Abstracts
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to explore how undergraduate nursing students in rural programs experience immersive virtual reality (IVR) as a strategy to support clinical learning and professional development. Situated learning theory (Lave & Wenger, 1991) provided the theoretical framework for this study.
Method: This qualitative study used focus groups and interviews with nursing students from two rural campuses of a Canadian undergraduate nursing program. Data were analyzed thematically, informed by situated learning theory.
Results: Participants identified four key influences on their learning with IVR: orientation and readiness to engage, physical and technological context, faculty facilitation, and realism of the simulation. IVR offered opportunities to engage in complex clinical decision-making and promoted confidence and active participation.
Conclusion: IVR, when integrated into nursing curricula using principles of situated learning theory, may support learner engagement and confidence among students in rural programs. Findings suggest the importance of thoughtful design, facilitation, and contextual relevance in virtual simulation experiences.
Keywords:
- nursing education,
- immersive virtual reality,
- nursing students
Résumé
Objectif : Cette étude visait à explorer l’expérience d’étudiantes et étudiants de premier cycle inscrits à un programme en milieu rural, de la réalité virtuelle immersive (RVI) comme stratégie de soutien à l’apprentissage clinique et au développement professionnel. La théorie de l’apprentissage situé (Lave et Wenger, 1991) a servi de cadre théorique pour cette étude.
Méthode : Cette étude qualitative a utilisé des groupes de discussion et des entretiens avec des étudiantes et étudiants en sciences infirmières provenant de deux campus ruraux d’un programme canadien de premier cycle en sciences infirmières. L’analyse thématique des données s’appuyait sur la théorie de l’apprentissage situé.
Résultats : Les participantes et participants ont identifié quatre influences clés sur leur apprentissage avec la RVI : l’orientation et la préparation à s’engager, le contexte physique et technologique, la facilitation par le corps professoral, et le réalisme de la simulation. La RVI a offert des occasions de s’engager dans la prise de décisions cliniques complexes et a favorisé la confiance ainsi que la participation active.
Conclusion : Lorsque la RVI est intégrée aux programmes de formation en sciences infirmières selon les principes de la théorie de l’apprentissage situé, elle peut soutenir l’engagement et la confiance des étudiantes et étudiants inscrits à un programme en milieu rural. Les résultats soulignent l’importance d’une conception réfléchie, d’une facilitation adéquate et d’une pertinence contextuelle dans les expériences de simulation virtuelle.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Anselmann, V. (2023). Connectivity between education and work in nursing education: Validation of an instrument. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 18(2), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2022.06.008
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 9(1), Article 26152. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.26152
- Cant, R. P., & Cooper, S. J. (2017). Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: An umbrella systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 49, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.015
- D’Errico, M. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as an international collaborative space for innovative simulation design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 54, 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.01.005
- Eppich, W., & Cheng, A. (2015). Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): Development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simulation in Healthcare, 10(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000072
- Hanshaw, S. L., & Dickerson, S. S. (2020). High fidelity simulation evaluation studies in nursing education: A review of the literature. Nurse Education in Practice, 46, 102818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102818
- INACSL Standards Committee. (2021). Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, P66.
- Kim, J. H., Lim, J. M., & Kim, E. M. (2021). Patient handover education programme based on situated learning theory for nursing students in clinical practice. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 28(1), e13005. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.13005
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
- Lee, J., Lee, H., Kim, S., Choi, M., Ko, I. S., Bae, J., & Kim, S. H. (2020). Debriefing methods and learning outcomes in simulation nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 87, 104345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104345
- Lemée, M.-H., Lavoie, S., Provost, J., & Ledoux, I. (2024). Exploring the acceptability and feasibility of an immersive virtual reality intervention for newly graduated nurses working in a rural area. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 91, 101542.
- Liaw, S. Y., Ooi, S. W., Rusli, K. D. B., Lau, T. C., Tam, W. W. S., & Chua, W. L. (2020). Nurse-physician communication team training in virtual reality versus live simulations: Randomized controlled trial on team communication and teamwork attitudes. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(4), e17279. https://doi.org/10.2196/17279
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
- Lioce, L., Lopreiato, J., Anderson, M., Deutsch, E. S., Downing, D., Robertson, J. M., Diaz, D. A., & Spain A. E. (Eds.). (2025). Healthcare simulation dictionary (3rd ed.). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ssih.org/sites/default/files/2025-03/Healthcare-Simulation-Dictionary-3.pdf
- Luscombe, G. M., Hawthorn, J., Wu, A., Green, B., & Munro, A. (2021). ‘Empowering clinicians in smaller sites’: A qualitative study of clinician’s experiences with a rural virtual paediatric feeding clinic. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 29(5), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12781
- Roberts, M. L., & Mazurak, J. O. E. (2022). Virtual clinical experiences in nursing education: Applying a technology-enhanced storyboard technique to facilitate contextual learning in remote environments. Nursing Education Perspectives, 43(4), 260–261. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nep.0000000000000883
- Sung, H., Kim, M., Park, J., Shin, N., & Han, Y. (2024). Effectiveness of virtual reality in healthcare education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sustainability, 16(19), 8520. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198520
- Thorne, S. (2016). Interpretive description: Qualitative research for applied practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315545196
- Verkuyl, M., Violate, E., Harder, N., Southam, T., Lavoie-Tremblay, M., Goldsworthy, S., Ellis, W., Campbell, S. H., & Atack, L. (2024). Virtual simulation in healthcare education: A multi-professional, pan-Canadian evaluation. Advances in Simulation, 9, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00276-x
- Walsh, H., Brown, N., Nicholson, L., & King, S. (2022). Innovative hospital-based pediatric virtual learning for nursing students. Nurse Educator, 47(2), E30–E33. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000001133

