Résumés
Abstract
Sarawak is the largest state in Malaysia, where two-thirds of the population are Indigenous. This study aims to evaluate, through the lens of good governance principles, the current practice of the Sarawak State’s formal land governance of lands associated with Native Customary Rights (hereafter known as Native land governance). Being quantitative in nature, this study conceptualises an evaluation framework for good governance principles as applied to Native land governance. Next, this study empirically tests out the framework by adopting a multi-criteria decision-making tool known as The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). TOPSIS analysis enables the integration of perceptions between State/private groups and Indigenous groups. The output of the TOPSIS analysis is summarised in a strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat (SWOT) format according to the TOPSIS closeness value. Unfortunately, results show that the weaknesses outnumber the strengths in Sarawak’s Native land governance. Among these issues, Indigenous respondents highlight major issues with the Sarawak land registry’s efficiency in delivering outcomes that are equitable for Indigenous land rights. This study ends with recommendations on how the state of Sarawak can move towards compliance with good governance principles in relation to lands associated with Native Customary Rights.
Keywords:
- Native,
- Native Customary Rights,
- Land Governance,
- Good Governance,
- TOPSIS
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- AMAN. (2013). Komunitas AMAN Kalteng Fasilitasi Pelatihan Pemetaan Partisipatif. AMAN KALTENG. https://aman.or.id/news/read/komunitas-aman-kalteng-fasilitasi-pelatihan-pemetaan-partisipatif
- AMAN. (2014a). Lagi, Tumbang Bahanei Ikuti Pelatihan FPIC. AMAN KALTENG.
- AMAN. (2014b). Pelatihan PPWA Di Komunitas Bundar. AMAN KALTENG.
- Andersen, A. O., Bruun, T. B., Egay, K., Fenger, M., Klee, S., Pedersen, A. F., Pedersen, L. M. L., Vallanueva, V. S. (2016). Negotiating development narratives within large-scale oil palm projects on village lands in Sarawak, Malaysia. The Geographical Journal, 182(4), 364-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12181
- Arko-Adjei, A., Tuladhar, A., De Jong, J., & Zevenbergen, J. (2010). Customary tenure institutions and good governance. FIG Congress 2010. 11-16 April. Sydney, Australia.
- Azima, A. M., Sivapalan, S., Zaimah, R., Suhana, S., & Mohd Yusof, H. (2015). Boundry and customary land ownership dispute in Sarawak. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s3p17
- Azima, A. M., Lyndon, N., & Akmal, M. S. (2015). Understanding of the meaning of Native Customary Land (NCL): Boundaries and ownership by the Bidayuh community in Sarawak, Malaysia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s1p342
- Bian, B. (2007). Native Customary Rights (NCR) over land in Sarawak, Malaysia. https://www.salvaleforeste.it/documentazione/Bian2.pdf
- Bulan, R. (2007). Native title in Malaysia A 'complementary' sui generis right protected by the federal constitution. Australian Indigenous Law Review, 11(1), 54-79.
- Bulan, R. (2014). Dispute resolution: restorative justice under native customary justice in Malaysia. In L. Wilton and S. Elsa (Eds.), Indigenous people access to justive, including truth and reconciliation process (pp. 319-343). Institute for the Study of Human Rights Columbia University.
- Castillo, R. C. A., & Alvarez-Castillo, F. (2009). The Law is not enough: Protecting Indigenous Peoples’ rights against mining interests in the Philippines. In D. S. Rachel Wynberg, Roger Chennells (Ed.), Indigenous Peoples, consent, and benefit sharing: Lessons from the San-Hoodia Case (pp. 271-284). Springer Science & Business Media.
- Colchester, M., Pang, W. A., Chuo, W. M., & Jalong, T. (2007). Land is life: Land lights and oil palm development in Sarawak. Forest Peoples Programme and Sawit Watch.
- Cramb, R. A. (2011). Re-Inventing dualism: Policy narratives and modes of oil palm expansion in Sarawak, Malaysia. The Journal of Development Studies, 47(2), 274-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380903428381
- Deininger, K., Selod, H., and Burns, A. (2012). The land governance assessment framework: Identifying and monitoring good practice in the land sector. The World Bank.
- Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2010). Total population by ethnic group, sub-district and state, Malaysia, 2010. https://www.mycensus.gov.my/index.php/census-product/publication/census-2010/659-population-distribution-and-basic-demographic-characteristics-2010.
- Enemark, S., & Molen, P. (2008). Capacity assessment in land administration. The International Federation of Surveyors (FIG).
- Fong, J. C. (2011). Law on Native Customary Land in Sarawak. Thomson Reuters Malaysia Sdn Bhd.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2007). Good governance in land tenure and administration. https://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/ec5fd5dc-4254-501d-b8bb-4cb8c5ac7e52/
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAO. (2012). Voluntary Guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests in the context of national food security. Committee on Food Security. https://www.fao.org/tenure/voluntary-guidelines/en/
- Freudenberger, M. S., Bruce, J., Mawalma, B., Wit, P. D., and Boudreaux, K. (2013). The future of customary tenure. Options for policymakers. Agency for International Development.
