Abstracts
Abstract
This study examines how the HEADSUP framework supports STEM teachers in integrating anti-oppressive and critical social justice frameworks into their teaching. Using a qualitative case study approach, STEM teachers and students at an Ontario secondary school participated in weekly sessions focused on utilizing HEADSUP in their STEM courses. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with teachers and classroom observations conducted by the research team. Findings reveal both opportunities and challenges in decolonizing STEM education through critical decolonial frameworks. Teacher interviews indicate that integrating HEADSUP into teaching amplified students’ voices, promoted active engagement in lessons, and encouraged them to explore concepts beyond the standard STEM curriculum. Findings also highlight that the implementation of anti-oppressive and social justice frameworks in STEM classrooms is constrained by the current provincial high school STEM curriculum. The study discusses implications for educational policy, particularly the need for curricular reforms that support anti-oppressive approaches in STEM education.
Keywords:
- STEM education,
- HEADSUP,
- decoloniality,
- teachers,
- ethical relationality
Résumé
Cette étude examine comment les éléments du programme HEADSUP aident les enseignants en STIM à intégrer des cadres anti-oppressifs et de justice sociale critique dans leur enseignement. En utilisant une approche qualitative d’étude de cas, les enseignants et les étudiants en STIM d’une école secondaire de l’Ontario ont participé à des sessions hebdomadaires axées sur l’utilisation de HEADSUP dans leurs cours de STIM. Les données ont été recueillies au moyen d’entrevues semi-structurées avec les enseignants et d’observations en classe effectuées par l'équipe de recherche. Les résultats révèlent à la fois les opportunités et les défis de la décolonisation de l’enseignement des STIM à travers des cadres décoloniaux critiques. Les entretiens avec les enseignants indiquent que l’intégration de HEADSUP dans l’enseignement a amplifié les voix des étudiants, favorisé leur engagement actif dans les leçons et les a encouragés à explorer des concepts au-delà du programme STIM standard. Les résultats soulignent également que la mise en oeuvre de cadres anti-oppressifs et de justice sociale critique dans les classes de STIM est limitée par le programme provincial actuel des STIM dans les écoles secondaires. L’étude examine les implications pour la politique éducative, en particulier la nécessité de réformer les programmes d’études qui soutiennent les approches anti-oppressives dans l’enseignement des STIM.
Mots-clés :
- Enseignement des STIM,
- HEADSUP,
- décolonialité,
- enseignants,
- relationalité éthique
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aikenhead, G. S. (2017). Enhancing school mathematics culturally: A path of reconciliation. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(2), 73–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2017.1308043
- Akkari, A., & Radhouane, M. (2022). Intercultural approaches to education: From theory to practice. Springer International Publishing AG.
- Andreotti, V. D. O. (2011). The political economy of global citizenship education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(3–4), 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2011.602292
- Andreotti, V. (2012). Editor’s preface: HEADS UP. Critical literacy: Theories and practices, 6(1), 1–3.
- Aronson, B., & Meyers, L. (2020). Critical race theory and the teacher education curriculum: Challenging understandings of racism, Whiteness, and coloniality. Whiteness and Education, 7(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/23793406.2020.1812109
- Arvanitis, E. (2018). Preservice teacher education: Towards a transformative and reflexive learning. Global Studies of Childhood, 8(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610617734980
- Battiste, M. (2013). Decolonizing education: Nourishing the learning spirit. Purich Publishing Limited.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
- Burbanks, I. V. S. M., Shockley, K. G., & LeNiles, K. (2020). The need for African centered education in STEM programs for black youth. Journal for African American Males in Education, 11(2), 12–24. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup
- Carroll, S. M. (2021). Anti-oppressive global citizenship education theory and practice in pre-service teacher education. Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review, 33, 7–27.
- Coulthard, G., & Simpson, L. B. (2016). Grounded normativity/place-based solidarity. American Quarterly, 68(2), 249–255.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Davies, J. (2021). Opening the “can of worms”: Preparing teachers to address issues relating to “race.” Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.489407
- Dei, G. J. S. (2020). Elders’ cultural knowledges and African Indigeneity. In The Palgrave handbook of African education and Indigenous knowledge (pp. 279–301). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/9783030842000
- Dei, G. J. S., Karanja, W., & Erger, G. (2022). Land as Indigenous epistemology. In G. J. S. Dei, W. Karanja, & G. Erger (Eds.), Elders’ cultural knowledges and the question of Black/African Indigeneity in education (pp. 113–126). Springer.
- DiAngelo, R., & Sensoy, Ö. (2018). “Yeah, but I'm shy!": Classroom participation as a social justice issue. Multicultural Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2018-0002
- Domina, T., Penner, A., & Penner, E. (2017). Categorical inequality: Schools as sorting machines. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 311–330.
- Donald, D. (2016). Chapter three: From what does ethical relationality flow? An “Indian” act in three artifacts. Counterpoints, 478, 10–16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45157205
- Dumas, M. J., & Ross, K. M. (2016). “Be real Black for me” imagining BlackCrit in education. Urban Education, 51(4), 415–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916628611
- Ermine, W. (2007). The ethical space of engagement. Indigenous Law Journal, 6(1), 193.
- Fúnez‐Flores, J. I. (2023). Anibal Quijano:(Dis) entangling the geopolitics and coloniality of curriculum. The Curriculum Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.219
- Gaudry, A., & Lorenz, D. (2018). Indigenization as inclusion, reconciliation, and decolonization: Navigating the different visions for indigenizing the Canadian academy. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 14(3), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180118785382
- Goddard, C., & Evans, D. (2018). Primary pre-service teacher’ attitudes towards inclusion across the training years. Australian Journal of Education, 43(6). 122–142. 10.14221/ajte.2018v43n6.8
- Hayes, C., & Juárez, B. (2012). There is no culturally responsive teaching spoken here: A critical race perspective. Democracy & Education, 20(1), 1–14. http://democracyeducationjournal.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=home
- James, C. E., & Turner, T. (2015). Fighting an uphill battle: Report on the consultations into the well-being of Black youth in Peel region. Turner Consulting Group.
