Mother, Mothers: Forms and Contents of Maternity. A Simmelian Interpretation of Surrogate Motherhood

Guizzardi, Luca

doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/1083823ar

Amat M. (2007). “Simmel’s Law of the Individual: A Relational Idea of Culture”, in: Simmel Studies, 21, 2, pp. 42-71.

Andrews L.B. (1988). “Surrogate Motherhood: The Challenge for Feminists”, in: Law, Medicine & Health Care, 16 (1-2), pp. 72-80.

10.1111/j.1748-720X.1988.tb01053.x Google Scholar

Balzano A. (2017). “In bilico tra mercificazione del biologico e autodeterminazione delle donne: oltre il divieto di surrogacy”, in: Notizie di Politeia, XXXIII (128), pp. 22-41.

Google Scholar

Banerjee A. (2010). “Reorienting the Ethics of Transnational Surrogacy as a Feminist Pragmatist”, in: The Pluralist, 5 (3), pp. 107-127.

10.1353/plu.2010.0014 Google Scholar

Belliotti R.A. (1988). “Marxism, Feminism, and Surrogate Motherhood”, in: Social Theory and Practice, 14 (3), pp. 389-417.

10.5840/soctheorpract198814318 Google Scholar

Berend Z. (2016). The Online World of Surrogacy. Oxford-New York: Berghahn Books.

10.3167/9781785332746 Google Scholar

Blumenberg H. (2012). “Money or Life: Metaphors of Georg Simmel’s Philosophy”, in: Theory, Culture & Society, 29 (7/8), pp. 249-262.

10.1177/0263276412455230 Google Scholar

Bromfield Nicole F. (2016). “‘Surrogacy Has Been One of the Most Rewarding Experiences in My Life’: A Content Analysis of Blogs by U.S.” in: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 9 (1), pp. 192-217.

10.3138/ijfab.9.1.192 Google Scholar

Busby K. and D. Vun (2010). “Revisiting The Handmaid’s Tale: Feminist Theory meets Empirical Research on Surrogate Mothers”, in: Canadian Journal of Family Law, 26, pp. 13-93.

Google Scholar

Capron A.M. and M.J. Radin (1988). “Choosing Family Law over Contract Law as a Paradigm for Surrogate Motherhood”, in: Law, Medicine & Health Care, 16 (1-2), pp. 34-43.

10.1111/j.1748-720X.1988.tb01048.x Google Scholar

Cooper M. and C. Waldby (2014). Clinical Labor. Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. Durham: Duke University Press.

10.1215/9780822377009 Google Scholar

Coser L.A. (1977). “Georg Simmel’s Neglected Contributions to the Sociology of Women”, in: Signs, 2 (4), pp. 869-876.

10.1086/493416 Google Scholar

Crenshaw K. (1989). “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics”, in: The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989 (1), pp. 139-167.

Google Scholar

Crenshaw K. (1991). “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color”, in: Stanford Law Review, 43 (6), pp. 1241-1299.

10.2307/1229039 Google Scholar

Crozier G.K.D., J.L. Johnson and C. Hajzler (2014). “At the Intersections of Emotional and Biological Labor: Understanding Transnational Commercial Surrogacy as Social Reproduction”, in: IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 7 (2), pp. 45-74.

10.3138/ijfab.7.2.0045 Google Scholar

Dahme H.-J. (1988). “On Georg Simmel’s Sociology of the Sexes”, in: Politics, Culture, and Society, 1 (3), pp. 412-430.

10.1007/BF01385428 Google Scholar

Dahme H.J. (1992). “Georg Simmel e la sociologia dei sessi. Significato della teoria del diritto materno per lo sviluppo della sociologia”, in: Annali di sociologia, II (8), pp. 234-256.

Google Scholar

Dal Lago A. (1994). Il conflitto della modernità. Il pensiero di Georg Simmel. Bologna: il Mulino.

Google Scholar

Davis K. (2008). “Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful”, in: Feminist Theory, 9 (1), pp. 67-85.

