Abstracts
Abstract
Romance fiction has a complicated relationship with visibility. It is a genre with undeniable presence in the contemporary publishing industry in terms of output and sales, but has historically been hidden in personal, rhetorical, and material ways. Within the genre, BIPOC, LGBTQ+, and erotic romance writers and their works experience a kind of hyper(in)visibility, a concept which describes how non‑normative identities and bodies are overlooked, ignored, and underrepresented, while simultaneously subject to intense scrutiny, surveillance, and stereotyping. Semi‑automated decision‑making technologies, including content moderation and search and recommendation algorithms, further compound these invisibilizing forces. Drawing on interviews with authors, metadata analysis, and critical discourse analysis of terms of service, this article argues that algorithmic systems maintain a politics of hyper(in)visibility for BIPOC, LGBTQ+, and erotic romance authors and books, which risks exacerbation in light of the broader deplatfomization of sex online and current conservative political movements, particularly in the United States.
Keywords:
- Hyper(in)visibility,
- self‑publishing,
- platform,
- imaginaries,
- algorithms,
- content moderation
Résumé
La romance fictionnelle entretient une relation complexe avec la visibilité. Il s’agit d’un genre dont la présence est indéniable dans l’industrie éditoriale contemporaine en termes de production et de ventes, mais qui a toujours été occulté sur les plans personnel, rhétorique et matériel. Au sein de ce genre, les autrices et les BIPOC, LGBTQ+ ainsi que les autrices et auteurs de romans érotiques, ainsi que leurs oeuvres, font l’expérience d’une sorte d’hyper(in)visibilité, un concept qui décrit la manière dont les identités et les corps non normatifs sont négligés, ignorés et sous-représentés, tout en étant soumis à un examen minutieux, à la surveillance et associés à des stéréotypes. Les technologies de prise de décision semi-automatisées, notamment la modération de contenu et les algorithmes de recherche et de recommandation, renforcent encore ces marques d’invisibilisation. S’appuyant sur des entretiens avec des auteurs, l’analyse de métadonnées et l’analyse critique du discours des conditions d’utilisation, cet article soutient que les systèmes algorithmiques maintiennent une politique d’hyper(in)visibilité pour les autrices et auteurs BIPOC, LGBTQ+, pour leurs livres et pour la romance érotique, qui risque de s’aggraver compte tenu de la déplateformisation plus générale du sexe en ligne et des mouvements politiques conservateurs actuels, en particulier aux États-Unis.
Mots-clés :
- Hyper-(in)visibilité,
- auto-publication,
- plateformes,
- imaginaires,
- algorithmes,
- modération de contenu
Appendices
Bibliography
- Amazon. “Ad Moderation and Approval: A Complete Guide for Book Advertisers.” Amazon Ads. Accessed June 12, 2025. https://advertising.amazon.com/library/guides/book-ad-moderation-and-approval. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Amazon. “Metadata Guidelines for Books.” Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing. Accessed February 7, 2025. https://kdp.amazon.com/en_US/help/topic/G201097560. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Balling, Gitte, and Marianne Martens. “BookTok Helped Us Sell It: How TikTok Disrupts Publishing and Fuels the #Romantasy Boom.” Convergence (2024): 1–21. doi:10.1177/13548565241301271. 10.1177/13548565241301271 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Beckett, Lois. “Fifty Shades of White: The Long Fight against Racism in Romance Novels.” The Guardian, April 4, 2019, sec. Books. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/apr/04/fifty-shades-of-white-romance-novels-racism-ritas-rwa. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Beirne, Rebecca. “Representing Lesbians in Film and Television.” In The Routledge Companion to Media, Sex and Sexuality, edited by Clarissa Smith and Feona Attwood, 38–48. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2017. 10.4324/9781315168302-5 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Beisel, Nicola. “Constructing a Shifting Moral Boundary: Literature and Obscenity in Nineteenth‑Century America.” In Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, edited by Michèle Lamont and Marcel Fournier, 104–130. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Brackett, Kim Pettigrew. “Facework Strategies Among Romance Fiction Readers.” The Social Science Journal 37, no. 3 (2019): 1–14. 10.1016/S0362-3319(00)00073-2 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Braidwood, Ella. “The Love Boom: Why Romance Novels Are the Biggest They’ve Been for 10 Years.” The Guardian, December 13, 2022, sec. Books. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2022/dec/13/love‑boom‑romance‑novels‑biggest‑10‑years‑young‑readers. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bucher, Taina. If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Buolamwini, Joy and Timnit Gebru, “Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification,” Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (PMLR) 81 (2018): 77‑91. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2002. 10.4324/9780203900055 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cotter, Kelley. “Playing the Visibility Game: How Digital Influencers and Algorithms Negotiate Influence on Instagram.” New Media & Society 21, no. 4 (2019): 895–913.doi:10.1177/1461444818815684. 10.1177/1461444818815684 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Dane, Alexandra. White Literary Taste Production in Contemporary Book Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. 10.1017/9781009234276 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Driscoll, Beth, and Susannah Bowen. “Diversity and the Australian Publishing Industry: Findings from a National Workforce Survey.” Publishing Research Quarterly 39, no. 4 (2023): 311–23. doi:10.1007/s12109‑023‑09969‑7. 10.1007/s12109-023-09969-7 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Driscoll, Beth, Lisa Fletcher, Kim Wilkins, and David Carter. “The Publishing Ecosystems of Contemporary Australian Genre Fiction.” Creative Industries Journal 11, no. 2 (2018): 203–21.https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2018.1480851 doi:10.1080/17510694.2018.1480851. 10.1080/17510694.2018.1480851 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Eslami, Motahhare, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. “First I ‘like’ It, Then I Hide It: Folk Theories of Social Feeds.” In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2371–82. CHI ’16. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858494. 10.1145/2858036.2858494 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Second edition. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013. 10.4324/9781315834368 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fletcher, Lisa, Jodi McAlister, Kurt Temple, and Kathleen Williams. “#loveyourshelfie: Mills & Boon Books and How to Find Them.” Mémoires du livre / Studies in Book Culture 11, no. 1 (2019). doi:10.7202/1066945ar.
10.7202/1066945ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Folta, James. “The Republicans’ Project 2025 Is Disastrous for Books.” Literary Hub, November 6, 2024.https://lithub.com/the-republicans-project-2025-is-disastrous-for-books/. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gailey, Jeannine A. The Hyper(in)Visible Fat Woman: Weight and Gender Discourse in Contemporary Society. New York: Springer, 2014. 10.1057/9781137407177 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ham, Julie, and Alison Gerard. “Strategic in/Visibility: Does Agency Make Sex Workers Invisible?” Criminology & Criminal Justice 14, no. 3 (2014): 298–313. doi:10.1177/1748895813500154. 10.1177/1748895813500154 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Johnson, Amber, and Robin M. Boylorn. “Digital Media and the Politics of Intersectional Queer Hyper/In/Visibility in Between Women.” Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies 11, no. 1 (2015): 1–26. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kamblé, Jayashree. “Branding a Genre: A Brief Transatlantic History of Romance Novel Cover Art.” In Romance Fiction and American Culture: Love as the Practice of Freedom? edited by W. A. Gleason and Eric M. Selinger. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kamblé, Jayashree, Eric Murphy Selinger, and Hsu‑Ming Teo. “Introduction.” In The Routledge Research Companion to Popular Romance Fiction, edited by Jayashree Kamblé, Eric Murphy Selinger, and Hsu‑Ming Teo, 1–23. Abingdon: Routledge, 2021.10.4324/9781315613468-25 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Larson, Christine. “Streaming Books: Confluencers, Kindle Unlimited and the Platform Imaginary.” Communication, Culture and Critique 15, no. 4 (2022): 520–30. doi:10.1093/ccc/tcac032. 10.1093/ccc/tcac032 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Larson, Christine, and Ashley Carter. “Love Is Love: Reverse Isomorphism and the Rise of LGBTQ+ Romance Publishing.” New Media & Society (2023): 1‑22. doi:10.1177/14614448231218991.10.1177/14614448231218991 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lois, Jennifer, and Joanna Gregson. “SNEERS AND LEERS: Romance Writers and Gendered Sexual Stigma.” Gender and Society 29, no. 4 (2015): 459–83.10.1177/0891243215584603 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- McDavis‑Conway, Shana. “Self‑Conscious, Unapologetic, and Straight: Fat Protagonists in Romantic Fiction.” Fat Studies 12, no. 2 (2023): 233–42. doi:10.1080/21604851.2022.2047337.10.1080/21604851.2022.2047337 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- McGrath, Laura B. “‘Books About Race’: Commercial Publishing and Racial Formation in the 21st Century.” New Literary History 53, no. 4 (2022): 771–94.10.1353/nlh.2022.a898329 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Michelson, Anna. “Pushing the Boundaries: Erotic Romance and the Symbolic Boundary Nexus.” Poetics 94 (2022): 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101729. 