Abstracts
Résumé
L’essor de l’intelligence artificielle (IA) générative reconfigure l’enseignement supérieur et interroge en profondeur les pratiques d’évaluation. Dans ce contexte, cet article propose une analyse réflexive des tensions entre compétences disciplinaires, littératie en IA et objectifs éducatifs. Plutôt que d’opposer interdiction et intégration de l’IA, il invite à repenser l’alignement entre les finalités, les méthodes et les modalités d’évaluation afin de former des étudiants capables d’un usage critique et éthique de ces technologies. Revenir aux fondamentaux pédagogiques apparaît comme un préalable pour préserver l’éducation comme un espace d’émancipation dans un monde où l’IA est omniprésente.
Mots-clés :
- intelligence artificielle générative,
- enseignement supérieur,
- littératie en IA,
- évaluation des apprentissages,
- pédagogie
Abstract
The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping higher education and profoundly challenging assessment practices. This article offers a reflective analysis of the tensions between disciplinary expertise, AI literacy, and educational goals. Rather than framing the debate as a choice between banning or integrating AI, it calls for a rethinking of the alignment between purposes, methods, and assessment approaches, with the aim of preparing students for a critical and ethical use of these technologies. Returning to pedagogical fundamentals emerges as a necessary step to preserve education as a space for human emancipation in a world where AI is omnipresent.
Keywords:
- generative artificial intelligence,
- higher education,
- AI literacy,
- assessment,
- pedagogy
Resumen
El auge de la inteligencia artificial (IA) generativa está transformando la educación superior y cuestionando profundamente las prácticas de evaluación. Este artículo propone un análisis reflexivo de las tensiones entre la experiencia disciplinaria, la alfabetización en IA y los objetivos educativos. Más que plantear la cuestión como una elección entre prohibir o integrar la IA, invita a repensar la coherencia entre finalidades, métodos y enfoques de evaluación, con el fin de preparar al estudiantado para un uso crítico y ético de estas tecnologías. Volver a los fundamentos pedagógicos se presenta como un paso necesario para preservar la educación como un espacio de emancipación humana en un mundo donde la IA es omnipresente.
Palabras clave:
- inteligencia artificial generativa,
- educación superior,
- alfabetización en IA,
- evaluación del aprendizaje,
- pedagogía
Resumo
O avanço da inteligência artificial (IA) generativa temremodeladoo ensino superior e desafiado profundamente as práticas de avaliação. Este artigo propõe uma análise reflexiva das tensões entre a expertise disciplinar, a literacia em IA e os objetivos educacionais. Mais do que encarar a questão como uma escolha entre proibir ou integrar a IA, este estudo defende a necessidade de repensar o alinhamento entre finalidades, métodos e abordagens de avaliação, de forma a preparar os estudantes para um uso crítico e ético destas tecnologias. Voltar aos fundamentos pedagógicos surge como um passo essencial para preservar a educação como espaço de emancipação humana num mundo onde a IA é omnipresente.
Palavras chaves:
- inteligência artificial generativa,
- ensino superior,
- literacia em IA,
- avaliação da aprendizagem,
- pedagogia
Appendices
Liste de références
- Bertoni, E., Cosgrove, J. et Cachia, R. (2024). Digital skills gaps - a closer look at the Digital Skills Index (DSI 2.0), European Commission, Ispra, JRC140617.
- Digital Education Council (2024). Digital Education Council global AI student survey 2024. Consulté le 10 avril 2025, sur https://www.digitaleducationcouncil.com/post/digital-education-council-global-ai-student-survey-2024
- Digital Education Council (2025). Global AI faculty survey. Consulté le 10 avril 2025, sur https://mcusercontent.com/
- Guo, K. et Wang, D. (2023). To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12146-0
- Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘Digital Divide’toDigital Inequality’: Studying internet use as penetration increases. Princeton Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Working Paper.
- Lanarès, J., Laperrouza, M. et Sylvestre, E. (2023). Design pédagogique. Éditions Épistémé.
- Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
- Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., et Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041.
- OpenAI. (2025, 5 octobre). ChatGPT (GPT-5.5) [grand modèle de langage]. https://chatgpt.com/
- Rege Colet, N. et Berthiaume, D. (2013). Comment choisir des méthodes d’évaluation adaptées. Dans N. Rege Colet et M. Romainville (dir.), La pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur : repères théoriques et applications pratiques (Vol. 1, p. 55-71). De Boeck Supérieur.
- Robinson, L., Schulz, J., Blank, G., Ragnedda, M., Ono, H., Hogan, B. et Khilnani, A. (2020). Digital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information age. First Monday, 25(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i7.10842
- Samala, A. D., et Rawas, S. (2025). Bias in artificial intelligence: smart solutions for detection, mitigation, and ethical strategies in real-world applications. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 14(1), 32-43. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v14.i1.pp32-43
- Service de didactique universitaire et compétences numériques (2025). Rapport d’activité 2024-2025 [Document interne]. Université de Fribourg.
- Shata, A. et Hartley, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence and communication technologies in academia: Faculty perceptions and the adoption of generative AI. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00511-7
- Spirgi, L., et Seufert, S. (2025). GenAI as a learning assistant: An empirical study in higher education. Dans Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2025) – Volume 2 (p. 27-34). SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0013199300003932
- Wieman, C. E. (2019). Expertise in university teaching & the implications for teaching effectiveness, evaluation & training. Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 148(4), 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01760
- Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T. J. et Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z