10.1177/1464700108086364 Google Scholar

De Simone A. (2002). Georg Simmel. I problemi dell’individualità moderna. Urbino: QuattroVenti.

Google Scholar

Deneault A. (2006). “The Definition of Economy n Simmel’s Philosophy of Money”, in Kim David D. (ed.), Georg Simmel in Translation: Interdisciplinary Border-Crossing in Culture and Modernity. Angerton Gardens, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press, pp. 158-172.

Google Scholar

Dillaway H.E. (2008). “Mothers for Others: A Race, Class and Gender Analysis of Surrogacy”, in: International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 34 (2), pp. 301-326.

Google Scholar

Fellman F. (2015). “Das Ende der Kultur: Wie Georg Simmel den Begriff der Kultur soziologisch dekonstruiert”, in: Zeitschrift für Kulturphilsophie, 9 (1-2), pp. 79-94.

10.28937/1000106694 Google Scholar

Fisher A.M. (2013). “The Journey of Gestational Surrogacy: Religion, Spirituality and Assisted Reproductive Technologies”, in: International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 18 (3), pp. 235-246.

10.1080/1364436X.2013.801831 Google Scholar

Fitzi G. (2012). “A ‘Transnormative’ View of Society: Building: Simmel’s Sociological Epistemology and Philosophical Anthropology of Complex Society”, in: Theory, Culture & Society, 29 (7/8), pp. 177-196.

10.1177/0263276411435571 Google Scholar

Fornari S. (2004). “La cultura soggettiva: femminilità e sessualità in Georg Simmel”, in De Simone A. (ed.), Leggere Simmel. Itinerari filosofici, sociologici ed estetici. Urbino: QuattroVenti, pp. 113-138.

Google Scholar

Frisby D. (1990). “Georg Simmel’s Concept of Society”, in Kaern M., B.S. Phillips and R.S. Cohen (ed.), Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology. Dordrecth: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 39-55.

10.1007/978-94-009-0459-0_4 Google Scholar

Giacomoni P. (2004). “L’Uno e il molteplice nel pensiero sulla differenza sessuale in Georg Simmel”, in: Annali di studi religiosi, 5, pp. 283-294.

Google Scholar

Giacomoni P. (2017). “Per una rilettura del Goethe di Simmel. Tra classico e moderno”, in: Iride, 30 (80), pp. 183-192.

Google Scholar

Grüning B. (2018). “Marianne Weber e la costruzione di una cultura femminile”, in Weber M. (ed.), La donna e la cultura. Questione femminile e partecipazione pubblica. Roma: Armando, pp. 7-50.

Google Scholar

Guizzardi L. (2017). “‘In September, they will start to ask: ‘So you all come here for Christmas?’. Rainbow Families and the Gift of Kinship”, in: Italian Sociological Review, 7 (3), pp. 325-350.

Google Scholar

Guizzardi L. (2018). “Nostro figlio. La maternità surrogata tra dono, diritto e contratto”, in: Quaderni di teoria sociale, 2, pp. 97-101.

Google Scholar

Guizzardi L. and L. Martignani (2012). “Échange, don, réciprocité: l’acte de ‘donner’ chez Simmel et Durkheim”, in: Durkheimian Studies, 18, pp. 98-118.

10.3167/ds.2012.180107 Google Scholar

Gunnarsson Payne J., E. Korolczuk and S. Mezinska (2020). “Surrogacy Relationships: A Critical Interpretative Review”, in: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 125, 2, pp. 183-191.

10.1080/03009734.2020.1725935 Google Scholar

Haesler A.J. (1995). “La monétarisation du monde: une approche simmélienne”, in: Simmel Newsletter, 5 (2), pp. 97-111.

Google Scholar

Horney K. (1926). “The Flight from Womanhood. The Masculinity-Complex in Women as Viewed by Men and by Women”, in: International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 7, pp. 324-339.

Google Scholar

Jouan M. (2017). “L’acceptabilité morale de la gestation pour autrui”, in: Travail, genre et sociétés, 2 (38), pp. 35-52.

