Abstracts
Résumé
L’éducation ouverte (EO) et les ressources éducatives libres (REL) s’appuient sur des valeurs démocratiques auxquelles peu de personnes s’opposent dans le champ de l’éducation. En effet, il s’agit de s’engager pour le partage des ressources permettant le développement de savoirs. Toutefois, le déploiement des REL semble freiné dans de nombreux établissements. Si les premières critiques s’adressent notamment à l’absence de politiques spécifiques et à la résistance du corps enseignant à les partager, s’ajoutent les disponibilités des ia génératives et la tension que ces techniques nourrissent avec le libre. Une reconceptualisation des REL semble alors nécessaire. Pour cela, la proposition est d’avoir recours à l’approche par capabilités, pour tenter de saisir la tension entre des valeurs partagées, mais des pratiques absentes, tant sur le plan institutionnel qu’individuel. En ayant recours aux processus d’opportunités et de liberté, c’est le pouvoir (d’)agir qui est en jeu lors d’une participation active à l’EO. En quoi les REL participent-elles à façonner un environnement professionnel capacitant pour les corps enseignant et estudiantin? L’article propose une place revalorisée pour les REL aujourd’hui que les ia sont disponibles, afin d’envisager une opérationnalisation plus confiante des cadres d’action pour l’EO.
Mots-clés :
- capabilité,
- OER,
- environnement capacitant,
- opportunité,
- liberté
Abstract
Open Education (OE) and Open Educational Resources (OERs) are founded on democratic values, which are principles that few people in the field of education oppose. Indeed, sharing resources is a commitment that enables the development of knowledge. However, the deployment of OERs seems to be held back in many institutions. Initial criticisms relate to the absence of dedicated policies and teachers’ resistance to sharing. Additionally, concerns regarding generative AI, and tensions with Libre/open must be addressed. Consequently, a reconceptualization of OERs seems necessary. To achieve this, we propose using the capability approach to grasp the tension between shared values and absent practices at both institutional and individual levels. By drawing on the processes of opportunity and freedom, empowerment is at stake during active participation in OE. How do OERs help shape an empowering professional environment for teachers and students? The article suggests a revitalized place for OERs now that AI is available with a view to consider in a more confident operationalization of action frameworks for OE.
Keywords:
- capability,
- OERs,
- enabling environment,
- opportunity,
- freedom
Resumen
La Educación Abierta (EA) y los Recursos Educativos Abiertos (REA) se basan en valores democráticos a los que pocas personas del ámbito de la educación se oponen. De hecho, se trata de un compromiso para compartir recursos que permiten el desarrollo del conocimiento. Sin embargo, el despliegue de los REA parece frenado en muchas instituciones. Mientras que las primeras críticas se refieren a la ausencia de políticas dedicadas y a la resistencia de los profesores a compartir, también existe la disponibilidad de IA generativa, y la tensión que estas técnicas alimentan con el código abierto. Por lo tanto, parece necesaria una reconceptualización de los REA. Para ello, proponemos utilizar el enfoque de las capacidades, para captar la tensión entre valores compartidos y prácticas ausentes, tanto a nivel institucional como individual. Recurriendo a los procesos de oportunidad y libertad, es la capacitación lo que está en juego durante la participación activa en los REA. ¿Cómo contribuyen los REA a configurar un entorno profesional capacitador para profesores y alumnos? El artículo propone un lugar revitalizado para los REA ahora que están disponibles, con el fin de considerar una operacionalización más segura de los marcos de acción para la EA.
Palabras clave:
- capacidad,
- REA,
- entorno favorable,
- oportunidad,
- libertad
Resumo
A Educação Aberta (EA) e os Recursos Educacionais Abertos (REA) assentam em valores democráticos aos quais poucas pessoas no domínio da educação se opõem. Com efeito, trata-se de um compromisso de mento de recursos que permitem o desenvolvimento do conhecimento. No entanto, a implantação dos REA parece travada em muitas instituições. Se as primeiras críticas se prendem com a ausência de políticas específicas e com a resistência dos professores ao compartilhamento, há também a disponibilidade de meios generativos e a tensão que estas técnicas alimentam com a liberdade/abertura. Por conseguinte, parece necessária uma reconceitualização dos REA. Para tal, propomos utilizar a abordagem das capacidades, para apreender a tensão entre valores compartilhados e práticas ausentes, tanto a nível institucional como individual. Recorrendo aos processos de oportunidade e de liberdade, é a capacitação que está em causa durante a participação ativa no REA. Como é que os REA ajudam a moldar um ambiente profissional capacitador para professores e alunos? O artigo propõe um lugar revitalizado para os REA, agora que estes estão disponíveis, levando-se em conta uma operacionalização mais confiante dos quadros de ação para a EA.
