Résumés
Abstract
This study aims to analyze how work digitalization and technological innovations influence the training engineering and professionalization processes in the Bachelor's degree in Sociology. A qualitative methodology based on Sociotechnical Discourse Analysis (SDA) was used to examine the relationship between technology and society and how these dynamics affect academic training in Sociology. The main findings reveal significant institutional resistance to adopting digital technologies (DT) and curricular changes, as well as a perception of digitalization as a temporary solution. Barriers such as gerontocracy, inadequate technological infrastructure, and an incentive system that discourages collaboration were identified. The conclusions underscore the urgent need to modernize the Sociology curriculum to include advanced digital competencies and foster a culture of innovation. It is recommended to implement pedagogical strategies that include the DT transversal use, continuous training programs for teachers, and a comprehensive curricular reform.
Keywords:
- work digitalization,
- digital competencies,
- educational innovation,
- digital sociology
Résumé
Cette étude vise à analyser comment la digitalisation du travail et les innovations technologiques influencent les ingénieries de formation et les processus de professionnalisation dans le cadre du diplôme de licence en sociologie. Une méthodologie qualitative basée sur l'analyse du discours sociotechnique (ADS) a été utilisée pour examiner la relation entre la technologie et la société, et comment ces dynamiques affectent la formation universitaire en sociologie. Les principaux résultats révèlent une résistance institutionnelle importante à l'adoption des technologies numériques (TD) et aux changements curriculaires, ainsi qu'une perception de la digitalisation comme une solution temporaire. Des barrières telles que la gérontocratie, l’insuffisance d'infrastructure technologique et un système d'incitations qui décourage la collaboration ont été identifiées. Les conclusions soulignent la nécessité urgente de moderniser le curriculum en sociologie pour inclure des compétences numériques avancées et promouvoir une culture d’innovation. Il est recommandé de mettre en œuvre des stratégies pédagogiques incluant l’utilisation transversale des technologies numériques émergentes, des programmes de formation continue pour les enseignants et une réforme curriculaire intégrale.
Mots-clés :
- digitalisation du travail,
- compétences numériques,
- innovation pédagogique,
- sociologie numérique
Resumen
Este estudio tiene como objetivo analizar cómo la digitalización del trabajo y las innovaciones tecnológicas influyen en las ingenierías de formación y los procesos de profesionalización en la Licenciatura en Sociología. Se utilizó una metodología cualitativa basada en el Análisis del Discurso Sociotécnico (ADS)para examinar la relación entre tecnología y sociedad y cómo estas dinámicas afectan la formación académica en sociología. Los principales hallazgos revelan una resistencia institucional significativa hacia la adopción de tecnologías digitales (TD) y cambios curriculares, así como una percepción de la digitalización como una solución temporal. Se identificaron barreras como la gerontocracia, la falta de infraestructura tecnológica adecuada, y un sistema de incentivos que desincentiva la colaboración. Las conclusiones subrayan la necesidad urgente de modernizar el currículo de sociología para incluir competencias digitales avanzadas y fomentar una cultura de innovación. Se recomienda implementar estrategias pedagógicas que incluyan el uso transversal de tecnologías digitales emergentes, programas de formación continua para docentes, y una reforma curricular integral.
Palabras clave:
- digitalización del trabajo,
- competencias digitales,
- innovación educativa,
- sociología digital
Resumo
Este estudo tem como objetivo analisar como a digitalização do trabalho e as inovações tecnológicas influenciam as engenharias de formação e os processos de profissionalização na Licenciatura em Sociologia. Utilizou-se uma metodologia qualitativa baseada na Análise do Discurso Sociotécnico (ADS), que permite examinar a relação entre tecnologia e sociedade e como essas dinâmicas afetam a formação acadêmica em sociologia. Os principais resultados revelam uma resistência institucional significativa à adoção de tecnologias digitais (TD) e mudanças curriculares, bem como uma percepção da digitalização como uma solução temporária. Barreiras como a gerontocracia, a falta de infraestrutura tecnológica adequada, e um sistema de incentivos que desencoraja a colaboração foram identificadas. As conclusões destacam a necessidade urgente de modernizar o currículo de sociologia para incluir competências digitais avançadas e promover uma cultura de inovação. Recomenda-se implementar estratégias pedagógicas que incluam o uso transversal de tecnologias digitais emergentes, programas de formação contínua para professores e uma reforma curricular integral.
Palavras chaves:
- digitalização do trabalho,
- competências digitais,
- inovação educacional,
- sociologia digital
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- American Sociological Association. (2024). https://www.asanet.org/public-engagement/Sociology-action-network/profiles/
- Baca, H. G. V., & Acosta, H. P. (2021). La digitalización de la formación universitaria con enfoque socioformativo: un análisis documental. IE Revista De Investigación Educativa De La REDIECH, 12, e1199. https://doi.org/10.33010/ie_rie_rediech.v12i0.1199
- Canaza-Choque, F. A. (2020). Ensino superior na quarentena global: interrupções e transições. Revista Digital De Investigación En Docencia Universitaria, 14(2). https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1315/1130
- Carneiro, J. D. N., & Francisco, D. J. (2019). Discursos dos docentes sobre tecnologias digitais no currículo dos discentes do curso de pedagogía. Linguagens Educação E Sociedade, 41, 556-575. https://doi.org/10.26694/les.v0i41.8099
- Carrozza, C. (2018). Re-conceptualizing social research in the “digital era”. Issues of scholarships, methods, and epistemologies. Análise Social, 53(3), 652-671. https://doi.org/10.31447/as00032573.2018228.05
- Evans, K. (2013). Re-Thinking Community in the Digital Age? Dans Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (pp. 79-94). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297792_6
- Flick, U. (2018). Doing Triangulation and Mixed Methods. Thousand Oaks Sage.
- Fussey, P. & Roth, S. (2020). Digitizing Sociology: Continuity and Change in the Internet Era. Sociology, 54(4), 659-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520918562
- Herzog, B. & Ruiz, J. (2019). Análisis sociológico del discurso: enfoques, métodos y procedimientos. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.
- Hidalgo-Cajo, B. G. & Gisbert-Cervera, M. (2022). Factores determinantes que permiten establecer tipologías de profesorado en el contexto de la innovación tecnológica educativa. Revista De Educación a Distancia (RED), 22(69). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.499171
- Inayah, C. N., Wilodati, W. & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Analysis of Cooperative Learning Model in Sociology Education as an Effort to Develop 21st Century 4C Skills. Forum Ilmu Sosial, 50(1), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.15294/fis.v50i1.41527
- Indeed (2024, June 27). What does a sociologist do? (Roles and responsabilities. https://uk.indeed.com/career-advice/finding-a-job/what-does-sociologist-do
- Jalal, J. (2024). Implementation of Multicultural Education As Revitalization of National Awareness for Sociology Education Students. AL-ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4174
- Lupton, D. (2013a) Digital Sociology. In J. Germov, and M. Poole (eds), Public Sociology: An Introduction to Australian Society. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
- Lupton, D. (2013b) Digital Sociology: beyond the digital to the sociological. In The Australian Sociological Association 2013 Conference Proceedings: Reflections, Intersections and Aspirations, 50 Years of Australian Sociology. Osbaldiston, N., Strong, C. and Forbes-Mewett, H. (eds). Melbourne: TASA. https://tinyurl.com/3f8c2zfp
- Lupton, D. (2015). Digital Sociology. Routledge.
- Madsen, H. M., Brown, R., Elle, M. & Mikkelsen, P. S. (2013). Comparative socio-technical discourse analysis of Water Sensitive Urban Design for Melbourne, Australia and Copenhagen, Denmark. In 8th International Water Senitive Urban Design Conference 2013 (pp. 1-20). https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/102120629/2013_Madsen_et_al._WSUD_Goldcoast.pdf
- Mesra, R., Monica, W. S., Anton, E. E., Sukini, S., Ritawati, R., Ngumarno, J. & Handaru, C. D. (2023). Filmora Video Editing Application Training to Improve Students’ Ability to Make Learning Videos in the Unima Sociology Education Study Program. Abdi Masyarakat, 5(2), 2330. https://doi.org/10.58258/abdi.v5i2.6025
- Missman, K. (2023). Bachelor’s Degree In Sociology: Everything You Need To Know. Recovered from Forbes in https://www.forbes.com/advisor/education/science/bachelors-in-Sociology/
- Niya, H., Bousaadani, A. E. & Radid, M. (2022). Adoption of technological solutions on fintechs using training engineering: case of health sector. JATT, 100(18), 5274-5285.
- Noeryanti, A. T., Rejekiningsih, T. & Sudiyanto. (2023). Learning Innovation through the Development of Interactive Multimedia Based on Local Wisdom for Sociology Learning in the Digital Era. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 11(1), 41 53. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JEU/article/view/60441
- Powell, W. W. (2017). A sociologist looks at crowds: Innovation or invention? Strategic Organization, 15(2), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016644642
- Pratiwi, P., Martiana, A., Jatmiko, D. & Apriantika, S. (2020). SWOT Analysis of Digital Learning Resources Development in The Department of Sociology Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yogyakarta State University. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.4-8-2020.2302453
- Qodr, T. S., Efendi, A., & Musadad, A. A. (2021). Opportunities for Using Smartphones in the Digital Era to Facilitate Students in Learning Sociology in High Schools. Journal of Education Technology, 5(2), 263-271. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i2.34806
- Rojas, N. a. S., Sorroza, J. P. J., Villacis, J. E. R., Ambuludi, W. A. C. & Sánchez, M. V. S. (2018). Las Tic y la resistencia al cambio en la Educación Superior. RECIMUNDO, 2(2), 477-495. https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/2.(2).2018.477-495
- Torpey, J. (2020). A sociological agenda for the tech age. Theory and Society, 49(5-6), 749-769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09406-0
- TraitLab (n.d.). Sociologist. Career profile. https://www.traitlab.com/occupations/sociologist
- University of Guadalajara [UdeG]. (2023). Informe de autoevaluación cuarta acreditación/ Licenciatura en Sociología 2023/ ACCECISO.
- Van Dijk, T. A. (2016). Análisis crítico del discurso. Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales, (30), 203-222. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/459/45955901010.pdf
- Venkatachalam, P. & Mishra, R. (2023). Future of workplace design from a socio-technical perspective. IIMB Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2022.12.006
- Yusra, A., Erinajoni & Anwar, S. (2024). Sociology learning in the era of digitalization: literatura review of needs, challenes and opportunities. Community Practitioner, 21(5), 1566-1572. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11392698