Abstracts
Résumé
Quelle signification attribuer à la gestion du changement lorsqu’elle se confronte aux figures de l’événement ? L’article propose un cadre théorique qui, circonscrit l’étendue d’une gestion planifiée du changement en distinguant deux types d’événements. Les micro-événements correspondent à un flux continu de différenciations situées hors du champ d’un changement planifié. Les macro événements interviennent épisodiquement du top management pour organiser le changement. Ils interprètent le passé et orientent normativement le futur du changement institutionnel. La gestion du changement du Comité des Champs Élysées montre l’interaction entre micro et macro événements et la tension entre des logiques de banalisation et de prestige.
Mots-clés :
- gestion du changement,
- pratique,
- institutionalisation,
- événement,
- routine,
- espace public
Abstract
What management of change means when it has to cope with the unexpected dimensions of events ? This paper introduces a theoretical framework, which shows the range of a planned management of change and makes a distinction between two types of events. Micro events belong to a continuous flow of differentiations and are out of reach of management of change. Macro events are discontinuous episodes originated by the management to monitor organizational evolution. Such macro events are interpretations from the past and normative guidelines for institutional evolution into expected future. Management of change operated by Le Comité des Champs-Elysées shows the interactions between macro and micro events and the tensions between the logics of banalizing and prestige.
Keywords:
- management of change,
- event,
- institutionalisation,
- routine,
- public space
Resumen
¿Cuál es el significado que se puede atribuir a la gestión del cambio cuando se confronta a las figuras del evento ? El artículo propone un cuadro teórico que precisa la extensión de una gestión planificada del cambio distinguiendo dos tipos de eventos. Los micro-eventos corresponden a un flujo continuo de diferenciaciones situadas fuera del campo de un cambio planificado. Los macro-eventos intervienen esporádicamente del top management para organizar el cambio. Interpretan el pasado y orientan normativamente el futuro del cambio institucional. La gestión del cambio del Comité de los Campos Elíseos ilustra la interacción entre micro y macro eventos y la tensión entre lógicas de banalización y de prestigio.
Palabras clave:
- gestión del cambio,
- práctica,
- institucionalización,
- evento,
- rutina,
- espacio público
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Alter, Norbert. (2003). L’Innovation Ordinaire. Paris : PUF, Quadrige.
- Alvarez, Fabienne. (2006). “Changement Organisationnel Et Production De Discours Managérial”. Entreprise et Histoire 42 : 84-104.
- Alvesson, Mats, Willmott, Hugh (2002). “Identity Regulation as Organizational Control : Producing the Appropriate Individual”. Journal of Management Studies 39(5) : 619-44.
- Babeau, Olivier, Chanlat, Jean-François. (2008). “La Transgression, Une Dimension Oubliée De L’organisation”. Revue française de gestion 3(183) : 201-19.
- Baret, Christophe., Huault, Isabelle., Picq, Thierry. (2006). “Management Et Réseaux Sociaux Jeux D’Ombres Et De Lumières Sur Les Organisations”. Revue française de gestion 163(2006/4) : 93-106.
- Baum, Joel A.C., Hayagreeva Rao. (2004). “Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizational Populations and Communities.” In Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, ed. Marshall Scott Poole, Andrew H. Van de Ven. New York : Oxford University Press.
- Becker, Markus, Lazaric, Nathalie Nelson, Richard, Winter, Sidney (2005). “Applying Organizational Routines in Understanding Organizational Change”. Industrial and corporate change 14(5) : 775-91.
- Blanchet, Alain, Gotman Anne. (2000). L’enquête Et Ses Méthodes : L’entretien. Paris : Nathan.
- Bourdieu, Pierre. (1980). Le Sens Pratique. Paris : Minuit.
- Castell, Manuel. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell.
- Child, John,. (1972). “Organizational Structure, Environmet, and Performance : The Role of Strategic Choice”. Sociology 6 : 2-22.
- Chiles, Todd, Meyer, Alan D., Hench, Thomas J. (2004). “Organizational Emergence : The Origin and Transformation of Branson, Missouri’s Musical Theaters”. Organization Science 499-519.
- Christianson, Marlys K., Farkas, Maria T., Sutcliffe, Kathleen M., Weick, Karl E. (2009). “Learning Through Rare Events : Significant Interruptions At the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Museum”. Organization Science 20(5) : 846-60.
- Clegg, Stewart, Baumeler, Carmen. (2010). “Essai : From Iron Cages to Liquid Modernity in Organization Analysis”. Organization Studies 31(12) : 1713-33.
- Cowell, Richard, Thomas, Huw. (2002). “Managing Nature and Narratives of Dispossession : Reclaiming Territory in Cardiff Bay”. Urban Studies 39(7) : 1241-60.
- Czarniawska, Barbara. (2002). “Remembering While Forgetting : The Role of Automorphism in City Management in Warsaw”. Public Administration Review 62(2) : 163-73.
- DeCerteau, Michel. (1990). L’Invention Du Quotidien, Arts De Faire. Paris : Gallimard.
