Abstracts
Abstract
This article investigates the positioning of the “migrant student” in an EU–Finland project which aims to prepare teachers for social justice “migrant education.” Since the project is produced in and for a neoliberal economic-political supranational institution, the authors seek to examine the potential contradictions between the frameworks of social justice and neoliberalism in documents produced by the project teams. The results show that the migrant student is othered and mostly positioned as different, disadvantaged, and problematic. The implications of othering are thus addressed, with recommendations made for ethical treatment of the other in research and education while urging, for example, funding institutions and individual scholars to recognize and address academic othering in the Nordics and beyond.
Keywords:
- Academic othering,
- the “migrant”,
- neoliberalism,
- Finland,
- EU projects
Résumé
Cet article examine le positionnement de « l’élève migrant » dans le cadre d’un projet UE-Finlande visant à préparer les enseignants à une « éducation des migrants » socialement juste. Le projet étant produit dans et pour une institution supranationale économico-politiquement néolibérale, les auteurs cherchent à examiner les contradictions potentielles entre les cadres de la justice sociale et du néolibéralisme dans les documents produits lors du projet. Les résultats montrent que l’élève migrant est altérisé, désavantagé et problématique. Les implications de cette altérisation sont donc abordées, avec des recommandations pour un traitement éthique de l’autre dans la recherche et l’éducation, tout en exhortant les institutions de financement et les chercheurs individuels à reconnaître et à traiter l’altérisation académique dans les pays nordiques et au-delà.
Mots-clés :
- Altérisation académique,
- le « migrant »,
- néolibéralisme,
- Finlande,
- projets de l’UE
Appendices
Bibliography
- Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
- Alcoff, L. (1991). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354221
- Angermuller, J. (2014). Poststructuralist discourse analysis: Subjectivity in enunciative pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442475
- Authier-Revuz, J. (1984). Hétérogénéité(s) énonciative(s). Langages, 73, 98–111.
- Mortensen, S.-L., Knudsen, J., & Proli, M. G. (Eds.). (2020). QuaMMELOT Guidelines. Erasmus+.
- Ball, S. J. (2016). Neoliberal education? Confronting the slouching beast. Policy Futures in Education, 14(8), 1046–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316664259
- Bell, L. A. (2016). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams & L. A. Bell (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (3rd ed., pp. 3–26). Routledge.
- Bernárdez, E. (1997). A partial synergetic model of Deagentivisation. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 4(1–3), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296179708590079
- Biesta, G. (2020). Educational research: An unorthodox introduction. Bloomsbury.
- Billett, P., Hart, M., & Martin, D. (Eds.). (2019). Complexities of researching with young people. Routledge.
- Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Zone Books.
- Carroll, T. (2022). Neoliberalism, globalization, and late capitalism: Capital, ideology, and making the world market. In Z. Cope & I. Ness (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic imperialism (pp. 135–152). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197527085.013.11.
- Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The Basics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Cooren, F., & Sandler, S. (2014). Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with Bakhtin. Communication Theory, 24(3), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12041
- Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
- Dervin, F. (2008). Métamorphoses identitaires en contexte de mobilité. Humanoria.
- Dervin, F. (2016). Interculturality in education: A theoretical and methodological toolbox. Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54544-2
- Dervin, F. (2023). Communicating around interculturality in research and education. Routledge.
- Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/415037
- Dyvik Cardona, M. (2022). More than just an immigrant: The semantic patterns of (im)migrant/predicate-pairings in news stories about Mexican and Central American (im)migrants to the USA. A corpus-assisted discourse study. Discourse & Communication, 16(3), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221101821
- Fejes, A., & Dahlstedt, M. (2017). Popular education, migration and a discourse of inclusion. Studies in the Education of Adults, 49(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2018.1463656
- Fraser, N. (2023). Cannibal capitalism: How our system is devouring democracy, care, and the planet — and what we can do about it. Verso.
- Holquist, M. (Ed.). (1982). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
- Jensen, S. Q. (2011). Othering, identity formation and agency. Qualitative Studies, 2(2), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v2i2.5510
- Krumer-Nevo, M., & Sidi, M. (2012). Writing against othering. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(4), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411433546
- Kunz, S. (2020). Expatriate, migrant? The social life of migration categories and the polyvalent mobility of race. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(11), 2145–2162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1584525
- Lukala, E.-M. (2023). Researchers othering the ‘migrant student’: Naming, agentivising, and positioning in an international educational project [Master’s thesis, University of Helsinki]. Helda. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/562831
- Maggio, M. L. V., & Westcott, H. (2014). Researchers’ reflections of empathy following interviews with migrants. Qualitative Research Journal, 14(3), 214–227, https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2012-0029
- Niemczyk, E. K., & Rónay, Z. (2023). Roles, requirements and autonomy of academic researchers. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(2), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12403
- Nowicka, M., & Cieslik, A. (2014). Beyond methodological nationalism in insider research with migrants. Migration Studies, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnt024
- Pietrandrea, P., & Battaglia, E. (2022). “Migrants and the EU.” The diachronic construction of ad hoc categories in French far-right discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 192, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.02.012
- Poth, C. N. (2023). The Sage handbook of mixed methods research design. Sage.
- Rajendra, T. M. (2017). Migrants and citizens: Justice and responsibility in the ethics of immigration. Eerdmans.
- Rosenberger, S., & Stöckl, I. (2018). The politics of categorization — political representatives with immigrant background between “the other” and “standing for.” Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1194764
- Roumbanis, L. (2019). Symbolic violence in academic life: A study on how junior scholars are educated in the art of getting funded. Minerva, 57(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9364-2
- Serrano Velarde, K. (2018). The way we ask for money … The emergence and institutionalization of grant writing practices in academia. Minerva, 56(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9346-4
- Shan, Y. (2022). Philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. Philosophy Compass, 17(1), Article e12804. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12804
- Sullivan, G. C. (2016). In your own words: Investigating voice, intertextuality, and credibility of Rachel Jeantel in the George Zimmerman trial. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 1, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v1i0.3711
- Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Vietze, J., Schwarzenthal, M., Moffitt, U., & Civitillo, S. (2023). Beyond ‘migrant background’: How to select relevant, social justice oriented, and feasible social categories in educational research. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(1), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00611-2
- Wickens, C. M., Cohen, J. A., & Theriault, J. C. (2020). Shifting identities: The figured worlds of one adolescent immigrant English learner. The Urban Review, 52, 650–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00543-0
- Wischmann, A., & Riepe, V. (2019). Resistant agency in German lessons in primary education in Germany. Ethnography and Education, 14(2), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2017.1405735
- Woelert, P., Lewis, J. M., & Le, A. T. (2021). Formally alive yet practically complex: An exploration of academics’ perceptions of their autonomy as researchers. Higher Education Policy, 34, 1049–1068. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00190-1
- Worthman, C., & Troiano, B. (2019). A good student subject: A Foucauldian discourse analysis of an adolescent writer negotiating subject positions. Critical Studies in Education, 60(2), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1246372