- Holland, C. A. (2013). The naked truth about how land acquisition deals in Sarawak are a gateway to violence. Radboud University Nijmegen.
- Huang, J. (2008). Combining entropy weight and TOPSIS method for information system selection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent. 21–24 September. Chengdu, China. https://doi:10.1109/ICCIS.2008.4670971
- Hull, S., & Whittal, J. (2018). Filling the gap: Customary land tenure reform in Mozambique and South Africa. South African Journal of Geomatics, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.4314/sajg.v7i2.1
- Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/
- Liang, T. M., Choon, T. L., Vern, T. W., Ujang, M. U. B., and Chin, T. A. (2019). A Preliminary Study on The Formation of Land Legislation and Cadastre System in Sarawak, Malaysia. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5C), 788-797. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1112.0585C19
- Meinzen-Dick, R., & Mwangi, E. (2009). Cutting the web of interests: Pitfalls of formalizing property rights. Land Use Policy, 26(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.06.003
- Mitchell, T., Arseneau, C., Thomas, D., & Smith, P. (2019). Towards an Indigenous-informed relational approach to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC). International Indigenous Policy Journal, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2019.10.4.8372
- Mohd, K. W., Hassan, F. M., Khan, I. N., G., & Wook, I. (2021). Customary land rights of orang asli: A case study in Kampung Parit Gong, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2021.12.1.9
- Nasser, H., & Salleh, B. (2011). Land law in Sarawak. Gavel Publications.
- Ngidang, D. (1995). The politics of development in longhouse communities in Sarawak, East Malaysia. Development in Practice, 5(4), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/
- Ngidang, D. (2002). Contradictions in land development schemes : the case of joint ventures in Sarawak, Malaysia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 43(2), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8373.00171
- Ngidang, D. (2005). Deconstruction and reconstruction of native customary land tenure in Sarawak. Southeast Asian Studies, 43(1), 47-75.
- Osman, S., & Kueh, H. U. (2010). Land Administration, Land Management and Spatial Information in Sarawak, Malaysia. Proceedings of the FIG Congress 2010. 11-16 April. Sydney, Australia, 1-16.
- Phoa, J. (2009). Protecting Native Customary Rights: Is legal recourse viable alternative? Akademika, 77, 69-89.
- Porter, A. F. (1967). Land administration in Sarawak: An account of the development of land administration in Sarawak from the rule of Rajah James Brooke to the present time, 1841-1967. US Government Print Press.
- Richard, A. J. N. (1961). Sarawak land law and Adat: A report. U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Sarawak Land Code. (1958). Cap. 81.
- SACCESS. (2012). Guidebook on reclaiming Sarawak NCR lands in courts. http://www.forestpeoples.org/sites/fpp/files/publication/2012/12/guidebook-reclaiming-sarawak-ncr-lands-courts1.pdf
- Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM). (2019). The land we lost: Native Customary Rights (NCR) and monoculture plantations in Sarawak. https://foe-malaysia.org/articles/the-land-we-lost-native-customary-rights-and-monoculture-plantations-in-sarawak/
- Samsudin, S., Ibrahim, N. A., Suratman, R., & Adnan, M. Z. (2021). Land for Indigenous people: Ownership conflicts and government interventions in Kampung Bawong, Perak, Malaysia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 683(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/683/1/012124
- Smith, J. & Mitchell, T. (2020). Development of an UNDRIP compliance assessment tool: How a performance framework could improve state compliance. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 11(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2020.11.2.10713
- Steudler, D., Rajabifard, A., and Williamson, I. P. (2004). Evaluation of land administration systems. Land Use Policy, 21(4), 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.05.001
- Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM). (2013). Report of the National Inquiry into the land rights of Indigenous people. National Human Rights Commission of Malaysia. http://www.suhakam.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/REPORT-OF-THE-NATIONAL-INQUIRY-INTO-THE-LAND-RIGHTS-OF-INDIGENOUS-PEOPLES-IN-MALAYSIA_5-Aug-2013.pdf
- Weinlein, E. (2017). Indigenous People, development and environmental justice: Narratives of the Dayak People of Sarawak, Malaysia. EnviroLab Asia, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5642/envirolabasia.20170101.06
- Williamson, I. P. (2001). Land administration “best practice” providing the infrastructure for land policy implementation. Land Use Policy, 18(4), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00021-7
- Williamson, I. P., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., and Rajabifard, A. (2008). Understanding land administration systems. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Land Administration Trends and Issues in Asia and the Pacific Region. 19-22 August Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1-11.
- Williamson, I. P., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Rajabifard, A. (2010). Land administration for sustainable development (1st ed.). ESRI Press.