Abstracts
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) on the English proficiency of English language teaching (ELT) students, comparing its effectiveness to traditional classroom-based instruction. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with 32 ELT students assigned to either an experimental group using commercial learning platforms (CLPs) or a control group receiving traditional instruction over the semester. The results indicated that, based on pre- and post-test scores, the experimental group achieved significantly greater improvements in overall English proficiency compared to the control group. Specifically, the experimental group exhibited greater improvements across all language skills, including vocabulary, listening, speaking, and reading. In addition, students in the MALL group expressed positive perceptions of the platforms, emphasizing increased engagement, flexibility, and motivation, which contributed to enhanced learning experiences. Students also highlighted challenges, such as technical issues and repetitive exercises, but overall, they favoured integrating MALL into their learning routines. These findings suggest that MALL can effectively enhance comprehensive language proficiency and that ELT students view it as a valuable tool for language learning. This study underscores the potential of MALL to improve language outcomes and provides insights into students’ attitudes towards its integration into language education.
Keywords:
- Language Learning,
- English Proficiency,
- Mobile-Assisted,
- ELT Students
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aliakbari, M., & Mardani, M. (2022). Mobile-assisted language learning and its effects on learners’ speaking development. Education Research International, 2022, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9043326
- Anggraini, M. P., Cahyono, B. Y., Anugerahwati, M., & Ivone, F. M. (2022). The interaction effects of reading proficiency and personality types on EFL university students’ online reading strategy use. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8821-8839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10979-9
- Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., Kharis, M., & Slamet, J. (2025). Gamifying English proficiency: A needs analysis for EFL student course design. Online Learning, 29(2), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i2.4506
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2025). Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: A values-based approach. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 22(2), 399–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2382244
- Chen, Y. (2024). Effects of technology-enhanced language learning on reducing EFL learners’ public speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 789–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2055083
- Dağdeler, K. O., Konca, M. Y., & Demiröz, H. (2020). The effect of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) on EFL learners’ collocation learning. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 16(1), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.712891
- Dai, Y., & Wu, Z. (2023). Mobile-assisted pronunciation learning with feedback from peers and/or automatic speech recognition: a mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(5–6), 861–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1952272
- Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). Technology acceptance model. J Manag Sci, 35(8), 982-1003.
- Essafi, M., Belfakir, L., & Moubtassime, M. (2024). Investigating mobile-assisted language learning apps: Babbel, Memrise, and Duolingo as a case study. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(2), 197. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n2p197
- Ghorbani, N., & Ebadi, S. (2020). Exploring learners’ grammatical development in mobile assisted language learning. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1704599
- Gonulal, T. (2019). The use of Instagram as a mobile-assisted language learning tool. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(3), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.590108
- Gou, P. (2023). Teaching English using mobile applications to improve academic performance and language proficiency of college students. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16935–16949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11864-9
- Gustavo, G. B., Questier, F., & Zhu, C. (2019). Self-directed language learning in a mobile-assisted, out-of-class context: do students walk the talk? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(1–2), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1485707
- Hammad, A. A. (2022). Investigating the low English proficiency of Saudi EFL learners. Arab World English Journal, 13(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.9
- Hidayati, D., & Slamet, J. (2025). Interactive multimedia via LMS on a reading comprehension course: Enhancing engagement and learning outcomes in Islamic higher education. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 20(1), 95–122. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsel/article/view/277426
- Hoi, V. N., & Mu, G. M. (2021). Perceived teacher support and students’ acceptance of mobile‐assisted language learning: Evidence from Vietnamese higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 879–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13044
- Hoo, F. J., Noh, M. A. M., Harun, Z. A., Ibrahim, R., & Mohsin, N. A. (2025). Open the black box of autonomous learning: A sustainable approach to language learning. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 19(2), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v19i2.9005
- Imamyartha, D., Widiati, U., Anugerahwati, M., & Hamat, A. (2023). Moodle and Telegram to develop students’ language performance and knowledge co-construction in technology-enhanced CLIL. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 863-883. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.28295
- Jia, C., & Hew, K. F. T. (2022). Supporting lower-level processes in EFL listening: The effect on learners’ listening proficiency of a dictation program supported by a mobile instant messaging app. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1–2), 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1671462
- Kessler, M., Loewen, S., & Gönülal, T. (2023). Mobile-assisted language learning with Babbel and Duolingo: Comparing L2 learning gains and user experience. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2215294
- Koo, K. K., & Jiang, M. (2022). What does it mean to take online classes as an international student during COVID-19? Online Learning, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.3495
- Lê, Q. T. N., & Polikoff, M. S. (2021). Do English Language Development Curriculum Materials Matter for Students’ English Proficiency? SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211035770
- Lei, X., Fathi, J., Noorbakhsh, S., & Rahimi, M. (2022). The impact of mobile-assisted language learning on English as a foreign language learners’ vocabulary learning attitudes and self-regulatory capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872922
- Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R., Kim, K. M., Maloney, J., Miller, Z. F., & Rawal, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000065
- Montgomery, D. P., & Snow, K. (2024). Supporting students with diverse learning needs using universal design for learning in online learning: Voice of the students. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 18(2), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v18i2.7453
- Moradimokhles, H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2022). The effect of online vs. blended learning in developing English language skills by nursing student: an experimental study. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), 1653–1662. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1739079
- OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/
- Refat, N., Kassim, H., Rahman, M. A., & Razali, R. bin. (2020). Measuring student motivation on the use of a mobile assisted grammar learning tool. PLOS ONE, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236862
- Romsi, A., Widodo, J. P., & Slamet, J. (2024). Empowering slow learners: Gamification’s impact on students’ engagement and academic performance in an LMS for undergraduate students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.2.2040
- Shi, Y., & Tsai, C. (2024). Fostering vocabulary learning: mind mapping app enhances performances of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 634–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2052905
- Slamet, J., & Basthomi, Y. (2024). Assessing gamification-based LMS for EFL students: A self-directed learning framework. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 12(2), 100–122. https://doi.org/10.46687/CVHT3942.%20
- Slamet, J., Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., & Eliyanah, E. (2024a). Unlocking the potential in a gamification-based MOOC: Assessing autonomous learning and self-directed learning behaviors. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 12, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.19
- Slamet, J., Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., & Eliyanah, E. (2024b). Utilizing an SDL approach in designing a gamification-based MOOC to enhance autonomous learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23, 010. https://doi.org/10.28945/5278
- Slamet, J., Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., & Eliyanah, E. (2025a). A needs analysis for designing a gamification-based MOOC in English for specific purposes. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 13(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.46687/ULRS1031
- Slamet, J., Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., & Eliyanah, E. (2025b). Promoting autonomous learning in ESP courses through a gamified MOOC platform: A self-directed learning framework. Journal of Educators Online, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2025.22.2.7
- Slamet, J., & Mukminatien, N. (2024). Developing an online formative assessment instrument for listening skill through LMS. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 188–211. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/index
- Sun, Y., & Gao, F. (2020). An investigation of the influence of intrinsic motivation on students’ intention to use mobile devices in language learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1181–1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09733-9
- Telles-Langdon, D., & Telles-Langdon, N. (2025). Empowering students through elective grading in a university setting. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 19(1), 185-194. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v19i1.8906
- Vaishnav, P. B. (2024). Current trends and future prospects in English language teaching (ELT). Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i71438
- Widodo, J. P., Musyarofah, L., & Slamet, J. (2025). The impact of digital-interactive-book gamification-based instruction on academic learning outcomes of students who learn at their own pace: Insight from Indonesia. MEXTESOL Journal, 49(2), 1–11.
- Wolf, M. K., Bailey, A. L., Ballard, L., Wang, Y., & Pogossian, A. (2023). Unpacking the language demands in academic content and English language proficiency standards for English learners. International Multilingual Research Journal, 17(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2022.2116221
- Zhen, L. S., & Hashim, H. (2022). The usage of MALL in learners’ readiness to speak English. Sustainability, 14(23), 16227. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316227
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676