Abstracts
Résumé
Les organisations sont reconnues pour leur rôle dans la dégradation des écosystèmes, mais elles peuvent aussi faire partie de la solution. Une étude quantitative a été réalisée auprès de 313 employés travaillant dans différents secteurs d’activité au Canada. L’étude a pour but de comprendre comment les facteurs de stress ainsi que les ressources sociales et personnelles influencent l’adoption de comportements écoresponsables. Les résultats montrent que le soutien environnemental du supérieur (ressource sociale) a plus d’influence sur les comportements écoresponsables de leurs subordonnés lorsque ceux-ci ressentent une fatigue citoyenne élevée en comparaison à une faible fatigue citoyenne (ressource personnelle). D’ailleurs, lorsque les subordonnés ressentent de la surcharge de travail (facteur de stress), l’effet du soutien du supérieur se détériore et a moins d’impact sur les comportements écoresponsables.
Mots-clés :
- Comportements écoresponsables,
- soutien du supérieur,
- fatigue citoyenne,
- surcharge de travail,
- théorie de la conservation des ressources
Abstract
Organizations are known to play a role in the degradation of ecosystems, but they can also be part of the solution. A quantitative study was conducted with 313 employees working in different sectors in Canada. According to Hobfoll & Shirom’s (2001) conservation of ressource theory, the purpose of the study is to understand how stressors, social and personnal resources influence eco-responsible behaviors. The results show that the supervisory support for environmental (social resource) has more influence on eco-friendly behaviors of their subordinates when they feel high citizenship fatigue compared to low citizenship fatigue (personal resource). Also, when subordinates experience workload (stressor), the effect of supervisor support deteriorates and has less impact on eco-friendly behaviors.
Keywords:
- Eco-friendly behavior,
- supervisory support,
- citizenship fatigue,
- workload,
- conservation of resources theory
Resumen
Las organizaciones son reconocidas por su papel en la degradación de los ecosistemas, pero también pueden ser parte de la solución. Se realizó un estudio cuantitativo entre 313 empleados que trabajan en diferentes sectores de actividad en Canadá. El estudio tiene como objetivo comprender cómo los factores de estrés y los recursos sociales y personales influyen en la adopción de comportamientos eco-responsables. Los resultados muestran que el apoyo medio ambiental del superior (recurso social) tiene más influencia en los comportamientos eco-responsables de sus subordinados cuando estos sienten una alta fatiga ciudadana en comparación con una baja fatiga ciudadana (recurso personal). Además, cuando los subordinados se sienten sobrecargados de trabajo (factor de estrés), el efecto del apoyo del superior se deteriora y tiene menos impacto en el comportamiento eco-responsable.
Palabras clave:
- Comportamientos eco-responsables,
- apoyo de un superior,
- cansancio ciudadano,
- fatiga ciudadana,
- sobrecarga de trabajo,
- teoría de la conservación de los recursos
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A., Notelaers, G., Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). The prevalence of destructive leadership behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21(2), p. 438-452.
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice : A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), p. 411-423.
- Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), p. 83-104.
- Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior : Good citizens at what cost ? Academy of Management Review, 32(4), p. 1078-1095.
- Bergeron, D. M., Shipp, A. J., Rosen, B., & Furst, S. A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes : The cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management, 39(4), p. 958-984.
- Bissing-Olson, M. J., Fielding, K. S., & Iyer, A. (2015). Diary methods and workplace pro-environmental behaviors. In J. L. Barling & J. L. Robertson (Eds.), The psychology of green organizations (Oxford Uni, p. 95-116).
- Boddy, C. R. (2011). Corporate Psychopaths, Bullying and Unfair Supervision in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, p. 367-379.
- Bohlmann, C., van den Bosch, J., & Zacher, H. (2018). The relative importance of employee green behavior for overall job performance ratings : A policy - capturing study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), p. 1002-1008.
- Boiral, O., & Paillé, P. (2012). Organizational Citizenship Behaviour for the Environment : Measurement and Validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, p. 431-445.
- Bolino, M. C., Harvey, J., & Lepine, J. a. (2015). “Well, I’m Tired of Tryin’ !” Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Citizenship Fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100 (1), p. 56-74.
- Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2005). The Personal Costs of Citizenship Behavior : The Relationship Between Individual Initiative and Role Overload, Job Stress, and Work-Family Conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), p. 740-8.
- Bowling, N. A., Alarcon, G. M., Bragg, C. B., & Hartman, M. J. (2015). A meta-analytic examination of the potential correlates and consequences of workload. Work & Stress, 29(2), p. 95-113.
- Cantor, D. E., Morrow, P. C., & Montabon, F. (2012). Engagement in environmental behaviors among supply chain management employees : An organizational support theoretical perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(3), p. 33-51.
- Ciocirlan, C. E. (2017). Environmental Workplace Behaviors : Definition Matters. Organization & Environment, 30(1), p. 51-70.
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ, US : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
- Crawford, E. R., Lepine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout : A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), p. 834-848.
- Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., & Byrne, Z. S. (2003). The relationship of emotional exhaustion to work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied psychology, 88(1), p. 160.
- Crosbie, T., & Houghton, M. (2011). An analysis of the attitudes and behaviours of Australians to sustainability in the workplace and the home. Sustainability at Work, p. 1-16.
- Davis, M. C., & Challenger, R. (2009). Climate change—Warming to the task. Psychologist, 22(2), p. 112-114.
- De Clercq, D., Suhail, A., Umer Azeem, M., & Ul Haq, U. (2019). Citizenship pressure and job performance : roles of citizenship fatigue and continuance commitment. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 59(3), p. 482-505.
- Doane, L. S., Schumm, J. A., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2012). The positive, sustaining, and protective power of resources : insights from conservation of resources theory. In Handbook of social resource theory (pp. 301-310). Springer, New York, NY.
- Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm : A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), p. 425-442.
- Eichhorn, B. R. (2014). Common Method Variance Techniques. Cleveland, OH : SAS Institute Inc. Retrieved from https://www.lexjansen.com/mwsug/2014/AA/MWSUG-2014-AA11.pdf
- Eisenberger, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived organizational support : Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees. American Psychological Association.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (2006). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error : Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), p. 382-388.
- Francoeur, V., & Paillé, P. (2018). Leadership machiavélique. Presses de l’Université Laval.
- Francoeur, V., & Paillé, P. (2022). Green Behaviors in the Workplace : Nature, Complexity, and Trends. Switzerland : Springer Nature (Collection Palgrave Macmillan).
- Francoeur, V., Paillé, P., Yuriev, A., & Boiral, O. (2021). The Measurement of Green Workplace Behaviors : A Systematic Review. Organization & Environment, 34(1), p. 18-42.
- Gkorezis, P. (2015). Supervisor support and pro-environmental behavior : the mediating role of LMX. Management Decisions, 53(5), p. 1045-1060.
- Global Footprint Network. (2021). Earth overshoot day. Retrieved from https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/earth-overshoot-day/
- Hair, J. J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson-Prentice Hall.
- Halbesleben, J. R. B., Harvey, J., & Bolino, M. C. (2009). Too Engaged ? A Conservation of Resources View of the Relationship Between Work Engagement and Work Interference With Family. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), p. 1452-1465.
- Halbesleben, J. R., Neveu, J. P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of management, 40(5), p. 1334-1364.
- Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), p. 307-324.
- Hobfoll, S. E., & Shirom, A. (2001). Conservation of resources theory : Applications to stress and management in the workplace. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (p. 57-80). New York, NY : Dekker.
- Jain, A. K., Giga, S. I., & Cooper, C. L. (2013). Perceived organizational support as a moderator in the relationship between organisational stressors and organizational citizenship behaviors. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 21(3), p. 313-334.
- Jin, M. H., McDonald, B., & Park, J. (2018). Person—organization fit and turnover intention : Exploring the mediating role of employee followership and job satisfaction through conservation of resources theory. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(2), p. 167-192.
- Katz, I. M., Rauvola, R. S., Rudolph, C W., & Zacher, H. (2022). Employee green behavior : A meta-analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. DOI : 10.1002/csr.2260
- Karasek, R. a. (1979). Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain : Implications for Job Redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), p. 285-308.
- Kudesia, R. S., Pandey, A., & Reina, C. S. (2022). Doing more with less : Interactive effects of cognitive resources and mindfulness training in coping with mental fatigue from multitasking. Journal of Management, 48(2), p. 410-439.
- Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J., & Williams, E. G. (2013). Read This Article, but Don’t Print It : Organizational Citizenship Behavior Toward the Environment. Group & Organization Management, 38(2), p. 163-197.
- Lanivich, S. E. (2015). The RICH entrepreneur : Using conservation of resources theory in contexts of uncertainty. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), p. 863-894.
- Lo, S. H., Peters, G. Y., & Kok, G. (2012). Energy-Related Behaviors in Office Buildings : A Qualitative Study on Individual and Organisational Determinants. Applied Psychology : An International Review, 61(2), p. 227-249.
- Lülfs, R., & Hahn, R. (2014). Sustainable Behavior in the Business Sphere : A Comprehensive Overview of the Explanatory Power of Psychological Models. Organization & Environment, 27(1), p. 43-64.
- Manika, D., Wells, V. K., Gregory-smith, D., & Gentry, M. (2015). The Impact of Individual Attitudinal and Organisational Variables on Workplace Environmentally Friendly Behaviours. Journal of Business Ethics, 126 (4), p. 663-684.
- Marchand, C., & Vandenberghe, C. (2015). Soutien organisationnel perçu, perception de perte de ressources, et santé psychologique : l’effet modérateur de l’affectivité négative. Le Travail Humain, 78 (3), p. 193-216.
- Medsker, G. J., & Williams, L. J. (1994). A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research. Journal of Management, 20(2), p. 439-464.
