Résumés
Abstract
In the Fall of 2021, STEM researchers were invited to participate in a series of SSHRC-funded workshops delivered at the University of Guelph’s School of Fine Art and Music (SOFAM), where they examined a work of abstract art drawn from the SOFAM Print Study Collection (Reflex Victory by Chrysanne Stathacos, lithograph, 1979). The project’s objective was to determine if methodologies used in the analysis and interpretation of art are helpful to researchers who use visual observation as a primary method of collecting data. Our findings indicate that over the duration of the one-hour workshop, participants demonstrated greater confidence in identifying what lay in their fields of vision with precision, exhibited greater comfort in pursuing open-ended inquiry, and became more conscious of the mutable and subjective qualities of their looking. This report shares the story of our experiment and presents our preliminary findings on the value of arts-based methodologies in developing skills in data collection and analysis. This research contributes to the discourse on the role visual art can play in practices of teaching, learning, and research that extend beyond the studio, museum, and gallery space.
Keywords:
- STEAM,
- Arts-Based Research,
- Critical Visuality,
- Visual Priority,
- Interdisciplinary/Transdisciplinary Pedagogy
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Bardes C., Gillers D. & Herman A. (2001). Learning to look: developing clinical observational skills at an art museum. Medical Education, 35, 1157 – 61.
- Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (Eds.). (2012). Arts based research. SAGE.
- Campbell, R. (2021, November 13–14). Art Education in STEAM: A Curriculum Windfall or Meagre Program Pickings? [Paper presentation.] CSEA 2021 (Canadian Society for Education Through Art): Encounters: Art Education, Social Justice, and Democracy, Virtual Conference, Canada.
- Friedlaender, G. E., & Friedlaender, L. K. (2013). Art in science: Enhancing observational skills. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 471(7), 2065–2067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3000-0.
- Friedlaender, L. K. (2021). Enhancing observational skills program at the Yale Schools of Medicine and Nursing. In C. Smylitopoulos (Ed.) Artful encounters: Sites of visual inquiry (pp. 81 – 97). Bachinski/Chu Print Study Collection, University of Guelph.
- Friedlaender, G. E., & Friedlaender, L. K. (2022) Art in science: Alchemy as seen through the eyes of David Teniers the Younger. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 480(2), 235–236. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002069
- Gonzalez, Heather B. and Kuenzi, Jeffrey J. (2012). “Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Primer.” Congressional Research Service Report (7-5700). https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R42642.pdf
- Groot, B., & Abma, T. (2021). Boundary objects: Engaging and bridging needs of people in participatory research by arts-based methods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 7903. https://doi.org/10.33/ijerph18157903
- Leavy, P. (2015). Method meets art, second edition: Arts-based research practice. Guilford Press.
- Le Gall, S. (2017). From STEM to STEAM: Arts Integration at the Museum. The Lantern (May 10). http://web.colby.edu/thelantern/2017/05/10/from-stem-to-steam/
- Le Gall, S. (2021). Framing environment in an exhibition of Whistler’s “Thames Set”. In C. Smylitopoulos (Ed.) Artful encounters: Sites of visual inquiry (pp. 53 – 73). Bachinski/Chu Print Study Collection, University of Guelph.
- Lev, M. (2020). Art as a mediator for Intimacy: Reflections of an art-based research study. Journal of Applied Arts and Health 11(3), 299 – 313. DOI:10.1386/jaah_00041_7
- Muhr, M. M. (2020). Beyond words – the potential of arts-based research on human-nature connectedness. Ecosystems and People, 16(1), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1811379
- Rice, C., Cook, K., & Bailey, K.A. (2021). Difference-attuned witnessing: Risks and potentialities of arts-based research. Feminism & Psychology, 31(3), 345–356. https://doi-org.subzero.lib.uoguelph.ca/10.1177/0959353520955142
- Seifert, L. S. (2009). Mainstreaming arts-based research: ABR’s release from marginalization. PsycCRITIQUES, 54(1), 2. http://resolver.scholarsportal.info/resolve/15540138/v54i0001/2_mararfm.xml
- Sousa, D. A. & Pilecki, T. (2018). From STEM to STEAM: Brain-compatible strategies and lessons that integrate the Arts: Second edition. Corwin.
- Oxford University Press (2023). Subjectivity. OED Online. Accessed 21 April 2023.
- Wang, Q., Coemans, S., Siegesmund, R., & Hannes, K. (2017). Arts-based methods in socially engaged research practice: A classification framework. Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 5–39. https://doi.org/10.18432/R26G8P
- Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 322(5898), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159845.
- Zazulak, J., & Knibb, N. (2021). Time, space, and imagination: The art of seeing at McMaster University. In C. Smylitopoulos (Ed.) Artful encounters: Sites of visual inquiry (pp. 105 – 125). Bachinski/Chu Print Study Collection. University of Guelph.
- Yakman, G. (2006) STEM Pedagogical Commons for Contextual Learning: How Fewer Teaching Divisions Can Provide More Relevant Learning Connections. EDCI 5774 STEM Ed Pedagogy, Virginia Tech. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.10682.44489