Abstracts
Résumé
L’intégration du numérique dans l’enseignement secondaire est désormais incontournable. Toutefois, tous les élèves ne disposent pas du même accès aux technologies ni des mêmes habiletés numériques ou expériences d’usage, ce qui influence leur capacité à en tirer profit. Cette disparité s’explique, d’une part, par les différences dans l’utilisation des technologies par les enseignants et, d’autre part, à la fois par la diversité des pratiques numériques des personnes enseignantes et par l’hétérogénéité des besoins et préférences des apprenants. Cette recherche vise à mettre en lumière la diversité des besoins et préférences des élèves du secondaire en matière d’usage du numérique, en s’alignant avec les principes de la conception universelle de l’apprentissage (CUA). Plus précisément, cette étude cherche à comprendre et à expliquer quels usages du numérique, adoptés par les personnes enseignantes, favorisent l’apprentissage et l’engagement d’un large éventail d’élèves, en tenant compte de leurs besoins individuels dans une perspective inclusive. Menée selon une approche méthodologique qualitative descriptive, elle se base sur des entrevues individuelles menées avec 17 personnes enseignantes et 40 élèves au secondaire, dans une diversité de niveaux et d’écoles au Québec. Les résultats sont organisés selon les trois grands principes de la CUA, de façon à mettre en relief les pratiques et usages du numérique susceptibles de soutenir les apprentissages et l’engagement d’une variété d’élèves en enseignement secondaire, dans une perspective inclusive.
Mots-clés :
- technologies éducatives,
- conception universelle de l’apprentissage,
- engagement des élèves,
- apprentissage,
- pédagogie inclusive,
- besoins des apprenants,
- préférences des élèves
Abstract
The integration of digital technology in secondary education is now essential. However, not all students have the same dispositions toward digital tools, nor do they benefit equally from digital technologies. This disparity can be attributed, on the one hand, to differences in how teachers use technology and, on the other hand, to the diversity of students’ needs and preferences. This study aims to highlight the variety of secondary students’ needs and preferences regarding digital technology use, aligning with the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL). More specifically, it seeks to understand and explain which digital practices adopted by teachers foster learning and engagement for a wide range of students, considering their individual needs from an inclusive perspective. It aims to answer the following question: Which uses of digital technology support students’ learning and engagement in secondary school courses, considering the variations in learners’ needs and preferences? Carried out using a qualitative descriptive methodological design, this study draws on individual interviews with 17 teachers and 40 secondary school students from various grade levels and schools across Québec. The results are organized around the three main principles of UDL in view of highlighting digital practices and uses that can support learning and engagement for a wide range of students in secondary education from an inclusive perspective.
Keywords:
- educational technologies,
- universal design for learning,
- student engagement,
- learning,
- inclusive pedagogy,
- learner needs,
- student preferences
Resumen
La integración de la tecnología digital en la enseñanza secundaria es ahora indispensable. Sin embargo, no todos los estudiantes tienen las mismas disposiciones frente a lo digital ni se benefician de la misma manera de las tecnologías digitales. Esta disparidad se explica, por un lado, por las diferencias en el uso de la tecnología por parte de los docentes y, por otro, por la diversidad de necesidades y preferencias de los estudiantes. Esta investigación tiene como objetivo destacar la diversidad de necesidades y preferencias de los estudiantes de secundaria en el uso de la tecnología digital, alineándose con los principios del Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje (DUA). Más específicamente, este estudio busca comprender y explicar qué usos de la tecnología digital, adoptados por los docentes, favorecen el aprendizaje y el compromiso de un amplio abanico de estudiantes, teniendo en cuenta sus necesidades individuales desde una perspectiva inclusiva. Busca responder a la siguiente pregunta: ¿Qué usos de la tecnología digital apoyan el aprendizaje y el compromiso de los estudiantes en los cursos de secundaria, considerando la variabilidad de sus necesidades y preferencias? Llevada a cabo bajo un enfoque metodológico cualitativo descriptivo, la investigación se basa en entrevistas individuales realizadas a 17 docentes y 40 estudiantes de secundaria, en una variedad de niveles y escuelas en Quebec. Los resultados están organizados según los tres grandes principios del DUA, con el fin de resaltar las prácticas y usos de la tecnología digital que pueden apoyar el aprendizaje y el compromiso de una diversidad de estudiantes en la enseñanza secundaria, desde una perspectiva inclusiva.
Palabras clave:
- tecnologías educativas,
- diseño universal para el aprendizaje,
- compromiso de los estudiantes,
- aprendizaje,
- pedagogía inclusiva,
- necesidades de los aprendientes,
- preferencias de los estudiantes
Resumo
A integração do digital no ensino secundário tornou-se agora indispensável. No entanto, nem todos os alunos têm as mesmas disposições em relação ao digital nem se beneficiam da mesma forma das tecnologias digitais. Essa disparidade se explica, por um lado, pelas diferenças no uso das tecnologias pelos professores e, por outro, pela diversidade de necessidades e preferências dos alunos. Esta pesquisa tem como objetivo destacar a diversidade de necessidades e preferências dos alunos do ensino secundário no uso do digital, alinhando-se aos princípios do Desenho Universal para a Aprendizagem (DUA). Mais especificamente, este estudo busca compreender e explicar quais usos do digital, adotados pelos professores, favorecem a aprendizagem e o engajamento de um amplo leque de alunos, considerando suas necessidades individuais a partir de uma perspectiva inclusiva. O estudo busca responder à seguinte questão: Quais usos do digital apoiam a aprendizagem e o engajamento dos alunos no ensino secundário, levando em conta a variabilidade das necessidades e preferências dos estudantes? Conduzida sob uma abordagem metodológica qualitativa descritiva, a pesquisa baseia-se em entrevistas individuais realizadas com 17 professores e 40 alunos do ensino secundário, abrangendo uma diversidade de níveis e escolas em Quebec. Os resultados são organizados de acordo com os três grandes princípios do DUA, de forma a destacar as práticas e usos do digital que podem apoiar a aprendizagem e o engajamento de uma variedade de alunos no ensino secundário, a partir de uma perspectiva inclusiva.
Palavras chaves:
- tecnologias educacionais,
- desenho Universal para a aprendizagem,
- engajamento dos alunos,
- aprendizagem,
- pedagogia inclusiva,
- necessidades dos aprendentes,
- preferências dos alunos
Appendices
Liste de références
- Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A. et Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1), Article 2218191. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191
- Allen, K. A., Ryan, T., Gray, D. L., McInerney, D. M. et Waters, L. (2014). Social media use and social connectedness in adolescents: The positives and the potential pitfalls. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 31(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2014.2
- Armstrong, A. (2022). Technological practices of middle years students with mathematics learning disabilities. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(3), 376-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00208-3
- Brassard, I., Moreau, A. C., Tremblay, K. N., Jolicoeur, E. et Beaulieu, J. (2021). Recension des écrits sur les pratiques d’enseignement en littératie intégrant des technologies numériques auprès d’élèves en situation de handicap. Revue de recherches en littératie médiatique multimodale, 14. https://doi.org/10.7202/1086913ar
- Bray, A., Devitt, A., Banks, J., Sanchez Fuentes, S., Sandoval, M., Riviou, K., Byrne, D., Flood, M. et Terrenzio, S. (2024). What next for Universal Design for Learning? A systematic literature review of technology in UDL implementations at second level. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 113-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13328
- Carmichael, J. (2023). Tour d’horizon de possibles utilisations des nouvelles technologies avec des élèves à besoins éducatifs particuliers. La nouvelle revue Éducation et société inclusives, 97(3), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.3917/nresi.097.0237
- CAST (2024). The Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0 [graphic organizer]. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/static/udlg3-graphicorganizer-digital-numbers-a11y.pdf
- Collin, S. (2017). Les élèves sont-ils prêts à apprendre avec le numérique? Dans J. Bugmann et T. Karsenti, Enseigner et apprendre avec le numérique (p. 149-158). Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal. https://doi.org/10.1515/9782760637764-011
- Collin, S., Guichon, N. et Ntebutse, J. G. (2015). Une approche sociocritique des usages numériques en éducation. STICEF (Sciences et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication pour l’Éducation et la Formation), 22. https://www.persee.fr/doc/stice_1764-7223_2015_num_22_1_1688
- Daley, S. G., Xu, Y., Proctor, C. P., Rappolt-Schlichtmann, G. et Goldowsky, B. (2020). Behavioral engagement among adolescents with reading difficulties: The role of active involvement in a universally designed digital literacy platform. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(3), 278-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1635545
- Ewe, L. P. et Galvin, T. (2023). Universal Design for Learning across Formal School Structures in Europe. A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 13(9), 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090867
- Fontana, A. et Frey, J. H. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. Dans N. K. Denzin et Y. S. Lincoln (dir.), The handbook of qualitative research (p. 361-376). Sage Publications.
- Gargiulo, R. M. et Metcalf, D. (2022). Teaching in today’s inclusive classroom: A universal design for learning approach (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.
- Hall, E. A. (2024). E-learning and academic achievement in low SES middle school students: A qualitative intrinsic case study [thèse de doctorat, National University, États-Unis]. ProQuest Dissertations et Theses Global.
- Heiser, L. (2019). Pourquoi absorber les pratiques numériques personnelles des élèves dans la prochaine évolution institutionnelle de la formation des enseignants? Distances et médiations des savoirs, 26. https://doi.org/10.4000/DMS.3563
- Hitchcock, C. H., Rao, K., Chang, C. C. et Yuen, J. W. L. (2016). TeenACE for Science: Using multimedia tools and scaffolds to support writing. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(2), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051603500203
- Holloway, S. et Qaisi, R. (2022). Composing meaning through multiliteracies and multimodality with adolescent and adult learners. Language and Literacy, 24(2), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29587
- Jang, H., Reeve, J. et Halusic, M. (2016). A new autonomy-supportive way of teaching that increases conceptual learning: Teaching in students’ preferred ways. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(4), 686-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1083522
- Karagianni, E. et Drigas, A. (2023). Using new technologies and mobiles for students with disabilities to build a sustainable inclusive learning and development ecosystem. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(1), 57‑73. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i01.36359
- King-Sears, M. E. et Johnson, T. M. (2020). Universal Design for Learning Chemistry Instruction for students with and without learning disabilities. Remedial & Special Education, 41(4), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519862608
- Leach, A. M. (2017). Digital Media Production to Support Literacy for Secondary Students with Diverse Learning Abilities. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 9(2), 30‑44. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2019-09-02-03
- Marino, M. T., Gotch, C. M., Israel, M., Vasquez, E., Basham, J. D. et Becht, K. (2014). UDL in the middle school science classroom: Can video games and alternative text heighten engagement and learning for students with learning disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948713503963
- Merriam, S. B. et Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass.
- Miles, M.B., Huberman, A. M., et Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
- Moberg, S., Muta, E., Korenaga, K., Kuorelahti, M. et Savolainen, H. (2019). Struggling for inclusive education in Japan and Finland: Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(1), 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1615800
- Murawski, W. W. et Scott, K. L. (2019). What really works with universal design for learning. Corwin Press.
- Ntebutse, J. G. et Collin, S. (2019). Une approche sociocritique : Quels apports à l’étude du numérique en éducation? Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation, 21(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7202/1067705ar
- O'Shaughnessy, T. J. (2021). Universal Design for Learning and Accessibility: A Practitioner Approach. Dans F, Fovet, Handbook of Research on Applying Universal Design for Learning Across Disciplines: Concepts, Case Studies, and Practical Implementation (p. 25-47). IGI Global.
- Pruet, P., Ang, C. S. et Farzin, D. (2016). Understanding tablet computer usage among primary school students in underdeveloped areas: Students’ technology experience, learning styles and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1131-1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.063
- Rao, K., Gravel, J., Rose, D., et Tucker-Smith, T. (2022). Universal Design for Learning in its 3rd decade: A focus on equity, inclusion, and design (p. 712‑720). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.14079-5
- Reyssier, S. et Simonian, S. (2021). Effet d’un environnement informatique pour l’apprentissage humain sur la motivation des élèves à faire des mathématiques : caractéristiques des élèves et style de l’enseignant. Canadian Journal of Education Revue Canadienne De l’éducation, 44(1), 116-149. https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.v44i1.4431
- Saloviita, T. (2020). Teachers’ Changing Attitudes and Preferences around Inclusive Education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(6), 1841-1858. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1828569
- Sahlberg, P. (2021). Does the pandemic help us make education more equitable? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 20(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09284-4
- Saha-Gupta, N., Song, H. et Todd, R. L. (2019). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as facilitating access to higher education. Journal of Education and Social Development, 3(2), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3370001
- Scott, L. A., Temple, P. et Marshall, D. (2015). UDL in online college coursework: Insights of infusion and educator preparedness. Online Learning, 19(5), 99-119.
- Sharpe, S. et Young, G. (2023). Using Google Classroom as assistive technology in universally designed classrooms. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / Revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 49(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28456
- Smith, S. J., Lowrey, K. A., Rowland, A. L. et Frey, B. (2020). Effective technology-supported writing strategies for learners with disabilities. Inclusion, 8(1), 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-8.1.58
- Smith Canter, L. L., King, L. H., Williams, J. B., Metcalf, D. et Potts, K. R. M. (2017). Evaluating pedagogy and practice of Universal Design for Learning in public schools. Exceptionality Education International, 27(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v27i1.7743
- Solari Landa, M., Rakotomalala Harisoa, N. et Pottier, L. (2023). Enseignants confinés : entre pratiques, besoins techno-pédagogiques et forme scolaire. Carrefours de l'éducation, 55(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.3917/cdle.055.0020
- Stalmach, A., D’Elia, P., Di Sano, S. et Casale, G. (2024). Digital methods to promote inclusive and effective learning in schools: A mixed methods research study. Open Education Studies, 6, Article 20240023. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2024-0023
- UNESCO (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Paris: UNESCO.
- Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Christensen, R. et Lai, K.-W. (2018). Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9
- Warschauer, M. et Xu, Y. (2018). Technology and equity in Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, 1063-1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_76