Palavras chaves:
- capacidade,
- REAs,
- ambiente propício,
- oportunidade,
- liberdade
Appendices
Liste de références
- Admiraal, W. (2021). A Typology of Educators Using Open Educational Resources for Teaching. International Journal on Studies in Education, 4(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.60
- Alombert, A. (2025). De la bêtise artificielle. Allia.
- Arnoud, J., et Falzon, P. (2013). Changement organisationnel et reconception de l’organisation : des ressources aux capabilités. Activites, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.760
- Bansal, T., et Joshi, D. (2015). OER and Teacher Educators: Awareness and Barriers. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 24(1 et 2), 59-68.
- Belikov, O., et Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308
- Blomgren, C. (2018). OER Awareness and Use: The Affinity Between Higher Education and K-12. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3431
- Bollier, D. (2024). Challenges in Expanding the Commonsverse. International Journal of the Commons, 18(1), 288-301. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1389
- Bondolfi, T. (2016). Citoyens du Net : le 1er manuel d’eculture générale au travail, en formation, en famille. Édition Ynternet.org. https://tedxgeneva.net/wp-content/uploads/CDN1.0c-1.pdf
- Bossu, C., et Willems, J. (2024). OER based capacity building to overcome staff equity and access issues in higher education. ASCILITE Publications, 22-26. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2017.734
- Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative AI, Synthetic Contents, Open Educational Resources (OER), and Open Educational Practices (OEP): A New Front in the Openness Landscape. Open Praxis, 15(3), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.3.579
- Butcher, N., Kanwar, A., et Uvalic-Trumbic, S. (2011). A basic guide to open educational resources (OER). Commonwealth of Learning; UNESCO.
- Cape Town Open Education Declaration (2007). Unlocking the promise of open educational resources. https://www.capetowndeclaration.org
- Cardon, D. (2019). Culture numérique. Presses de Sciences Po.
- Cavignaux-Bros, D. (2023). Ingénierie pédagogique et numérique : une analyse selon l’approche par les capabilités. L’Harmattan.
- Cengage Learning (2016). Open Educational Resources (OER) and the Evolving Higher Education Landscape [White Paper]. Cengage Learning. https://eliterate.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/wp_oer-evolving-higher-ed-landscape.pdf
- Conole, G., Evans, J., et Sims, E. (2003). Use and reuse of digital images in teaching and learning. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning (pp. 156-170). Kogan Page.
- Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
- de Rosnay, M. D., et Stalder, F. (2020). Digital commons. Internet Policy Review, 9(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1530
- Ehlers, U.-D., et Kunze, K. (2021). Open Education and Training Where does Europe go from here? State of Play for an Emerging European OER Ecosystem. ENCORE+.
