ror.org/01x3t1868
Abstracts
Abstract
Plato is often understood to be merely an outspoken critic of rhetoric and Aristotle a systematizer of rhetoric. The reality is more complex. Plato’s criticism is not of rhetoric per se but of a particular (Sophistic) kind of rhetoric; his work actually evidences a keen desire to enshrine a true rhetoric, one that will enable instruction in truth to happen. Nor is Aristotle a critic of Plato; rather, Aristotle provides a systematic approach to political discourse and human language as it is in practice. Aristotle thus establishes both the foundations for analysis of democratic political discourse and the analytical groundwork for the much later analysis of “ordinary language.”
Résumé
Platon est souvent compris comme un critique de la rhétorique, tandis qu’Aristote comme systématiseur de la rhétorique. La réalité est plus complexe. La critique de Platon ne porte pas sur la rhétorique en soi mais sur la rhétorique sophistique ; son travail témoigne en réalité d’un désir ardent de fonder une vraie rhétorique comme moyen de pouvoir enseigner la vérité. Aristote n’est pas non plus un critique de Platon. Il propose plutôt une approche systématique du discours politique et du langage humain tel qu’ils sont dans la pratique. Aristote établit ainsi à la fois les bases de l’analyse du discours politique démocratique et les bases analytiques pour le « langage ordinaire ».
Appendices
Bibliography
- Balla, Chloe 2004, “Isocrates, Plato, and Aristotle on Rhetoric,” Rhizai: Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 1, pp. 45-71.
- Ballacci, Giuseppe 2018, “Between Philosophy and Rhetoric: Plato and Aristotle,” in Rhetoric, Politics and Society: Politics as Transcendence and Contingency, London, Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 13-50.
- Bloom, Allan (trans.) 1991, The Republic of Plato2, New York NY, Basic Books.
- Bloomquist, L. Gregory 2003, “Paul’s Inclusive Language: The Ideological Texture of Romans 1,” in David B. Gowler, L. Gregory Bloomquist, and Duane Watson (ed.), Fabrics of Discourse: Essays in Honor of Vernon K. Robbins, Harrisburg PA, Trinity, pp. 165-193.
- Bloomquist, L. Gregory 2000, “The Possibility of Biblical Studies in a Post-Wittgensteinian World,” in Stephen G. Wilson and Michel Desjardins (ed.), Text and Artifact in the Religions of Mediterranean Antiquity: Essays in Honour of Peter Richardson, Waterloo ON, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, pp. 271-288.
- Bloomquist, L. Gregory 2010, “Rhetoric, Culture, and Ideology: Socio-Rhetorical Analysis in the Reading of New Testament Texts,” in James D. Hester and J. David Hester, Rhetorics in the New Millennium: Promise and Fulfillment, New York NY, T & T Clark, pp. 115-146.
- Cavell, Stanley 2003, “Afterword,” in Kenneth Dauber, Ordinary Language Criticism: Literary Thinking After Cavell After Wittgenstein, Evanston IL, Northwestern University Press, pp. 347-349.
- Coulter, James A. 1967, “Phaedrus 279A: The Praise of Isocrates,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 8, pp. 225-236.
- Crosswhite, James 1989, “Universality in Rhetoric: Perelman’s Universal Audience,” Philosophy & Rhetoric, 22, pp. 157-173.
- Düring, Ingemar 1957, Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition (Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia, 2), Göteborg, Almqvist & Wiksell.
- Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark 2003, The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, New York NY, Basic Books.
- Fortenbaugh, William W. 2007, “Aristotle’s Art of Rhetoric,” in Ian Worthington (ed.), A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, Malden MA, Blackwell, pp. 107-123.
- Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1980, Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato, P. Christopher Smith (ed. and trans.), New Haven CT, Yale University Press.
- Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1991, Plato’s Dialectical Ethics: Phenomenological Interpretations Relating to the Philebus, New Haven CT, Yale University Press.
- Grimaldi, William M. A. 1958, “Rhetoric and the Philosophy of Aristotle,” Classical Journal, 53, pp. 371-375.
- Heidegger, Martin 2009, Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy (Studies in Continental Thought), Robert D. Metcalf and Mark B. Tanzer (trans.), Bloomington IN, Indiana University Press.
- Jones, William H. S. 1946, Philosophy and Medicine in Ancient Greece: With an Edition of [Peri Arxaiès Iètrikès] [De Prisca Medicina] (Supplements to the Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 8), Baltimore MD, John Hopkins Press.
- Kennedy, George A. 1994, A New History of Classical Rhetoric, Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press.
- Kennedy, George A. (ed. and trans.) 2003, Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Writings from the Greco-Roman World, 10), Atlanta GA, Society of Biblical Literature.
- Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark 1981, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago IL, University of Chicago Press.
- Lanham, Richard A. 1976, The Motives of Eloquence. Literary Rhetoric in the Renaissance, New Haven CT, Yale University Press.
- Malina, Bruce J. 2001, The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology3, Louisville KY, Westminster John Knox Press.
- Ostwald, Martin and Lynch, John P. 1994, “The Growth of Schools and the Advance of Knowledge,” in David M. Lewis al. (ed.), TheCambridge Ancient History, Volume 6: The Fourth Century BC, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 592-633.
- Parsons, Mikeal C. and Martin, Michael W. 2018, Ancient Rhetoric and the New Testament: The Influence of Elementary Greek Composition, Waco TX, Baylor University Press.
- Perelman, Chaïm and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie 1969, The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver (trans.), Notre Dame IN, University of Notre Dame Press.
- Reames, Robin and Schiappa, Edward (ed.) 2017, Logos Without Rhetoric: The Arts of Language Before Plato, Columbia SC, The University of South Carolina Press.
- Robbins, Vernon K. 2005, “Conceptual Blending and Early Christian Imagination,” in Petri Luomanen, Ilkka Pyysiäinen and Risto Uro (ed.), Explaining Christian Origins and Early Judaism: Contributions from Cognitive and Social Science (Biblical Interpretation Series, 89), Leiden, Brill, pp. 161-195.
- Robbins, Vernon K. 1996a, Exploring the Texture of Texts: A Guide to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation, Valley Forge PA, Trinity Press International.
- Robbins, Vernon K. 1996b, The Tapestry of Early Christian Discourse: Rhetoric, Society and Ideology, London-New York NY, Routledge.
- Schiappa, Edward 2003 [1991], Protagoras and Logos: A Study in Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric2, Columbia SC, University of South Carolina.
- Shore, Bradd 1996, Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning, Oxford-New York NY, Oxford University Press.
- Ustinova, Yulia 2018, “Ancient Psychotherapy? Fifth-Century BCE Athenian Intellectuals and the Cure of Disturbed Minds,” in Paul Bishop and Leslie Gardner (ed.), The Ecstatic and the Archaic: An Analytical Psychological Inquiry, London, Routledge, pp. 43-55.
- Walker, Jeffrey 1994, “The Body of Persuasion: A Theory of the Enthymeme,” College English, 56, pp. 46-65.
- Watson, James M. 1909, Aristotle’s Criticisms of Plato, London, Oxford University Press.
- Wilcox, Stanley 1943, “Isocrates and His φιλοσοφία,” in Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 74, pp. 113-133.
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1958, Philosophical Investigations, Gertrude E. M. Anscombe (trans.), New York NY, Macmillan.
- Yunis, Harvey 2007, “Plato’s Rhetoric,” in Ian Worthington (ed.), A Companion to Greek Rhetoric (Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World), Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 75-89.
- Yunis, Harvey 1996, Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens (Rhetoric & Society), Ithaca NY, Cornell University Press.