Abstracts
Résumé
Les familles aux prises avec des conflits sévères de séparation posent des défis importants aux intervenants psychosociaux et aux juristes. Le protocole d’intervention Parentalité-Conflit-Résolution (PCR) propose une alternative interdisciplinaire à la gestion traditionnelle de ces situations familiales en visant l’établissement d’une coparentalité fonctionnelle et une reprise de contacts parent-enfant, lorsque le lien est rompu ou gravement fragilisé. Cet article présente le cadre pratique du psychothérapeute au sein du PCR, le rôle du psychothérapeute au sein du modèle interdisciplinaire, les enjeux cliniques auxquels il fait face ainsi que les défis déontologiques que pose un tel modèle d’intervention. En conclusion, des recommandations sont émises dans le but de préciser l’avenir de cette intervention psychojudiciaire novatrice auprès des familles vivant des conflits sévères.
Mots-clés :
- conflits sévères de séparation,
- rupture de lien parent-enfant,
- intervention psychojudiciaire,
- justice familiale
Abstract
High-conflict parental separation cases generate significant challenges for psychosocial professional and law professionals. The Parentalité-Conflit-Résolution intervention protocol (PCR) offers an interdisciplinary alternative for dealing with these family situations, aiming to improve interparental communication and to support or restore the parent–child relationship. This article presents the practical framework of the psychotherapist within the PCR, the psychotherapist’s role within the interdisciplinary model, the clinical issues he faces as well as the ethical challenges that come with such an intervention model. In conclusion, recommendations are made with the aim of clarifying the future of this innovative psycho-judicial intervention for families living in severe conflicts.
Keywords:
- high-conflict divorce,
- parent-child contact problems,
- psychojudicial intervention,
- family justice
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Anderson, S. R., Anderson, S. A., Palmer, K. L., Mutchler, M. S. et Baker, L. K. (2010). Defining high conflict. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 39(1), 11-27. doi:10.1080/01926187.2010.530194
- Bala, N. (2004). Assessments for postseparation parenting disputes in Canada. Family Court Review, 42(3), 485-510.
- Bala, N., Birnbaum, R. et Martinson, D. (2011). One judge for one family: Differentiated case management for families in continuing conflict. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 26(2) 395-450.
- Ballard, R. H., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Applegate, A. G. et Beck, C. J. (2011). Detecting intimate partner violence in family and divorce mediation: A randomized trial of intimate partner violence screening. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(2), 241.
- Baude, A., Lamonde, G., Angele, R., Lachance, V. et St-Arnaud, N. (2021). Application d’un programme d’intervention sociojudiciaire en conflits sévères de séparation : qu’en pensent les professionnels?. Revue québécoise de psychologie, 42(2), 167-189.
- Beck, C. J., Anderson, E. R., O'Hara, K. L. et Benjamin, G. A. H. (2013). Patterns of intimate partner violence in a large, epidemiological sample of divorcing couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 743.
- Beck, C. J. et Raghavan, C. (2010). Intimate partner abuse screening in custody mediation: The importance of assessing coercive control. Family Court Review, 48(3), 555-565.
- Biland, É. et Schütz, G. (2012). Pour avoir la garde, il faut la demander! Les déterminants de la garde des enfants dans les procédures judiciaires au Québec. Colloque Les séparations conjugales: décisions judiciaires et incidences familiales.
- Biland, É. et Schütz, G. (2013). La garde des enfants de parents séparés au Québec: une analyse quantitative de dossiers judiciaires. Université Laval. Centre de recherche sur l'adaptation des jeunes et des familles à risques.
- Birnbaum, R. et Bala, N. (2010) Towards the differentiation of high-conflict families: An analysis of social science research and Canadian case law. Family Court Review, 48(3), 403–416.
- Birnbaum, R. et Saini, M. (2012). A scoping review of qualitative studies on the voice of the child in child custody disputes. Childhood, 20(2), 260-282.
- Braver, S. L. et Griffin, W. A. (2000). Engaging fathers in the post-divorce family. Marriage and Family Review, 29, 247-267.
- Braver, S. L., Griffin, W.A. et Cookston, J. T. (2005). Prevention programs for divorced non-resident fathers. Family court Review, 43, 81-96.
- Braver, S. L., Sandler, I. N., Cohen Hita, L. et Wheeler, L. A. (2016). A Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Two Court‐Connected Programs for High‐Conflict Families. Family Court Review, 54(3), 349-363.
- Brecht, M. L., Anglin, M. D. et Dylan, M. (2005). Coerced treatment for methamphetamine abuse: Differential patient characteristics and outcomes. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31(2), 337-356.
- Campbell, J. (2020). Children resisting contact with a parent due to abuse, alienation, or other causes: Can a proactive role for lawyers contribute to better outcomes?. Family Court Review, 58(2), 456-469.
- Charette, L. (2018). Le traitement des conflits sévères de séparation : enjeux et défis du système judiciaire. Conférence organisée par le Laboratoire de psychologie légale, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec.
- Comité de réflexion et d’orientation sur la justice de première instance au Québec, C. (2005). Une réforme judiciaire axée sur le citoyen. Rapport du comité de réflexion et d'orientation sur la justice de première instance au Québec.
- Cyr, F. (2020). La psychothérapie auprès des familles séparées hautement conflictuelles: cadre pratique et enjeux éthiques pour le psychologue. Psychologie Québec. https://www.ordrepsy.qc.ca/-/introduction-au-dossier-problematiques-familiales
- Cyr, F., Macé, C. et Quigley, C. (2016). Parenting coordination pilot project at the Montreal Superior Court: Implementation and outcome study. Research report presented to the Quebec Ministry of Justice (Report No. 000119259). Montreal (QC). http://www.justice.gouv.qc.ca/francais/publications/rapports/pdf/Rapport_CP. pdf.
- Cyr, F., Poitras, K., Godbout, É. et Macé, C. (2017). Projet pilote sur la gestion des dossiers judiciaires à haut niveau de conflit. https://www.justice.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/user_upload/contenu/documents/Fr__francais_/centredoc/rapports/couple-famille/Rapport_UMTL_final_2.pdf
- Cyr, F., Poitras, K. et Godbout, É. (2020). An interdisciplinary case management protocol for child resistance or refusal dynamics. Family Court Review, 58(2), 560-575.
- Desrosiers, H. et Simard, M. (2010). Diversité et mouvance familiales durant la petite enfance. Étude longitudinale du développement des enfants du Québec (ÉLDEQ 1998- 2010) – De la naissance à 6 ans (vol. 4). Institut de la statistique du Québec.
- Deutsch, R., Drozd, L. et Ajoku, C. (2020). Trauma‐Informed Interventions in Parent–Child Contact Cases. Family Court Review, 58(2), 470-487.
- Eddy, B. (2020). Ten things to understand about alienation (resistance or refusal to see a parent). AFCC eNews, 15(4).
- Ellis, D. et Stuckless, N. (2006). Domestic violence, DOVE, and divorce mediation. Family Court Review, 44(4), 658-671.
- Emery, R. E. (1999). Marriage, divorce, and children's adjustment (vol. 14). Sage.
- Fidler, B. J. et Bala, N. (2020). Introduction to the 2020 Special Issue on parent-child contact problems: concepts, controversies et conundrums of parent‐child contact problems. Family Court Review, 58(2), 265-269.
- Fidler, B. J., Bala, N. et Saini, M. (2011). Ten tips for legal and mental health professionals involved in alienation, or alleged alienation. Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Monthly E-Newsletter, 6(5).
- Fidler, B. J., Bala, N et Saini, M. (2013). Children resisting contact post-separation and parental alienation: An evidence based review. Oxford University Press.
- Fidler, B. J., Deutsch, R. M. et Polak, S. (2019). “How am I supposed to treat these cases?” Working with families struggling with entrenched parent–child contact problems. Dans L. Greenberg, B. Fidler et M. Saini (dir.), Evidence-informed interventions for court-involved families (p. 227–259). Oxford University Press
- Firestone, G. et Weinstein, J. (2004). In the best interests of children: A proposal to transform the adversarial system. Family Court Review, 42(2), 203-215.
- Friedlander, M. L., Escudero, V., Heatherington, L. et Diamond, G. M. (2011). Alliance in couple and family therapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 25.
- Gagné, M.-H., Drapeau, S. et Hénault, R. (2005). L'aliénation parentale: Un bilan des connaissances et des controverses. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 46(2), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087007
- Ganong, L. H., Coleman, M., Markham, M. et Rothrauff, T. (2011). Predicting postdivorce coparental communication. Journal of Divorce et Remarriage, 52(1), 1-18.
- Gauthier, S. (2018). Aliénation parentale, fragilisation et perte du lien parent-enfant : le point de vue de l’avocat. Revue scientifique sur les familles séparées de l’Association internationale francophone des intervenants auprès des familles séparées, 12, 43-90.
- Gauthier, S. et Paquin-Boudreau, A. (2020). Le projet-pilote Parentalité – Conflit – Résolution : le rôle de l’avocat repensé. Dans K. Poitras et P.-C. Gagnon (dir.), Psychologie et droit. Éditions Yvon Blais.
- Godbout, E., Lachance, V., Pauzé, R., Baude, A., Gauthier, M., Groleau, H. et Noël, J. (2017). Recension des écrits sur les facteurs de risque associés aux conflits sévères de séparation et sur les conséquences possibles sur l’adaptation des enfants. Outil destiné aux intervenants du CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale.
- Godbout, É. et Saint-Jacques, M. C. (2014). Les interventions spécifiquement dédiées aux familles séparées et recomposées: analyse de l’offre de services au Québec. ARUC-Séparation parentale recomposition familiale.
- Haddad, L., Phillips, K. D. et Bone, J. M. (2016). High-conflict divorce: A review of the literature. American Journal of Family Law, 29(4), 243-258. https://lrus.wolterskluwer.com/store/products/american-journal-family-law-prod-9900039000/paperback-item-1-9900039000
- Hardesty, J. L., Haselschwerdt, M. L. et Johnson, M. P. (2012). Domestic violence and child custody. Dans K. Kuehnle et L. Drozd (dir.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court (p. 442-475). Oxford University Press.
- Holtzworth‐Munroe, A., Beck, C. J. et Applegate, A. G. (2010). The mediator's assessment of safety issues and concerns (MASIC): A screening interview for intimate partner violence and abuse available in the public domain. Family Court Review, 48(4), 646-662.
- Honea-Boles, P. et Griffin, J. E. (2001). The court-mandated client: Does limiting confidentiality preclude a therapeutic encounter?. TCA Journal, 29(2), 149-160.
- Jaffe, P. G., Johnston, J. R., Crooks, C. V. et Bala, N. (2008). Custody disputes involving allegations of domestic violence: Toward a differentiated approach to parenting plans. Family Court Review, 46(3), 500-522.
- Jaffe, A. M., Thakkar, M. J. et Piron, P. (2017). Denial of ambivalence as a hallmark of parental alienation. Cogent Psychology, 4(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2017.1327144
- Johnston, J. R., Roseby, V., et Kuehnle, K. (2009). In the name of the child: A developmental approach to understanding and helping children of conflicted and violent divorce. Springer.
- Joyal, R., Lapierre-Adamcyk, É., le Bourdais, C., et Marcil-Gratton, N. (2002). Le rôle des tribunaux dans la prise en charge des enfants après le divorce ou la séparation des parents. Ministère de l'Emploi, de la Solidarité sociale et de la Famille du Québec.
- Karver, M. S., Handelsman, J. B., Fields, S. et Bickman, L. (2006). Meta-analysis of therapeutic relationship variables in youth and family therapy: The evidence for different relationship variables in the child and adolescent treatment outcome literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(1), 50-65.
- Levite, Z. et Cohen, O. (2012). The tango of loving hate: Couple dynamics in high-conflict divorce. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40(1), 46-55.
- Maccoby, E. E. et Mnookin, R. H. (1992). Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Harvard University Press.
- McIntosh, J. (2003). Enduring conflict in parental separation: Pathways of impact on child development. Journal of Family Studies, 9(1), 63-80.
- McIntosh, J. (2006). The children's cases pilot project: an exploratory study of impacts on parenting capacity and child well-being: final report to the family court of Family Court of Australia.
- McIntosh, J. et Long, C. (2005). Current findings on australian children in postseparation disputes: outer conflict, inner discord1. Journal of Family Studies, 11(1), 99-109.
- McIntosh, J. E., Wells, Y. et Lee, J. (2016). Development and validation of the Family Law DOORS. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 1516.
- Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (2017). Bilan annuel des directeurs de la protection de la jeunesse. https://www.cisss-bsl.gouv.qc.ca/sites/default/files/fichier/bilan_2016_vfinale_taille_reduite_0.pdf
- Neff, R. et Cooper, K. (2004). Progress and parent education: Parental conflict resolution. Family court Review, 42, 1-16.
- Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M. et Fincham, F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 653-663.
- Owen, J. J. et Rhoades, G. K. (2012). Reducing interparental conflict among parents in contentious child custody disputes: An initial investigation of the Working together program. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(3), 542-555.
- Pinsof, W. M. (1995). Integrative problem-centered therapy: A synthesis of family, individual, and biological therapies. Basic Books.
- Poitras, K., Birnbaum, R., Saini, M., Bala, N. et Cyr, F. (2020). Family dispute resolution: Case characteristics associated to trial. Children and Youth Services Review, 123.
- Poitras, K., Cyr, F. et Chatigny, A. (2017). Trajectoires psychojudiciaires suite à la séparation parentale : études de dossiers en provenance du Québec. Revue scientifique sur les familles séparées de l’Association internationale francophone des intervenants auprès des familles séparées (AIFI), 11.
- Projet Pilote PCR-2 Annexe 8 p. 32-33 http://www.tribunaux.qc.ca/c-superieure/avis/index_modeles_avis.html
- Polak, S., Altobelli, T et Popielarczyk, L. (2020). responding to severe parent–child rejection cases without a parentectomy: a blended sequential intervention model and the role of the courts. Family Court Review, 58(2) 507–524.
- Quigley, C. et Cyr, F. (2014). Gestion psychojuridique des situations familiales à haut niveau de conflit. L’enfant et le litige en matière de garde : Regards psychologiques et juridiques. Presses de l’Université du Québec, Collection Enfance.
- Raub, J. M., Carson, N. J., Cook, B. L., Wyshak, G. et Hauser, B. B. (2012). Predictors of custody and visitation decisions by a family court clinic. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 41(2), 206-218.
- Rauh, S., Irwin, P. et Vath, N. (2016). Giving children hope: A treatment model for high-conflict separation families. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 50(3s).
- Rittner, B. et Dozier, C. D. (2000). Effects of court-ordered substance abuse treatment in child protective services cases. Social Work, 45(2), 131-140.
- Saini, M. et Birnbaum, R. (2007). Unraveling the label of" high conflict": What factors really count in divorce and separated families. University of Toronto Librairies.
- Saini, M. A., Black, T., Fallon, B. et Marshall, A. (2013). Child custody disputes within the context of child protection investigations: secondary analysis of the Canadian incident study of reported child abuse and neglect. Child welfare, 92(1).
- Saini, M., Laajasalo, T. et Platt, S. (2020). Gatekeeping by allegations: An examination of verified, unfounded, and fabricated allegations of child maltreatment within the context of resist and refusal dynamics. Family Court Review, 58(2), 417-431.
- Scharff, K. E. (2006). Therapeutic supervision with families of high-conflict divorce. Dans J. S. Scharff etD. E. Scharff (dir.), New paradigms for treating relationships (p. 133–146). Jason Aronson.
- Schneeberger, A. R., Huber, C. G., Lang, U. E., Muenzenmaier, K. H., Castille, D., Jaeger, M., ... et Link, B. G. (2017). Effects of assisted outpatient treatment and health care services on psychotic symptoms. Social Science & Medicine, 175, 152-160.
- Sullivan, M. J. (2017, April). Visitation resistance. [Webinar]. In the Association of family and conciliation courts. https://www.afccnet.org/Conferences-Training/Webinars/ctl/ViewConference/ConferenceID/184/mid/772
- Target, M., Hertzmann, L., Midgley, N., Casey, P. et Lassri, D. (2017). Parents’ experience of child contact within entrenched conflict families following separation and divorce: A qualitative study. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 31(2), 218-246.
- Templer, K., Matthewson, M., Haines, J. et Cox, G. (2017). Recommendations for best practice in response to parental alienation: Findings from a systematic review. Journal of Family Therapy, 39(1), 103-122.
- Ward, E. (2007). Mandatory court-annexed aternative dispute resolution in the United-States federal courts: Panacea or pandemic? St. John’s Law Review, 81(77), 77-98.
- Whiteside, M. F. (1998). The parental alliance following divorce: An overview. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24(1), 3-24.
- Wright, J. E., Heinze, R. K. et Wright, M. E. (2020). Medical neglect allegations in the context of conflicted divorce/separation child custody: what should the health care provider do?. Journal of Child et Adolescent Trauma, 13(3), 285-291.
10.7202/1081260ar