- Nielsen, K. S., Clayton, S., Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Capstick, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2021). How Psychology Can Help Limit Climate Change. American Psychological Association, 71(1), p. 130-145.
- Norton, T. A., Parker, S. L., Zacher, H., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015). Employee Green Behavior : A Theoretical Framework, Multilevel Review, and Future Research Agenda. Organization & Environment, 28(1), p. 103-125.
- Norton, T. A., Zacher, H., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015). Pro-environmental organizational culture and climate. In J. L. Robertson & J. Barling (Eds.), The psychology of green organizations (pp. 322-348). New York : Oxford University Press.
- Ones, D. S., Wiernik, B. M., Dilchert, S., & Klein, R. M. (2018). Multiple Domains and Categories of Employee Green Behaviors : More than Conservation. In V. Wells, D. Gregory-Smith, & D. Manika (Eds.), Research handbook on employee pro-environmental behaviour. Cheltenham, United Kingdom : Edward Elgar.
- Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior : The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA, England : Lexington Books.
- Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior : Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
- Ouimet, G. (2018). Psychologie du leadership pathologique. Chenelière.
- Paillé, P. (2020). Greening the Workplace : Theories, Methods, and Research. Basingstoke : United Kingdom : Springer Nature.
- Paillé, P., & Boiral, O. (2013). Pro-environmental behavior at work : Construct validity and determinants. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, p. 118-128.
- Paillé, P., & Francoeur, V. (2022). Enabling employees to perform the required green tasks through support and empowerment. Journal of Business Research, 140, p. 420-429.
- Paillé, P., Mejía-Morelos, J. H., Raineri, N., & Stinglhamber, F. (2019). The Influence of the Immediate Manager on the Avoidance of Non-green Behaviors in the Workplace : A Three-Wave Moderated-Mediation Model. Journal of Business Ethics, 155 (3), p. 723-740.
- Paillé, P., Raineri, N., & Boiral, O. (2019). Environmental Behavior On and Off the Job : A Configurational Approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 158 (1), p. 253-268.
- Paillé, P., & Valéau, P. (2021). “I Don’t Owe You, But I Am Committed” : Does Felt Obligation Matter on the Effect of Green Training on Employee Environmental Commitment ? Organization and Environment, 34(1), p. 123-144.
- Paul, K. B., & Nilan, K. J. (2012). Managing human resource for environmental sustainability. In S. E. Jackson, D. S. Ones, & S. Dilchert (Eds.), Environmental sustainability and employee engagement at 3M (pp. 267-280). San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
- Penney, L. M., Hunter, E. M., & Perry, S. J. (2011). Personality and counterproductive work behaviour : Using conservation of resources theory to narrow the profile of deviant employees. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), p. 58-77.
- Pérez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, J., & Pout, C. (2008). A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy and Building, 40(3), p. 394-398.
- Ramus, C. A., & Killmer, A. B. C. (2007). Corporate greening Through Prosocial Extrarole Behaviours — A Conceptual Framework for Employee Motivation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, p. 554-570.
- Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2015). The psychology of green organizations. USA : Oxford University Press.
- Ruepert, A., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2015). Theorical basis for organizational pro-environmental research. In J. L. Robertson & J. Barling (Eds.), The psychology of green organizations (p. 33-57). New York : USA : Oxford University Press.
- Schaufeli, W., & Salanova, M. (2011). Work engagement : On how to better catch a slippery concept. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), p. 39-46.
- Shirom, A. (2004). Feeling vigorous at work ? The construct of vigor and the study of positive affect in organizations. In P. L. P. & D. Ganster (Ed.), Research in organizational stress and well-being : Emotional and physiological processes and positive intervention strategies (p. 135-165). Oxford : Elsevier.
- Statistique Canada. (2017). Stress perçu dans la vie. Retrieved from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-627-m/contest/finalists-finalistes_2-fra.htm
- Stern, P. C. (2000). Psychology and the Science of Human-Environment Interactions. American Psychologist, 55(5), p. 523-530.
- Trougakos, J. P., Beal, D. J., Cheng, B. H., Hideg, I., & Zweig, D. (2015). Too drained to help : A resource depletion perspective on daily interpersonal citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100 (1), p. 227-236.
- Van den Broeck, A., De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). Not all job demands are equal : Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the Job Demands—Resources model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(6), p. 735-759.
- Wehrmeyer, W. (2017). Greening people : Human resources and environmental management. New York : USA : Routledge.
- Yuriev, A., Boiral, O., Francoeur, V., & Paillé, P. (2018). Overcoming the barriers to pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace : A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, p. 379-394.
- Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O., & Guillaumie, L. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior : A scoping review. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 155 (1-12).
- Zacher, H., & Bissing-Olson, M. J. (2018). Between-and within-person variability in employee pro-environmental behaviour. In Research Handbook on Employee Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Zibarras, L., Judson, H., & Barnes, C. (2011). Promoting environmental behavior in the workplace : A survey of UK organizations. In D. Bartlet (Ed.), The psychology of sustainability in the workplace (p. 1-16). London : BPS.