Résumés
Abstract
The article reports an empirical inquiry into the rhetorical use of master/counter juxtapositions in narrating an ongoing scene of political action. Drawing on the studies of institutional interaction, it investigates the institutional setting of public political speeches, focusing on the empirical example of Donald Trump’s public speech in the rally after the election results and just before the violent invasion of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. My research approaches master/counter positioning as a multilayered relational constellation of identifications mobilized in the telling and deployed strategically for specific institutional purposes. I am interested in counter-narratives as interpretative discursive frames superimposed on surrounding socio-material circumstances to refute an alternative (pre-existing and prevailing) interpretation of reality. My take on the concept as a multifaceted rhetorical resource subsumes the aspects of an act of contestation, a breach of cultural orders, and a mission towards emancipation, albeit in a slightly modified version of the conventionalized definitions. In the context of political interaction, that is, in institutional activities connected to ongoing processes in policy-making and governance, counter-narratives are world-breaking but they are also world-making in a decidedly concrete consequential manner, firstly, by building on institutional continuities, virtues, and legitimacies, and secondly, by addressing recipients as co-actors, projecting identifications on them and expecting them to assume a role in the political participation field at hand. Applying tools from small story research, membership categorization analysis, epistemic governance and narrative positioning analysis, I explore the purposeful evocation of contrastive storylines in political rhetoric. The article aims to shed light on the argumentative use of counter-narratives in a political line of action.
Keywords:
- identification,
- moral disorder,
- narrative positioning,
- political persuasion,
- public speech
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Biographical note
Hanna Rautajoki works as a university lecturer and a senior researcherat Tampere University, Finland. She holds a PhD in sociology and herinterdisciplinary research work focuses on the use of identifications as rhetorical assets in argumentation. Rautajoki has studied institutionalinteraction, political persuasion, narrative positioning, bodily rhetoric,and cultural membership categorization, published, e.g. in DiscourseStudies, Contemporary Politics, Narrative Inquiry, Semiotics, CriticalPolicy Studies and the Journal of Language and Politics.
Bibliography
- Abbas, A. H. (2019). Super-hyperbolic man: Hyperbole as an ideological discourse strategy in Trump’s speeches. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 32(2), 505-522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09621-8
- Alasuutari, P. (2015). The discursive side of new institutionalism. Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 162–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514561805
- Alasuutari, P. & Qadir, A. (2014). Epistemic governance. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 67–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2014.887986
- Al Dilaimy, H., Al-Rawe, M., & Suleiman, S. (2022). Donald Trump’s Aggressive and Offensive Language Before and After His Inauguration Speeches. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 3(1), 1–9.
- Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional Interaction: Studies of Talk at Work. Ashgate. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315252209
- Asif, N. (2023). The Role of Symbolic Politics in Shaping Political Attitudes. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects/1777/
- Bager, A. S., Lueg K. & Lundholt, M. F. (2021) Concluding remarks: narrative processuality and future research avenues for counter narrative studies. In k. Lueg & M. W. Lundholt (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Counter-Narratives (pp. 442–461). Routledge.
- Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of narrative and life history, 7(1-4), 335–342.
- Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & talk, 28 (3), 377–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
- Bamberg, M., & Wipff, Z. (2020). Reconsidering counter-narratives. In K. Lueg & M. W. Lundholt (Eds.) Routledge handbook of counter-narratives (pp. 70–82). Routledge.
- Begzjav, O., & Nyamsuren, K. (2023). Features of Political Euphemisms in President Donald Trump’s Speeches. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 13(6), 912–923. DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2023.136053
- Björninen, S., Hatavara, M., & Mäkelä, M. (2020). Narrative as social action. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(4), 437–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1721971
- Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press.
- Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
- Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V.A. (2018). Ideational Power and Pathways to Legitimation in the Euro Crisis. Review of International Political Economy 25 (6): 753–778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1512892
- Conklin, M. (2021). Capitol Offense: Is Donald Trump Guilty of Inciting a Riot at the Capitol? U. St. Thomas JL & Pub. Pol'y, 15, 483. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/tjlpp15&div=18&id=&page=
- Davies, B., & Harrè, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.
- Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (eds.) (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge University Press.
- Fanani, A., Setiawan, S., Purwati, O., Maisarah, M., & Qoyyimah, U. (2020). Donald Trump’s grammar of persuasion in his speech. Heliyon, 6(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03082
- Febriana, S. W., & Fajariah, M. F. (2018). The analysis speech acts of Donald Trump’s speech. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 1(5), 573.
- Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
- Garfinkel, H. (2006). Seeing Sociologically. Paradigm.
- Gea, D. (2020). Commissive speech act in Donald Trump’s speech campaign. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 8(2), 350–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34050/jib.v8i2.11781
- Georgakopoulou, A. (2006). Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. Narrative inquiry, 16(1), 122-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.16geo
- Georgakopoulou, A. (2007). Small stories, interaction and identities. (Vol. 8). John Benjamins Publishing.
- Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Harvard University Press.
- Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 2, 115–131.
- Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of Public Sphere. Polity Press.
- Hall, J. (2021). In search of enemies: Donald Trump’s populist foreign policy rhetoric. Politics, 41(1), 48–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720935377
- Hamed, D. M. (2022). Trump's January 6 address: Hate speech or freedom of speech? A transdisciplinary study. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 4(5), 438–456.
- Henricksen, W., & Betz, B. (2022). The stolen election lie and the freedom of speech. Penn Statim, 127, 111. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/statim127&div=10&id=&page=
- Hidalgo-Tenorio, E., & Benítez-Castro, M. Á. (2022). Trump’s populist discourse and affective politics, or on how to move ‘the People’ through emotion. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 20(2), 86–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1861540
- Housley, W. & Fitzgerald, R. (2007). Categorization, interaction, policy and debate. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 187–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464840
- Hyvärinen, M. (2016). Expectations and Experientiality: Jerome Bruner's “Canonicity and Breach”. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 8(2), 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5250/storyworlds.8.2.0001
- Hyvärinen, M. (2020). Toward a Theory of Counter-Narratives: Narrative Contestation, Cultural Canonicity, and Tellability. In K. Lueg & M. Lundholt (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Counter-Narratives (pp. 17–29). Routledge.
- Hyvärinen, M. & Hatavara, M. & Rautajoki, H. (2021). Positioning with Master and Counter-Narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 31(1), 97–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.20014.hyv
- Ivana, P. S. I., & Suprayogi, S. (2020). The representation of Iran and United States in Donald Trump’s speech: A critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 40–45.
- Jayyusi, L. (1984). Categorization and the Moral Order. Routledge.
- Jordan, L. S., & Dykes, D. (2022). “If you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country”: An intersectional settler colonial analysis of Trump’s “Save America” speech and other messages of (non) belonging. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, 22(5), 443–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086221093947
- Kadim, E. N. (2022). A critical discourse analysis of Trump's election campaign speeches. Heliyon, 8(4). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09256
- Krasner, M. A. (2023). Tweets, Taunts, Tirades, and Tantrums: How America’s Donald Trump Transformed Transgressive Language into Political Power. In Debasing Political Rhetoric (pp. 201–218). Springer Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0894-3_12
- König, H. D. (2023). Performing as a Firefighter: Reconstruction of Donald Trump's Speech on the Storming of the Capitol Through Depth Hermeneutics. In Forum: Qualitative Social Research 24(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.3.4029
- Lacatus, C. (2021). Populism and President Trump’s approach to foreign policy: An analysis of tweets and rally speeches. Politics, 41(1), 31–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720935380
- Lee, C. S., Merizalde, J., Colautti, J. D., An, J., & Kwak, H. (2022). Storm the capitol: linking offline political speech and online Twitter extra-representational participation on QAnon and the January 6 insurrection. Frontiers in Sociology, 7, 876070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.876070
- Meretoja, H. (2018). The ethics of storytelling: Narrative hermeneutics, history, and the possible. Oxford University Press.
