Résumés
Abstract
In this paper, Ayelet Shachar begins by restating the main idea of her important book The Birthright Lottery : Citizenship and Global Inequality (Harvard, Harvard University Press, 2009) and then goes on to address in a constructive spirit the main themes raised by the five preceding comments written by scholars in the fields of law, philosophy and political science.
Résumé
Dans cet article, Ayelet Shachar commence par rappeler l’idée centrale de son livre important The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality (Harvard, Harvard University Press, 2009) avant de répondre de manière constructive aux cinq commentaires qui précèdent, rédigés par des experts dans les domaines du droit, de la philosophie et de la science politique.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Daniel Heller-Roazen Trans. Stanford University Press.
- Anderson, Bridget. 2010. “Migration, Immigration Controls and the Fashioning of Precarious Workers.” Work,Employment and Society 24: 300-317.
- Baubock, Rainer. 2005. “Expansive Citizenship—Voting beyond Territory and Membership,” Political Science and Politics 38: 683-688.
- Benhabib, Seyla. 2011. Dignity in Adversity: Human Rights in Troubled Times. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Dagan, Hanoch. 2012. “Inside Property,” Wright Lecture. Toronto: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto.
- Dahl, Robert A. [1970] 1990. After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Gonzales, Roberto G. 2007. Wasted Talent and Broken Dreams: The Lost Potential of Undocumented Migrants, Washington DC: Immigration Policy Center.
- Goodin, Robert E. 2007. “Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35: 40-68.
- Grey, Thomas, C. 1980. “The Disintegration of Property,” in NOMOS XXII: Property, J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman eds. New York: NYU Press.
- Haslett, J.S. 1986. “Is Inheritance Justified?” Philosophy & Public Affairs 15: 122-155.
- Held, David. 1991. “Between State and Civil Society: Citizenship” in Citizenship, Geoff Andrews, ed. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
- Henderson, Hubert Douglas. 1926. Inheritance and Inequality: A Practical Proposal. London: The Daily News.
- International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2010. World Migration Report 2010. IOM: Geneva.
- Joppke, Christian. 2011. “How Liberal Are Citizenship Tests? A Rejoinder,” in How Liberal Are Citizenship Tests? Rainer Baubock and Christian Joppke eds. EUI Working Papers, RSCAS 2010/42. Florence: European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.
- Kanstroom, Daniel. 2007. Deportation Nation: Outsiders in American History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Shachar, Ayelet. 2009. The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Shachar, Ayelet. 2011. “Earned Citizenship: Property Lessons for Immigration Reform,” Yale Journal of Law & Humanities 23: 110-158.
- Shapiro, Ian. 1999. Democratic Justice. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Spiro, Peter J. 2008. Beyond Citizenship: American Identity After Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs (UN DESA). 2008. Trends in International Migrants Stock, the 2008 Revision.
- Vink, Maarten P. and Gerard-René de Groot. 2010. “Birthright Citizenship: Trends and Regulations in Europe.” EUDO Citizenship Observatory Comparative Report. Florence: European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.
- Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
- Whelan, Fredrick G. 1983. “Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem,” in NOMOS XXV: Liberal Democracy, J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman eds. New York: NYU Press.
- Yack, Bernard. 2011. “Birthright, Birthwrongs: Contingency, Choice and Cosmopolitanism in Recent Political Thought.” Political Theory 39: 406-416.