Résumés
Abstract
This paper seeks to revisit the concept of “pedagogy of discomfort” through the combined lenses of Lauren Berlant’s work on “inconvenience” and recent theorization of “affective infrastructure” to clarify how an infrastructural understanding of “discomfort-as-inconvenience” might provide deeper insights about the pedagogical and political risks and possibilities of discomfort. In particular, the paper highlights three insights: first, it expands our understanding of discomfort by situating it in the broader context of the inconvenience of other people, as an ethics and politics of coexistence; second, it calls for a contextual approach of a pedagogy of discomfort that examines discomfort as a multifaceted affective event entangled with other material, social, and political elements; and third, it enables educators to create environments that could enrich the moral and political potential of a pedagogy of discomfort, by paying attention to the affective conditions in which students and educators find themselves when they encounter different manifestations of discomfort-as-inconvenience.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Airton, L. (2018). The de/politicization of pronouns: Implications of the No Big Deal Campaign for gender-expansive educational policy and practice. Gender & Education, 30(6), 790–810.
- Amin, A. (2014). Lively infrastructure. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7), 137–161.
- Amsler, S. (2011). From “therapeutic” to political education: The centrality of affective sensibility in critical pedagogy. Critical Studies in Education, 52(1), 47–63.
- Applebaum, B. (2017). Comforting discomfort as complicity: White fragility and the pursuit of invulnerability. Hypatia, 32(4), 862–875.
- Bailey, A. (2017). Tracking privilege-preserving epistemic pushback in feminist and critical race philosophy classes. Hypatia, 32(4), 876–892.
- Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Berlant, L. (2022). On the inconvenience of other people. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York: Routledge.
- Boler, M. & Zembylas, M. (2003). Discomforting truths: The emotional terrain of understanding differences. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), Pedagogies of difference: Rethinking education for social justice (pp. 110–136). New York: Routledge.
- Bosworth, K. (2023). What is “affective infrastructure”? Dialogues in Human Geography, 13(1), 54–72.
- Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
- Chadwick, R. (2021). On the politics of discomfort. Feminist Theory, 22(4), 556–574.
- Cutri, R., & Whiting, E. (2015). The emotional work of discomfort and vulnerability in multicultural teacher education. Teachers & Teaching: Theory & Practice, 21(8), 1,010–1,025.
- Facer, K., & Buchczyk, M. (2019). Understanding learning cities as discursive, material and affective infrastructures. Oxford Review of Education, 45(2), 168–187.
- Galloway, S., Aslam, A., Campi, A., & Kotef, H. (2022). Lauren Berlant’s legacy in contemporary political theory. Contemporary Political Theory, 22(1), 118–142.
- Hallinan, B., & Gilmore, J. (2021). Infrastructural politics amidst the coils of control. Cultural Studies, 35(4–5), 617–640.
- Harvey, P., & Knox, H. (2015). Roads: An anthropology of infrastructure and expertise. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Haslanger, S. (2020). Failures of methodological individualism: The materiality of social systems. Journal of Social Philosophy, 53(4), 512–534, DOI: 10.1111/josp.12373.
- Head, N. (2020). A “pedagogy of discomfort’?: Experiential learning and conflict analysis in Israel-Palestine. International Studies Perspectives, 21, 78–96.
- Hemmings, C. (2012). Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161.
- Hetherington, K. (Ed.). (2019). Infrastructure, environment, and life in the anthropocene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Larkin, B. (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42(1), 327–343.
- Leibowitz, B., Bozalek, V., Rohleder, P., Carolissen, R., & Swartz, L. (2010). “Ah, but the whiteys love to talk about themselves”: Discomfort as a pedagogy for change. Race Ethnicity & Education, 13(1), 83–100.
- Leonardo, Z., & Porter, R. K. (2010). Pedagogy of fear: Toward a Fanonian theory of “safety” in race dialogue. Race Ethnicity & Education, 13(2), 139–157.
- Matias, C. (2016). Feeling white: Whiteness, emotionality and education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
- Munch-Jurisic, D. M. (2020a). Against comfort: Political and social implications of evading discomfort. Global Discourse, 10(2), 277–297.
- Munch-Jurisic, D. M. (2020b). The right to feel comfortable: Implicit bias and the moral potential of discomfort. Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 23, 237–250.
- Ohito, E. O. (2016). Making the emperor’s new clothes visible in anti-racist teacher education: Enacting a pedagogy of discomfort with white preservice teachers. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(4), 454–467.
- Waghid, Y. (2014). Faith-based education and the notion of autonomy, common humanity and authenticity: In defense of a pedagogy of disruption. In J. Chapman, S. McNamara, M. Reiss, Y. Waghid. (Eds.), International handbook of learning, teaching and leading in faith-based schools (pp. 279–292). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Zeavin, H. (2022). In theory, anyway: Lauren Berlant’s posthumous work on life as it could be. Bookforum (Sept/Oct/Nov 2022), accessed at https://www.bookforum.com/print/2903/lauren-berlant-s-posthumous-work-on-life-as-it-could-be-25066
- Zembylas, M. (2012). Pedagogies of strategic empathy: Navigating through the emotional complexities of antiracism in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(2), 113–125.
- Zembylas, M. (2015). “Pedagogy of discomfort” and its ethical implications: The tensions of ethical violence in social justice education. Ethics & Education, 10(2), 1–12.
- Zembylas, M. (2018). Affect, race, and White discomfort in schooling: Decolonial strategies for “pedagogies of discomfort.” Ethics & Education, 13(1), 86–104.
- Zembylas, M. (2021). Affect and the rise of right-wing populism: Pedagogies for the renewal of democratic education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Zembylas, M., & Boler, M. (2002). On the spirit of patriotism: Challenges of a “pedagogy of discomfort.” Special issue on Education and September 11. Teachers College Record On-line.
- Zembylas, M. & McGlynn, C. (2012). Discomforting pedagogies: Emotional tensions, ethical dilemmas and transformative possibilities. British Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 41-60.
- Zembylas, M. & Papamichael, E. (2017). Teaching for anti-racism by troubling teachers’ comfort zones: discomfort and empathy as pedagogies in teacher professional development. Intercultural Education, 28(1), 1-19.
- Zheng, R. (2016). Attributability, accountability, and implicit bias. In M. Brownstein, and J. Saul (Eds.), Implicit bias and philosophy, vol. 2 (pp. 62–89). New York: Oxford University Press.