Abstracts
Résumé
Cette étude a pour but d’évaluer la validité discriminante de la version française de la méthode SCORS (Social Cognition and Object Relation Scale). Procédure : les cotations SCORS de récits TAT ont été comparées entre deux groupes (non clinique et clinique). Méthode : les récits TAT de 114 participants (47 non cliniques et 67 cliniques) ont été recueillis et les planches 1, 2, 3BM et 13MF ont été cotées par deux juges indépendants. Puis nous avons comparé les résultats des deux groupes. Résultats : la fidélité interjuge entre coteurs est bonne, voire excellente suivant les échelles; il y a des différences entre les moyennes des deux groupes aux échelles de SCORS dans le sens attendu. Cela montre la validité discriminante de la version française de SCORS. Les implications cliniques et scientifiques de ces résultats sont discutées.
Mots-clés :
- TAT,
- SCORS,
- Test projectif,
- validation
Abstract
The study aimed at assessing the discriminant validity of the French version of the Social Cognition and Object Relation Scale, French Version. Design: SCORS ratings of TAT narratives were compared across two groups (Non-Clinicals, Clinicals). Method: 114 participants’ TAT narratives (47 Non-Clinicals, 67 Clinicals) were collected and the pictures 1, 2, 3BM, 4 and 13 MF were rated by two independent judges. Then we compared the result of Non-Clinical and Clinical groups. Results demonstrated that interrater reliability was established and fell in the “good” to “excellent” ranges. Results also indicated that the French version of the SCORS was able to differentiate between Non-Clinical and Clinical groups. Implications and future directions are discussed and explored.
Keywords:
- TAT,
- SCORS,
- Projective test,
- Validation
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Ackerman, S. J., Clemence, A. J., Weatherill, R. et Hilsenroth, M. J. (1999). Use of the TAT for the assessment of DSM IV cluster B personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73(3), 422-448.
- Ackerman, S. J., Hilsenroth, M. J., Clemence, A. J., Weatherill, R. et Fowler, J. C. (2001). Convergent validity of Rorschach and TAT scales of object relations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(2), 295-306.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2003). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [Manuel diagnostique et statistique des troubles mentaux (4e éd.)]. Paris, France : Masson.
- Barends, A., Westen, D., Leigh, L., Silbert, D. et Byers, S. (1990). Assessing affect: Tone of relationship paradigms from TAT and interview data. Psychological Assessment, 2(3), 329-332.
- Bell, M. et Bruscato, W. (2002). Object relations deficits in schizophrenia: A cross-cultural comparison between Brazil and the United States. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190(2), 73-79.
- Bellak, L. (1954). TAT, CAT and SAT in clinical use. New York, NY: Allyn and Bacon.
- Biran, M. W. et Reese, C. (2007). Parental influences on social anxiety: The sources of perfectionism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 282-285.
- Bouvet, C. (2010). Présentation de la social cognition and object relation scale (SCORS - échelles de cognition sociale et de relation d’objet) pour coter les récits TAT – intérêts, limites et illustrations pour la clinique et la recherche empirique [Presentation of the Social Cognition and Object Relation Scale (SCORS of D. Westen) to score the TAT stories]. Bulletin de psychologie, 63(4), 263-277.
- Bouvet, C. et Cleach, C. (2011). Les ruptures de prise en charge chez des patients d’un centre de soin de réadaptation psychiatrique et leurs liens avec les capacités relationnelles, les relations d’objets intériorisées et l’intensité des troubles. [Patients early dropping out in psychiatric psychosocial rehabilitation treatment and its links to relational skills, object relation and intensity of psychopathology]. L’Encéphale, 37(suppl 1), 19-26.
- Bouvet, C., Nascimento Stieffatre, M. et Prime, C. (2006). Évolution d’une patiente schizophrène, prise en charge dans un centre de soins de réadaptation [Evolution of a schizophrenic patient in a psychosocial rehabilitation center]. Bulletin de psychologie, 59(4), 395-405.
- Brelet-Foulard, F. et Chabert, C. (2003). Nouveau manuel du TAT, approche psychanalytique [New TAT manual, psychoanalytic approach]. Paris, France : Dunod.
