swilling, M. (2019). The guiding logics and principles for designing emergent transdisciplinary research processes: Learning experiences and reflections from a transdisciplinary urban case study in Enkanini informal settlement, South Africa. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 823–841. https://doi/org/10.1007/s11625-018-0606-x
- Van Poeck, K., Östman, L., & Block, T. (2020). Opening up the black box of learning-by-doing in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.006
- Wiek, A., & Lang, D. J. (2016). Transformational sustainability research methodology. In H. Heinrichs, P. Martens, G. Michelsen & A. Wiek (Eds.), Sustainability science (pp. 31-41). Springer.
- Wittmayer, J. M., & Schäpke, N. (2014). Action, research and participation: Roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4
- Wittmayer, J., Huang, Y.-S., Bogner, K., Boyle, E., Hölscher, K., von Wirth, T., Boumans, T., Garst, J., Hendlin, Y. H., Lavanga, M., Loorbach, D., Mungekar, N., Tshangela, M., Vandekerckhove, P., & Vasques, A. (2024). Neither right nor wrong? Ethics of collaboration in transformative research for sustainable futures. Humanities Social Sciences Communications, 11, 677. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03178-z
- Wittmayer, J., Loorbach, D., Bogner, K., Hendlin, Y., Hölscher, K., Lavanga, M., Vaquez, A., von Wirth, T., & de Wal, M. (2021). Transformative Research: Knowledge and action for just sustainability transitions. Erasmus University Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28485.99047
- Wittmayer, J., Schäpke, N., Feiner, G., Piotrowski, R., van Steenbergen, F., & Baasch, S. (2013). Action research for sustainability reflections on transition management in practice. Ecologic Institute: Berlin, Germany, 1-24.
- Ziegler, R., & Ott, K. (2011). The quality of sustainability science: A philosophical perspective. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 7(1), 31-44.