Abstracts
Résumé
La collaboration dans les cours d’arts plastiques s’établit grâce à un amalgame d’étudiant·es, de matériaux, d’idées et de compétences. Cet assemblage de facteurs humains et non humains peut créer des expériences pédagogiques uniques pour les étudiant·es au premier cycle universitaire. L’idée de l’artiste comme génie solitaire persiste depuis le modernisme, malgré le fait que de nombreuses galeries, biennales et foires d’art ont accepté la collaboration comme mode de création artistique. Dans cette étude, nous examinons les expériences en collaboration des étudiant·es en création au sein de groupes d’étudiant·es, d’artistes professionnel·les et issus des institutions postsecondaires.
Mots-clés :
- collaboration,
- phénoménologie,
- université,
- arts visuels,
- communauté
Abstract
Collaboration in the studio art classroom is an amalgamation of students, materials, ideas, and skills. This assemblage of human and non-human factors can create unique pedagogical experiences for students. However, the idea of the artist as a lone genius persists from modernism despite the fact that many galleries, biennials, and art fairs have embraced collaboration as a way of art making. In this article we look at the experiences of students, professional artists, and post-secondary instructors who utilize collaboration.
Keywords:
- collaboration,
- phenomenology,
- university,
- visual arts,
- community
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Batt, P. J. et Purchase, S. (2004). Managing Collaboration Within Networks and Relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.11.004
- Boulous Walker, M. (2016). Slow philosophy. Bloomsbury Academic.
- Brodkey, L. (1987). Academic Writing as Social Practice. Temple University Press.
- Burke LeFevre, K. (1987). Invention as a social act. Southern Illinois University Press.
- Callon, M. (1999). Actor-network theory: The Market Test. Dans Actor network theory and After (pp. 181–196). Blackwell Publishers.
- Gover, K. E. (2016). The Solitary Author as Collective Fiction. Dans Collaborative art in the twenty-first century (p. 65–76). Routledge.
- Giguère, M.-H. et Lapointe, F. (2020). L’accompagnement et l’expérience au coeur d’une collaboration chercheur-CP. Formation et profession, 28(2), 120-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.18162/fp.2020.a204
- Husserl, E. (1977). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology (D. Cairns, trad., éd. de 1977). Springer.
- Hurwitz, A. (1993). Collaboration in Art Education. National Art Education Association.
- Kirschner, P. A. et De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The Myths of the Digital Native and the Multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142.
- Latour, B. (1999). On Recalling ANT. Dans Actor network theory and After (pp. 15–25). Blackwell Publishers.
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
- Leiby, M. A. et Henson, L. (1998). Common Ground, Difficult Terrain: Confronting Difference Through Feminist Collaboration. Dans Common Ground: Feminist Collaboration in the Academy (p. 173–192). State University of New York Press.
- Murray, T., Albright, T. et Obcarskaite, E. (2016). Empathy, Surviving, Collective Reflexivity. Dans Collaborative Art in the Twenty-First Century (p. 94–104). Routledge.
- Nizet, I. et Monod Ansaldi, R. (2017). Construction de bénéfices mutuels en contexte collaboratif : pistes théoriques et méthodologiques. Phronesis, 6(1-2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.7202/1040224ar
- O’Meara, A. et MacKenzie, N. (1998). Reflections on Scholarly Collaboration. Common Ground: Feminist Collaboration in the Academy (p. 209–227). State University of New York Press.
- Petitmengin, C., Remillieux, A. et Valenzuela-Moguillansky, C. (2019). Discovering the Structures of Lived Experience: Towards a Micro-Phenomenological Analysis Method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 691–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9597-4
- Reed-Tsocha, K. (2016). Collective Action and the Reciprocity of Friendship. Dans Collaborative Art in the Twenty-First Century (p. 105–113). Routledge.
- Schrage, M. (1990). Shared Minds: The New Technologies of Collaboration. Random House.
- Thomson, A. M. et Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
- Tillman-Healy, L. (2003). Friendship as Method. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(5), 729–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403254894
- Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
- Woodmansee, M. (1994). The Author, Art and the Market: Rereading the History of Aesthetics. Columbia University Press.
10.7202/1040224ar