- Farrow, R. (2017). Open education and critical pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991
- Farrow, R. (2025). Cosmopolitics and The Commons. Education Ouverte et Libre - Open Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.52612/journals/eol-oe.2025.e1632
- Farrow, R., et Díez-Arcón, P. (2024). Understanding Innovation Vectors in the Use of Open Educational Resources. Open Praxis, 16(4), 526-546. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.702
- Farrow, R., Iniesto, F., Pitt, R., Weller, M., et Bossu, C. (2025). Innovation with Open Educational Resources: An integrative review of drivers, barriers and enablers. Journal of Open, Distance, and Digital Education, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.25619/Y3YTE265
- Fernagu Oudet, S. (2012). Favoriser un environnement « capacitant » dans les organisations. Dans E. Bourgeois et M. Durand (dir.), Apprendre au travail (pp. 201-213). Presses Universitaires de France. https://www.cairn.info/apprendre-au-travail--9782130588948-page-201.htm20
- Fernagu, S. (2023). Les Capabilités : une grille de lecture des conditions de la professionnalisation au travail et en formation. McGill Journal of Education, 57(1), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.7202/1102016ar
- Flipo, F. (2005). Pour une écologisation du concept de capabilité d’Amartya Sen. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 13(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2005010
- Flowers, S., Hazlett, Z. S., Ramirez, M., Treibergs, K., Vinson, E., Smith, M. K., et Knight, J. K. (2024). Understanding how professional development opportunities affect open educational resource sharing. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1422383. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1422383
- Fournier, C., et Laroussi, M. (2023). Chapitre 7. Les ressources éducatives libres pour tous et tout au long de la vie en réponse à l’objectif de développement durable n°4. Dans F. Chevalier et M. Kalika, Recherches sur la Sustainability (p. 141-157). EMS Editions. https://doi.org/10.3917/ems.cheva.2023.01.0141
- Hart, C. S. (2012). The capability approach and education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42, 275-282. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0305764X.2012.706393
- Henderson, S., et Ostashewski, N. (2018). Barriers, incentives, and benefits of the open educational resources (OER) movement: An exploration into instructor perspectives. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i12.9172
- Kimmons, R. (2016). Expansive Openness in Teacher Practice. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 118(9), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800901
- Kılıçkaya, F., et Kic-Drgas, J. (2021). Issues of context and design in OER (open educational resources). Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 401-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09852-8
- Kuo, Y.-C., Kuo, Y.-T., et Tseng, H. (2024). Exploring the Factors That Influence K-12 Teachers’ Use of Open Educational Resources. Education Sciences, 14(3), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030276
- Lachaîne, C., et Cotnam-Kappel, M. (2023). Pratiques éducatives ouvertes au postsecondaire en milieu minoritaire francophone au Canada : défis et possibilités pour viser l’équité linguistique. The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 3(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2023.3.2.51
- Lelli, S. (2008). Operationalising Sen’s capability approach: The influence of the selected technique. Dans F. Comim, M. Qizilbash, et S. Alkire (dir.), The Capability Approach. Concepts, Measures and Applications (p. 310-361). Cambridge.
- Lemay, M.-P. (2015). L’approche des capabilités de Martha Nussbaum face aux enjeux multiculturels des sociétés libérales occidentales. Ithaque, 16, 77-100. http://www.revueithaque.org/fichiers/Ithaque16/Lemay.pdf
- Leonelli, S. (2023). Philosophy of Open Science (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009416368
- Li, Z., Pardos, Z. A., et Ren, C. (2024). Aligning open educational resources to new taxonomies: How AI technologies can help and in which scenarios. Computers & Education, 216, 105027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105027
- Liesenfeld, A., et Dingemanse, M. (2024). Rethinking open source generative AI: Open washing and the EU AI Act. The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1774-1787. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3659005
- Luo, T., Hostetler, K., Freeman, C., et Stefaniak, J. (2020). The power of open: Benefits, barriers, and strategies for integration of open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(2), 140-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222
- Mahendraprabu, M., Kumar, K. S., Susanto, E., et Fathurrochman, Dr. I. (2022). Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges of Incorporating Open Educational Resources in India. International Journal of Emerging Knowledge Studies, 01(01), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.70333/ijeks-01-12-001
- Martin, L. (2024). Clarification conceptuelle de l’approche des environnements capacitants : un atout pour le développement professionnel et le processus de prise de décision de l’action pour les paramédicaux. Revue Francophone Internationale de Recherche Infirmière, 10(3), 100332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.refiri.2024.100332
- Mayer, J. (2023). Open Educational Resources (OER) Efficacy and Experiences: A Mixed Methods Study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 23(4), 773-798. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2023.a908701
- McGeary, B., Guder, C., et Ganeshan, A. (2021). Opening up Educational Practices through Faculty, Librarian, and Student Collaboration in OER Creation: Moving from Labor-intensive to Supervisory Involvement. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v16i1.6149
- McLean, M., Abbas, A., et Ashwin, P. (2013). University knowledge, human development and pedagogic rights. Dans A. Boni et M. Walker (dir.), Human development and capabilities: Re-imagining the university of the twenty-first century (p. 30-43). Routledge.
- Mirowski, P. (2018). The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science, 48(2), 171-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718772086
- Mouta, A., Pinto-Llorente, A. M., et Torrecilla-Sánchez, E. M. (2023). Uncovering Blind Spots in Education Ethics: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00384-9
- Mullen, R., Kydd, A., Fleming, A., et McMillan, L. (2021). A practical guide to the systematic application of nominal group technique. Nurse Researcher, 29(1), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2021.e1777
- Mullens, A. M., et Hoffman, B. (2023). The Affordability Solution: A Systematic Review of Open Educational Resources. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09793-7
- Murray, R. (2024). The Capability Approach, Pedagogic Rights and Course Design: Developing Autonomy and Reflection through Student-Led, Individually Created Courses. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 25(1), 131‑150. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2023.2261856
- Nussbaum, M. C., et Sen, A. (1993). The Quality of Life. Clarendon & Oxford.
- Ossiannilsson, E., Ulloa Cazarez, R. L., Goode, C., Mansour, C., et Martins Gomes De Gusmão, C. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Use to Empower the Implementation of OER and the UNESCO OER Recommendation. Open Praxis, 16(2), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.2.650
- Otto, D. (2021). Driven by Emotions! The Effect of Attitudes on Intention and Behaviour regarding Open Educational Resources (OER). Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.606
- Peter, S., et Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23
- Pulker, H., et Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Openness reexamined: Teachers’ practices with open educational resources in online language teaching. Distance Education, 41(2), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757412
- Rodés, V., Gewerc-Barujel, A., et Llamas-Nistal, M. (2019). University Teachers and Open Educational Resources: Case Studies from Latin America. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3853
- Rodriguez Diaz, J. (2025). Vers une école capacitante : construire des environnements inclusifs et équitables. Revue suisse de pédagogie spécialisée, 15(01), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.57161/r2025-01-08
- Salais, R. (2009). L’approche par les capacités et le travail. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00430169v1
- Savarieau, B. (2017). Pouvoir d’agir et environnements capacitants, de nouvelles voies de développement professionnel avec les technologies? Dans T. Ardouin, S. Briquet-Duhazé, et E. Annoot (dir.), Le champ de la formation et de la professionnalisation des adultes : attentes sociales, pratiques, lexique et postures identitaires (pp. 274-266). L’Harmattan.
- Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. AnchorBooks.
- Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., Grundy, E. A. C., Graham, J., Noetel, M., Uuk, R., Dao, J., Pour, S., Casper, S., et Thompson, N. (2025). The AI Risk Repository: A Comprehensive Meta-Review, Database, and Taxonomy of Risks From Artificial Intelligence. arXiv, v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12622
- Strowel, A. (2023). ChatGPT and Generative AI Tools: Theft of Intellectual Labor? IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 54(4), 491-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01321-y
- Tang, H., Lin, Y.-J., et Qian, Y. (2021). Improving K-12 Teachers’ Acceptance of Open Educational Resources by Open Educational Practices: A Mixed Methods Inquiry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3209-3232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10046-z
- Tlili, A., Zhang, J., Papamitsiou, Z., Manske, S., Huang, R., Kinshuk, et Hoppe, H. U. (2021). Towards utilising emerging technologies to address the challenges of using Open Educational Resources: A vision of the future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 515-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09993-4
- UNESCO (2019). Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370936
- UNESCO (2024a). Dubai Declaration on Open Educational Resources (OER). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000392271.locale=en
- UNESCO (2024b). Guidelines on the implementation of the OER Recommendation. Action Areas 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/search/84caec4f-ee25-4bad-b0e0-0e61e87b0af3
- UNESCO (2024c). 3ème Congrès mondial sur les REL de l’UNESCO 2024. Biens publics numériques : solutions ouvertes et IA pour un accès inclusif à la connaissance. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391562_fre
- Van De, A., et Delbecq, A. L. (1971). Nominal Versus Interacting Group Processes for Committee Decision-Making Effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 14(2), 203-212.
- Weller, M. (2014). Battle For Open. How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory. Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bam
- Wills, S., et Pegler, C. (2016). A Deeper Understanding of Reuse: Learning Designs, Activities, Resources and their Contexts. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2016(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.405