- Cramer, P. (1991). The development of defense mechanisms: Theory, research and assessment. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
- Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S. et Covi, L. (1973). SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9, 13-22.
- Delteil, P. (1961). La relation d'objet psychotique [The psychotic object relation]. L'Évolution psychiatrique, 26, 365-397.
- Eurelings-Bontekoe, E. H. M., Luyten, P. et Snellen, W. (2009). Validation of a theory-driven profile interpretation of the Dutch short form of the MMPI using the TAT social cognitions and object relations scale (SCORS). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 155-165.
- Fowler, J. C., Ackerman, S. J, Speanburg, S., Bailey, A. et Blagys, M. (2004). Personality and symptom change in treatment-refractory inpatients: Evaluation of the phase model of change using Rorschach, TAT, and DSM –IV Axis V. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(3), 306-322.
- Firtz, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J. B. W. et Benjamin, J. (1997). Structural clinical interview for DSM IV axis II personality disorders. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Harcourt Test.
- Fliess, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd edition). New York, NY: Wiley.
- Hibbard, S. (2003). À critique of Lilienfeld et al’s (2000) ‘The scientific status of projective techniques.’ Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(3), 260-271.
- Hibbard, S., Hilsenroth, M. J., Klepser-Hibbard, J. et Nash, M. R. (1995). A validity study of two projective object representations measures. Psychological Assessment, 7(4), 432-439.
- Hibbard, S., Porcerelli, J., Kamoo, R.,Schwartz, M. et Abell, S. (2010). Defense and object relational maturity on thematic apperception test scales indicate levels of personality organisation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(3), 241-253.
- Hilsenroth, M., Stein, M. et Pinsker, J. (2004). Social cognition and object relation scale: Global rating method (SCORS-G). Garden City, NY: The Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University.
- Jenkins, S.R.(Dn). (2007). A Handbook of Clinical Scoring Systems for Thematic Apperceptive Techniques (Personality and Clinical Psychology). New York, NY : Taylor and Francis Group.
- Joormann, J. et Gotlib, I. H. (2006). This happiness I see ? Biases in the identification of emotional facial expressions in depression and social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(4), 705-714.
- Kernberg, O. (1976). Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis, New York, NY : Jason Aronson.
- Kernberg, O. (2004). Les troubles limites de la personnalité [The borderline personality disorders]. Paris, France : Dunod.
- Lagache D. (1984). La sublimation et les valeurs [The sublimation and values]. De la fantaisie à la sublimation, Oeuvres complètes tome V. Paris, France : Presses Universitaires de France.
- Leigh, J., Westen, D., Barends, A., Mendel, M. J. et Byers, S. (1992). The assessment of complexity of representations of people using TAT and interview data. Journal of Personality, 60(4), 809-837.
- Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141-173.
- Lilienfeld, S. O, Wood, J.M. et Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 27-66.
- Lysaker, P. H., Dimaggio, G., Daroyanni, P., Buck, K. D., LaRocco, V. A., Carcione, A. et Nicolo G. (2010). Assessing metacognition in schizophrenia with the metacognition assessment scale: Associations with the social cognition and object relations scale. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 83(3), 303-315.
- Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., ... Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment, a review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56(2), 128-165.
- Mitchell, D. L. (2001). Construct validity of two projective measures. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The sciences and Engineering, 62(3B), 1591.
- Morgan, W. G. (1995). Origin and history of the thematic apperception test images. Journal of personality assessment, 65(2), 237-254.
- Morgan, C. D. et Murray, H. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The Thematic Apperception Test. Archives of Neurological Psychiatry, 34, 289-306.
- Morval, M. (1982). Le TAT et les fonctions du moi [The TAT and the functions of the ego]. Montréal, Québec : Les Presses de l’Université.
- Murray, M. D. (1943). Manuel du TAT [Manual of the Thematic apperception test]. Paris, France : Les Éditions du Centre de psychologie appliquée.
- Ornduff, S. (2003). Correction and Clarification for Ornduff, Freedenfeld, Kelsey, and Critelli (1994); Freedenfeld, Ornduff, and Kelsey (1995); and Ornduff and Kelsey (1996). Journal of Personality Assessment, 81(2), 179–182.
- Pariente, P. et Guelfi, J. D. (1990). Inventaires d’auto-évaluation de la psychopathologie chez l’adulte 1re partie: Inventaires multidimensionnels [Inventories of self-assesment of adult psychopathology, first part : multidimensional inventories]. Psychiatrie et psychobiologie, 5, 49-63.
- Pariente, P., Lépine, J. P., Boulenger, J. P., Zarifian, E., Lempérière, T. et Lellouch, J. (1989). The symptom checklist 90R (SCL-90R) in a French general psychiatric 708 outpatient sample: Is there a factor structure. Psychiatrie et psychobiologie, 4, 151-157.
- Pellet, J. (1997). La symptom check list. Dans J. D. Guelfi (dir.). L’évaluation clinique standardisée en psychiatrie [Standardised clinical assesment in psychiatry] (p. 77-85). Lavaur, France : SIA.
- Pinto-Gouveia, J., Castilho, P., Galhardo, A. et Cunha, M. (2006). Early maladaptive schemas and social phobia. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30, 571-584.
- Racamier, P. C. (1980). Les schizophrènes [Schizophrenics]. Paris, France : Payot et Rivages.
- Sokolowski, K., Schmalt H. -D., Langens T. A. et Puca R. M. (2000). Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: The Multi-Motive Grid (MMG). Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 126-145.
- Stein, M., Hilsenroth, M., Slavin-Mulford, J. et Pinsker, J. (2011). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Global Rating Method (SCORS-G; 4th Ed.). Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
- Stein, M. B., Slavin-Mulford, J., Sinclair, S. J., Siefert, C. J. et Blais, M. A. (2012). Exploring the construct validity of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale in a clinical sample. Journal of personality assessment, 94(5), 533-540.
- Stein, M. B., Pinsker, J. H. et Hilsenroth, M. J. (2007). Borderline pathology and the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI): An evaluation of criterion and concurrent validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(1): 81-89.
- Tatu, P., Pellet, J., Lang, F., Pichon, M. et Coerchon, C. (1994). La SCL 90 R dans un échantillon de sujets francophones libres de troubles psychiatriques [The SCL 90-R in a sample of french speaking people without psychiatric disorders]. Annales Médico-Psychologiques, 152, 187-190.
- Vaz, F. J., Bejar, A. et Casado, M. (2002). Insight, psychopathology, and interpersonal relationships in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 28(2), 311-317.
- Weise, K. et Tuber, S. (2004). The self and object representations of narcissistically disturbed children, an empirical investigation. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 21(2), 244-258.
- Westen, D., Lohr, N., Silk, K. R., Gold, L. et Kerber, K., (1990a). Object relations and social cognition in borderlines, major depressives and normals: A thematic apperception test analysis. Psychological Assessment, 2(4), 355-364.
- Westen, D., Lohr, N., Silk, K., Kerber, K. et Goodrich, S. (1990b). Social cognition and object relations scales, Manual for coding TAT data. (Unpublished, but available upon request from D. Westen).
- Westen, D. (1991a). Clinical assessment of object relations using the TAT. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 56-74.
- Westen, D., Huebner, D., Lifton, N. et Silverman, M. (1991b). Assessing complexity of representations of people and understanding of social causality: A comparison of natural science and clinical psychology graduate students. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10(4), 448-458.
- Westen, D., Klepser, J., Ruffins, S. A., Riggs, A., Silverman, M., Boekamp, J. et Lifton, N. (1991c). Object relations in childhood and adolescence: The development of working representations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(3), 400-409.
- Westen, D. (1999). The scientific status of unconscious processes. Is Freud really dead? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47(4), 1061-1106.
- Westen, D., Ludolph, P., Lerner, H., Ruffins, S. et Wiss, C. (1990c). Object relations in borderline adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 338-348.
- Yao, S. N., Note, I., Fanget, F., Albuisson, E., Bouvard, M., Jalenques, I. et Cottraux, J. (1999). L’anxiété sociale chez les phobiques sociaux : validation de l’échelle d’anxiété sociale de Liebowitz (version française) [Social anxiety in patients with social phobia : validation of the Liebowitz social anxiety scale, the french version]. L’Encéphale, 25, 429-435.
- Young, J. (1999). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (3e éd.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange.