Abstracts
Résumé
Le coengagement enfant[s]-enseignant[e] au cours d’un jeu partagé, tout type de jeu confondu, est complexe à instaurer en classe d’éducation préscolaire (Bouchard et al., 2021), d’où l’importance de mieux le comprendre selon la perspective des acteurs qui en sont parties prenantes (Fleer, 2015). Dans cette visée, l’objectif de cette synthèse thématique est d’identifier les éléments perçus par les enfants et les enseignant[e]s comme influençant leur coengagement au cours d’un jeu partagé. Suivant le guide Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses, 17 articles à devis qualitatif ou mixte ont été inclus. Les données ont été regroupées en 10 sous-catégories et selon le cadre d’analyse des trois moments de l’organisation séquentielle d’un jeu partagé, soit le signal du jeu, la connexion au jeu et la coparticipation à un jeu (Pursi et Lipponen, 2018). Les résultats montrent l’importance de la présence d’une réciprocité cognitive et affective entre les partenaires de jeu, enfant[s] et enseignant[e], celle-ci permettant de négocier le jeu et de le percevoir comme un espace collaboratif où chaque partenaire a son importance. Ce point de bascule pourrait être le fondement d’une culture du jeu dans la classe, à la base des apprentissages et du développement des enfants.
Mots-clés :
- coengagement,
- jeu partagé,
- perspective des enfants,
- perspective des enseignant[e]s,
- synthèse thématique
Abstract
Co-engagement between children and their teacher during shared play, all types of play combined, is complex to establish in the preschool classroom (Bouchard et al., 2021) but essential to implement, as it promotes children’s learning and development (Fleer, 2015). The aim of this thematic synthesis is to identify the elements perceived by children and teachers as influencing their co-engagement during jointed play. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guide, 17 articles with qualitative or mixed methods were included. The data were thematized into 10 subcategories and classified into one of the three moments of sequential organization of joint play interaction, which included play signalling, play connection, and sustained co-participation (Pursi & Lipponen, 2018). The results show the importance of the presence of cognitive and affective reciprocity, enabling the play to be negotiated and perceived as a collaborative project in which each partner is important. This tipping point could be the foundation of a culture of play in the early children’s education field, leading favourably to children’s learning and development.
Keywords:
- co-engagement,
- jointed play,
- children’s perspective,
- teacher perspectives,
- thematic synthesis
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Aksoy, M. et Aksoy, A. B. (2022). An investigation on the effects of block play on the creativity of children. Early Child Development and Care, 193(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2022.2071266
- Allard, É. Bouchard, C. et Richard, V. (2024). L’effet de l’accompagnement de l’enseignante dans le jeu de construction des enfants sur leurs habiletés de la pensée à l’éducation préscolaire 4 ans. Revue internationale de communication et de socialisation, 11(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.7202/1122457ar
- Aras, S. (2016). Free play in early childhood education: A phenomenological study. Early Child Development and Care, 186(7), 1173–1184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1083558
- Atkins, S., Lewin, S., Smith, H., Engel, M., Fretheim, A. et Volmink, J. (2008). Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(21). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21
- Bateson, G. (1976). A theory of play and fantasy. Dans J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly et K. Sylva (dir.), Play – Its role in development and evolution (p. 119–129). Penguin Books Ltd.
- Bodrova, E. et Leong, D. J. (2019). Making play smarter, stronger, and kinder: Lessons from Tools of the Mind. American Journal of Play, 12(1), 37–53. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1238559.pdf
- Bouchard, C., Hamel, C. et Viau-Guay, A. (2021). « Je n’osais pas intervenir dans le jeu des enfants. » Tensions vécues dans le soutien du jeu symbolique à l’éducation préscolaire. Revue Préscolaire, 59(3), 41–45.
- Bubikova-Moan, J., Hjetland, H.N. et Wollscheid, S. (2019). ECE teachers’ view on play-based learning: A systematic review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 27(6), 776–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2019.1678717
- Bulunuz, M. (2013). Teaching science through play in kindergarten: Does integrated play and science instruction build understanding? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(2), 226–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2013.789195
- Canaslan-Akyar, B. et Sevimli-Celik, S. (2022). Playfulness of early childhood teachers and their views in supporting playfulness. Education 3-13, 50(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1921824
- Cavanaugh, D. M., Clemence, K. J., Teale, M. M., Rule, A. C. et Montgomery, S. E. (2017). Kindergarten scores, storytelling, executive function, and motivation improved through literacy-rich guided play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(6), 831–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0832-8
- Clerc-Georgy, A. et Martin, D. (2022). Changements à l’âge préscolaire : rôle du jeu et de l’imagination. Dans B. Schneuwly, I. Leopoldoff Martin et D. N. H. Silva (dir.), L.S. Vygotskji, Imagination. Textes choisis (p. 423–442). Peter Lang.