- Karsgaard, C., Pillay, T., & Shultz, L. (2022). Facing colonial Canada through pedagogies of equity for First Nations: An advocacy education project. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2022.2134948
- Kayumova, S., & Dou, R. (2022). Equity and justice in science education: Toward a pluriverse of multiple identities and onto‐epistemologies. Science Education, 106(5), 1097–1117. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sce.21750
- Kelly, V. (2021). Radical acts of re-imaging ethical relationality and trans-systemic transformation. Engaged Scholar Journal, 7(1), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v7i1.70759CopiedAn error has occurred
- Khushal, S. (2022). Anti-racist educational leadership and policy: Addressing racism in public education. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150211050441
- Krasnoff, B. (2016). Culturally responsive teaching. A guide to evidence-based practices for teaching all students equitably. Equity Assistant Center at Education Northwestern. https://educationnorthwest.org/sites/default/files/resources/culturally-responsive-teaching.pdf
- Leyva, D., Libertus, M. E., & McGregor, R. (2023). Math intervention targeting family routines increases parental math talk and math activities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 89, Article 101595. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0193397323000850?via%3Dihub
- Lopez, A. E., & Jean-Marie, G. (2021). Challenging anti-Black racism in everyday teaching, learning, and leading: From theory to practice. Journal of School Leadership, 31(1–2), 50–65. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1052684621993115
- Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548
- Mignolo, W. D. (2011). Geopolitics of sensing and knowing: On (de) coloniality, border thinking and epistemic disobedience. Postcolonial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2011.613105
- Mignolo, W. D., & Walsh, C. E. (2018). On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Duke University Press.
- Miller, B. G., & Roehrig, G. (2018). Indigenous cultural contexts for STEM experiences: Snow snakes’ impact on students and the community. Cultural Studies of Science Education 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9738-4
- Mills, C., & Ballantyne, J. (2016). Social justice and teacher education: A systematic review of empirical work in the field. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116660152
- Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2019). Provisional notes on decolonizing research methodology and undoing its dirty history. Journal of Developing Societies, 35(4), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X19880417
- Nganga, L. (2020). Analyzing children’s literature for hidden bias helps preservice teachers gain pedagogical practices in critical multicultural education. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(1), 93–107. https://doi-org.proxy.queensu.ca/10.1080/02568543.2019.1692109
- Öngel G., & Tabancalı E. (2022). Conservatism and social justice: Why do some teachers strive harder for social justice while others do not? International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 14(1), 53–62.
- Ontario Ministry of Education. (2009). Realizing the promise of diversity: Ontario’s equity and inclusion education strategy. https://files.ontario.ca/edu-equity-inclusive-education-strategy-2009-en-2022-01-13.pdf
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (OECD). (2022). OECD employment outlook 2022: Building back more inclusive labour markets. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1bb305a6-en
- Pashby, K., & Sund, L. (2020). Decolonial options and challenges for ethical global issues pedagogy in northern Europe secondary classrooms. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 4(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3554
- Pichette, J., Effah, H., & Fritz, M. (2022). Opportunities for distance learning for adult learners: Analysis of data on college admission applications in Ontario during the COVID-19 pandemic. Toronto: Ontario Council on Quality in Higher Education.
- Pillay, T., Ahn, C., Gyamerah, K., & Liu, S. (2022). Considering the role of social media:# BlackLivesMatter as a pedagogical intervention to decolonise curriculum. London Review of Education, 20(1), 1–13. 10.14324/LRE.20.1.14
- Pohl, C. (2008). From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.06.001
- Shultz, L., & Pillay, T. (2018). Global citizenship, common wealth, and uncommon citizenships: An introduction. In L. Shultz & T. Pillay (Eds.), Global citizenship, common wealth and uncommon citizenships (pp. 1–7). Brill.
- Spivak, G. C. (2023). Can the subaltern speak?. In Imperialism (pp. 171–219). Routledge.
- Styres, S. (2020). Reconciliaction: Reconciling contestation in the academy. Power and Education, 12(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757743820916845
- Takeuchi, M. A., & Marin, A. (2022). “Globalization,” coloniality, and decolonial love in STEM education. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://oxfordre.com/education/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-1655
- Toronto District School Board. (2021). Working towards anti-oppressive schools—Lessons from WE Charity: A critical review. https://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/research/docs/reports/WorkingTowardsAntiOppressiveSchoolsLessonsfromWECharity.pdf
- Tsang, J., & Eizadirad, A. (2024). We are all racists: Calling out and undoing Whiteness in teacher education. In A. Kempf & K. Watts (Eds.), Critical perspectives on White supremacy and racism in Canadian education (pp. 81–98). Routledge.
- Tuters, S. (2015). Conceptualising diversity in a rural school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(7), 685–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2014.964573
- Ullucci K. (2012). Knowing we are White: Narrative as critical praxis. Teaching Education, 23(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2011.622747
- Visentin, E. (2022). Baked in like a muffin: The culture of Whiteness in Ontario elementary schools [Master's thesis, Queen's University, Canada].
- Williams, N. V., Robinson, K., Gillham, J. C., & Fetty, K. (2021). Superintendent evaluations: School boards report on criteria, procedures, and professional development. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 18(4). https://articlearchives.co/index.php/JLAE/article/view/4030

