Résumés
Résumé
Contrairement à la perspective « Nothing works » de Martinson (1974), l’approche « What works ? » du traitement correctionnel s’est centrée sur la possibilité que le traitement correctionnel soit efficace dans la réduction de la récidive criminelle des délinquants. Les preuves empiriques examinées dans le présent article corroborent le fait que l’application des principes risque-besoins-réceptivité d’Andrews et Bonta (2006) donnent les bases d’un modèle efficace de réhabilitation. Pourtant, malgré les grands progrès réalisés dans le développement et la mise en oeuvre d’un traitement correctionnel fondé sur des données probantes, il subsiste des sphères qui nécessitent un approfondissement. Dans cet article, trois questions souvent négligées relativement à la réhabilitation du délinquant sont aussi examinées, à savoir la nécessité de prendre en considération les enjeux motivationnels chez les délinquants, l’importance des compétences et attitudes du personnel, et la nécessité de documenter et d’évaluer continuellement les pratiques de réhabilitation.
Mots-clés:
- Traitement correctionnel,
- préparation au changement,
- caractéristiques des intervenants,
- données probantes
Abstract
In contrast to the Martinson’s (1974) ‘Nothing works’ view, the ‘What works ?’ approach to correctional treatment has focused on whether correctional treatment can be effective in reducing offenders’ criminal recidivism. The empirical evidence reviewed in this paper supports that the Andrews and Bonta’s (2006) risk-need-responsivity principles provide the bases of an effective model of rehabilitation. Yet, despite great strides toward the development and implementation of evidence-based correctional treatment, there continues to be areas that require further development. In this paper, three issues frequently neglected in offender rehabilitation are additionally discussed, namely the need to attend to motivational issues among offenders, the importance of staff skills and attitude, and the need to continually document and evaluate rehabilitative practices.
Keywords:
- Correctional treatment,
- readiness for treatment,
- characteristics of therapeutic staff,
- evidence based
Resumen
Contrariamente a la perspectiva “Nothing works” de Martinson (1974), la orientación “What works ?” del tratamiento correccional se ha centrado en la posibilidad de que el tratamiento profesional pueda ser eficaz en la reducción de la reincidencia de los delincuentes. Las pruebas empíricas examinadas en el presente artículo corroboran el hecho de que la aplicación de los principios riesgo-necesidades-receptividad de Andrews y Bonta (2006) proporcionan las bases de un modelo eficaz de rehabilitación. Sin embargo, pese a los grandes progresos realizados en el desarrollo y la puesta en práctica de un tratamiento correccional basado en la evidencia, subsisten áreas que necesitan ser profundizadas. Examinamos también en este artículo tres cuestiones a menudo descuidadas respecto a la rehabilitación del delincuente, a saber, la necesidad de tomar en cuenta las motivaciones de los delincuentes, la importancia de las competencias y actitudes del personal y la necesidad de documentar y evaluar continuamente las prácticas de rehabilitación.
Palabras clave:
- Tratamiento correccional,
- preparación al cambio,
- características de los terapeutas,
- prácticas basadas en la evidencia
Parties annexes
Références
- Andrews, D. A. (1983). Assessment of outcomes in correctional samples. In M. L. Lambert, E. R. Christensen & S. S. DeJulio (eds.), The Measurement of Psychotherapy Outcome in Research and Evaluation (160-201). New York : John Wiley & Sons.
- Andrews, D. A. (2001). Principles of effective correctional programs. In L. L. Motiuk & R. C. Serin (eds.), Compendium 2000 on Effective Corrections (I, 9-17). Ottawa : Correctional Service Canada.
- Andrews, D. A., & Bonta J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th Ed.). Cincinnati : Anderson.
- Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
- Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
- Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, C. (2005). Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism : A meta-analytic review of program integrity. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 173-187.
- Andrews, D.A., & Dowden, C. (2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment : A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50, 88-100.
- Andrews, D.A., & Dowden, C. (2007). The Risk-Need-Responsivity model of assessment and human service in prevention and corrections : Crime-prevention jurisprudence. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 49, 439-464.
- Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work ? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
- Beech, A. R., & Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E. (2005). Relationship between therapeutic climate and treatment outcome in group-based sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse : A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 127-140.
- Bernfeld, G. A., Farrington, D. P., & Leschied, A. W. (Eds.) (2001). Offender rehabilitation in practice : Implementing and evaluating effective programs. Chichester, UK : John Wiley & Sons.
- Birgden, A. (2004). Therapeutic jurisprudence and responsivity : Finding the will and the way in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 283-295.
- Bonta, J., Law, M., & Hanson, R. K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders : A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 39, 127-144.
- Bourgon, G. & Armstrong, B. A. (2005). Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a “real world” prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 3-25.
- Brown, S. L. (2001). Cost-effective correctional treatment. In L. L. Motiuk & R. C. Serin (eds.), Compendium 2000 on Effective Corrections (I, 221-233). Ottawa : Correctional Service Canada.
- Canada (1992). Loi sur le système correctionnel et la mise en liberté sous condition. Ottawa : Département de Justice, Gouvernement du Canada.
