Résumés
Abstract
This article reviews Marcin Lewinski and Mark Aakhus’s Argumentation in Complex Communication (Oxford 2022).
Keywords:
- argumentation theory,
- contrastivism,
- polylogues
Résumé
Cet article passe en revue l’ouvrage de Marcin Lewinski et Mark Aakhus, Argumentation in Complex Communication (Oxford 2022).
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aikin, Scott F. 2006. “Contrastive Self‐Attribution of Belief.” Social Epistemology 20 (1): 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720500512275.
- Aikin, Scott F. 2021a. “Argumentative Adversariality, Contrastive Reasons, and the Winners-and-Losers Problem.” Topoi 40 (5): 837–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-020-09719-w.
- Aikin, Scott F. 2021b. “Dialectical Responsibility and Regress Skepticism.” In Epistemic Duties: New Arguments, New Angles, 268–80. New York; London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Groupe.
- Aikin, Scott F., and Robert Talisse. 2019. Why We Argue (and How We Should): Guide to Disagreement in an Age of Unreason. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
- Baumann, Peter. 2008. “Problems for Sinnott-Armstrong’s Moral Contrastivism.” The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-) 58 (232): 463–70.
- Becker, Kelly. 2009. “Contrastivism and Lucky Questions.” Philosophia, January, 37 (2):245-260
- Sinnott‐Armstrong, Walter. 2008. “A Contrastivist Manifesto.” Social Epistemology 22 (3): 257–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720802546120.
- Snedegar, Justin. 2015. “Contrastivism About Reasons and Ought: Contrastivism About Reasons and Ought.” Philosophy Compass 10 (6): 379–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12231.