Abstracts
Abstract
Second language (L2) research suggests that synchronous written corrective feedback (SWCF) in online collaborative writing tasks can help improve L2 linguistic knowledge and writing skills. Following the rise of online collaborative writing in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, this exploratory study examines L2 learners’ perceptions of receiving SWCF during collaborative writing tasks completed on an online text-editing platform (Google Docs) and mediated by videoconferencing (Zoom). Adult learners (N = 46) enrolled in advanced online French as a Second Language courses took part in two collaborative writing tasks, during which their teachers (N = 3) provided SWCF. Learners’ screen activity was recorded. After the experiment, a perception survey was distributed and selected participants took part in semi-structured interviews to further discuss their experience. Results indicate that learners viewed the provision of SWCF through computer-mediated communication as an effective way to improve their L2 writing compared to traditional, delayed written feedback. Pedagogical implications for the implementation of videoconferences collaborative writing tasks involving teacher SWCF are discussed.
Keywords:
- computer-assisted language learning,
- synchronous written corrective feedback,
- video-conferenced collaborative writing,
- computer-mediated communication
Résumé
La recherche en langues secondes (L2) suggère que la rétroaction corrective écrite synchrone (RCÉS) dans les tâches d'écriture collaborative (ÉC) en ligne peut aider à améliorer les compétences en écriture. Au vu de l’essor de l’ÉC en ligne faisant suite à la pandémie de COVID-19, cette étude exploratoire examine les perceptions des apprenants de L2 quant à la RCÉS reçue lors de tâches d’ÉC effectuées sur une plateforme d'édition de texte en ligne (Google Docs) et médiatisées par vidéoconférence (Zoom). Les apprenants adultes avancés de français L2 (N = 46) ont participé à deux tâches d’ÉC, au cours desquelles leur enseignant (N = 3) fournissait une RCÉS. L’activité d'écran des apprenants a été enregistrée. Après l’expérience, un questionnaire de perceptions a été distribué et les participants sélectionnés ont participé à des entretiens semi-structurés pour discuter de leur expérience. Les résultats indiquent que les apprenants considèrent la RCÉS médiatisée par la technologie comme un moyen efficace d’améliorer leur écriture en L2 par rapport à la rétroaction écrite traditionnelle et différée. Les implications pédagogiques pour la mise en œuvre de tâches d’ÉC par vidéoconférence sont discutées.
Mots-clés :
- apprentissage des langues assisté par ordinateur,
- communication assistée par ordinateur,
- rétroaction corrective écrite synchrone,
- rédaction collaborative par vidéoconférence
Appendices
Bibliography
- Abrams, Z. (2019). Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 22–42. https://doi.org/10125/44681
- Alghasab, M., & Handley, Z. (2017). Capturing (non-)collaboration in wiki-mediated collaborative writing activities: The need to examine discussion posts and editing acts in tandem. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 664–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1341928
- Alharbi, M. A. (2020). Exploring the potential of Google Doc in facilitating innovative teaching and learning practices in an EFL writing course. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1572157
- Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers think is right and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 95–127. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19886
- Aubrey, S. (2014). Students’ attitudes towards the use of an online editing program in an EAP course. Annual Research Review, 17, 45–55. https://kwansei.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=23551&item_no=1&attribute_id=22&file_no=1
- Aubrey, S. (2022). Dynamic engagement in second language computer-mediated collaborative writing tasks: Does communication mode matter? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.1.4
- Balaman, U. (2021), The interactional organization of video-mediated collaborative writing: Focus on repair practices. TESOL Quarterly, 55, 979–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3034
- Bax, S. (2003). CALL - past, present, and future. System, 31(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00071-4
- Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 79–99. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2016/bikowskivithanage.pdf
- Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
- Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.013
- Cho, H., Kim, Y., & Park, S. (2022). Comparing students’ responses to synchronous written corrective feedback during individual and collaborative writing tasks. Language Awareness, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1937194
- Côté, S., & Gaffney, C. (2021). The effect of synchronous computer-mediated communication on beginner L2 learners’ foreign language anxiety and participation. The Language Learning Journal, 49(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1484935
- Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002
- Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1363056
- Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 1¬–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.005
- Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications.
- Kim, H. Y. (2014). Learning opportunities in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.692386
- Kim, Y., Choi, B., Kang, S., Kim, B., & Yun, H. (2020). Comparing the effects of direct and indirect synchronous written corrective feedback: Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 53(1), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12443
- Kim, Y., Choi, B., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Choi, S. (2020). Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 26(6), 1106–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820912354
- Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53(1), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235
- Li, M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: An analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 882–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1465981
- Li, M., & Zhang, M. (2022). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 56(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000318
- Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011
- Long, M. H. (2017). Problems in SLA. Routledge.
- Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004010
- Nguyen, T. H. (2023). Students’ perceptions and practice of the blended learning approach to writing skills: Using Google Docs. ICTE Conference Proceedings, 3, 52–67. https://doi.org/10.54855/ictep.2335
- Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2014). Promoting foreign language collaborative writing through the use of Web 2.0 tools and tasks. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT (pp. 115–148). John Benjamins.
- Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publishing. http://digital.casalini.it/9781529755992
- Shintani, N. (2016). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400
- Shintani, N., & Aubrey, S. (2016). The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in a computer‐mediated environment. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12317
- Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters.
- Storch, N. (2017). Sociocultural theory in the L2 classroom. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 69–83). Routledge.
- Storch, N. (2019). Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52(1), 40–59. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000320
- Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 1–18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/calicojournal.31.1.1
- Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474212113.ch-004
- Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). Longman.
- Ubaldo, E. F. (2021). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Attitudes of learners toward working in pairs and small groups. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 935–951. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i3.20079
- Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
- Yamashita, T. (2021). Corrective feedback in computer-mediated collaborative writing and revision contributions. Language Learning & Technology, 25(2), 75–93. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73434
- Wu, H. J. (2015). The effects of blog-supported collaborative writing on writing performance, writing anxiety and perceptions of EFL college students in Taiwan. [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa]. SF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5600
- Yeh, H. C. (2014). Exploring how collaborative dialogues facilitate synchronous collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 23–37. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44348
- Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2021). Types, features, and effectiveness of technologies in collaborative writing for second language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2391–2422. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1880441