- Clerc-Georgy, A., Martin, D. et Maire Sardi, B. (2021). Des usages du jeu dans une perspective didactique. Dans A. Clerc-Georgy et S. Duval (dir.), Les apprentissages fondateurs de la scolarité : enjeux et pratiques à la maternelle (p. 41–59). Presses de l’Université Laval.
- Conseil supérieur de l’éducation (CSE). (2012). Mieux accueillir et éduquer les enfants d’âge préscolaire, une triple question d’accès, de qualité et de continuité des services. Le Conseil. https://www.cse.gouv.qc.ca/publications/accueillir-eduquer-prescolaire-50-0477/
- Cooney, M. H., Gupton, P. et O’Laughlin, M. (2000). Blurring the lines of play and work to create blended classroom learning experiences. Early Childhood Education Journal, 27(3), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694230
- De Kruif, R. E. L., McWilliam, R. A., Maher Ridley, S. et Wakely, M. B. (2000). Classification of teachers’ interaction behaviors in early childhood classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(00)00051-X
- Devi, A., Fleer, M. et Li, L. (2018). ‘We set up a small world’ : Preschool teachers’ involvement in children’s imaginative play. International Journal of Early Years Education, 26(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1452720
- Devi, A., Fleer, M. et Li, L. (2021). Preschool teachers’ pedagogical positioning in relation to children’s imaginative play. Early Child Development and Care, 191(16), 2471–2483. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2020.1717479
- Drainville, R. (2023). Élaboration et mise à l’essai d’un dispositif pédagogique reposant sur la perspective vygotskienne : soutenir l’émergence de l’écrit des enfants à l’éducation préscolaire en contexte de jeu symbolique. [Thèse de doctorat, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue]. Depositum. https://depositum.uqat.ca/id/eprint/1403
- Drainville, R., Marinova, K. et Dumais, C. (2023). Intervenir dans le jeu symbolique des enfants d’âge préscolaire pour soutenir leur développement langagier. Revue internationale du CRIRES, 7(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.51657/ric.v7i1.51835
- Einarsdóttir, J. (1998). The role of adults in children’s dramatic play in Icelandic preschools. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 6(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13502939885208261
- Enz, B. J. et Christie, J. F. (1997). Teacher play interaction styles: Effects on play behavior and relationships with teacher training and experience. International Journal of Early Childhood Education, 2, 55–69.
- Fleer, M. (2015). Pedagogical positioning in play – teachers being inside and outside of children’s imaginary play. Early Child Development and Care, 185(11-12), 1801–1814. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1028393
- Fleer, M. (2010). Early learning and development. Cultural-historical concepts in play. Cambridge.
- Garte, R. (2020). Collaborative competence during preschooler’s peer interactions: Considering multiple levels of context within classrooms. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09496-1
- Garvey, C. (1976). Some properties of social play. Dans D. G. Singer, J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly et K. Sylva (dir.), Play – Its role in development and evolution (p. 570–583). Penguin Books Ltd.
- Gmitrová, V. et Gmitrov, J. (2004). The primacy of child‐directed pretend play on cognitive competence in a mixed‐age environment: Possible interpretations. Early Child Development and Care, 174(3), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443032000153589
- Göncü, A. (1993). Development of intersubjectivity in the dyadic play of preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(05)80100-0
- Goodhall, N. et Atkinson, C. (2019). How do children distinguish between ‘play’ and ‘work’? Conclusions from the literature. Early Child Development and Care, 189(10), 1695–1708. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1406484
- Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speaker and hearer. Academic Press.
- Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
- Goodwin, C. (2007a). Interactive footing. Dans E. Holt et R. Clift (dir.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction (p.16–46). Cambridge University Press.
- Goodwin, C. (2007b). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457
- Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educationnal Communication and Technology, 29(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
- Guillemette, F. (2006). L’engagement des enseignants du primaire et du secondaire dans leur développement professionnel [Thèse de doctorat, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières]. Archipel. https://archipel.uqam.ca/1939/1/D1481.pdf
- Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. Dans T. Stivers, L. Mondada et J. Steensig (dir.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (p. 159–183). Cambridge University Press.
- Ivrendi, A. (2020). Early childhood teachers’ roles in free play. Early years, 40(3), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2017.1403416
- Johnson, J. E., Christie, J. F. et Wardle, F. (2005). Play, development and early education. Allyn and Bacon.
- King, N. R. (1979). Play: The kindergarteners’ perspective. The Elementary School Journal, 80(2), 80–87.
- Kontos, S. (1999). Preschool teachers’ talk, roles, and activity settings during free play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 14(3), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)00016-2
- Laevers, F. (2005). The curriculum as means to raise the quality of early childhood education. Implications for policy. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 13(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13502930585209531
- Leik, R. K., Owens, T. J. et Tallman, I. (1999). Interpersonal commitments. Dans J. M. Adams et W. H. Jones (dir.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (p. 2239–2256). Kluwer.
- Lewin, K. (1959). Psychologie dynamique. Presses universitaires de France.
- Lobman, C. L. (2006). Improvisation: An analytic tool for examining teacher-child interactions in the early childhood classroom. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.09.004
- Marchand, M.-C., Bouchard, C. et Robert-Mazaye, C. (2023). Le concept de perezhivanie pour étudier la complexité des interactions entre l’enfant et l’environnement socioculturel. Revue internationale du CRIRES, 7(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.51657/ric.v7i1.52002
- Marchand, M.-C., Bouchard, C. et Robert-Mazaye, C. (2025). Qu’est-ce que jouer ? Regards d’enfants posés sur le jeu en services éducatifs à l’enfance. Pour la petite enfance, 4(1), 11–19. https://www.pourlapetiteenfance.ca/vol4-num1
- Marchand, M.-C., Bouchard, C. et Robert-Mazaye, C. (soumis). Perspectives d’enfants et d’enseignant∙e∙s quant à l’engagement de l’enseignant∙e dans les situations de jeu des enfants : une synthèse thématique. Revue Internationale de Socialisation et Communication.
- Marinova, K. (2014). L’intervention éducative au préscolaire : un modèle de pédagogie du jeu. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Marinova, K., Dumais, C. et Leclaire, É. (2020). Le rôle des enseignantes lors du jeu symbolique : réflexions au sein d’une communauté de pratique d’enseignantes de l’éducation préscolaire. Revue internationale de communication et de socialisation, 7(1-2), 128–154. https://www.revuerics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/RICS_2020-Vol-7-1_Marinova-et-al-Le-ro%CC%82le-des-enseignantes-lors-du-jeu-symbolique-14-11-2020.pdf
- McInnes, K., Howard, J., Miles, G. et Crowley, K. (2011). Differences in practitioners’ understanding of play and how this influences pedagogy and children’s perceptions of play. Early Years, 31(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2011.572870
- McLean, K., Lake, G., Wild, M., Licandro, U. et Evangelou, M. (2023). Perspectives of play and play-based learning: What do adults think play is? Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 48(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391221130790
- McWilliam, R. A., Scarborough, A. A. et Kim, H. (2003). Adult interactions and child engagement. Early Education and Development, 14(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1401_2
- Michel-Chevalley, M.-L. et Clerc-Georgy, A. (2021). Les interactions d’étayage pendant le jeu à l’école maternelle. Dans A. Clerc-Georgy et S. Duval (dir.), Les apprentissages fondateurs de la scolarité : Enjeux et pratiques à la maternelle (p. 71–86). Presses de l’Université Laval. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.25737954.7
- Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec [MEQ]. (2023). Programme-cycle d’éducation au préscolaire. Gouvernement du Québec. https://cdn-contenu.quebec.ca/cdn-contenu/education/pfeq/prescolaire/Programme-cycle-prescolaire.pdf
- Montie, J. E., Xiang, Z. et Schweinhart, L. J. (2006). Preschool experience in 10 countries : Cognitive and language performance at age 7. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(3), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.07.007
- Norðdahl, K. et Jóhannesson, I. A. (2016). ‘Let’s go outside’ : Icelandic teachers’ views of using the outdoors. Education 3-13, 44(4), 391–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2014.961946
- Ólafsdóttir, S. M. et Einarsdóttir, J. (2019). ‘Drawing and playing are not the same’ : children’s views on their activities in Icelandic preschools. Early Years, 39(1), 51–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2017.1342224
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134(6), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- Pinchover, S. (2017). The relation between teachers’ and children’s playfulness: A pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02214
- Pálmadóttir, H. et Einarsdóttir, J. (2015). Young children’s views of the role of preschool educators. Early Child Development and Care, 185(9), 1480–1494. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1004056
- Pramling, N., Wallerstedt, C., Lagerlöf, P., Björklund, C., Kultti, A., Palmér, H., Magnusson, M., Thulin, S., Jonsson, A. et Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2019). Play-responsiveness teaching in early childhood education: Vol. 26. International perspectives on early childhood education and development. Springer.
