Résumés
Abstract
This paper draws on data from a qualitative study of youth climate activists in Cyprus to explore the notion of temporality implied in how youth interrogate intergenerational relations in the context of their struggle against climate change and the tensions therein. Acknowledging the structural age inequalities that limit their actions, youth activists drew on multiple temporal frames of present, future, and past to delineate a sense of urgency for action to prevent an irreversible catastrophe in the future and to forge a future of hope. In the process, they invited other/older generations to the climate struggle, an opening that came with expressions of ambivalence among some activists.
Keywords:
- intergenerational justice,
- climate activism,
- youth,
- temporality
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Bartos, A. E. (2015). Children and young people’s political participation: A critical analysis. In K. P. Kallio, S. Mills, & T. Skelton (Eds), Politics, citizenship, and rights (pp. 113–131). Geographies of Children and Young People, 7. Springer.
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
- de Moor, J., Uba, K., Wahlström, M., Wennerhag, M., & De Vydt, M. (Eds.). (2020). Protest for a future II: Composition, mobilization, and motives of the participants in Fridays For Future climate protests on 20–27 September, 2019, in 19 cities around the world. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1397070/FULLTEXT01.pdf
- Diprose, K., Liu, C., Vanderbeck, R. M., Valentine, G., Chen, L., McQuaid, K., & Zhang, M. (2017). Contrasting theories of intergenerational justice: Just savings or capabilities? In S. Punch & R. M. Vanderbeck (Eds.), Family, intergenerationality, and peer group relations (pp. 1–19). Geographies of Children and Young People, 5. Springer.
- Farquhar, S. (2016). Time in early childhood: Creative possibilities with different conceptions of time. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(4), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949116677925
- Groves, C. (2010). Living in uncertainty: Anthropogenic global warming and the limits of “risk thinking.” In S. Skrimshire (Ed.), Future ethics: Climate change and apocalyptic imagination (pp. 118–126). Continuum.
- Groves, C. (2011). The political imaginary of care: Generic versus singular futures. Journal of International Political Theory, 7(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.3366/jipt.2011.0013
- Instone, L., & Taylor, A. (2015). Thinking about inheritance through the figure of the Anthropocene, from the Antipodes and in the presence of others. Environmental Humanities, 7, 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3616371
- Kallio, K. P. (2015). Youthful political presence: Right, reality, and practice of the child. In K. P. Kallio, S. Mills, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Politics, citizenship, and rights (pp. 89–110). Geographies of Children and Young People, 7. Springer.
- Kverndokk, K. (2020). Talking about your generation: “Our children” as a trope in climate change discourse. Ethnologia Europaea, 50(1),145–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.16995/ee.974
- Liou, A., & Literat, I. (2020). “We need you to listen to us”: Youth activist perspectives on intergenerational dynamics and adult solidarity in youth movements. International Journal of Communication, 14, 4662–4682. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/15807/3209
- Loveless, N. S. (2013). The materiality of duration: Between ice time and water time. Performance Research, 18(6), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2013.908068
- Mayes, E., & Hartup, M. E. (2021). News coverage of the School Strike for Climate movement in Australia: the politics of representing young strikers’ emotions. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(7), 994–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1929887
- Meo, A. I. (2010). Picturing students’ habitus: The advantages and limitations of photo-elicitation interviewing in a qualitative study in the city of Buenos Aires. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900203
- Nguyen, J. M. (2020). Intergenerational justice and the Paris Agreement. https://www.e-ir.info/2020/05/11/intergenerational-justice-and-the-paris-agreement/
- Ojala, M. (2012). Regulating worry, promoting hope: How do children, adolescents, and young adults cope with climate change? International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7(4), 537–561. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ997146.pdf
- Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Kummen, K. (2016). Shifting temporal frames in children’s common worlds in the Anthropocene. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949116677930
- Puaschunder, J. (2020). Governance and climate justice. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Rooney, T. (2019). Weathering time: Walking with young children in a changing climate. Children's Geographies, 17(2),177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1474172
- Rose, D. B. (2012). Multispecies knots of ethical time. Environmental Philosophy, 9(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.5840/envirophil2012918
- Sanson, A. V., & Burke, S. E. L. (2020). Climate change and children: An issue of intergenerational justice. In N. Balvin & D. J. Christie (Eds.), Children and peace (pp. 343–362). Peace Psychology Book Series. SpringerOpen. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22176-8
- Shirani, F., Butler, C., Henwood, K., Parkhill, K., & Pidgeon, N. (2013). Disconnected futures: Exploring notions of ethical responsibility in energy practices. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 18(4), 455–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.779236
- Skillington, T. (2019). Climate change and intergenerational justice. Routledge.
- Spyrou, S. (2020). Editorial: Children as future-makers. Childhood, 27(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568219884142
- Spyrou, S., Theodorou, E., & Christou, G. (2021). Crafting futures with hope: Young climate activists’ imaginaries in an age of crisis and uncertainty. Children & Society, 36, 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12529
- Stapleton, S. (2019). A case for climate justice education: American youth connecting to intragenerational climate injustice in Bangladesh. Environmental Education Research, 25(5), 732–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1472220
- Taft, J. (2015). “Adults talk too much”: Intergenerational dialogue and power in the Peruvian movement of working children. Childhood, 22(4), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568214555148
- Taft, J. K., & Gordon, H. R. (2015). Intergenerational relationships in youth activist networks. In S. Punch & R. M. Vanderbeck (Eds.), Family, intergenerationality, and peer group relations (pp. 217–237). Geographies of Children and Young People, 5. Springer.
- Wahlström, M., Kocyba, P., De Vydt, M., & de Moor, J. (Eds.). (2019). Protest for a future: Composition, mobilization and motives of the participants in Fridays For Future climate protests on 15 March, 2019 in 13 European cities. https://protestinstitut.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/20190709_Protest-for-a-future_GCS-Descriptive-Report.pdf
- Walker, C. (2020). Uneven solidarity: The school strikes for climate in global and intergenerational perspective. Sustainable Earth, 3(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-020-00024-3