- DeVaujany, F. (2006). “Pour Une Théorie De L’Appropriation Des Outils De Gestion : Vers Un Dépassement De L’Opposition Conception-Usage”. Management & Avenir 9(3) : 109.
- Deleuze, Gilles. (1988). Le Pli. Leibniz Et Le Baroque. Paris : Editions de Minuit.
- Deleuze, Gilles. (2002). L’Île Déserte, Textes Et Entretiens 1953-1974. Paris : Les Éditions de Minuit.
- Deroy, Xavier. (2008). “L’événement Entrepreneurial Et Le Modèle Entrepreneurial”. Revue Française de Gestion 51-63.
- Deroy, Xavier. (2009). “Qui Contrôle L’Éthique Des Affaires Dans Les Situations D’Événement ?”. Management International 13(2) : 11-22.
- Deroy, Xavier, Clegg, Stewart. (2011). “When Events Interact With Business Ethics”. Organization
- Drucker-Godard Carole, Ehlinger Sylvie, Grenier Corinne. (1999). “Validité Et Fiabilité De La Recherche » in s. In R-A.Thiétart et al.Dunod, Paris.
- Dunbar, Roger, Garud, Raghu. (2009). “Distributed Knowledge and Indeterminate Meaning : The Case of the Columbiashuttle Flight”. Organization Studies 30(4) : 397-421.
- Eisendhardt, Katleen. (1989). “Building Theories From Case Study Research”. Academy of Management Review 14(4) : 532-50.
- Feldman, Martha. (2000). “Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change”. Organization Science 11(6) : 611-29.
- Feldman, Martha, Rafaeli, Anat. (2002). “Organizational Routines as Sources of Connections and Understandings”. journal of managment studies 39(309-330) : 295-309.
- Feldman, Martha. (2003). “A Performative Perspective on Stability and Change in Organizational Routines”. Industrial and corporate change 12(4) : 727.
- Friedland, Roger. (2009). “The Endless Fields of Pierre Bourdieu”. Organization 16(6) : 887.
- Gombault, Anne. (2005). “La Méthode Des Cas.” In Management Des Ressources Humaines, Méthodes De Recherche En Sciences Humaines Et Sociales, ed. Patrice Roussel, Frédéric Wacheux. Bruxelles : De Boeck.
- Granovetter, Mark. (1983). “The Strength of Weak Ties : A Network Theory Revisited”. Sociological theory 1(1) : 201-33.
- Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., Hinings, C. (2002). “Theorizing Change : The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields”. The Academy of management journal 45(1) : 58-80.
- Hinings, C., Greenwood R., Trish R., Suddaby R. (2004). “Dynamics of Change in Organizational Fields.” : 304-23 In Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, ed. Marshall Scott Poole, Andrew Van de Ven. New York : Oxford University Press.
- Lawrence, Thomas, Roy Suddaby, Bernard Leca. (2009). Institutional Work, Actors and Agency in Institutionals Studies and Organizations. New-York : Cambridge University Press.
- Lehmann-Ortega, Laurence, Moingeon, Bernard. (2010). “Lever L’Incertitude Sur Les Conséquences De L’Innovation Stratégique”. Revue Française de Gestion 4(203) : 57-70.
- Lejeune, Christophe, Vas, Alain. (2011). “Identité, Changement Et Proximité Organisationnelle. Une Étude Comparée Décoles De Gestion Européennes”. Revue Française de Gestion 4(213) : 171-87.
- Lewin, Arie Y., Weigelt Carmen B., Emery James D.(2004). “Adaptation and Selection in Strategy and Change : Perspectives on Strategic Change in Organizations.” In Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, ed. Marshall Scott Poole, Andrew H. Van de Ven. New York : Oxford University Press.
- Lounsbury, Michael. (2007). “A Tale of Two Cities : Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds”. The Academy of Management Journal 50(2) : 289-307.
- Lowenthal, David. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge University Press.
- Mayer, Michael. C., Whittington, Richard. (1999). “Strategy, Structure and ‘Systemness’ : National Institutions and Corporate Change in France, Germany and the Uk, 1950-1993”. Organization Studies 20(6) : 933-59.
- Meyer, Alan, Gaba, Vibha, Colwell, Kenneth. (2005). “Organizing Far From Equilibrium : Nonlinear Change in Organizational Fields”. Organization Science 456-73.
- Meyer, Alan, J. Goes, G Brooks. (1993). “Organizational Reacting to Hyperturbulence.” in Orgnizational Change and Redesign : 66-112, ed. G Hubert, W Glick. New York : Oxford university Press.
- Miles, Steven. (2005). “‘Our Tyne’ : Iconic Regeneration and the Revitalisation of Identity in Newcastlegateshead”. Urban Studies 42(5) : 913-26.
- Moles, Abraham. (1972). “Notes Pour Une Typologie Des Événements”. Communications 18(1) : 90-96.
- Moles, Abraham, Rohmer, Elisabeth. (1976). Micropsychologie et vie quotidienne, Paris : Denoël/Gonthier.