10.3917/tgs.038.0035 Google Scholar

Kaern M. (1983). “Understanding Georg Simmel”, in: Sociological Focus, 16 (3), pp. 169-179.

10.1080/00380237.1983.10570447 Google Scholar

Kaern M. (1990). “The World as Human Construction”, in Kaern M., B.S. Phillips and R.S. Cohen (ed.), Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology. Dordrecth: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 75-98.

10.1007/978-94-009-0459-0_6 Google Scholar

Khader S.J. (2013). “Intersectionality and the Ethics of Transnational Commercial Surrogacy”, in: IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 6 (1), pp. 68-90.

10.3138/ijfab.6.1.68 Google Scholar

Lee M. and D. Silver (2012). “Simmel’s Law of the Individual Ethics of the Relational Self”, in: Theory, Culture & Society, 29 (7/8), pp. 124-145.

10.1177/0263276411435569 Google Scholar

Lewin E. (2009). Gay Fatherhood. Narratives of Family and Citizenship in America. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

10.7208/chicago/9780226476599.001.0001 Google Scholar

Lichtblau K. (1989). “Eros and Culture: Gender Theory in Simmel, Tönnies and Weber”, in: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought, 82, pp. 89-110.

10.3817/1289082089 Google Scholar

Lorenzetti A. (2015). “Coppie same-sex e fecondazione assistita: la progressiva decostruzione del paradigma familiare”, in Azzalini M. (ed.), La procreazione assistita, dieci anni dopo. Evoluzioni e nuove sfide. Ariccia (Roma): Aracne, pp. 103-129.

Google Scholar

Martignani L. (2014). “Dell’inesistenza della società perfetta come perfetta società (Ovvero come imparai a non preoccuparmi e ad amare la forma)”, in Martignani L. and D. Ruggieri (ed.), Georg Simmel. Il problema della sociologia. Milano-Udine: Mimesis, pp. 119-145.

Google Scholar

McCall L. (2005). “The Complexity of Intersectionality”, in: Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30 (3), pp. 1771-1800.

10.1086/426800 Google Scholar

McElroy R. (2002). “Whose Body, Whose Nation? Surrogate Motherhood and its Representation”, in: European Journal of Cultural Studies, 5 (3), pp. 325-342.

10.1177/1364942002005003068 Google Scholar

McNamee S. and M. Glasser (1987). “The Power Concept in Sociology: A Theoretical Assessment”, in: Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 15 (1), pp. 79-104.

Google Scholar

Merchant J. (2017). “Une gestation pour autrui «éthique» est possible”, in: Travail, genre et sociétés, 2 (38), pp. 183-189.

10.3917/tgs.028.0183 Google Scholar

Millson J.A. (2009). “The Reflexive Relativism of Georg Simmel”, in: The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 23 (3), pp. 180-207.

10.2307/jspecphil.23.3.0180 Google Scholar

Oakes G. (1984). “The Problem of Women in Simmel’s Theory of Culture”, in Simmel G. (trans. and ed. Oakes G.), On Women, Sexuality and Love, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 3-64.

Google Scholar

Oliver K. (1989). “Marxism and Surrogacy”, in: Hypatia, 4 (3), pp. 95-115.

10.1111/j.1527-2001.1989.tb00594.x Google Scholar

Pande A. (2014). Wombs in Labor. Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India, New York: Columbia University Press.

10.7312/pand16990 Google Scholar

Partyga D. (2016). “Simmel’s Reading of Nietzsche: The Promise of ‘Philosophical Sociology’”, in: Journal of Classical Sociology, 16 (4), pp. 414-437.

10.1177/1468795X16656267 Google Scholar

Pateman C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Google Scholar

Peterson J. (2016). “Baby M: American feminists respond to a controversial case”, in: Journal of Women’s History, 28 (2), pp. 103-125.

10.1353/jowh.2016.0020 Google Scholar

Patil V. (2013). “From Patriarchy to Intersectionality: A Transnational Feminist Assessment of How Fare We’ve Really Come”, in: Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38 (4), pp. 847-867.

