Abstracts
Abstract
Research on students’ understanding of covariation has primarily focused on static, linear models, overlooking the cognitive challenges of translating dynamic and cyclical representations. Despite their relevance to real-world applications, few studies have examined how students process covariational relationships in cyclic contexts, thereby limiting the development of effective strategies to improve their problem-solving abilities. Using a sequential mixed-methods design, the study was conducted with 53 first-semester students at STKIP PGRI Sumenep in Indonesia, during the 2024/2025 academic year. Data were collected through pre-tests and post-tests to measure changes in problem-solving performance, along with a closed-ended questionnaire administered to all students and structured interviews with six selected participants, which provided deeper insights into the cognitive processes involved. The findings revealed significant improvements in students’ ability to interpret and solve covariation problems after engaging in tasks that required translating between cyclic graphical and tabular representations. Specifically, students demonstrated improved learning outcomes in recognizing periodicity, understanding variable interdependence, and applying functional reasoning in cyclical contexts. The cognitive analysis indicated that tasks involving representation translation helped students engage more deeply with the cyclical nature of mathematical relationships. These results suggest that focused instruction on representation translation can foster stronger cognitive engagement with Translating Cyclical Mathematical Representations: Effects on Students’ Learning Outcomes and Cognitive Processes in Covariation Problem-Solving 20(2) 120 complex mathematical concepts. The study emphasizes the importance of incorporating cyclic models into early mathematics instruction and recommends that curriculum developers prioritize representational fluency. Further research is needed to explore the broader implications of such instructional strategies in diverse mathematical contexts.
Keywords:
- Cognitive Processes,
- Covariation,
- Cyclic Mathematical Representations,
- Learning Outcomes,
- Problem-Solving
Appendices
Bibliography
- Afriyani, D., Sa’dijah, C., Subanji, S., & Muksar, M. (2019). Students’ construction error in translation among mathematical representations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 032098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032098
- Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33(2–3), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9
- Alpindo, O., Istiyono, E., & Andriyanti, E. (2024). Can critical-thinking skills be measured by analyzing metacognition?. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 18(2), 194-211. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v18i2.8813
- Alsina, Á., & Salgado, M. (2022). Understanding early mathematical modelling: First steps in the process of translation between real-world contexts and Mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(8), 1719–1742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10232-8
- Bagossi, S., Ferretti, F., & Arzarello, F. (2022). Assessing covariation as a form of conceptual understanding through comparative judgement. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111(3), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10178-w
- Basri, H., Purwanto, As’ari, A. R., & Sisworo. (2019). Investigating critical thinking skill of junior high school in solving mathematical problem. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 745-758. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12345a
- Bolden, D., Barmby, P., Raine, S., & Gardner, M. (2015). How young children view mathematical representations: A study using eye-tracking technology. Educational Research, 57(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2014.983718
- Bossé, M. J., Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Cheetham, M. R. (2011). Assessing the difficulty of mathematical translations: Synthesizing the literature and novel findings. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(3), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/264
- Casler-Failing, S. L. (2024). Facilitating productive struggle in an online secondary education Mathematics methods course: Experiences of pre-service teachers. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 18(1), 56-74. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v18i1.7813
- Creswell, J. W., Fetters, M. D., & Ivankova, N. V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. The Annals of Family Medicine, 2(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.104
- Goldin, G. A. (2020). Mathematical representations. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 566–572). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_103
- Harding, S.-M. E., Griffin, P. E., Awwal, N., Alom, B. M., & Scoular, C. (2017). Measuring collaborative problem solving using Mathematics-based tasks. AERA Open, 3(3), 233285841772804. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417728046
- Kafetzopoulos, G.-I., & Psycharis, G. (2022). Conceptualization of function as a covariational relationship between two quantities through modeling tasks. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 67, 100993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100993
- Kosko, K. W. (2020). The multiplicative meaning conveyed by visual representations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 60, 100800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100800
- Lagrange, J.-B., Huincahue, J., & Psycharis, G. (2022). Modeling in education: New perspectives opened by the theory of mathematical working spaces (pp. 247–266). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90850-8_11
- Lathifaturahmah, L., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., & Muksar, M. (2024). Prediction ability of college students in solving graph problems. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 15(6), 59-73.
- Lusiana, R., Sa'dijah, C., Subanji, & Chandra, T. D. (2025, March). Exploring prospective mathematics teachers’ noticing of primary students’ higher order thinking through learning video cases. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3142, No. 1, p. 020044). AIP Publishing LLC.
- Mainali, B. (2020). Representation in teaching and learning Mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1111
- Martínez-Sierra, G., & Toral-Rodríguez, O. D. (2025). Derivative as a function through the development of graphical covariational reasoning between x and f′(x). International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2483499
- Nugroho, A. A., Nizaruddin, N., Dwijayanti, I., & Tristianti, A. (2020). Exploring students’ creative thinking in the use of representations in solving mathematical problems based on cognitive style. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5(2), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.9983
- Putri, N. D., & Musdi, E. (2020). Analysis of students Initial mathematical communication skills in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1554(1), 012064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012064
- Rahmawati, D., Purwantoa, P., Subanji, S., Hidayanto, E., & Anwar, R. B. (2017). Process of mathematical representation translation from verbal into graphic. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/618
- Rezaei, J., & Asghary, N. (2025). Teaching differential equations through a mathematical modelling approach: The impact on problem-solving and the mathematical performance of engineering undergraduates. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(5), 899–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.2307397
- Sa’dijah, C., Sa’diyah, M., Sisworo, & Anwar, L. (2020, April). Students’ mathematical dispositions towards solving HOTS problems based on FI and FD cognitive style. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2215, No. 1, p. 060025). AIP Publishing LLC.
- Sokolowski, A. (2021). Adaptivity of Mathematics representations to reason scientifically students’ perspective. In Understanding Physics Using Mathematical Reasoning (pp. 187–201). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80205-9_13
- Srivani, M., & Murugappan, A. (2023). Design of a cognitive knowledge representation model to assess the reasoning levels of primary school children. Expert Systems with Applications, 231, 120604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120604
- Subanji, S., Nusantara, T., Sukoriyanto, S., & Atmaja, S. A. A. (2023). Student’s creative model in solving mathematics controversial problems. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 42(2), 310-326. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i2.55979
- Thompson, P. W., Hatfield, N. J., Yoon, H., Joshua, S., & Byerley, C. (2017). Covariational reasoning among U.S. and South Korean secondary mathematics teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.001
- Weatherby, C., Kotsopoulos, D., Woolford, D., & Khattak, L. (2018). A cross-sectional analysis of Mathematics education practices at Canadian universities. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v12i1.5099