- Motion, Judith, Leitch, Shirley. (2002). “The Technologies of Corporate Identity”. International Studies of Management and Organization 32(3) : 45-64.
- Orlikowski, Wanda. (1993). “Case Tools as Organizational Change : Investigating Incrementai and Radical Chianges in Systems Development”. MIS QUATERLY (septembre) : 309-40.
- Patton, Paul. (2000). Deleuze and the Political. London : Routledge.
- Pentland, Brian., Reuter, Henry. (1994). “Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action.”. Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (3) : 484-510.
- Pentland, Brian.T. (1995). “Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes”. 6 : 541-56.
- Pentland, Brian T., Feldman, Martha S. (2008). “Designing Routines : On the Folly of Designing Artifacts, While Hoping for Patterns of Action”. Information and Organization 18(4) : 235-250.
- Pentland, Brian T., Haerem, Thorvald, Derel, Hillison. (2011). “The (N)Ever-Changing World : Stability and Change in Organizational Routines”. Organization Science 22 (6) : 1369-1383.
- Pettigrew, Andrew. (1979). “On Studying Organizational Cultures”. Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4) : 570-81.
- Pettigrew, Andrew. (1977). “Strategy Formulation as a Political Process”. International Studies of Management and Organization 7(2) : 78-87.
- Pettigrew, Andrew Woodman, Richard, Cameron, Kim. (2001). “Studying Organizational Change and Development : Challenges for Future Research”. Academy of Management Journal 697-713.
- Polanyi, Karl. (1944). The Great Transformation. Beacon Press.
- Pozzo di Borgo, Roland. (1997). Les Champs Elysées, 3 Siècles D’Histoire. Paris : La Martinière.
- Pullen Alison, Linstead Stephen. (2005). “Organizing Identity.” In Organization and Identity, ed. A.Pullen et S. Linstead. Routledge.
- Rao, Hayagreeva, Monin, Philippe, Durand, Rodolphe. (2003). “Institutional Change in Toque Ville : Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy 1”. American Journal of Sociology 108(4) : 795-843.
- Rerup, Claus, Feldman, Martha S. (2011). “Routines as a Source of Change in Organizational Schemata : The Role of Trial-and-Error Learning”. The Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) 54(3) : 577-610.
- Reynaud, Bénédicte (2005). “The Void At the Heart of Rules : Routines in the Context of Rule-Following. The Case of the Paris Metro Workshop”. Industrial and corporate change 14(5) : 847-71.
- Reynaud, Jean Daniel. (2003). “Une Théorie De La Régulation Sociale : Pour Quoi Faire ?” In La Théorie De La Régulation Sociale De Jean-Daniel Reynaud, ed. Gilbert de Terssac. Paris : La Découverte « Recherches ».
- Salmon, Christian. (2007). Storytelling, La Machine à Fabriquer Des Histoires et à Formater Les Esprits. Paris : La Découverte.
- Shipilov, A., Greve, H., Rowley, T. (2010). “When Do Interlocks Matter ? Institutional Logics and the Diffusion of Multiple Corporate Governance Practices”. The Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) 53(4) : 846-64.
- Subramaniam, Mohan, Youndt, Mark. (2005). “The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities”. Academy of Management Journal 48(3) : 450-63.
- Sveningsson, Stefan, Alvesson, Mats. (2003). “Managing Managerial Identities : Organizational Fragmentation, Discourse and Identity Struggle”. Human Relations 56(10) : 1163-1193.
- VandeVen, Andrew, Timothy J. Hargrave. (2004). “Social, Technical, and Institutional Change : A Literature Review and Synthesis.” In Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, ed. Marshall Scott Poole, Andrew H. Van de Ven. New York : Oxford University Press.
- Veyne, Paul. (1971). Comment on Écrit L’Histoire. Paris : Editions du Seuil.
- Wacheux, Frédéric. (2005). “Compréhension, Explication Et Action Du Chercheur Dans Une Situation Sociale Complexe.” In Management Des Ressources Humaines, Méthodes De Recherche En Sciences Humaines Et Sociales, ed. Patrice Roussel, Frédéric Wacheux. Bruxelles : De Boeck.
- Weick, Kark. E (1996). “Drop Your Tools : An Allegory for Organizational Studies”. Administrative Science Quarterly 301-13.
- Weick, KarL. E., Sutcliffe, Kathleen M., Obstfeld, David. (2005). “Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking”. Organization Science 16
- Weick, Karl, Quinn, Robert. (1999). “Organizational Change and Development”. Annual Review of Psychology 50 : 361-86.
- Whitehead, Alfred. N. (1978). Process and Reality : An Essay in Cosmology. New-York : Free Press.
- Whittington, Richard. (2006). “Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research”. Organization Studies 27(5) : 613-34.
- Whittington, Richard. (2007). “Strategy Practice and Strategy Process : Family Differences and the Sociological Eye”. Organization Studies 28(10) : 1575-86.
10.7202/029776ar