ror.org/025r5qe02
Résumés
Abstract
Over the past several decades, industrial relations (IR) scholars have consistently advocated for better integration of their conflict theory and empirical research with that of the neighbouring discipline of organizational behaviour (OB). Achievement of such a goal has nonetheless been a continuing challenge. Offering a novel perspective on the quest for integration, this paper categorizes the distinct and dissimilar conceptual norms of conflict in IR and OB, concluding that conceptualizations of conflict in the two disciplines are built upon irreconcilable logics. Although a unified conceptualization of conflict across these differing logics is not possible, a better understanding of their irreconcilability could facilitate a more robust and ultimately fruitful dialogue among IR and OB researchers.
Summary
Over the past several decades, industrial relations (IR) scholars have consistently advocated for better integration of their theory and empirical research on conflict with that of the neighbouring discipline of organizational behaviour (OB). Achievement of such a goal has nonetheless been a continuing challenge.
Offering a novel perspective on the quest for integration, this paper categorizes the distinct and dissimilar conceptual norms of conflict in IR and OB. Conflict is normally spatial in IR and temporal in OB. In IR, the existence of conflict is commonly determined by the observer (i.e., the researchers). In OB, it is determined by the observed (i.e., the parties in the workplace, be they individuals, teams or organizations).
This paper argues that conceptual norms of conflict in IR and OB are built upon distinct, irreconcilable logics. The norm in IR is labelled a Spatial/Observer-determined (SO) logic, while the norm in OB is labelled a Temporal/Party-determined (TP) logic. The SO logic conceptualizes conflict spatially as a situation or state of affairs that can be determined by a researcher or other observer. Conflict itself is conceptualized as existing spatially among opposing interests, objectives or values. Alternatively, the norm in OB research is to utilize a TP logic that conceptualizes conflict as a temporal process between or among opposing parties, who determine when it begins and ends. Although a unified conceptualization of conflict across these differing logics is not possible, a better understanding of their irreconcilability could facilitate a more robust and ultimately fruitful dialogue among IR and OB researchers.
Keywords:
- organizational theory,
- industrial relations theory,
- organizational behaviour,
- organizational conflict
Parties annexes
References
- Alblas, Gert and Ella Wijsman (2021) Organisational Behaviour. 2nd Ed. Groningen: Noordhoff.10.4324/9781003194736 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Avgar, Ariel C. (2020) “Integrating Conflict: A Proposed Framework for the Interdisciplinary Study of Workplace Conflict and Its Management.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 73(2), 281–311.10.1177/0019793919885819 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Avgar, Ariel C. and Alexander J. S. Colvin (2017) “Introduction: Toward an Integration of Conflict Research.” In Ariel C. Avgar and Alexander J. S. Colvin (eds.), Conflict Management (Volume 1). New York: Routledge, pp. 1-37.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Avgar, Ariel C. and Eric J. Neuman (2015) “Seeing Conflict: A Study of Conflict Accuracy in Work Teams.” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 8(2), 65–84.10.1111/ncmr.12048 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Batstone, Eric (1979) “The Organization of Conflict.” In Geoffrey Stephenson & Christopher Brotherton (eds.), Industrial Relations: A Social Psychological Approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 55-74.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Bendersky, Corinne, Julia B. Bear, Kristin J. Behfar, Laurie R. Weingart, Gergana Todorova and Karen A. Jehn (2014) “Identifying Gaps Between the Conceptualization of Conflict and Its Measurement.” In Oluremi Bolanle Ayoko, Neal M. Ashkanasy and Karen A. Jehn (eds.), Handbook of Conflict Management Research. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 79-89.10.4337/9781781006948.00012 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Bradley, Bret H., Heather J. Anderson, John E. Bauer and Anthony C. Klotz (2015) “When Conflict Helps: Integrating Evidence for Beneficial Conflict in Groups and Teams Under Three Perspectives.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19(4), 243–272.10.1037/gdn0000033 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Bray, Mark, John W. Budd and Johanna Macneil (2020) “The Many Meanings of Co-Operation in the Employment Relationship and Their Implications.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 58(1), 114–141.10.1111/bjir.12473 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Budd, John W. (2020) “The Psychologisation of Employment Relations, Alternative Models of the Employment Relationship, and the OB Turn.” Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 73–83.10.1111/1748-8583.12274 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Budd, John W. and Devasheesh Bhave (2019) “The Employment Relationship: Key Elements, Alternative Frames of Reference, and Implications for HRM.” In Adrian Wilkinson, Nicolas Bacon, Scott A. Snell and David P. Lepak (eds.), SAGE Handbook of Human Resource Management (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 41-64.10.4135/9781529714852.n4 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Budd, John W., Alexander J. S. Colvin and Dionne Pohler (2020) “Advancing Dispute Resolution by Understanding the Sources of Conflict: Toward an Integrated Framework.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 73(2), 254–280.10.1177/0019793919866817 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Chamberlain, Neil W. (1944) “The Nature and Scope of Collective Bargaining.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 58(2), 359–387.10.2307/1882846 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Contu, Alessia (2019) “Conflict and Organization Studies.” Organization Studies, 40(10), 1145–1462.10.1177/0170840617747916 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel (1991) “The Impact on Economic Performance of a Transformation in Workplace Relations.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44(2), 241–260.10.1177/001979399104400204 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- De Dreu, Carsten K. W. and Michele J. Gelfand (2008) “Conflict in the Workplace: Sources, Functions, and Dynamics Across Multiple Levels of Analysis.” In Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Michele J. Gelfand (eds.), The Psychology of Conflict and Conflict Management in Organizations. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 3-54.10.4324/9780203810125 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- DeChurch, Leslie A., Jessica R. Mesmer-Magnus and Dan Doty (2013) “Moving Beyond Relationship and Task Conflict: Toward a Process-State Perspective.