10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101729 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Milan, Courtney. “Fake Covers.” Courtney Milan. Accessed November 19, 2024.https://www.courtneymilan.com/fake‑covers/.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Monea, Alexander. The Digital Closet: How the Internet Became Straight. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2023.10.7551/mitpress/12551.001.0001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Moody‑Freeman, Julie E. “African American Romance.” In The Routledge Research Companion to Popular Romance Fiction, edited by Jayashree Kamblé, Eric Murphy Selinger, and Hsu‑Ming Teo, 229–51. Abingdon: Routledge, 2021.10.4324/9781315613468-10 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Moran, Rachel E., Izzi Grasso and Kolina Koltai, “Folk Theories of Avoiding Content Moderation: How Vaccine‑Opposed Influencers Amplify Vaccine Opposition on Instagram,” Social Media + Society (2022): 1–12. doi:10.1177/20563051221144252.10.1177/20563051221144252 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Olson, Hope A. The Power to Name: Locating the Limits of Subject Representation in Libraries. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Parnell, Claire. "Independent Authors’ Dependence on Big Tech: Categorization and Governance of Authors of Color on Amazon.” AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 2021. http://spir.aoir.org/. 10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12005 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Parnell, Claire. Inequalities of Platform Publishing: The Promise and Peril of Self‑Publishing in the Digital Book Era. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press, 2025. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Polk, Shelbi. “Why We’re All Swooning for Romance Books.” Shondaland, April 22, 2024.https://www.shondaland.com/shondaland‑series/bridgerton/why‑we‑re‑all‑swooning‑for‑romance‑books.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Reddy, Maureen T. “Invisibility/Hypervisibility: The Paradox of Normative Whiteness.” Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy 9, no. 2 (1998): 55–64.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Saha, Anamik, and Sandra Van Lente. “How the Marketing and Selling of Books by Authors of Colour Produces Racial Inequalities in Publishing.” Mémoires du livre / Studies in Book Culture 13, no. 2 (June 14, 2023): 1–31. doi:10.7202/1100565ar.10.7202/1100565ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Sharma, Vishal, Kirsten E. Bray, Neha Kumar, and Rebecca E. Grinter. “Romancing the Algorithm: Navigating Constantly, Frequently, and Silently Changing Algorithms for Digital Work.” Proc. ACM Hum.‑Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2, Article 538 (November 2022): 1–29. doi:10.1145/3555651. 10.1145/3555651 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Smilges, J. Logan. Queer Silence: On Disability and Rhetorical Absence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2022. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- So, Richard Jean. Redlining Culture: A Data History of Racial Inequality and Postwar Fiction. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020.10.7312/so--19772 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Steen, Ella, Kathryn Yurechko, and Daniel Klug. “You Can (Not) Say What You Want: Using Algospeak to Contest and Evade Algorithmic Content Moderation on TikTok.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 3 (2023): 1–17. doi:10.1177/20563051231194586.10.1177/20563051231194586 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Stegeman, Hanne M., Carolina Are, and Thomas Poell. “Strategic Invisibility: How Creators Manage the Risks and Constraints of Online Hyper(In)Visibility.” Social Media + Society 10, no. 2 (2024): 1–12. doi:10.1177/20563051241244674.10.1177/20563051241244674 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Veros, Vassiliki. “Nobody Puts Romance Fiction in the Corner: Public Librarians in New South Wales and Their Dalliance with Romance Fiction.” Journal of Popular Romance Studies (2023): 1–20.10.70138/VTOU1871 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Young, Erin S. “Race, Ethnicity, and Whiteness.” In The Routledge Research Companion to Popular Romance Fiction, edited by Jayashree Kamblé, Eric Murphy Selinger, and Hsu‑Ming Teo, 511–28. Abingdon: Routledge, 2021.10.4324/9781315613468-23 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar