Résumés
Résumé
Alors que la confiance organisationnelle est appréhendée comme un élément central à toute relation d’échange, elle n’a pas été étudiée dans le cadre d’une approche globale de l’échange social employeur-employé. Cet article vise à préciser le concept de confiance organisationnelle et à montrer son rôle lorsque l’organisation fait preuve de bienveillance à l’égard de ses employés. Le rôle médiateur de la confiance entre le soutien organisationnel perçu et les attitudes au travail est tout particulièrement étudié. Les résultats obtenus auprès de 249 cadres et gestionnaires confirment que la confiance en l’organisation est au coeur du processus d’échange social, et se présente comme une variable intermédiaire nécessaire pour expliquer l’engagement organisationnel et l’intention de quitter l’entreprise.
Mots-clés:
- soutien organisationnel perçu,
- engagement organisationnel,
- intention de quitter,
- rétention du personnel
Summary
Several studies show a decrease in employees’ trust toward their organization; in parallel, organizations want to develop a long-term employment relationship to remain competitive in a context of employee shortage (Robinson and Rousseau, 1994). How can organizations develop a high level of organizational trust among their employees?
In this article, we propose to integrate organizational trust—defined as “the willingness of the employee to be vulnerable to the actions of the organization” (Mayer, Davis and Schoorman, 1995)—into a chain of relationships between HRM practices, perceived organizational support (POS) and two attitudes that reflect a long-term link with the organization: affective commitment and intention to quit. Our hypotheses suggest that organizational trust will partially mediate the link between POS and employees’ attitudes (i.e., affective commitment and intention to quit). As many past studies found a direct link between POS, affective commitment and intention to quit (Eisenberger et al., 1986, 1997, 2001; Rhoades, Eisenberger and Armeli, 2001; Shore and Tetrick, 1991; Shore and Wayne, 1993; Wayne, Shore and Liden, 1997), we expect that the mediation will be partial. A direct and negative link is also expected between affective commitment and intention to quit. Finally, the chain of relationships identifies two examples of HRM practices—skills development practices and communication practices—as potential antecedents of organizational trust (Lamsa and Pucetaite, 2006) and POS (Allen, Shore and Griffeth, 2003). HRM practices generate a perception of support favourable to trust, because those practices illustrate the attention the organization gives to employees.
The chain of relationships is tested with a three-wave longitudinal design that is more appropriate for the study of causal relations between variables than a cross-sectional design. We used AMOS 4.01 software to test two alternative models: the first model does not include organizational trust in path analyses; the second model includes this variable in the structural equation model. Results show that the second model has better fit indexes than the first model (Chi 2 = 170.79; RMSEA = 0.05; CFI = 0.97; GFI = 0.93). We validate that organizational trust partially mediates the relationship between POS and affective commitment, and fully mediates the relationship between POS and intention to quit.
The last part of the article aims to discuss results. We focus the discussion on three major contributions: (1) the integration into one unique model of several research fields that were tested only separately in the past; (2) the mediating role of trust in this chain of relationships; (3) the use of a longitudinal design that provides guaranties about the direction of tested relationships. Despite these strengths, our research has several limitations; specifically, we did not control risks of common variance for the answers given in the same questionnaire.
Keywords:
- perceived organizational support (POS),
- organizational commitment,
- intention to quit,
- retention of employees
Resumen
Aunque la confianza organizacional es asumida como elemento central de toda relación de intercambio, ella no ha sido estudiada en el marco de un enfoque global del intercambio social empleador – empleado. Este artículo se propone precisar el concepto de confianza organizacional y mostrar el rol que ella puede jugar cuando la organización hace prueba de benevolencia respecto a sus empleados. Se estudia particularmente el rol mediador de la confianza entre el apoyo organizacional percibido y las actitudes en el trabajo. Los resultados obtenidos a partir de una muestra de 249 directivos y gerentes confirman que la confianza en la organización se sitúa al centro del proceso de intercambio social y se presenta como una variable intermediaria necesaria para explicar la implicación organizacional y la intención de dejar la empresa.
Palabras claves:
- apoyo organizacional percibido,
- implicación organizacional,
- intención de abandonar el empleo,
- retención del personal
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Allen, David, Lynn Shore et Roger Griffeth. 2003. « The Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Supportive Human Resource Practices in the Turnover Process ». Journal of Management, 29, 99–118.10.1177/014920630302900107 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Allen, Natalie et John Meyer. 1990. « The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization ». Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Allen, Natalie et John Meyer. 1996. « Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: An Examination of the Construct Validity ». Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252–276.10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Aryee, Samuel, Pawan Budhwar et Zhen Xiong Chen. 2002. « Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model ». Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 267–285.10.1002/job.138 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Becker, Thomas. 2005. « Potential Problems in the Statistical Control of Variables in Organizational Research: A Qualitative Analysis with Recommendations ». Organizational Research Methods, 8, 274–289.10.1177/1094428105278021 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Blau, Peter. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.10.1177/014920639101700307 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Butler, John. 1991. « Toward Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust: Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory ». Journal of Management, 17, 643–663.10.1177/014920639101700307 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline. 2002. « A Psychological Contract Perspective on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour ». Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 927–946.10.1002/job.173 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline et Neil Conway. 2005. « Exchange Relationships: Examining Psychological Contracts and Perceived Organizational Support ». Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 774–781.10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.774 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Cropanzano, Russell et Marie Mitchell. 2005. « Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review ». Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.10.1177/0149206305279602 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Dalton, Dan, Jonathan Johnson et Catherine Daily. 1999. « On the Use of “Intent to…” Variables in Organizational Research: An Empirical and Cautionary Assessment ». Human Relations, 52, 1337–1350.10.1177/001872679905201006 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Deluga, Ronald. 1994. « Supervisor Trust Building, Leader-Member Exchange and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour ». Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 315–326.10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00570.x Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Dirks, Kurt et Donald Ferrin. 2002. « Trust in Leadership: Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice ». Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (4), 611–628.10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Eisenberger, Robert, Robert Huntington, Steven Hutchinson et Debora Sowa. 1986. « Perceived Organizational Support ». Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Eisenberger, Robert, Peter Fasolo et Valerie Davis-LaMastro. 1990. « Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation ». Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51–59.10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Eisenberger, Robert, Jim Cummings, Stephen Armeli et Patrick Lynch. 1997. « Perceived Organizational Support, Discretionary Treatment and Job Satisfaction ». Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 812–820.10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.812 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Eisenberger, Robert, Stephen Armeli, Barbara Rexwinkel, Patrick Lynch et Linda Rhoades. 2001. « Reciprocation of Perceived Organisational Support ». Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1), 42–51.10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Flynn, Francis. 2005. « Identity Orientations and Forms of Social Exchange in Organizations ». Academy of Management Review, 30, 737–750.10.5465/AMR.2005.18378875 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Foa, Uriel et Edna Foa. 1974. Societal Structures of the Mind. Springfield: Charles Thomas.10.1177/1059601101261004 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Frank, Frederic, Richard Finnegan et Craig Taylor. 2004. « The Race for Talents: Retaining and Engaging Workers in the 21st Century ». Human Resource Planning, 27 (3), 65–78.10.1177/014920630002600305 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Fuller, Jerry, Kim Hester, Tim Barnett, Len Frey, Cathy Relyea et David Beu. 2006. « Perceived External Prestige and Internal Respect: New Insights into the Organizational Identification Process ». Human Relations, 59, 815–846.10.1177/0018726706067148 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Gomez, Carolina et Benson Rosen. 2001. « The Leader-Member Exchange as a Link between Managerial Trust and Employee Empowerment ». Group & Organization Management, 26 (1), 53–69.10.1177/1059601101261004 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Griffeth, Rodger, Peter Hom et Stefan Gaertner. 2000. « A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium ». Journal of Management, 26, 463–488.10.1177/014920630002600305 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Joseph, Errol et Bruce Winston. 2005. « A Correlation of Servant Leadership, Leader Trust, and Organizational Trust ». Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26 (1), 6–22.10.1108/01437730510575552 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Lämsä, Anna-Maija et Raminta Pucetaite. 2006. « Development of Organizational Trust among Employees from a Contextual Perspective ». Business Ethics: A European Review, 15 (2), 130–141.10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00437.x Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Landis, Ronald, Daniel Beal et Paul Tesluk. 2000. « A Comparison of Approaches to Forming Composite Measures in Structural Equation Models ». Organizational Research Methods, 3 (2), 186–207.10.1177/109442810032003 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Levinson, Harry. 1965. « Reciprocation: The Relationship between Man and Organization ». Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 370–390.10.2307/2391032 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Mathieu, Johen et Dennis Zajac. 1990. « A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment ». Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171–194.10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Mayer, Roger et Mark Gavin. 2005. « Trust in Management and Performance: Who Minds the Shop while the Employees Watch their Boss? ». Academy of Management Journal, 48 (5), 874–888.10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803928 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Mayer, Roger, James Davis et David Schoorman. 1995. « An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust ». Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- McAllister, Daniel. 1995. « Affect and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations ». Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.10.2307/256727 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Meyer, John et Natalie Allen. 1991. « A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment ». Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Meyer, John et Natalie Allen. 1997. Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Newbury Park: Sage.10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Meyer, John et Catherine Smith. 2000. « HRM Practices and Organizational Commitment: Test of a Mediation Model ». Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17, 319–331.10.1111/j.1936-4490.2000.tb00231.x Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Meyer, John, Natalie Allen et Catherine Smith. 1993. « Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three-Component Conceptualization ». Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551.10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Moore, Jo. 2000. « One Road to Turnover: An Examination of Work Exhaustion in Technology Professionals ». MIS Quarterly, 24, 141–68.10.2307/3250982 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Pillai, Rajnandini, Terri Scandura et Ethlyn Williams. 1999. « Leadership and Organizational Justice: Similarities and Differences across Cultures ». Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 764–779.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490838 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Rhoades, Linda, Robert Eisenberger et Stephen Armeli. 2001. « Affective Commitment to the Organization: The Contribution of Perceived Organizational Support ». Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825–836.10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Roberson, Quinetta, Neta Moye et Edwin Locke. 1999. « Identifying a Missing Link between Participation and Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Procedural Justice Perceptions ». Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 585–593.10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.585 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Robinson, Sandra. 1996. « Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract ». Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–599.10.2307/2393868 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Robinson, Sandra et Denise Rousseau. 1994. « Violating the Psychological Contract: Not the Exception but the Norm ». Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 245–259.10.1002/job.4030150306 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Rousseau, Denise, Sim Sitkin, Ronald Burt et Colin Camerer. 1998. « Not so Different after All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust ». Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.10.5465/AMR.1998.926617 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Schoorman, David, Roger Mayer et James Davis. 2007. « An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future ». Academy of Management Review, 32 (2), 344–354.10.5465/AMR.2007.24348410 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Shore, Lynn et Lois Tetrick. 1991. « A Construct Validity Study of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support ». Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 637–643.10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.637 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Shore, Lynn et Sandy Wayne. 1993. « Commitment and Employee Behavior: Comparison of Affective and Continuance Commitment with Perceived Organizational Support ». Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 774–780.10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.774 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Shore, Lynn et Ted Shore. 1995. « Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Justice ». Organizational Politics, Justice, and Support: Managing Social Climate at Work. R. Cropanzano et K. Kacmar, dir. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 149–164.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Stinglhamber, Florence, Kathleen Bentein et Christian Vandenberghe. 2002. « Extension of the Three-Component Model of Commitment to Five Foci: Development of Measures and Substantive Test ». European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 123–138.10.1027//1015-5759.18.2.123 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Tett, Robert et John Meyer. 1993. « Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Turnover Intention, and Turnover: Path Analyses Based on Meta-Analytic Findings ». Personnel Psychology, 46, 259–291.10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Wat, Dennis et Margaret Shaffer. 2005. « Equity and Relationship Quality Influences on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors ». Personnel Review, 34 (4), 406–512.10.1108/00483480510599752 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Wayne, Sandy, Lynn Shore et Robert Liden. 1997. « Perceived Organizational Support and Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective ». Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1), 82–112.10.2307/257021 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Whitener, Ellen. 2001. « Do “High Commitment” Human Resource Practices Affect Employee Commitment? A Cross-Level Analysis Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling ». Journal of Management, 27, 515–535.10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00106-4 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Whitener, Ellen, Susan Brodt, Audrey Korsgaard et Jon Werner. 1998. « Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior ». Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 513–530.10.5465/amr.1998.926624 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
