Résumés
Abstract
To support evidence based decision making, for updating and enhancing authentic Library and Information Studies (LIS) curriculum, or supporting services, programs, and other evaluative practices within various library settings, this exploratory quantitative content analysis examined the scope of Canadian LIS research. In total, 4354 peer reviewed research articles from 25 LIS journals published between 2015-2022, were coded for Canadian content, author affiliation, and sector representation. Percentages of Canadian content and authorship from this point in time analysis align with previous studies, showing that Canadian content and authors are less prevalent compared to those from the USA, with a strong emphasis on academic libraries and academic affiliated authors. A shortlist of key academic journals with significant Canadian representation was also compiled and shared to aid in gathering evidence about Canadian libraries.
Keywords:
- Content analysis,
- Library and Information Studies,
- Canada,
- Canadian Content
Résumé
Pour soutenir la prise de décision basée sur des preuves, pour mettre à jour et améliorer le programme authentique des études en bibliothéconomie et sciences de l’information (LIS), ou pour soutenir les services, programmes et autres pratiques évaluatives au sein de divers environnements de bibliothèques, cette analyse exploratoire quantitative de contenu a examiné la portée de la recherche canadienne en LIS. Au total, 4354 articles de recherche évalués par des pairs provenant de 25 revues LIS publiées entre 2015 et 2022 ont été codés pour le contenu canadien, l’affiliation des auteurs et la représentation sectorielle. Les pourcentages de contenu et d’auteurs canadiens de cette analyse ponctuelle s’alignent avec les études précédentes, montrant que le contenu et les auteurs canadiens sont moins présents par rapport à ceux des États-Unis, avec un fort accent sur les bibliothèques académiques et les auteurs affiliés à des institutions académiques. Une liste restreinte de revues académiques clés avec une représentation canadienne significative a également été compilée et partagée pour aider à recueillir des preuves sur les bibliothèques canadiennes.
Mots-clés :
- analyse de contenu,
- bibliothéconomie et sciences de l’information,
- Canada,
- Contenu canadien
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Adkins, D. (2019). Journals, subjects, and authors of research literature on public libraries: An analysis. Public Library Quarterly, 38(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2018.1564533
- Albarillo, F., Kennedy, M., & Brancolini, K. (2022). Assessment of the Institute for Research Design in Librarianship (IRDL): Impact on the research productivity and careers of academic librarians. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 17(4), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30094
- Albarillo, F., Kennedy, M., & Brancolini, K. (2024). Assessment of the Institute for Research Design in Librarianship, phase 2: Impact on the research productivity and careers of academic librarians. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 19(1), 4–34. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30461
- Armann-Keown, V., & Patterson, L. (2020). Content analysis in library and information research: An analysis of trends. Library and Information Science Research, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101048
- Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE). (2016).
- ALISE research taxonomy. ALISE. https://www.alise.org/research-taxonomy-
- Aytac, S., & Slutsky, B. (2014). Published librarian research, 2008 through 2012: Analyses and perspectives. Collaborative Librarianship, 6(4), 147-159.
- Berg, S., & Hoffmann, K. (2022). Peer Reviewed LIS Journals. University of Saskatchewan University Library. https://library.usask.ca/ceblip/research-resources/peer-reviewed-journals.php
- Chang, Y. W. (2015). Librarians' contribution to open access journal publishing in library and information science from the perspective of authorship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(5), 660–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.06.006
- Chang, Y. W. (2016). Characteristics of articles co-authored by researchers and practitioners in library and information science journals. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.021
- Chang, Y. W. (2017). Comparative study of characteristics of authors between open access and non-open access journals in library and information science. Library and Information Science Research, 39(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.01.002
- Chang, Y. W. (2021). Academic impact of articles by practitioners in the field of library and information science. College & Research Libraries, 82(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.1.59
- Chapman, K., & Pike, L. E. (1994). Public librarians as authors in the library science periodical literature. Public Library Quarterly, 13(3), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1300/J118v13n03_06
- Clarivate. (2023). Journal Citation Reports. Clarivate. https://clarivate.com/products/scientific-and-academic-research/research-analytics-evaluation-and-management-solutions/journal-citation-reports/
- Davarpanah, M.R., & Aslekia, S. (2008). A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics, 77(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1803-z
- DOAJ. (2023). DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals. DOAJ. https://doaj.org/
- Gavigan, K. (2018). School library research from around the world: Where it’s been and where it’s headed. Knowledge Quest, 46(5), 32–39.
- Gupta, N., & Chakravarty, R. (2022). Deciphering the status of library and information science research in BRICS Nations: A research visualization approach. Journal of Library Administration, 62(3), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2022.2043695
- Hoffmann, K., Berg, S., & Koufogiannakis, D. (2014). Examining success: Identifying factors that contribute to research productivity across librarianship and other disciplines. Library & Information Research, 38(119), 13–28. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wlpub/60
- Hoffmann, K., Berg, S., & Koufogiannakis, D. (2017). Understanding factors that encourage research productivity for academic librarians. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 12(4), 102–128. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8G66F
- Huxley, K., (2020). Content analysis, Quantitative, In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J.W. Sakshaug, & R.A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE Research Methods Foundations. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036880564
- Jones, E. P., Mani, N. S., Carlson, R. B., Welker, C. G., Cawley, M., & Yu, F. (2022). Analysis of anti-racism, equity, inclusion and social justice initiatives in library and information science literature. Reference Services Review, 50(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-07-2021-0032
- Julien, H., & Fena, C. (2019). Thirty-one years of the Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science: A content analysis / Trente et un ans de la Revue canadienne des sciences de l’information et de bibliothéconomie : Une analyse de contenu. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 42(1), 1–17. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/717385
- Kim, E. (2023). Publishing international library and information science journals: The changing landscape. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(2), 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221090958
- Kloda, L. A. (2015). What it means to be an international journal. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(4), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8359T
- Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science’s first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 63(5), 997–1016. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22645
- Librarianship.ca. (2021). Periodicals. Librarianship.ca. https://librarianship.ca/resources/periodicals/
- Liu, G., & Yang, L. (2019). Popular research topics in the recent journal publications of library and information science. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(3), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.04.001
- Luo, L., & McKinney, M. (2015). JAL in the past decade: A comprehensive analysis of academic library research. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.01.003
- Manzari, L. (2013). Library and information science journal prestige as assessed by library and information science faculty. Library Quarterly, 83(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1086/668574
- Mongeon, P., Gracey, C., Riddle, P., Hare, M., Simard, M.-A., & Sauvé, J.-S. (2023). Mapping information research in Canada. Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences, 46(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v46i2.15568
- Nixon, J. M. (2014). Core journals in library and information science: Developing a methodology for ranking LIS journals. College & Research Libraries, 75(1), 66–90.
- Paul-Hus, A., Mongeon, P., & Shu, F. (2016). Portraying the landscape of Canadian library and information science research = Portrait de la recherche en bibliothéconomie et sciences de l’information au Canada. Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences, 40(4), 332–346. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/649274
- Penta, M., & McKenzie, P. J. (2005). The big gap remains: Public librarians as authors in LIS journals, 1999-2003. Public Library Quarterly, 24(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1300/J118v24n01_04
- ProQuest. (2023). Ulrichsweb Global Serials Directory. Proquest Serial Solutions. http://ulrichsweb.serialssolutions.com
- Reitz, J. (2014). Special library. ODLIS: Online dictionary for library and information science. ABC-CLIO. https://odlis.abc-clio.com/odlis_s.html#speciallibrary
- Richey, J. (2014). School librarians’ experiences with evidence-based library and information practice. School Library Research, 17(2), 2-19.
- Scimago. (2023). Scimago Journal Rankings. Scimago. https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php
- Shin, E.-J., & Lee, G. (2022). Exploring COVID-19 research papers published on journals in the field of LIS. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, OnlineFirst, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221090676
- Smart, P. (2020). Publishing during pandemic: Innovation, collaboration, and change. Learned Publishing, 33(3), 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1314
- United Nations Statistical Division. (2006). Methodology: Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49). United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/
- Vaidya, P., Malik, B. A., & Ali, P. M. N. (2022). Characteristics and trends in literature of library service quality as reflected in Scopus. Serials Librarian, 81(2), 145–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2021.1882642
- Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2015). Worldwide contributors to the literature of library and information science: Top authors, 2007-2012. Scientometrics, 103(1), 301–327.
- Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2016). Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007-2012. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 67(6), 1487–1506. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23448
- Walters, W. H. (2017). Composite journal rankings in library and information science: A factor analytic approach. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(5), 434–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.005
- White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22-45.
- Whitfield, S. (2022). Women’s voices in library technology: Explored through thematic analysis in library publications. Journal of Library Administration, 62(4), 481–493. https://doi-org.ezproxy.macewan.ca/10.1080/01930826.2022.2057128
- Wilson, V. (2010). Something for everyone? A content analysis of provincial library association conference sessions. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v5i1.1097
- Winkler, B., & Kiszl, P. (2020). Academic libraries as the flagships of publishing trends in LIS: A complex analysis of rankings, citations and topics of research. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102223
- Wolfram, D. (2012). An analysis of Canadian contributions to the information science research literature: 1989-2008. Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences, 36(1/2), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/ils.2012.0005
- Woods, H. B., & Booth, A. (2013). What is the current state of practitioner research? The 2013 LIRG research scan. Library and Information Research, 37(116), 2-22.
- Xie, J., & Sun, L. (2018). A content analysis of Journal of Library Science in China in 2007–2016. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 30(4), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2018.1521083
- Yang, K., Lee, J., & Choi. W. (2016). Publication and citation patterns of Korean LIS research by subject areas. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 21(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol21no2.5
- Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., & Wang, Y. (2016). A study on statistical methods used in six journals of library and information science. Online Information Review, 40(3), 416-434. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2015-0247