Résumés
Abstract
Picking up on recent feminist calls for an emphasis on social histories of cinema, the author argues for the importance of socio-historical contextualization in order to preserve feminist goals of critiquing epistemologies and power relations. Analyzing two early Edison films, she shows that the historical importance of each can be located in the ways they depict ideological confusion over female sexuality and mobility in changing urban spaces. Through socio-cultural contextualization, she further illuminates how Laughing Gas (Edison, 1907) depicts social tensions about the national rise of African American female domestics.
Résumé
Prenant en considération la récente mobilisation des féministes en faveur d’une histoire sociale du cinéma, l’auteure du présent article montre que la mise en contexte sociohistorique joue un rôle essentiel dans l’entreprise féministe visant à critiquer les approches épistémologiques et les relations de pouvoir. Une analyse de deux films d’Edison lui permet de montrer que leur importance historique réside en ceci qu’ils illustrent la confusion idéologique à propos de la sexualité féminine et de la mobilité des femmes dans un espace urbain en transformation. L’auteure met par ailleurs en lumière la façon dont Laughing Gas (Edison, 1907) dépeint les tensions sociales liées à l’émancipation des domestiques afro-américaines.
Parties annexes
Bibliographical references
- Bean and Negra 2002: Jennifer M. Bean and Diane Negra (eds.), A Feminist Reader for Early Cinema, Durham, Duke University Press, 2002.
- Bogle 1990: Donald Bogle, Toms, Coons, Mulattoes, Mammies, and Bucks: An Interpretive History of Blacks in American Films, New York, Continuum, 1990.
- Bruno 1993: Giuliana Bruno, Streetwalking on a Ruined Map: Cultural Theory and the City Films of Elvira Notari, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1993.
- Franklin and Moss 1988: John Hope Franklin and Alfred A. Moss Jr., From Slavery to Freedom: A History of Negro Americans, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1988.
- Gaines 2004: Jane M. Gaines, “Film History and the Two Presents of Feminist Film Theory,” Cinema Journal, Vol. 44, no. 1, 2004, pp. 113-119.
- Gilfoyle 1992: Timothy J. Gilfoyle, City of Eros: New York City, Prostitution, and the Commercialization of Sex, 1790-1920, New York, Norton, 1992.
- Gunning 1993: Tom Gunning, “Now You See It, Now You Don’t: The Temporality of the Cinema of Attractions,” The Velvet Light Trap, no. 32, 1993, pp. 3-12.
- Hansen 1993: Miriam Hansen, Babel & Babylon: Spectatorship in American Silent Film, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1993.
- Mayne 1990: Judith Mayne, The Woman at the Keyhole: Feminism and Women’s Cinema, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1990.
- Mayne 1993: Judith Mayne, Directed by Dorothy Arzner, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1993.
- McHugh and Sobchack 2004: Kathleen McHugh and Vivian Sobchack (eds.), “Beyond the Gaze: Recent Approaches to Film Feminisms,” Signs, Vol. 30, no. 1, 2004.
- Petro 2002: Patrice Petro, Aftershocks of the New: Feminism and Film History, New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, 2002.
- Rabinovitz 1998: Lauren Rabinovitz, For the Love of Pleasure: Women, Movies and Culture in Turn-of-the-Century Chicago, New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, 1998.
- Rich 1998: B. Ruby Rich, Chick Flicks: Theories and Memories of the Feminist Film Movement, Durham, Duke University Press, 1998.
- Sampson 1995: Henry Sampson, Blacks in Black and White: A Source Book on Black Films, Metuchen, Scarecrow Press, 1995.
- Stewart 2003: Jacqueline Stewart, “Negroes Laughing At Themselves? Black Spectatorship and the Performance of Urban Modernity,” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 29, no. 4, 2003, pp. 650-677.
- Stewart 2005: Jacqueline Stewart, Migrating to the Movies: Cinema and Black Urban Modernity, Berkeley, University of California Press, 2005.