Abstracts
Abstract
This two-part essay explores circular, loop-based animation at two pivotal moments in media history: its 19th-century emergence at the advent of the moving image, and its 21st-century reimagining within contemporary art. Rod Bantjes’ reconstructions uncover how spectral illusions, which still elude explanation, were generated by experimental uses of machines, revealing an early form of machine self-reflexivity embedded in the aesthetic and epistemological logic of the devices. Guido Devadder extends this inquiry through artistic research, analyzing how contemporary installations like CourtCirquit reconfigure the structural principles of the phenakistiscope within a digitally mediated, hyper-reflexive context. Together, the two parts argue that the loop is not merely a visual device but a cultural form—reappearing in times of technological upheaval to expose the limits of perception, the illusion of progress, and the recursive entanglements of human and machine vision.
Résumé
Cet essai en deux parties explore l’animation circulaire et répétitive à deux moments clés de l’histoire des médias : son émergence au xixe siècle, à l’avènement de l’image animée, et sa réinvention au xxie siècle dans l’art contemporain. Les reconstitutions de Rod Bantjes révèlent comment des illusions spectrales, encore inexpliquées aujourd’hui, ont été produites par des expérimentations mécaniques, introduisant une réflexivité machinique précoce inscrite dans la logique esthétique et épistémologique des dispositifs. Guido Devadder prolonge cette enquête par la recherche artistique, analysant comment des installations contemporaines comme CourtCirquit reconfigurent les principes structurels du phénakistiscope dans un contexte numérique et hyperréflexif. Ensemble, les deux parties montrent que la boucle n’est pas qu’un procédé visuel, mais une forme culturelle qui resurgit lors de bouleversements technologiques pour interroger les limites de la perception, du progrès illusoire et l’imbrication récursive de la vision humaine et machinique.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Anderson, Joseph D., and Barbara Fisher Anderson. 1993. “The Myth of Persistence of Vision Revisited.” Journal of Film and Video 45 (1): 3–12.
- Bak, Meredith A. 2013. “Grand Illusions: Large-Scale Optical Toys and Contemporary Scientific Spectacle.” Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 35 (1): 249–67.
- Bantjes, Rod. 2019. “Pre-Cinema, Pre-Giff, or Auto-Erotic Machine Art?”. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts. October (32): 1-8.
- Bantjes, Rod. 2021. “The Birth of Machine Sex: The Pornographic Phenakistiscope Disks of the 1840s.” Proceedings of Artech 2021: 10th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Art. October (10): 1-8.
- Bergson, Henri. 2001 [1913]. Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. Dover Publications.
- Bolter, J. David, and Richard A. Grusin. 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. MIT Press.
- Crary, Jonathan. 1990. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. MIT Press.
- Devadder, Guido, Steven Devleminck, and Roel Vande Winkel. 2024. “An Old Soul in a Young Body: Reincarnating Time in Status Quontinuum.” MAST 5 (1): 12–25.
- Devadder, Guido, Steven Devleminck, and Roel Vande Winkel. 2025. “Remediating the Uncanny: Visualizing Unconscious Drives.” Gramma: Journal of Theory and Criticism 30: 242–279.
- Dulac, Nicolas, and André Gaudreault. 2006. “Circularity and Repetition at the Heart of the Attraction: Optical Toys and the Emergence of a New Cultural Series.” In The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded, edited by Wanda Strauven, 227–244. Amsterdam University Press.
- Faraday, Michael. 1831. “On a Peculiar Class of Optical Deception.” Journal of the Royal Institution 1: 205–23.
- Fisher, Mark. 2014. Ghosts of My Life: Writings on Depression, Hauntology and Lost Futures. Zero Books.
- Gunning, Tom. 2012. “Hand and Eye: Excavating a New Technology of the Image in the Victorian Era.” Victorian Studies 54 (3): 495–516.
- Griffin, George. 2013. “Take the B Train: Reconstructing the Proto-Cinematic Apparatus.” In Pervasive Animation, edited by Suzanne Buchan, 17–33. Routledge.
- Han, Byung-Chul. 2017. Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power. Verso.
- Huhtamo, Erkki. 2016. “Art in the Rear-View Mirror: The Media-Archaeological Tradition in Art.” In A Companion to Digital Art, edited by Christiane Paul, 32–45. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Macdonald, Iain. 2016. Hybrid Practices in Moving Image Design. Springer International Publishing.
- Plateau, M. Joseph. 1828. “Sur les apparences que présentent deux lignes qui tournent autour d’un point avec un Mouvement angulaire uniforme.” Correspondance Mathematique et Physique de l’Observatoire de Bruxelles 4: 393.
- Plateau, M. Joseph. 1830. “Lettre de M. Plateau au rédacteur, relative à différentes expériences d’optique.” Correspondance Mathématique et Physique de l’Observatoire de Bruxelles 6: 121-6.
- Plateau, M. Joseph. 1833. “Sur un nouveau genre d’illusions d’optique.” Correspondance Mathématique et Physique de l’Observatoire de Bruxelles 7: 365-68.
- Roget, Peter Mark. 1825. “Explanation of an Optical Deception in the Appearance of the Spokes of a Wheel Seen through Vertical Apertures.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 115: 131.
- Stöhr, Franziska. 2016. Endlos: Zur Geschichte des Film- und Videoloops im Zusammenspiel von Technik, Kunst und Ausstellung. Transcript Verlag.
- Torre, Dan. 2017. Animation – Process, Cognition and Actuality. Bloomsbury Academic.
- Uroskie, Andrew V. 2014. Between the Black Box and the White Cube: Expanded Cinema and Postwar Art. University of Chicago Press.
- Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.