- Ntontis, E., Jurstakova, K., Neville, F., Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2024). A warrant for violence? An analysis of Donald Trump's speech before the US Capitol attack. British journal of social psychology, 63(1), 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12679
- Phelan, J. (2008). Narratives in contest; or, another twist in the narrative turn. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 123(1), 166-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2008.123.1.166
- Rautajoki, H. (2009). Staging Public Discussion. In Richard Fitzgerald & William Housley (Eds.) Media, Policy and Interaction. Ashgate, 88–109.
- Rautajoki, H. (2012). Membership categorization as a tool for moral casting in TV discussion: The dramaturgical consequentiality of guest introductions. Discourse Studies, 14:2 243–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611433637
- Rautajoki, H. (2022). Relational scaffolding of justifications in policy-making: Deploying the multi standard of identifications in EU policy negotiation. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 11(2), 255–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2022.2142143
- Rautajoki, H. (2023). Actualizing societal membership in imaginary interaction: The ‘real construction of society’ in the opening of current affairs TV discussion. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1228498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1228498
- Rautajoki, H. & Fitzgerald, R. (2022). Populating ‘Solidarity’ in Political Debate: Interrelational Strategies of Persuasion within the European Parliament in the Aftermath of the Brexit. Journal of Language and Politics, 21(5), 763–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21023.rau
- Rautajoki, H. & Hyvärinen M. (2021). Aspects of voice in the use of narrative positioning in polyphonic storytelling. Ventriloquial moves within a biographical interview. Journal of Interdisciplinary Voice Studies 6(1), 55–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/jivs_00037_1
- Rautajoki, H. & Pi Ferrer, L. (2023). Shadowboxing in silence: Balancing with European Semester guidelines in national parliamentary debates on economic policies. Critical Policy Studies. 17 (3), 351–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2101015
- Rautajoki, H., Hatavara, M. & Hyvärinen, M. (2023). Projective small stories invoking policy paths in parliamentary debates: Narrating outcome, performance and responsibilities. In A. Georgakopoulou, K. Giaxoglou & S. Patron (Eds.) Small stories research: Tales, tellings, and tellers across contexts. Routledge, 185–203. DOI: 10.4324/9781003253563-13
- Reyes, A. (2020). I, Trump: The cult of personality, anti-intellectualism and the Post-truth era. Journal of language and politics, 19(6), 869–892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20002.rey
- Reyes, A., & Ross, A. (2021). From the White House with anger: Conversational features in President Trump's official communication. Language & Communication, 77, 46–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.12.003
- Rong, J. (2021). An analysis on stylistic features of Donald Trump’s speech. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(3), 11–18. DOI:10.5539/ijel.v11n3p11
- Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumberz & D. Hymes (Eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics (pp. 325–345). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on Conversation, volumes I and II. (Ed.) G. Jefferson. Blackwell.
- Schaefer, D. O. (2020). Whiteness and civilization: Shame, race, and the rhetoric of Donald Trump. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(1), 1–18.
- Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
- Schmidt, V. (2017). Theorizing ideas and discourse in political science. Critical Review, 29(2), 248–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1366665
- Sigurdardottir, H., & Rautajoki, H. (2024). Embodying scenes of moral disorder: Bodily gestures as a site of signification in feminist TikTok activism. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 6(1), 11–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2024-0002
- Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. The making of modern identity. Harvard University Press
- Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Duke University Press.
- Taylor, M. (2021). Some preliminary thoughts prompted by President Trump’s 6 January Speech: Words, enemies, affordances. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(5), 907–911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1932337
- Valcore, J., Asquith, N. L., & Rodgers, J. (2023). “We’re led by stupid people”: Exploring Trump’s use of denigrating and deprecating speech to promote hatred and violence. Crime, law and social change, 80(3), 237–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-023-10085-y
- Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2018). Is Trump always rambling like a fourth-grade student? Discourse & Society, 29(3), 299–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734659