Abstracts
Abstract
Active learning activities play a crucial role in today's world of education and beyond. In an age of constant distractions and shortened attention spans, active learning activities maintain students' attention better than traditional passive learning methods. This paper introduces a hybrid model that integrates the flipped classroom (FC) with the snowballing technique (FCS), combining pre-class self-learning with in-class collaborative group expansion. This innovative approach aims to foster collaboration, critical thinking, and knowledge retention among engineering students. Students begin by working individually on the given problem or topic, gradually forming groups. Despite extensive research on active learning, limited literature exists on the structured integration of the snowballing technique within a FC framework, particularly in engineering disciplines. This study addresses this gap by investigating the impact of this combined approach in the context of a VLSI testing and verification course, an undergraduate elective course in the third year of electronics engineering. A detailed methodology, supported by quantitative data, student feedback, and assessment results, underscores the approach's effectiveness.
Keywords:
- Flipped Learning,
- Snowballing,
- Active Learning,
- Engineering Education
Appendices
Bibliography
- Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
- Abraham, R. R., Frambach, J. M., Verheggen, M., & Dolmans, D. H. (2019). Exploring the dimensions of group discussion in problem-based learning among a diverse group of international students: A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 13(9), JC1-JC5.
- Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Sage.
- Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
- Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead?. Computers & Education, 79, 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004
- Chikeme, P. C., Ogbonnaya, N. P., Ihudiebube-Splendor, C., Abonyi, E. O., Madu, O., & Okoronkwo, I. (2024). Self-directed learning readiness and learning achievements of a flipped classroom model approach in research methods class: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education in Practice, 103968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103968
- Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.
- Egara, F. O., & Mosimege, M. (2024). Effect of flipped classroom learning approach on mathematics achievement and interest among secondary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8131-8150.
- Gómez-Tejedor, J. A., Vidaurre, A., Tort-Ausina, I., Molina-Mateo, J., Serrano, M. A., Meseguer-Dueñas, J. M., ... & Riera, J. (2020). Effectiveness of flip teaching on engineering students' performance in the physics lab. Computers & Education, 144, 103708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103708
- Gren, L. (2020). A flipped classroom approach to teaching empirical software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(3), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2960264
- Kanteti, D., Srikar, D. V. S., & Ramesh, T. K. (2017, November). Active learning techniques and impacts. In 5th IEEE International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE) (pp. 131–134). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2017.00029
- Karjanto, N., & Acelajado, M. J. (2022). Sustainable learning, cognitive gains, and improved attitudes in college algebra flipped classrooms. Sustainability, 14(19), 12500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912500
- Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759
- Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2
- Lyman, F. T., Tredway, L., & Purser, M. (2023). Think-pair-share and Thinktrix: Standard bearers of student dialogue. In R. M. Gillies, B. Millis, & N. Davidson (Eds.), Contemporary global perspectives on cooperative learning (pp. 124–143). Routledge.
- Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Prentice Hall.
- Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B., & Fink, L. D. (2002). Frequently asked questions about team-based learning. In L. K. Michaelsen, A. B. Knight, & L. D. Fink (Eds.), Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups (pp. 213–232). Praeger.
- Ng, L. K., & Lo, C. K. (2022). Flipped classroom and gamification approach: Its impact on performance and academic commitment on sustainable learning in education. Sustainability, 14(9), 5428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095428
- Nja, C. O., Orim, R. E., Neji, H. A., Ukwetang, J. O., Uwe, U. E., & Ideba, M. A. (2022). Students’ attitude and academic achievement in a flipped classroom. Heliyon, 8(1), e08791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08792
- O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
- Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (2008). The psychology of the child. Basic books.
- Samaila, K., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2024). Reinventing teaching pedagogy: the benefits of quiz-enhanced flipped classroom model on students' learning outcomes and engagement. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(4), 1214-1227.
- Sefira, R., Setiawan, A., Hidayatullah, R., & Darmayanti, R. (2024). The influence of the snowball throwing learning model on Pythagorean theorem material on learning outcomes. Edutechnium Journal of Educational Technology, 2(1), 1-7.
- Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
- Toto, R., & Nguyen, H. (2009, October). Flipping the work design in an industrial engineering course. In 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1-4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350529
- Tran, V. D. (2014). The effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement and knowledge retention. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p131
- Van Haastrecht, M., Sarhan, I., Yigit Ozkan, B., Brinkhuis, M., & Spruit, M. (2021). SYMBALS: A systematic review methodology blending active learning and snowballing. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6, 685591. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.685591
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.
- Yang, K. C., & Kang, Y. (2020). The effectiveness of gamification on student engagement, learning outcomes, and learning experiences. In L. Kyei-Blankson, E. Ntuli, & J. Blankson (Eds.), Handbook of research on creating meaningful experiences in online courses (pp. 286–305). IGI Global.
- Yahyazade, M., Moghaddam, M. M., & Attaran, A. (2014). Towards an interactive EFL class: Using active learning strategies. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 6(8), 8-14.
- Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274