10.1086/669560 Google Scholar

Prandini R. (1998). Le radici fiduciarie del legame sociale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Google Scholar

Pyyhtinen O. (2016). “The Real as Relation: Simmel as a Pioneer of Relation Sociology”, in Kemple T. and O. Pyyhtinen (ed.), The Anthem Companion to Georg Simmel. London: Anthem Press, pp. 101-120.

Google Scholar

Radin M.J. (1995). “What, if Anything, Is Wrong with Baby Selling?”, in: Pacific Law Journal, 26, pp. 135-145.

Google Scholar

Ragoné H. (1994). Surrogate Motherhood. Conception in the Heart. Boudler-San Francisco-Oxford: Westview Press.

Google Scholar

Ragoné H. (2003). “The Gift of Life: Surrogate Motherhood, Gamete Donation and Constructions of Altruism”, in Layne L. (ed.), Transformative Motherhood: On Giving and Getting in a Consumer Culture. New York: New York University Press, pp. 209-226.

Google Scholar

Rozée V. (2018). “La gestation pour autrui en Indie, un révélateur de la condition des femmes dans le pays”, in Côté I., K. Lavoie and J. Courduriès (ed.), Perspectives internationales sur la gestation pour autrui. Expériences des personnes concernées et contextes d’action. Presses de l’Université du Québec, pp. 167-188.

10.1515/9782760548893-009 Google Scholar

Rudrappa S. (2015). Discounted Life: The Price of Global Surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press.

10.18574/nyu/9781479879489.001.0001 Google Scholar

Ruggieri D. (2014). “Lo sguardo dell’altro. Il problema della sociologia in Georg Simmel (Ovvero la sociologia come problema)”, in Martignani L. and D. Ruggieri (ed.), Georg Simmel. Il problema della sociologia. Milano-Udine: Mimesis, pp. 9-37.

Google Scholar

Ruggieri D. (2016). La sociologia relazionale di Georg Simmel. La relazione come forma sociale vitale. Milano-Udine: Mimesis.

Google Scholar

Ruggieri D. (2017). “Georg Simmel and the ‘Relational Turn’. Contributions to the Foundation of the Lebenssoziologie since Simmel”, in: Simmel Studies, 21 (1), pp. 43-71.

10.7202/1041336ar Google Scholar

Ruggieri D. (2019). “La chiave e il martello: vita e tragedia degli oggetti culturali nella teoria sociologica di Georg Simmel”, in: Im@go. A Journal of the Social Imaginary, 13 (VIII), pp. 20-38.

Google Scholar

Schermer H. and D. Jary (2013). Form and Dialectic in Georg Simmel’s Sociology. A New Interpretation, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

10.1057/9781137276025 Google Scholar

Scott E.S. (2009). “Surrogacy and the Politics of Commodification”, in: Law and Contemporary Problems, 72, pp. 109-146.

Google Scholar

Segalen M. (2017). “Pourquoi la gestation pour autrui dite ‘éthique’ ne peut être”, in: Travail, genre et sociétés, 2 (38), pp. 53-73.

10.3917/tgs.038.0053 Google Scholar

Silver D., M. Lee and M.R. Moore (2007). “The View of Life: A Simmelian Reading of Simmel’s ‘Testament’”, in: Simmel Studies, 17 (2), pp. 262-290.

Google Scholar

Silver D. and M. Brocic (2019). “Three Concepts of Form in Simmel’s Sociology”, in: The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory, 94 (2), pp. 114-124.

10.1080/00168890.2019.1585666 Google Scholar

Simmel G. (1896). “Sur quelques relations de la pensée théorique avec les intérêts pratiques”, in: Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 4 (2), pp. 160-178.

Google Scholar

Simmel G. [1902] (1984). “Female Culture”, in Simmel G., (trans. and ed. Oakes G.), On Women, Sexuality and Love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 65-101.

Google Scholar

Simmel G. [1911] (1984). “The Relative and the Absolute in the Problem of the Sexes”, in (trans. and ed. Oakes G.), On Women, Sexuality and Love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 102-132.

Google Scholar

Simmel G. [1918] (1997). Intuizioni della vita. Quattro capitoli metafisici. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.

Google Scholar

Simmel G. [1900] (2004). The Philosophy of Money, ed. by. Frisby D., 3^rd edition. London-New York: Routledge.

Google Scholar

Simmel G. (2008). Briefe 1912-1918. GSG 22.

Google Scholar

Simmel G. [1983] (2009). Sociology. Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms, 2 Vols., ed. By Blasi A.J., Jacobs A.K., Kanjirathinkal M. Leiden: Brill.

10.1163/ej.9789004173217.i-698 Google Scholar

Simmel G. [1916] (2012). “The Fragmentary Character of Life”, in: Theory, Culture & Society, 29 (7/8), pp. 237-248.

10.1177/0263276412457432 Google Scholar

Stoetzler M. (2016). “Intersectional Individuality: Georg Simmel’s Concept of ‘The Intersection of Social Circles’ and the Emancipation of Women”, in: Sociological Inquiry, 86 (2), pp. 216-240.

10.1111/soin.12110 Google Scholar

Stoetzler M. (2017). “From Interacting Systems to a System of Division: The Concept of Society and the ‘Mutual Constitution’ of Intersecting Social Divisions”, in: European Journal of Social Theory, 20 (4), pp. 455-472.

10.1177/1368431016647970 Google Scholar

Théry I. (2010). Des humaines comme les autres. Bioétique, anonymat et genre du don. Paris: Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales.

10.4000/books.editionsehess.1538 Google Scholar

Toledano S.J. and K. Zeiler (2017). “Hosting the Others’ Child? Relational Work and Embodied Responsibility in Altruistic Surrogate Motherhood”, in: Feminist Theory, 18 (2), pp. 159-175.

10.1177/1464700117700048 Google Scholar

Türk R. and F. Terzioglu (2014). “Ethical Issues in the Surrogate Maternity Practice”, in: Caucasican Journal of Sciences, 1 (1), pp. 98-108.

Google Scholar

Vromen S. (1990). “Georg Simmel and the Cultural Dilemma of Women”, in Kaern M., B.S. Phillips and R.S. Cohen (ed.), Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology. Dordrecth: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 319-340.

10.1007/978-94-009-0459-0_18 Google Scholar

van Vucht Tijssen L. (1991). “Women and Objective Culture: Georg Simmel and Marianne Weber”, in: Theory, Culture & Society, 8, pp. 203-218.

10.1177/026327691008003014 Google Scholar

Walker R. and L. van Zyl (2017). Towards a Professional Model of Surrogate Motherhood. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

10.1057/978-1-137-58658-2 Google Scholar

Weber M. [1913] (2018). La donna e la cultura. Questione femminile e partecipazione pubblica, trans. and ed. by Grüning B. Roma: Armando.

Google Scholar

Weber M. (2003). “Authority and Autonomy in Marriage” trans. and ed. by Bermingham C.R., in: Sociological Theory, 21 (2), pp. 85-102.

10.1111/1467-9558.00179 Google Scholar

Witz A. (2001). “Georg Simmel and the Masculinity of Modernity”, in: Journal of Classical Sociology, 1 (3), pp. 353-370.

10.1177/14687950122232585 Google Scholar

Witzleb N. and A. Chawla (2015). “Surrogacy in India: Strong Demand, Weak Laws”, in Gerber P. and K. O’Byrne (ed.), Surrogacy, Law and Human Rights. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 167-191.

Google Scholar

Zelizer V.A. (2010). Economic Lives: How Culture shapes the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

10.23943/princeton/9780691139364.001.0001 Google Scholar

Mother, Mothers: Forms and Contents of Maternity. A Simmelian Interpretation of Surrogate Motherhood[Notice]

Abstract

Bibliography

Résumés

Abstract

Parties annexes

Bibliography

Outils de citation

Citer cet article

Exporter la notice de cet article