ror.org/03dbr7087
Résumés
Abstract
During the 2023 Canadian Bioethics Society forum, 28 practicing healthcare ethicists (PHEs) and other attendees from across Canada, including bioethics students and fellows, gathered virtually for a collaborative workshop entitled “Towards Evaluating Clinical Ethics Consultation Effectiveness: Engagement in a Scoping Review of Reported Outcomes”. The workshop was open to all members of the bioethics community who registered for the forum but was designed primarily for PHEs.
Keywords:
- clinical ethics consultation,
- outcomes,
- research,
- professionalization
Résumé
Lors du forum 2023 de la Société canadienne de bioéthique, 28 éthiciens praticiens des soins de santé et d’autres participants de tout le Canada, y compris des étudiants et des fellows en bioéthique, se sont réunis virtuellement pour un atelier collaboratif intitulé « Towards Evaluating Clinical Ethics Consultation Effectiveness: Engagement in a Scoping Review of Reported Outcomes ». L’atelier était ouvert à tous les membres de la communauté bioéthique qui s’étaient inscrits au forum, mais il était principalement destiné aux spécialistes en éthique clinique.
Mots-clés :
- consultation d’éthique clinique,
- résultats,
- recherche,
- professionnalisation
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- 1. Bell JA, Salis M, Tong E, et al. Clinical ethics consultations: a scoping review of reported outcomes. BMC Medical Ethics. 2022;23:99.
- 2. Simpson C. Getting engaged: Exploring professionalization in Canada: Introduction to this Issue. HEC forum 2012;24(3):149-51.
- 3. Rogers W, Mackenzie C, Dodds S. Why bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. 2012;5(2):11-38.
- 4. Glover AC, Cunningham TV, Sterling EW, Lesandrini J. How much volume should healthcare ethics consult services have?. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 2020 1;31(2):158-72.
- 5. Hartman L, Van Baarle E, Diepeveen M, Widdershoven G, Molewijk B. Quality characteristics for clinical ethics support in the Netherlands. AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 2022;13(1):22-32.
- 6. Olszewski AE, Zhou C, Ugale J, Ramos J, Patneaude A, Opel DJ. Disparities in clinical ethics consultation among hospitalized children: a case-control study. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2023;258:113415.
- 7. Lanphier E. Trust, transparency, and trauma informed care. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2021;21(5):38-40.
- 8. Schuchter P, Heller A. The care dialog: the “ethics of care” approach and its importance for clinical ethics consultation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2018;21(1):51-62.
- 9. Cho MK, Taylor H, McCormick JB, et al. Building a central repository for research ethics consultation data: a proposal for a standard data collection tool. Clinical and translational science. 2015;8(4):376-87.
- 10. Godkin MD, Faith K, Upshur RE, MacRae SK, Tracy CS. Project examining effectiveness in clinical ethics (PEECE): phase 1—descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2005;31(9):505-12.