Résumés
Résumé
Nous examinons ici la critique de l’éthique universelle que Carl Schmitt aborde en tant qu’aspect politique de l’ordre planétaire. L’article porte sur les mutations du discours humanitariste, dans un contexte de gouvernementalité globale. Il ne s’agit pas d’adopter une perspective éthique différente, mais de reconnaître que l’éthique universelle alimente des discours et des pratiques politiques qui génèrent un monde politique (ou plus exactement biopolitique) unipolaire. Nous appuyant sur les « iconographies » de l’ennemi propres à Schmitt et sur la pensée de Foucault, nous esquissons un concept de devoir politique planétaire qui se pose à la fois envers l’Autre et à l’égard de l’ouverture du monde politique.
Mots clés:
- humanité,
- hostilité,
- ennemi,
- obligation,
- ordre politique,
- Carl Schmitt
Abstract
This article examines Carl Schmitt’s critique of universal ethics made in his indictment of the discourse of humanity and addressed as a political concern of world order. It extends this critique further to include the ways in which the discourse of humanity transforms itself in the era of global governmentality. This kind of interrogation requires an almost ‘anti-ethical’ awareness that universal ethics fuels political discourses and practices that instantiate a political, indeed a biopolitical, universe. Schmitt’s discussion offers, it is argued, two iconographies of enmity, significant for mapping the contemporary world order. Together with Foucault, Schmitt helps articulate a notion of world-political obligation which is both for the other and for the openness of the political as a pluriverse.
Keywords:
- humanity,
- enmity,
- foe,
- obligation,
- political order,
- Carl Schmitt
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Agamben Giorgio, 1993, The Coming Community, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
- Agamben Giorgio, 2005, State of Exception, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
- Anidjar Gil, 2004, « Terror Right », CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 4, no 3 : 35-69.
- Arendt Hannah, 1963, On Revolution, Londres, Penguin.
- Beasley-Murray J., 2005, « The Common Enemy. Tyrants and Pirates », South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 104, no 2 : 217-225.
- Beck Ulrich, 2000, « The Cosmopolitan Perspective. Sociology of the Second Age of Modernity », British Journal of Sociology, vol. 51, no 1 : 79-105.
- Beitz Charles, 2003, « What Human Rights Mean », Daedalus, vol. 132, no 1 : 36-46.
- Behnke Andreas, 2004, « Terrorising the Political. 9/11 within the Context of the Globalisation of Violence », Millennium, vol. 33, no 2 : 279-312.
- Benso Silvia, 1994, « On the Way to an Ontological Ethics. Ethical Suggestions in Reading Heidegger », Research in Phenomenology, vol. 24 : 98-112.
- Blair Tony, 1999, « Prime Minister’s Speech: Doctrine of the International Community at the Economic Club, Chicago », 22 avril. Consulté sur Internet (www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page1297.asp) le 19 mars 2008.
- Blaney David L. et Naeem Inayatullah, 2000, « The Westphalian Deferral », International Studies Review, vol. 2, no 2 : 29-64.
- Booth Ken, 1999, « Three Tyrannies », dans T. Dunne et N.J. Wheeler (dir.), Human Rights in Global Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press : 31-70.
- Brennan T., 2003, « Cosmopolitanism and Internationalism », dans D. Archibugi (dir.), Debating Cosmopolitics, Londres, Verso : 40-50.
- Campbell David, 1994, « The Deterritorialization of Responsibility. Levinas, Derrida, and Ethics after the End of Philosophy », Alternatives, vol. 19 : 455-484.
- Campbell David, 1996, « The Politics of Radical Interdependence. A Rejoinder to Daniel Warner », Millennium, vol. 25, no 1 : 129-141.
- Campbell David, 1998, « Why Fight. Humanitarianism, Principles, and Post-Structuralism », Millennium, vol. 27, no 3 : 497-522.
- Caputo John D., 1989, « Disseminating Originary Ethics and the Ethics of Dissemination », dans A.B. Dallery et C.E. Scott (dir.), The Question of the Other. Essays in Contemporary Continental Philosophy, Albany, State University of New York Press : 55‑62.
- Caputo John D., 1993, Against Ethics. Contributions to a Poetics of Obligation with Constant Reference to Deconstruction, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
- Carr E.H., 2001, The Twenty Years’ Crisis. An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 1919‑1939, Basingstoke, Palgrave.
- Champetier C., 2000, « Reflections on Human Rights », Telos, no 118 : 77‑87.
- Cochran Molly, 1999, Normative Theory in International Relations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Coles R., 1992, Self/Power/Other. Political Theory and Dialogical Ethics, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
- Colombo Alessandro, 2007, « The “Realist Institutionalism” of Carl Schmitt », dans L. Odysseos et F. Petito (dir.), The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt. Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order, Londres, Routledge : 21‑35.
- Dallmayr Fred, 2002, « “Asian Values” and Global Human Rights », Philosophy East & West, vol. 52, no 2 : 173‑189.
- Dean Mitchell, 2007, « Nomos. Word and Myth », dans L. Odysseos et F. Petito (dir.), The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt. Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order, Londres, Routledge : 242‑258.
- Dillon Michael, 1998, « Criminalising Social and Political Violence Internationally », Millennium, vol. 27, no 3 : 543‑568.
- Dillon Michael et Justin Reid, 2001, « Global Liberal Governance. Biopolitics, Security and War », Millennium. Journal of International Studies, vol. 30, no 1 : 41‑66.
- Donnelly Jack, 1998, « Human Rights : A New Standard of Civilization », International Affairs, vol. 74, no 1 : 1‑24.
- Dyzenhaus David, 1998, « Introduction. Why Carl Schmitt ? », dans D. Dyzenhaus (dir.), Law as Politics. Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism, Durham, Duke University Press : 1‑20.
- Elshtain Jean B., 2003, « The Responsibility of Nations. A Moral Case for Coercive Justice », Daedalus, vol. 132, no 1 : 64‑72.
- Gasché Rodolphe, 2004, « The Partisan and the Philosopher », CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 4, no 3 : 9‑34.
- Goodson A.C., 2004a, « About Schmitt. Partisans and Theory »,CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 4, no 3 : 1‑7.
- Goodson A.C., 2004b, « Pro Aris et Focis. Schmitt’s Partisans in Münkler’s Theory of War », CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 4, no 3 : 145‑159.
- Gowan Peter, 2003, « The New Liberal Cosmopolitanism », dans D. Archibugi (dir.), Debating Cosmopolitics, Londres, Verso : 51‑66.
- Foucault Michel, 1991, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Londres, Penguin.
- Foucault Michel, 1997a, « Society Must be Defended », The Essential Works of Foucault, vol. 1 : Ethics, Londres, Allen Lane and Penguin Press : 59‑65.
- Foucault Michel, 1997b, « Security, Territory, and Population », The Essential Works of Foucault, vol. 1 : Ethics, Londres, Allen Lane : 67‑71.
- Foucault Michel, 2001a, « Governmentality », The Essential Works of Foucault, vol. 3 : Power, New York, New Press : 201‑222.
- Foucault Michel, 2001b, « Confronting Governments: Human Rights », The Essential Works of Foucault, vol. 3 : Power, New York, New Press : 474‑475.
- Foucault Michel, 2003, Society Must Be Defended. Lectures at the Collègede France, 1975‑76, New York, Picador.
- Foucault Michel, 2007a, Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collègede France, 1977‑78, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Foucault Michel, 2007b, The Politics of Truth, New York, Semiotext(e).
- Foucault Michel, 2008, The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978‑1979, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hardt Michael et Antonio Negri, 2004, Multitude. War and Democracy in the Age of Empire, Londres, Hamish Hamilton.
- Härting Heike, 2006, « Global Civil War and Post-colonial Studies », Globalization and Autonomy Online Compendium, 2 février. Consulté sur Internet (www.globalautonomy.ca/global1/article.jsp?index=RA_Harting_GlobalCivilWar.xml) le 16 août 2007.
- Hopgood Stephen, 2000, « Reading the Small Print in Global Civil Society. The Inexorable Hegemony of the Liberal Self », Millennium, vol. 29 : 1-25.
- Hovden Elvind et Edward Keene (dir.), 2002, The Globalization of Liberalism, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hunter Ian, 2002, « Westphalia and the Desacralisation of Politics », dans B. Hindess et M. Jolly (dir.), Thinking Peace, Making Peace, Canberra, Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia : 36-44.
- Jayasuriya Kanishka, 2005, Reconstituting the Global Liberal Order. Legitimacy and Regulation, Londres, Routledge.
- Joas Hans, 2003, War and Modernity, Cambridge, Polity.
- Kalyvas Andreas, 1999, « Review Essay. Who’s Afraid of Carl Schmitt », Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 25, no 5 : 87-125.
- Kennedy Ellen, 1998, « Hostis not Inimicus. Toward a Theory of the Public in the Work of Carl Schmitt », dans D. Dyzenhaus (dir.), Law as Politics. Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism, Durham, Duke University Press : 92-108.
- Laclau Ernesto, 2005, « On Real and Absolute Enemies », CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 5, no 1 : 1-12.
- Larner Wendy et William Walters (dir.), 2004, Global Governmentality. Governing International Spaces, Londres, Routledge.
- Lemke Thomas, 2001, « “The Birth of Bio-Politics” – Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-Liberal Governmentality », Economy and Society, vol. 30, no 2 : 190-207.
- Levinas Emmanuel, 1989, « Ethics as First Philosophy », dans S. Hand (dir.), The Levinas Reader, Oxford, Oxford University Press : 75-87.
- Mbembe Achille, 2003, « Necropolitics », Public Culture, vol. 15, no 1 : 11-40.
- Mouffe Chantal, 2007, « Carl Schmitt’s Warning on the Dangers of a Unipolar World », dans L. Odysseos et F. Petito (dir.), The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt. Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order, Londres, Routledge : 147-153.
- Müller Jan-Werner, 2006, « “An Irregularity That Cannot be Regulated”. Carl Schmitt’s Theory of the Partisan and the “War on Terror” ». Communication présentée à la conférence Jurisprudence and the War on Terrorism, Columbia Law School, 22 avril.
- Nancy Jean-Luc 2007, The Creation of the World or Globalization, Albany, suny Press.
- Neumann Iver B. et O.J. Sending, 2007, « “The International” as Governmentality », Millennium, vol. 35, no 3 : 677-701.
- Nielsen Kai, 1966, « Ethical Relativism and the Facts of Cultural Relativity », Social Research, vol. 33 : 531-51.
- Odysseos Louiza, 2002, « Dangerous Ontologies. The Ethos of Survival and Ethical Theorising in International Relations », Review of International Studies, vol. 28, no 2 : 403-418.
- Odysseos Louiza, 2003, « On the Way to Global Ethics ? Cosmopolitanism, Ethical Selfhood and Otherness », European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 2, no 2 : 183-207.
- Odysseos Louiza, 2007a, The Subject of Coexistence. Otherness in International Relations, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
- Odysseos Louiza, 2007b, « Crossing the Line ? Carl Schmitt on the “Spaceless Universalism” of Cosmopolitanism and the War on Terror », dans L. Odysseos et F. Petito (dir.), The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt. Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order, Londres, Routledge : 124-143.
- Odysseos Louiza, 2007c, « Violence after the State ? A Preliminary Examination of the Concept of “Global Civil War” », communication présentée à la 6e Conférence pan-européenne sur les relations internationales, 12-15 septembre, Université de Turin, Italie.
- Odysseos Louiza, 2008, « Liberalism’s War, Liberalism’s Order. Rethinking the Global Liberal Order as a “Global Civil War” », communication présentée à la conférence Revising the Theoretical and Political Status of Liberal Internationalism, International Studies Association Workshop, San Francisco, 25 mars.
- Ojakangas Mika, 2007, « A Terrifying World without an Exterior. Carl Schmitt and the Metaphysics of International (Dis)Order », dans L. Odysseos et F. Petito (dir.), The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt. Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order, Londres, Routledge : 205-221.
- Prozorov Sergei, 2006, « Liberal Enmity: the Figure of the Foe in the Political Ontology of Liberalism », Millennium, vol. 35, no 1 : 75-99.
- Prozorov Sergei, 2007a, Foucault, Freedom and Sovereignty, Aldershot, Ashgate.
- Prozorov Sergei, 2007b, « The Ethos of Insecure Life. Reading Carl Schmitt’s Existential Decisionism as a Foucauldian Ethics », dans L. Odysseos et F. Petito (dir.), The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt. Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order, Londres, Routledge : 222-243.
- Prozorov Sergei, 2009, « Generic Universalism in World Politics. Beyond International Anarchy and the World State », International Theory, vol. 1, no 2 (à paraître).
- Rasch William, 2003, « Human Rights as Geopolitics. Carl Schmitt and the Legal Form of American Supremacy », Cultural Critique, no 54 : 120-147.
- Rasch William, 2005, « Lines in the Sand. Enmity as a Structuring Principle », South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 104, no 2 : 253-262.
- Saad-Filho A. et D. Johnston (dir.), 2005, Neoliberalism. A Critical Reader, Londres, Pluto Press.
- Sax Benjamin, 2002, « The Distinction Between Political Theology and Political Philosophy », European Legacy, vol. 7, no 4 : 499-502.
- Schmitt Carl, 1994, Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles 1923-1939, Dritte Auflage, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot.
- Schmitt Carl, 1995a, « Die letzte globale Linie », dans Staat, Großraum, Nomos. Arbeiten aus den Jahren 1916-1969, G. Maschke (dir.), Berlin, Duncker & Humblot : 441-452.
- Schmitt Carl, 1995b, « Die Einheit der Welt », dans Staat, Großraum, Nomos. Arbeiten aus den Jahren 1916-1969, G. Maschke (dir.), Berlin, Duncker & Humblot : 496-512.
- Schmitt Carl, 1996a, The Concept of the Political, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
- Schmitt Carl, 1996b, The Tyranny of Values, Corvallis, Plutarch Press.
- Schmitt Carl, 2003a, The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, New York, Telos Press.
- Schmitt Carl, 2003b, Die Wendung zum diskriminierenden Kriegsbegriff, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot.
- Schmitt Carl, 2004, Theory of the Partisan. A Commentary/Remark on the Concept of the Political, East Lansing, Michigan State University Press.
- Schmitt Carl, 2005, Political Theology. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
- Scott Charles E., 1990, The Question of Ethics. Nietzsche, Foucault, Heidegger, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
- Schwab George, 1987, « Enemy or Foe. a Conflict of Modern Politics », Telos, no 72 : 194-201.
- Teschke Bruno, 2003, The Myth of 1648:Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations, Londres, Verso.
- Ulmen Gary L., 1987, « Return of the Foe », Telos, no 72 : 187-193.
- Walker R.B.J., 1993, Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Warner Daniel, 1996, « Levinas, Buber, and the Concept of Otherness in International Relations. A Reply to David Campbell », Millennium, vol. 25, no 1 : 111-128.
- Young Tom, 2002, « “A Project to be Realized”. Global Liberalism and a New Global Order », dans E. Hovden et E. Keene (dir.), The Globalization of Liberalism, Basingstoke, Palgrave : 173-190.
- Zarmanian Thalin, 2006, « Carl Schmitt and the Problem of Legal Order. From Domestic to International », Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 19, no 1 : 41-67.
- Zolo Danilo, 2007, « The Re-Emerging Notion of Empire and the Influence of Carl Schmitt’s Thought » dans L. Odysseos et F. Petito (dir.), The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt. Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order, Londres, Routledge : 154-165.