- Pramling Samuelsson, I. et Carlsson, M. A. (2008). The playing learning child : Towards a pedagogy of early childhood. Scandinavia Journal of Education Research, 52(6), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830802497265
- Pursi, A. (2019). Play in adult-child interaction: Institutional multi-party interaction and pedagogical practice in a toddler classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.014
- Pursi, A. et Lipponen, L. (2018). Constituting play connection with very young children: Adults’ active participation in play. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 17, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.12.001
- Pursi, A., Lipponen, L. et Sajaniemi, N. K. (2018). Emotional and playful stance taking in joint play between adults and very young children. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 18, 28–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.03.002
- Pyle, A. et Alaca, B. (2018). Kindergarten children’s perspectives on play and learning. Early Child Development and Care, 188(8), 1063–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1245190
- Pyle, A. et Danniels, E. (2017). A continuum of play-based learning: The role of the teacher in play-based pedagogy and the fear of hijacking play. Early Education and Development, 28(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1220771
- Rengel, K. (2014). Preschool teachers’ attitudes towards play. Croatian Journal of Education, 16(1), 113–125. https://hrcak.srce.hr/117852
- Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001
- Sandberg, A. (2002). Children’s concepts of teachers’ ways of relating to play. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 27(4), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693910202700405
- Sandelowski, M. et Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer.
- Sidnell, J. (2014). The architecture of intersubjectivity revisited. Dans N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman et J. Sidnell (dir.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistics and anthropology (p. 364–399). Cambridge University Press.
- Singer, E., Nederend, M., Penninx, L., Tajik, M. et Boom, J. (2014). The teacher’s role in supporting young children’s level of play engagement. Early Child Development and Care, 184(8), 1233–1249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.862530
- Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123
- Stivers, T. et Sidnell, J. (2016). Proposals for activity collaboration. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1164409
- Sylva, K., Roy, C. et Painter, M. (1980). Childwatching at playgroup and nursery school. High/Scope Press.
- Thomas, J. et Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
- Trawick-Smith, J. et Dziurgot, T. (2011). ‘Good-fit’ teacher–child play interactions and the subsequent autonomous play of preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(1), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.04.005
- Trevarthen, C. (1988). The communication of emotion. Neuropsychologia, 26(4), 639–640.
- Veresov, N. (2017). The concept of perezhivanie in cultural-historical theory: Content and contexts. Dans M. Fleer, F. Gonzáles Rey et N. Veresov, (dir.), Perezhivanie, emotions and subjectivity: Advancing Vygotsky’s legacy (p. 47–70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4534-9_3
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. Dans R. van der Veer et J. Valsiner (dir.), The Vygotsky reader (p. 338–354). Blackwell.
- Vygotskij, L. S. (2022). Le jeu et son rôle dans le développement psychologique de l’enfant. Dans B. Schneuwly, I. Leopoldoff Martin et D. N. Henrique Silva (dir.), L.S. Vygotskij : Imagination. Textes choisis (I. Leopoldoff Martin, trad., p. 41–55). Peter Lang. (Texte original publié en 1933)
- Wanlin, P. (2007). L’analyse de contenu comme méthode d’analyse qualitative d’entretiens : une comparaison entre les traitements manuels et l’utilisation de logiciels. Recherches qualitatives, Hors Série(3), 243–272. https://www.recherche-qualitative.qc.ca/documents/files/revue/hors_serie/hors_serie_v3/Wanlin2.pdf
- Wickstrom, H., Pyle, A. et DeLuca, C. (2019). Does theory translate into practice? An observational study of current mathematics pedagogies in play-based kindergarten. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(3), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-018-00925-1
- Wood, L. et Bennett, N. (1997). The rhetoric and reality of play: Teachers’ thinking and classroom practice. Early Years, 17(2), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0957514970170205
- Zosh, J. M, Hirsh-Pasek, K., Hopkins, E. J., Jensen, H., Liu, C., Neale, D., Solis, S.L. et Whitebread, D. (2018). Accessing the inaccessible: Redefining play as a spectrum. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01124