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 559–578.10.1037/a0032896 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Edwards, Paul (1992) “Industrial Conflict: Themes and Issues in Recent Research.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 30(3), 361–404.10.1111/j.1467-8543.1992.tb00781.x Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Farber, Henry S. and Harry C. Katz (1979) “Interest Arbitration, Outcomes, and the Incentive to Bargain.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 33(1), 55–63.10.1177/001979397903300105 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Fox, Alan (1974) Beyond Contract: Work, Power, and Trust Relations. London: Farber & Farber.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Frangi, Lorenzo, Sung-Chul Noh and Robert Hebdon (2018) “A Pacified Labour? The Transformation of Labour Conflict.” In Adrian Wilkinson, Tony Dundon, Jimmy Donaghey and Alexander J. S. Colvin (eds.), Routledge Companion to Employment Relations. New York: Routledge, pp. 285-303.10.4324/9781315692968-18 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Gall, Gregor and Robert Hebdon (2008) “Conflict at Work.” In Paul Blyton, Nicolas Bacon, Jack Fiorito and Edmund Heery (eds.), SAGE Handbook of Industrial Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 588-603.10.4135/9781849200431.n31 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Godard, John (2014) “The Psychologisation of Employment Relations?” Human Resource Management Journal, 24(1), 1–18.10.1111/1748-8583.12030 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hartley, Jean (1988) “Psychology and Industrial Relations: Social Processes in Organisations.” International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 4(1), 53–60.10.54648/IJCL1988006 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Heery, Edmund (2016) Framing Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199569465.001.0001 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Jehn, Karen A. (1995) “A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282.10.2307/2393638 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Jehn, Karen A. (1997) “A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530–557.10.2307/2393737 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Jehn, Karen A., Lindred L. Greer, Sheen Levine and Gabriel Szulanski (2008) “The Effects of Conflict Types, Dimensions, and Emergent States on Group Outcomes.” Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(6), 465–495.10.1007/s10726-008-9107-0 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Katz, Harry C. (2020) “Introduction to a Special Issue on Conflict and Its Resolution in the Changing World of Work: Honoring Professor David Lipsky.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 73(2), 253.10.1177/0019793919896790 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Katz, Harry C., Thomas A. Kochan and Alexander J.S. Colvin (2017) An Introduction to U.S. Collective Bargaining and Labor Relations. 5th Ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501713880 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Kochan, Thomas A. (1998) “What is Distinctive about Industrial Relations Research?” In Keith Whitfield and George Strauss (eds.), Researching the World of Work. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 31-45.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Kochan, Thomas A., Harry C. Katz and Robert B. McKersie (1986) The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Kochan, Thomas A., Christine A. Riordan, Alexander M. Kowalski, Mahreen Khan and Duanyi Yang (2019) “The Changing Nature of Employee and Labor-Management Relationships.” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 195–219.10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015335 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Mikkelsen, Elisabeth N. and Stewart Clegg (2018) “Unpacking the Meaning of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research.” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 11(3), 185–203.10.1111/ncmr.12127 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Mikkelsen, Elisabeth N. and Stewart Clegg (2019) “Conceptions of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research: Toward Critical Reflexivity.” Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 166–179.10.1177/1056492617716774 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Nieto-Guerrero, Manuel, Mirko Antino and Jose M. Leon-Perez (2019) “Validation of the Spanish Version of the Intragroup Conflict Scale (ICS-14).” International Journal of Conflict Management, 30(1), 24–44.10.1108/IJCMA-11-2017-0139 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- O’Neill, Thomas A. and Matthew J. W. McLarnon (2018) “Optimizing Team Conflict Dynamics for High Performance Teamwork.” Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 378–394.10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.06.002 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Park, Semin, John E. Mathieu and Travis J. Grosser (2020) “A Network Conceptualization of Team Conflict.” Academy of Management Review, 45(2), 352–375.10.5465/amr.2016.0472 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Pondy, Louis R. (1967) “Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(2), 296–320.10.2307/2391553 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Riordan, Christine A. and Alexander M. Kowalski (2021) “From Bread and Roses to #METOO: Multiplicity, Distance, and the Changing Dynamics of Conflict in IR Theory.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 74(3), 580–606.10.1177/0019793920970868 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Strauss, George (1977) “The Study of Conflict: Hope for a New Synthesis Between Industrial Relations and Organizational Behavior?” In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association. Madison: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 329-337.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Tapia, Maite, Christian L. Ibsen and Thomas A. Kochan (2015) “Mapping the Frontier of Theory in Industrial Relations: the Contested Role of Worker Representation.” Socio-Economic Review, 13(1), 157–184.10.1093/ser/mwu036 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Thomas, Kenneth W. (1976) “Conflict and Conflict Management.” In Marvin D. Dunnette (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 889-935.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Thomas, Kenneth W. (1992) “Conflict and Conflict Management: Reflections and Update.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 265–274.10.1002/job.4030130307 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Walton, Richard E. and Robert B. McKersie (1965) A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Weingart, Laurie R., Kristin J. Behfar, Corinne Bendersky, Gergana Todorova and Karen A. Jehn (2015) “The Directness and Oppositional Intensity of Conflict Expression.” Academy of Management Review, 40(2), 235–262.10.5465/amr.2013-0124 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar