Abstracts
Abstract
We study how and why firms shift their interfirm network positions during the routinized regime of a mature high-technology industry. Firms seek benefits from network positions (structural holes or centrality) by forming alliances that move them into these positions and increase their innovation performance. However, during the routinized technology regime, inertia impedes such movements, leading firms a dilemma: whether to continue shifting between two network positions and determine if such shifts yield better outcomes. We analyzed firm network positioning behavior in the semiconductor industry from 1991-2007. Our findings indicate that firms shift toward more central positions, which, in turn, improves innovation performance. These results explain how firms actively shape their network strategy when external conditions discourage such shifts.
Keywords:
- interfirm network positioning,
- innovation performance,
- high-technology industries,
- routinized technology regime,
- semiconductor industry
Résumé
Nous étudions comment et pourquoi les entreprises changent de position dans les réseaux interentreprises au cours du régime routinier d’une industrie de haute technologie mature. Les entreprises recherchent les avantages des positions en réseau (trous structurels ou centralité) en passant d’une position à l’autre et en augmentant leurs performances en innovation. Cependant, pendant le régime technologique routinier, l’inertie empêche ces mouvements, de sorte que les entreprises sont confrontées à un dilemme : continuer à basculer entre deux positions dans le réseau et déterminer si ces changements produisent de meilleurs résultats. Nous analysons le positionnement en réseau des entreprises de semi-conducteurs de 1991 à 2007, constatant que les entreprises se dirigent vers des positions plus centrales, améliorant leurs performances en innovation.
Mots-clés :
- positionnement du réseau interentreprises,
- performance de l’innovation,
- industries de haute technologie,
- régime technologique routinisé,
- industrie des semi-conducteurs
Resumen
Estudiamos cómo y por qué las empresas cambian sus posiciones en redes interempresariales durante el régimen rutinizado de una industria de alta tecnología madura. Las empresas buscan beneficios de las posiciones en la red (huecos estructurales o centralidad) al cambiar entre estas posiciones y aumentar su desempeño en innovación. Sin embargo, durante el régimen de tecnología rutinizada, la inercia impide tales movimientos, llevando a las empresas a un dilema: si continuar cambiando entre dos posiciones en la red y determinar si dichos cambios producen mejores resultados. Analizamos el comportamiento de posicionamiento en redes de empresas en la industria de semiconductores de 1991 a 2007, encontrando que las empresas se desplazan hacia posiciones más centrales, mejorando así su rendimiento en innovación.
Palabras clave:
- posicionamiento de redes entre empresas,
- desempeño de la innovación,
- industrias de alta tecnología,
- régimen tecnológico rutinizado,
- industria de semiconductores
Appendices
Bibliography
- Agarwal, R. (1998). Evolutionary trends of industry variables. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16(4), 511–525. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7187(97)00004-0
- Agarwal, R., & Audretsch, D. B. (2001). Does Entry Size Matter? The Impact of the Life Cycle and Technology on Firm Survival. Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(1), 21–43. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00136
- Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425. http://doi.org/10.2307/2667105
- Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 521–543. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.176
- Ahuja, G., Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. (2012). The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434–448. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0695
- Alsop, T. (2022). Semiconductor companies market share 2022. Statista. http://www.statista.com/statistics/266143/global-market-share-of-leading-semiconductor-vendors/#statisticContainer
- Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D.
- Balland, P.-A., De Vaan, M., & Boschma, R. (2012). The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: The case of the global video game industry, 1987–2007. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(5), 741–765. http://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs023
- Berends, H., van Burg, E., & van Raaij, E. M. (2011). Contacts and Contracts: Cross-Level Network Dynamics in the Development of an Aircraft Material. Organization Science, 22(4), 940–960. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0578
- Borgatti, S. P. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis.
- Boumgarden, P., Nickerson, J., & Zenger, T. R. (2012). Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 587–610. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1972
- Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard Univ. Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1kz4h78
- Burt, R. S. (1997). The Contingent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339. http://doi.org/10.2307/2393923
- Casanueva, C., Castro, I., & Galán, J. L. (2013). Informational networks and innovation in mature industrial clusters. Journal of Business Research, 66(5), 603–613. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.043
- CNNMoney. (2002). HP-Compaq merger completed - May. 3, 2002. Money.cnn.com. http://money.cnn.com/2002/05/03/news/deals/hp_compaq/index.htm
- Faems, D., Janssens, M., & van Looy, B. (2007). The Initiation and Evolution of Interfirm Knowledge Transfer in R&D Relationships. Organization Studies, 28(11), 1699–1728. http://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606082222
- Gilsing, V., Cloodt, M., & Roijakkers, N. (2015). From Birth through Transition to Maturation: The Evolution of Technology-Based Alliance Networks. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(2), 181–200. http://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12289
- Greve, H. R., Rowley, T. J., & Shipilov, A. (2012). Network advantage: How to Unlock Value from Your Alliances and Partnerships. Wiley. http://doi:10.1002/9781118561393
- Gulati, R. (1995). Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619. http://doi.org/10.2307/2393756
- Gulati, R. (2007). Managing network resources: alliances, affiliations and other relational assets. Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199299355.001.0001
- Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164. http://doi.org/10.2307/2095567
- Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716–749. http://doi.org/10.2307/2393655
- He, Y., Keung Lai, K., Sun, H., & Chen, Y. (2014). The impact of supplier integration on customer integration and new product performance: The mediating role of manufacturing flexibility under trust theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 260–270. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.044
- Hernandez, E., & Shaver, J. M. (2019). Network Synergy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 171–202. http://doi-org.rennes-sb.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0001839218761369
- Hoetker, G. (2007). The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 331–343. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.582
- Howley, C. (2022). Gartner Says Worldwide Semiconductor Revenue Grew 1.1% in 2022. Gartner. http://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2023-01-17-gartner-says-worldwide-semiconductor-revenue-grew-one-percent-in-2022
- Jackson, M. O., & Rogers, B. W. (2007). Meeting Strangers and Friends of Friends: How Random Are Social Networks? American Economic Review, 97(3), 890–915. http://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.3.890
- Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2009). Managing Strategic Alliances: What Do We Know Now, and Where Do We Go From Here? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 45–62. http://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.43479263
- Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 217–237. http://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3%3C217::aid-smj95%3E3.0.co;2-y
- Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194. http://doi.org/10.5465/3069433
- Kim, T.-Y., Oh, H., & Swaminathan, A. (2006). Framing Interorganizational Network Change: A Network Inertia Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 704–720. http://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318926
- Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (2008). Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 639–661. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.679
- Malerba, F., Nelson, R. R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. G. (2016). Innovation and the Evolution of Industries. Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107280120
- Mazzola, E., Perrone, G., & Handfield, R. (2018). Change Is Good, But Not Too Much: Dynamic Positioning in the Interfirm Network and New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6), 960–982. http://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12438
- Mazzola, E., Perrone, G., & Kamuriwo, D. S. (2015). Network embeddedness and new product development in the biopharmaceutical industry: The moderating role of open innovation flow. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 106–119. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.002
- McCarthy, K. J., & Aalbers, H. L. (2022). Alliance-to-acquisition transitions: The technological performance implications of acquiring one’s alliance partners. Research Policy, 51(6), 104512. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104512
- Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2002). Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice. Organization Science, 13(5), 547–566. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.547.7815
- NXP Semiconductors. (2015). NXP and Freescale Announce $40 Billion Merger. Www.nxp.com. http://www.nxp.com/company/about-nxp/nxp-and-freescale-announce-40-billion-merger: NW-FREESCALE-40BILLION-MERGE
- O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(28), 185–206. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
- Ozmel, U., Reuer, J. J., & Gulati, R. (2013). Signals across Multiple Networks: How Venture Capital and Alliance Networks Affect Interorganizational Collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 852–866. http://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0549
- Phelps, C. C. (2010). A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 890–913. http://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.52814627
- Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V. (2003). Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(3), 190–202. http://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1430190
- Roodman, D. (2009). How to do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 9(1), 86–136. http://doi-org.rennes-sb.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106
- Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 201–221. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.376
- Shimizu, K., & Hitt, M. A. (2005). What Constrains or Facilitates Divestitures of Formerly Acquired Firms? The Effects of Organizational Inertia. Journal of Management, 31(1), 50–72. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271381
- Shipilov, A. V., & Li, S. X. (2008). Can you have your Cake and Eat it too? Structural Holes’ Influence on Status Accumulation and Market Performance in Collaborative Networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(1), 73–108. http://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.1.73
- Shipilov, A. V., Li, S. X., & Greve, H. R. (2011). The Prince and the Pauper: Search and Brokerage in the Initiation of Status-Heterophilous Ties. Organization Science, 22(6), 1418–1434. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0594
- Smithsonianchips. (2019). 1 Profitability in the Semiconductor Industry. http://smithsonianchips.si.edu/ice/cd/CEICM/SECTION1.pdf
- Sorkin, A. R. (2006, July 24). A.M.D. to Acquire ATI Technologies (Published 2006). The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/24/technology/24cnd-semi.html
- Stuart, T. E. (1998). Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 668. http://doi.org/10.2307/2393679
- Talay, M. B., Seggie, S. H., & Cavusgil, E. (2009). Exploring Correlates of Product Launch in Collaborative Ventures: An Empirical Investigation of Pharmaceutical Alliances. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(4), 360–370. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00665.x
- Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67. http://doi.org/10.2307/2393808
- White, S., & Siu-Yun Lui, S. (2005). Distinguishing costs of cooperation and control in alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 913–932. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.490
- Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809–825. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.482

