Résumés
Abstract
The main purpose of this article is to re-examine the legacy of Marx and Simmel for the study of romantic love from a feminist perspective. I am interested in the relational legacy these two authors provide for the study of the affective sphere. Specifically, I am interested in highlighting how both offer analytical inputs to consider the relationships between love, power, and conflict. I attempt to answer the following questions: What do Marx and Simmel postulate when they talk about love? What is the complementary contribution of their proposals considering recent studies on love from a feminist perspective? While Marx allows us to incorporate the socio-structural and historical level – specifically the material dimension –, Simmel allows us to incorporate the social process and symbolic exchange – specifically the cultural dimension – to think about the affective dimension of social ties and love as social bond. I consider that from this analytical and political perspective, the Marxist-Simmelian legacy provides a thought-provoking program for the relational analysis of affects, emotions and love.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Biographical note
Olga Sabido Ramos is Professor-Researcher of the Department of Sociology, UAM, Azcapotzalco. She is author and co-editor of five books, chapters and articles on Simmel’s Relational Sociology; Sensory Studies, and Sociology of Emotions. She is author of El cuerpo como recurso de sentido en la construcción del extraño (2012). She edited Georg Simmel. Una revisión contemporánea (2007) and Los sentidos del cuerpo: un giro sensorial en la investigación social y los estudios de género (2019) among others.
Bibliography
- Ahmed S. (2006). Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
- Ahmed S. (2014). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Bowring F. (2019). Erotic Love in Sociology, Philosophy and Literature From Romanticism to Rationality. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Kindle Edition.
- Cantó-Milà N. (2012). “Gratitude – invisibly webbing society together”, in: Journal of Classical Sociology, 13(1), pp. 8-19.
- Cantó-Milà N. (2005). A Sociological Theory of Value. Georg Simmel’s Sociological Relationism. Bielefeld: Transcript.
- Christias P. (2019). “Eros as Educator in the Era of Advanced Monetary Economy: Simmel’s Social Metaphysics of the Erotic Being”, in: Simmel Studies, 23(1), pp. 183–201.
- Dépelteau F. (2018). “Relational Thinking in Sociology: Relevance, Concurrence and Dissonance”, in: Dépelteau, F. (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 3-29
- Emirbayer M. (1997). “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology”, in: The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), pp. 281-317.
- Federici S. (1975). Wages against housework. London: Power of Women Collective.
- Federici S. (2018). El patriarcado del salario. Críticas feministas al marxismo. Madrid: Traficante de Sueños.
- Ferguson A. (2018). “Alienation in love. Is mutual love the solution?”, in: García Andrade, A., Gunnarsson, L., Jónasdóttir, A. (Ed.), Feminism and the Power of Love. Interdisciplinary Interventions. New York: Routledge, pp 36-54.
- Fraser N. (2016). “Contradictions of Capital and Care”, in: New Left Review. (100), pp. 99-117
- Frisby D. (1998). “Introduction to Georg Simmel’s On the Sociology of the Family”, in: Theory, Culture, and Society. 15(3-4), pp. 277-281.
- Gabriel M. (2011). Love and Capital. Karl and Jenny Marx and the Birth of a Revolution. New York: Little Brown.
- Gago V. (2020). La potencia feminista o el deseo de cambiarlo todo. México: Tinta Limón.
- García Andrade A., and O. Sabido Ramos (2016). “Los amantes y su mundo: una propuesta teórico-metodológica”, in: Pozas, M., Estrada, M. (Ed.), Disonancias y resonancias conceptuales. México: El Colegio de México, pp. 179-203
- García Andrade A., and O. Sabido Ramos (2018). “The invisible ties We share. A relational analysis of the contemporary loving couple”, ?”, in: García Andrade, A., Gunnarsson, L., Jónasdóttir, A. (Ed.), Feminism and the Power of Love. Interdisciplinary Interventions. New York: Routledge, pp 137-154.
- García Andrade A., Gunnarsson, L., Jónasdóttir, A. (Ed.), (2018). Feminism and the Power of Love. Interdisciplinary Interventions. New York: Routledge
- Giddens A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- González F. (22 de Noviembre de 1980). Karl Marx sobre el divorcio. El País. https://elpais.com/diario/1980/11/23/sociedad/343782004_850215.html (accesed 19 July 2021)
- González N. (2012). “Estudio preliminar y notas”, in: Marx, K. Sobre el suicidio. Madrid: El Viejo Topo, pp. 7-50
- Haraway D. (1988). “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”, in: Feminist Studies, 14(3), pp. 575-599
- Hartmann H. (1981). “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union”, in: Sargent, L. (Ed.), Women and Revolution. A discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism. A Debate on Class and Patriarchy. London: Pluto Press, pp. 1-41
- Herrera C. (2020). “Amor romántico”, in: Cobo, R., Ranea, B. (Ed.), Breve diccionario de feminismo. Madrid: Catarata, pp. 7-50
- Illouz E. (1997). Consuming the Romantic Utopia. California: University of California Press.
