Résumés
Résumé
La Behavior and Instructional Management Scale (BIMS) développée par Martin et Sass (2010) permet de mesurer les pratiques et les croyances des enseignants en gestion de la classe. Elle est composée de deux dimensions théoriques : la gestion de l’enseignement et la gestion du comportement des élèves. Martin et Sass (2010) ont validé la version anglaise de cet instrument de mesure. L’objectif de cet article est de présenter la chronologie de son évolution, puis de valider sa version française auprès de 338 enseignants qui se forment à l’enseignement au primaire et au secondaire. Les résultats, qui sont discutés en termes de perspectives de recherche, montrent que la traduction française de la BIMS obtient des indicateurs de qualités psychométriques proches de ceux rapportés par Martin et Sass (2010).
Mots-clés :
- gestion de la discipline,
- gestion du comportement des élèves,
- gestion de l’enseignement,
- instrument de mesure
Abstract
Martin and Sass (2010) have construct-validated the Behavior and Instructional Management Scale (BIMS), an instrument that facilitates assessment of teachers’ beliefs and practices in classroom management. This scale is subdivided into two independent theoretical constructs: instructional management and behavior management. Our aim is to report on the evolution of the scale and to validate its French translated version. In this perspective, we collected data from a sample containing 338 pre-service elementary and secondary school graduating teachers. Results show that the French translated version of the BIMS obtains psychometric properties that are close to those observed by Martin and Sass (2010). These results are discussed in terms of research perspectives.
Keywords:
- behavior management,
- instructional management,
- measurement scale
Resumo
A Behavior and Instructional Management Scale (BIMS) desenvolvida por Martin e Sass (2010) permite medir as práticas e as crenças dos professores na gestão da sala de aula. Trata-se de uma escala composta por duas dimensões teóricas: a gestão do ensino e a gestão dos comportamento dos alunos. Martin e Sass (2010) validaram a versão anglófona deste instrumento de medida. O objetivo deste artigo é validar a sua versão francesa, apresentando também a cronologia da sua evolução. Neste sentido, recolheram-se dados de uma amostra de 338 professores em formação inicial para o ensino básico e secundário. Os resultados, que são discutidos em termos de perspectivas de investigação, mostram que a tradução francesa do BIMS obtém indicadores com qualidades psicométricas próximas das observadas por Martin e Sass (2010).
Palavras chaves:
- gestão da disciplina,
- gestão das abordagens pedagógicas,
- instrumento de medida
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
- Browne, M. W., & Cudek, R. (1993). Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47-65. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0013188960380104
- Furr, M. (2011). Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. London, UK: Sage. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446287866
- Glickman, C. D., & Tamashiro, R. T. (1980). Clarifying teachers’ beliefs about discipline. Educational Leadership, 37, 459-464.
- Henson, R. K. (2003). Relationships between preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, task analysis, and classroom management beliefs. Research in the Schools, 10(1), 53-62.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Laveault, D. (2012). Soixante ans de bon et mauvais usages du alpha de Cronbach. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 35(2), 1-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1024716ar
- Martin, N. K., & Baldwin, B. (1993a, April). Validation of an Inventory of Classroom Management Style: Differences between novice and experienced teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
- Martin, N. K., & Baldwin, B. (1993b, November). An examination of the construct validity of the Inventory of Classroom Management Style. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
- Martin, N. K., & Baldwin, B. (1994, January). Beliefs regarding Classroom Management Style: Differences between novice and experienced teachers. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.
- Martin, N. K., & Sass, D. A. (2010). Construct validation of the Behavior and Instructional Management Scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1124-1135. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.12.001
- Martin, N. K., & Yin, Z. (1997, January). Attitudes and Beliefs regarding Classroom Management Style: Differences between male and female teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX.
- Martin, N. K., Yin, Z., & Baldwin, B. (1998a, April). Classroom management training, class size and graduate study: Do these variables impact teachers’ beliefs regarding classroom management style? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
- Martin, N. K., Yin, Z., & Baldwin, B. (1998b). Construct validation of the Attitudes and Beliefs on Classroom Control Inventory. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 33(2), 6-15.
- Martin, N. K., Yin, Z., & Mayall, H. (2007). The Attitudes and Beliefs on Classroom Control Inventory revised and revisited: A continuation of construct validation. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 42(2), 11-20.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles,CA: Muthén & Muthén.
- Ritter, J. T., & Hancock, D. R. (2007). Exploring the relationship between certification sources, experience levels, and classroom management orientations of classroom teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1206-1216. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.013
- Savran, A., & Cakiroglu, J. (2003). Differences between elementary and secondary preservice teachers’ perceived efficacy beliefs and their classroom management beliefs. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(4), 15-20.
- Sokal, L., Smith, D. G., & Mowat, H. (2003). Alternative certification teachers’ attitudes toward classroom management. The High School Journal, 86(3), 8-16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2003.0004
- Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1
- Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118356258.ch1
- Wolfgang, C. H., & Glickman, C. D. (1986). Solving discipline problems: Strategies for classroom teachers (2nd ed.). Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Yilmaz, H., & Çavaş, P. H. (2008). The effect of the teaching practice on pre-service elementary teachers’ science teaching efficacy and classroom management beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,4(1), 45-54.
10.7202/1024716ar