- Canada (2007) Rapport sur les plans et les priorités du Service correctionnel du Canada 2007-2008. Ottawa : Service correctionnel du Canada. Disponible sur www.csc-scc.gc.ca
- Cortoni, F., & Carich, M. S. (2007). The how and why of building coping skills in treatment. In D. Prescott (ed.), Applying knowledge to practice : Challenges in the treatment and supervision of sexual abusers (222-238). Oklahoma City, OK : Wood’N’Barnes.
- Cortoni, F., Nunes, K. L., & Latendresse, M. (2006). An examination of the effectiveness of the Violence Prevention Program. Research Report R-178. Ottawa : Correctional Service Canada.
- Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (1989). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation – reconsidering the “nothing works” debate. In L. Goodstein & D. L. McKenzie (eds.), The American prison : Issues in research and policy (23-44). New York : Plenum.
- Day, A., Bryan, J., Davey, L., & Casey, S. (2006). The process of change in offender rehabilitation programmes. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 473-487.
- Dowden, C. & Andrews, D. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment : A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 203-214.
- Dowden, C., & Serin, R. (2001). Anger management Programming for Offenders : The impact of program performance measures. Research Report R-106. Ottawa : Correctional Service Canada.
- Fernandez, Y. M., & Serran, G. (2002). Characteristics of an effective sex offender therapist. In B. Schwartz (ed.), The Sex offender vol. 4 : Current treatment modalities and systems issues (9.1-9.12). Kingston, NJ : Civic Research Institute.
- Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist, 55, 647-654.
- French, S. A., & Gendreau, P. (2006). Reducing prison misconducts : What works ! Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 185-218.
- Gannon, T. A., Ward, T., Beech, A. R., & Fisher, D. (2007). Aggressive Offenders’ Cognition : Theory, Research and Practice. Chichester, England : John Wiley & Sons.
- Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (1999). The forgotten issue in effective correctional treatment : program implementation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 180-187.
- Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2001). Implementation guidelines for correctional programs in the ‘real world’. In G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington & A. W. Leschied (eds.), Offender Rehabilitation in Practice : Implementing and evaluating effective programs (247-268). Chichester, UK : Wiley.
- Goggin, C., & Gendreau, P. (2006). The implementation and maintenance of quality services in offender rehabilitation programmes. In C. R. Hollin, & E. J. Palmer (eds), Offending behaviour programmes : Development, application, and controversies (209-246). Chichester, UK : Wiley & Sons.
- Greenspan, E. L., & Rosenberg, M. (2007). Martin’s annual criminal code. Aurora, ON : Canada Law Book Inc.
- Hanson, R. K. (1997). Sex offender risk assessment. In C. R. Hollin (ed.), Handbook of Offender Assessment and Treatment (85-96). Chichester, UK : Wiley.
- Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting Relapse : A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
- Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T. L., & Helmus, T. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision : The Dynamic Supervision Project. (User Report No. 2007-05). Ottawa : Corrections Research, Public Safety Canada.
- Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders : A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
- Hollin, C. R. (2006). Offending behaviour programmes and contention : Evidence-based practice, manuals, and programme evaluation. In C. R. Hollin, & E. J. Palmer (eds), Offending behaviour programmes : Development, application, and controversies (33-67). Chichester, UK : Wiley & Sons.
- Hollin, C. R., & Palmer, E. J. (Eds.) (2006a). Offending behaviour programmes : Development, application, and controversies. Chichester, UK : Wiley & Sons.
- Hollin, C. R., & Palmer, E. J. (2006b). Offending behaviour programmes : Controversies and resolutions. In C. R. Hollin & E. J. Palmer (eds.), Offending behaviour programmes : Development, application, and controversies (247-278). Chichester, UK : Wiley & Sons.
- Howells, K., & Day, A. (2003). Readiness for anger management : Clinical and theoretical issues. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 11, 189-196.
- Langston, C. A. (1994). Capitalizing on and coping with daily-life events : Expressive responses to positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1112-1125.
- Leschied, A. W., Bernfeld, G. A., & Farrington, D. P. (2001). Implementation issues. In G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington & A. W. Leschied (eds.), Offender Rehabilitation in Practice : Implementing and evaluating effective programs (3-19). Chichester, UK : Wiley.
- Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment : A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis & F. Mosteller (eds.) Meta-analysis for explanation : A Casebook (83-127) New York : Sage.
- Lipsey, M. W. (1995). What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents ? In J. McGuire (ed.), What Works : Reducing Reoffending – Guidelines From Research and Practice (63-78). UK : Wiley.
- Lipton, D. S., Pearson, F. S., Cleland, C. M., & Yee, D. (2001). The effectiveness of cognitive- behavioural treatment methods on offender recidivism : Meta-analytic outcomes from the CDATE project. In J. McGuire (ed.), Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment : Effective Programmes and Policies to reduce Re-offending (79-112). UK : Wiley & Sons.
- Lösel, F. (2001). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional programs : Bridging the gap between research and practice. In G. A. Bernfeld & D. P. Farrington (eds.), Offender Rehabilitation in Practice (67-92). Chichester, UK : Wiley.
- Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders : A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117-146.
- Marchand, A. (2008). L’implication dans le traitement et la récidive des agresseurs sexuels adultes. Mémoire de maîtrise, Université de Montréal, Montréal.
- Marshall, W. L., & McGuire, J. (2003). Effect sizes in the treatment of sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 653-663.
- Martinson, R. (1974). What Works ? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 36, 22-54.
- McCulloch, A., & McMurran, M. (2007). The features of a good offender treatment programme manual : A Dephi survey of experts. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 265-274.
- McGuire, J. (2001a). What works in correctional intervention ? Evidence and practical implications. In G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington & A. W. Leschied (eds.), Offender Rehabilitation in Practice : Implementing and evaluating effective programs (25-43). Chichester, UK : Wiley.
- McGuire, J. (2001b). Development of a program Logic Model to assist evaluation. In L. L. Motiuk, & R. C. Serin (eds.), Compendium 2000 on Effective Corrections, (I, 208‑220). Ottawa : Correctional Service Canada.
- McGuire, J. (2004). Commentary : Promising answers, and the next generation of questions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 335-345.
- McGuire, J. (2006). General offending behaviour programmes : Concept, theory, and practice. In C. R. Hollin & E. J. Palmer (eds), Offending behaviour programmes : Development, application, and controversies (69-111). Chichester, UK : Wiley & Sons.
- Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing : Preparing people to change addictive behavior. Chichester, UK : John Wiley & Sons.
- Nunes, K. L., & Cortoni, F. (2006). Estimating risk of dropout and expulsion from correctional programs. Research Report R-177. Ottawa : Correctional Service Canada.
- Ogborne, A. C. (2003). Program Evaluation : An overview of some basic issues. Paper presented at the Correctional Service Canada Addiction Research Centre Summer Institute, août 2003. Montague, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
- Ogloff, J. R. P. (1995). Communication de renseignements : les obligations éthiques et juridiques des psychologues qui travaillent en milieu correctionnel. In T. A. Leis, L. L. Motiuk, et J. R. P. Ogloff (eds.), Psychologie médico-légale : Politique et pratiques en milieu correctionnel (15-23). Ottawa : Service correctionnel Canada.
- Ogloff, J. R. P., & Davis, M. R. (2004). Advances in offender assessment and rehabilitation : Contributions of the risk-needs-responsivity approach. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 229-242.
- Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications Inc.
- Polaschek, D. L. L. (2006). Violent offender programmes : Concept, theory, and practice. In C. R. Hollin & E. J. Palmer (eds), Offending behaviour programmes : Development, application, and controversies (113-154). Chichester, UK : Wiley & Sons.
- Polaschek, D. L. L., & Collie, R. M. (2004). Rehabilitating serious violent adult offenders : An empirical and theoretical stockade. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 321-334.
- Porteous, N. L., Sheldrick, B. J., & Stewart, P. J. (2002). Introducing program teams to Logic Models : Facilitating the learning process. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 17, 113-141.
- Preston, D. L. (2001). Addressing treatment resistance in corrections. In L.L. Motiuk, & R. C. Serin (eds.), Compendium 2000 on Effective Corrections (I, 47-55). Ottawa : Correctional Service of Canada.
- Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking : Toward an integrated model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 390-395.
- Proulx, J., Brien, T., Ciampi, A., Allaier, J-F., McDonald, M., & Chouinard, A. (2004). Treatment attrition in sexual aggressors. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, octobre 2004. Albuquerque, NM.
- Quinsey, V. L. (2008). Seeking enlightenment on the dark side of psychology. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse. 9, 72-83.
- Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Violent Offenders : Appraising and Managing Risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
- Quirion, B. (2006). Traiter les délinquants ou contrôler les conduites : le dispositif thérapeutique à l’ère de la nouvelle pénologie. Criminologie, 39 (2), 137-164.
- Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The Good Lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 243-257.
- Ward, T., Howells, K., & Birgden, A. (2004). The multifactor offender readiness model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 645-673.
- Ward. T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation : Beyond the risk paradigm. London, UK : Routledge.
- Ward, T., Polaschek, D. L. & Beech, A. R. (2006). Theories of sexual offending. Chichester, U.K. : Wiley.
- Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2001). Evaluating the economic efficiency of correctional intervention programs. In G. A. Bernfeld & D. P. Farrington (eds.), Offender Rehabilitation in Practice (45-65). Chichester, UK : Wiley.
- Wild, T. C., Newton-Taylor, B., & Alletto, R. (1998). Perceived coercion among clients entering substance abuse treatment : Structural and psychological determinants. Addictive Behaviors, 23, 81-95.
- Wong, S. (2000). Psychopathic offenders. In S. Hodgins & R. Muller-Isbener (eds.), Violence, crime and mentally disordered offenders : Concepts and methods for effective treatment and prevention (87-112). Chichester, UK : John Wiley & Sons.
- Wong, S. & Hare, R. D. (2005). Guidelines for a psychopathy treatment program. Toronto : Multi-Health Systems.
- Wormith, J. S., & Olver, M. E. (2002). Offender treatment attrition and its relationship with risk, responsivity, and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 447-471.