- Illouz E. (2012). Why love hurts. A sociological explanation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Illouz E. (2019). The End of Love: A Sociology of Negative Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Jimeno M. (2004). Crimen pasional. Contribución a una antropología de las emociones. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
- Jónasdóttir A. (1993). El poder del amor. ¿Le importa al sexo la democracia? Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.
- Jónasdóttir A. (2008): “Feminist questions, Marx’s method and the theorisation of “love power””, in: Jónasdóttir, A. and K. Jones, (Ed.): The Political Interests of Gender Revisited. Redoing theory and research with a feminist face. Manchester, Manchester University Press, pp. 58-83
- Jónasdóttir A. (2011). “¿Qué clase de poder es el poder del amor?” in: Sociológica. 26(74), pp. 247-274.
- Jónasdóttir A. (2014). “Los estudios acerca del amor: un renovado interés para el conocimiento”, in: García Andrade, A. and Sabido Ramos, O. (Ed.), Cuerpo y afectividad en la sociedad contemporánea. Algunas rutas del amor y la experiencia sensible en las ciencias sociales. México: UAM-Azcapotzalco, pp. 39-80
- Jónasdóttir A. (2018). “The difference that love (power) makes”, in: García Andrade, A., Gunnarsson, L., Jónasdóttir, A. (Ed.), Feminism and the Power of Love. Interdisciplinary Interventions. New York: Routledge, pp. 15-35.
- Klesse C. (2014). “Poliamor. De la promesa de amar a muchos”, in: García Andrade, A. and Sabido Ramos, O. (Ed.), Cuerpo y afectividad en la sociedad contemporánea. Algunas rutas del amor y la experiencia sensible en las ciencias sociales. México: UAM-Azcapotzalco. pp. 131-161
- Lamas M. (2020). Dolor y política. Sentir, pensar y hablar desde el feminismo. México: Océano.
- Levine D. (1971). Introduction. Georg Simmel on Individuality of Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. IX-LXV
- Lichtblau K. (1989). “Eros and Culture: Gender Theory in Simmel, Tönnies and Weber”, in: Telos. A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought, (82), pp. 89-110.
- Luhmann N. (1998). Love as Passion. The Codification of Intimacy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Marx K. [1867] (1954). Capital (Vol. I). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
- Marx K. [1932] (2014). Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. USA: Wilder Publications.
- Marx K. [1842] (1982). “El proyecto de ley sobre el divorcio”, in: Escritos de juventud. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, pp. 289-291
- Marx K [1857/1858] (1973). Grundrisse. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
- Marx K. [1844] (1978). “On the Jewish Question”, in: Tucker, C. (Ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton, pp. 26-46
- Marx K. [1846] (2012). Sobre el suicidio. Madrid: El Viejo Topo.
- Marx K. [1841] (2017). “Sobre el amor”, in: Bértolo, C. (Ed.), Llamando a las puertas de la revolución. Antología. Barcelona: Penguin, pp. 143-144
- Marx K. and Engels, F. ([1846] (1998). The German Ideology: including Theses on Feuerbach and Introduction to the Critique of Political Economy. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.
- Marx K. and Engels, F. [1848] (2011). The Communist Manifesto. USA: Penguin.
- Oakes G. (1984). “The problem of women in Simmel’s theory of culture” in Simmel, G., On women, sexuality, and love. New Haven, CT. and London: Yale University Press, pp. 3-62
- Pedwell C. and A. Whitehead. (2012). Affecting feminism: Questions of feeling in feminist theory. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 115-129.
- Pyyhtinen O. (2010). Simmel and “The Social”. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Quintana V. (2020). Canción sin miedo. Recuperado de https://www.letras.mus.br/vivir-quintana/cancion-sin-miedo-part-el-palomar/ (accesed 19 July 2021)
- Rammstedt, A. (2015). “Tres mujeres en diálogo con Simmel”, in: Díaz, G. (Ed.), Un actitud del espíritu. Interpretaciones en torno a Georg Simmel. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia, pp. 181-203.
- Rougemont D. (1983). Love in the Western World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Sabido Ramos O. (2015). “Fragmentos amorosos en el pensamiento de Georg Simmel”, in: Díaz, G, (Ed.), Un actitud del espíritu. Interpretaciones en torno a Georg Simmel. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia, pp. 205-235
- Sabido Ramos O. (2018). “La sensorialidad capitalista en Karl Marx y Georg Simmel: Claves para el análisis sensible de la sociedad contemporánea”, in: Dissonância: Revista de Teoria Crítica. 2(2), pp. 224-261.
- Sabido Ramos O, and A. García Andrade. (2015). “El amor como vínculo social: con Elias y más allá de Elias”, in: Sociológica, 30(86), pp. 31-63.
- Sabido Ramos O, and A. García Andrade. (2017). “El cuerpo de los amantes. El amor como experiencia sensible en jóvenes universitarios”, in: Domínguez, A., Zirión, A. (Ed.), La dimensión sensorial de la cultura. Diez contribuciones al estudio de los sentidos en México. México: UAM-Iztapalapa, pp. 233-270.
- Sabido Ramos O, and A. García Andrade. (2018). “In the Name of Love: A Relational Approach to Young People’s Relationships in Urban Mexico”, in: Juvonen, T., and M. Kolehmainen (Ed.), Affective Inequalities in Intimate Relationships. Nueva York-London: Routledge, pp. 141-154.
- Seebach S. (2017). Love and society: Special social forms and the master emotion, New York and London: Routledge.
- Sempruch J. (2018). “Feminist visions and socio-political meanings of non-monogamous love”, in: García Andrade, A., Gunnarsson, L., Jónasdóttir, A. (Ed.), Feminism and the Power of Love. Interdisciplinary Interventions. New York: Routledge, pp. 117-136.
- Simmel G. [1916] (1971). “Eros, Platonic and Modern”, in: Levine, D. (Ed.), Georg Simmel on Individuality of Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 235-248.
- Simmel G. [1913] (1984a). “On Love (A Fragment)”, in: Oakes, G. (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality, and Love. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 153–192.
- Simmel G. [1911] (1984b). “Flirtation”, in: Oakes, G. (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality, and Love. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 133–152.
- Simmel G. [1911] (1984c). “The Relative and the Absolute in the Problem of the Sexes in: Oakes, G. (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality, and Love. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 102–132.
- Simmel G. [1911] (1984d). “Female Culture”, in: Oakes, G. (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality, and Love. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 65–101.
- Simmel G. [1904] (1997a). “The Philosophy of Fashion”, in: Frisby, D. and M. Featherstone (Ed.), Simmel on Culture. London: SAGE, pp. 187-206
- Simmel G. [1891/1892] (1997b). “Some Remarks on Prostitution in the Present and in Future”, in: Frisby, D. and M. Featherstone (Ed.), Simmel on Culture. London: SAGE, pp. 262-270.
- Simmel G. [1895] (1998). “On the Sociology of the Family”, in: Theory, Culture, and Society, 15(3-4), pp. 283-293.
- Simmel G. [1900] (2004). The Philosophy of Money. New York and London: Routledge.
- Simmel G. [1901/1902] (2007) “Fragmentos de una filosofía del amor”, in: Simmel, G. Imágenes momentáneas sub specie aeternitatis. Barcelona: Gedisa, pp. 116-119
- Simmel G. [1908] (2009). Sociology: Inquiries Into the Construction of Social Forms. Boston: Leiden.
- Simmel G. [1918] (2010a). The View of Life. Four Metaphysical Essays with Journal Aphorisms. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
- Simmel G. [1898] (2010b). “El papel del dinero en las relaciones de género”, in: Simmel, G. Cultura líquida y dinero. Fragmentos simmelianos de la modernidad. Barcelona: Anthropos y UAM, Cuajimalpa, pp. 62-78
- Simmel G. [1901] (2018). Sobre una psicología de la vergüenza. Digithum 21, 67-74.
- Swedberg R. and Reich, W. (2010). “Georg Simmel’s Aphorisms”, in: Theory, Culture, and Society, 27(1), pp. 24-51.
- Torres M. (2016). “El nuevo rostro de un viejo fenómeno: la trata de personas con fines de explotación sexual y los derechos humanos”, in: Sociológica, 31, 89, pp. 95-129.
- Turner B. (2008). The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. London: SAGE.
- Vandenberghe F. (2018). “The Relation as Magical Operator: Overcoming the Divide. Between Relational and Processual Sociology”, in: Dépelteau, F. (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 35-57.
- Vromen S. (1990). “Georg Simmel and the Cultural Dilemma of Women”, in: Kaern, M., B. Phillips, R. Cohen (Ed.), Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Puplishers, pp. 318-340
- Weeks K. (2011). The problem of work. Feminism, marxism, antiwork politics and postwork imaginaties. London: Duke Press.
10.7202/1062543ar