Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Van Der Vleuten CP. The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ. 1996;1(1):41‑67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00596229
- Brown GTL. The past, present and future of educational assessment: a transdisciplinary perspective. Front Educ. 2022;7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1060633
- Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77(1):81‑112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
- Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9):S63-7.
- Ben-David MF. The role of assessment in expanding professional horizons. Med Teach. 2000;22(5):472‑7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590050110731
- Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):387‑96. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054784
- Norcini J, Anderson MB, Bollela V, et al. 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment. Med Teach. 2018;40(11):1102‑9. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016
- Boud D, Molloy E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assess Eval High Educ. 2013;38(6):698‑712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
- Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Amending Miller’s pyramid to include professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2016;91(2):180‑5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000913
- Edmondson AC. The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2018.
- Gierl MJ, Haladyna TM. Automatic item generation: Theory and practice. New York: Routledge; 2013.
- Lee J, Wu AS, Li D, Kulasegaram KM. Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: ascoping review. Acad Med. 2021;96(11S):S62‑70. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004291
- García-Ramírez Y, Bijelić V. Assessing task prioritization for professors through affinity and satisfaction scores. Cogent Educ. 2024;11(1):2321355. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2321355
- Link AN, Swann CA, Bozeman B. A time allocation study of university faculty. Econ Educ Rev. 2008;27(4):363‑74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.04.002
- Naveed H, Khan AU, Qiu S, et al. A comprehensive overview of large language models. ArXiv Prepr ArXiv230706435. 2023;
- Liu Y, Cao J, Liu C, Ding K, Jin L. Datasets for large language models: a comprehensive survey. ArXiv Prepr ArXiv240218041. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.18041
- Sardi J, Candra O, Yuliana DF, Yanto DTP, Eliza F. How generative AI influences students’ self-regulated learning and critical thinking skills? A systematic review. Int J Eng Pedagogy. 2025;15(1):94‑108. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v15i1.53379
- Panadero E. A review of self-regulated learning: six models and four directions for research. Front Psychol. 2017;8:422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
- Roll I, Winne PH. Understanding, evaluating, and supporting self-regulated learning using learning analytics. J Learn Anal. 2015;2(1):7‑12. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.21.2
- Yang C, Li J, Zhao W, Luo L, Shanks DR. Do practice tests (quizzes) reduce or provoke test anxiety? A meta-analytic review. Educ Psychol Rev. 2023;35(3):87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09801-w
- Dawson P, Bearman M, Dollinger M, Boud D. Validity matters more than cheating. Assess Eval High Educ. 2024;49(7):1005‑16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2386662
- Corbin T, Dawson P, Nicola-Richmond K, Partridge H. ‘Where’s the line? It’s an absurd line’: Towards a framework for acceptable uses of AI in assessment. Assess Eval High Educ. 2025;1‑13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2456207
- Cochrane JD, Dudek N, Crawford K, Cowley L, LaDonna KA. Exploring the perspectives of new-in-practice specialists about the Health Advocate role: “I didn’t even know where to start” Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78570
- Pulkki KH, Pira S, Young M, et al. Considering the potential unintended consequences of RateMDs: an exploratory study in one specialty. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77821
- Bartman I, St-Onge C, Roy M, et al. Multi-source feedback in undergraduate medical education: a pilot study. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79283
- Bergeron L, Blanchette P, Chakroun M, et al. Are we optimizing medical students’ preparation for clerkship? A content analysis of narrative comments on clinical skills during preclinical training. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78569
- Benoit S, Bouchard-Lamothe D, Denis-LeBlanc M, Burnier I. Diagnostic hypothesis generation through engaged peer observation: a quantitative descriptive study in a clinical simulation context. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77080
- Massalou D, Doyen J, Almairac F, et al. Can relaxation exercises improve students’ OSCE grades: a prospective study. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77739
- Rowe J, Bouchard Lamothe D, Haggerty T, et al. Optimizing feedback reception: a scoping review of skills and strategies for medical learners. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79722
- Lahouaoula I, Buckley H, Nathoo N. To be (virtual) or not to be: six ways to get a grip on choosing a delivery method for your educational program. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78281
- Azer B. Beyond the classroom: lessons in empathy and accessibility as a student clinician serving Calgary’s vulnerable populations. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.80338
- Kumar R, Gosain A, Saintyl JJ, Zheng A, Chima K, Cassagnol R. Bridging gaps in orthopedic residency admissions: embracing diversity beyond research metrics. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.80775
- Fisher LA, Aristizabal Londono C, Cropper K, Beresh G, Alhassan JA. Rethinking global health training: making the links between theory and practice. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79921
- Shoppoff L, Mathew C, Burkholder Harris K, et al. Teaching compassion through a community-led, experiential learning activity for undergraduate medical students: the Empathy Project. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79452
- Sinha S, Gilchrist C, Leung F-H. Breaking bad news, building better learners: using the SPIKES framework for medical education feedback. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.80847
- MacFarlane MM. A critical analysis of The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada examination experience. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79678
- Ali MK. The hidden curriculum. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.81103
- Modesto dos Santos V, Modesto Sugai K. Disclosure of bad news: a challenging practice? Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.80918
- Preti BT, Sanatani MS. Five ways to get a grip on the personal emotional cost of breaking bad news. Can Med Educ J. 2024;15(3):97-99. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78228.
- Bandiera G, Watling C, Horsley T, Dagnone D, Taber S, Bhanji F. Royal College exams, examined. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.81283
- Azer B, Dyson K, Ivaturi S. A glimpse beyond. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.80997
- Huntley JS. Constellations and the sound of hooves. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.81116
- Gilchrist C, Bismilla Z. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations practices across Canadian medical schools: a national overview. Can Med Educ J. 2025;16(2) https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.80144