Abstracts
Abstract
Prompt literacy has emerged as a pivotal concept in academic writing, particularly within higher education. This systematic literature review (SLR) critically examines and synthesizes research conducted between 2020 and 2025 on using prompting strategies to enhance academic writing among university students. The review aims to identify the types of prompts employed, evaluate their pedagogical effectiveness, explore the contexts of their implementation, and assess the outcomes associated with their use. The SLR followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, encompassing four key stages: data search and collection, selection criteria, data extraction, and data analysis. A two-stage screening process—pre-screening and final eligibility selection—was applied to ensure the inclusion of relevant studies. Findings reveal that 40.5% of the reviewed studies (n=17) adopted a mixed methods research design, reflecting a growing trend toward integrating qualitative and quantitative insights. A central theme across the literature is the critical role of prompt formulation in maximizing the benefits of AI technologies for academic writing. Effective prompts significantly enhanced students' engagement, critical thinking, and writing proficiency. The review also highlights the CLEAR framework as a guiding model for implementing prompting strategies, with implications spanning pedagogical practices, technological integration, and institutional policy development. This review underscores the transformative potential of well-designed prompting strategies in higher education. It calls for a more nuanced understanding of prompt literacy as a foundational skill in the digital age, advocating for targeted interventions and policy support to foster its development. The findings contribute to the growing knowledge of academic writing enhancement and provide actionable insights for educators, instructional designers, and policymakers.
Keywords:
- Academic Writing,
- Artificial Intelligence,
- PRISMA,
- Prompt Literacy
Appendices
Bibliography
- Abdi Tabari, M., & Wang, Y. (2022). The effects of prompt types on L2 learners’ textual emotionality and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Studies, 5(1), 34-57.
- Almutairi, Y. M. N. (2022). Effects of academic integrity of faculty members on students' ethical behaviour. Education Research International, 2022(1), 6806752.
- Alsofyani, A. H., & Barzanji, A. M. (2025). The effects of ChatGPT-generated feedback on Saudi EFL learners’ writing skills and perception at the tertiary level: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(2), 431-463. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241307297
- Amin, D., Salminen, J., Ahmed, F., Tervola, S. M., Sethi, S., & Jansen, B. J. (2025). How Is Generative AI Used for Persona Development?: A Systematic Review of 52 Research Articles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.04927.
- Andreadis, K., Newman, D. R., Twan, C., Shunk, A., Mann, D. M., & Stevens, E. R. (2024). Mixed methods assessment of the influence of demographics on the medical advice of ChatGPT. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 31(9), 2002-2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae086
- Baier, J., & Brehm, E. (2022). Prompts as a means of scaffolding literacy discourse. Classroom discourse competence, pp. 89 -104.
- Bland, T. (2025). Enhancing Medical Student Engagement Through Cinematic Clinical Narratives: Multimodal Generative AI–Based Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Medical Education, 11(1), e63865.
- Cain W (2023) Prompting change: Exploring prompt engineering in large language model AI and its potential to transform education. TechTrends 68(1): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00896-0
- Cao, L., & Dede, C. (2023). Navigating a world of generative AI: Suggestions for educators. The next level lab at harvard graduate school of education, 5(2). Available at: https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/websites.harvard.edu/dist/a/108/files/2023/08/Cao_Dede_final_8.4.23.pdf
- Cao, Y., Said, M. N. H. M., Hanid, M. F. A., & Zhu, R. (2025). The Effect of WeChat on Promoting Foreign Students’ Chinese Language Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(5), 753-769.
- Castillo-Martínez, I. M., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2021, January). Research competencies to develop academic reading and writing: A systematic literature review. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 5, p. 576961). Frontiers Media SA.
- Chen C, & Gong Y. (2025). The Role of AI-Assisted Learning in Academic Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study on Chinese as a Second Language Students. Education Sciences. 2025; 15(2):141. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020141
- Deng, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, Z., & Gu, Q. (2023, November 7). Rephrase and respond: Let large language models ask better questions for themselves. arXiv.Org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04205
- Denny, Paul., Kumar, Viraj., & Giacaman, Nasser. (2022). Conversing with Copilot: Exploring Prompt Engineering for Solving CS1 Problems Using Natural Language. Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 . http://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569823
- Elnashar, A., White, J., & Schmidt, D. C. (2025). Enhancing structured data generation with GPT-4o evaluating prompt efficiency across prompt styles. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1558938.
- Gattupalli, S. S., Maloy, R. W., Edwards, S. A., & Rancourt, M. (2023). Designing for learning: Key decisions for an open online math tutor for elementary students. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-023-00128-3
- Guo, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025). Exploring the Effects of Artificial Intelligence Application on EFL Students' Academic Engagement and Emotional Experiences: A Mixed‐Methods Study. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12812. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12812
- Hwang, Y. H. (2023). The emergence of generative AI and PROMPT literacy: Focusing on the use of ChatGPT and DALLE for English education. Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 22(2), 263–288.
- Hwang, M., Jeens, R., & Lee, H. K. (2024). Exploring Learner Prompting Behavior and Its Effect on ChatGPT-Assisted English Writing Revision. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00930-6
- Hwang, G. J., Cheng, P. Y., & Chang, C. Y. (2025). Facilitating students’ critical thinking, metacognition and problem-solving tendencies in geriatric nursing class: A mixed-method study. Nurse Education in Practice, 83, 104266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104266
- Hyland, K. (2008). Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching, 41(4), 543-562.
- Jacobs, H. H., & Fisher, M. (2023). Prompt Literacy: A key for ai-based learning. ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/prompt-literacy-a-key-for-ai-based-learning
- Jin, Y., Yang, K., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Zhao, L., Alfredo, R., ... & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025, March). Chatting with a learning analytics dashboard: The role of generative AI literacy on learner interaction with conventional and scaffolding chatbots. In Proceedings of the 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 579-590). https://doi.org/10.1145/3706468.3706545
- Junina, A. K., Strauss, P., Wood, J. K., & Grant, L. (2025). A mixed-method inquiry into Arabic-speaking students’ experiences with English academic writing at the undergraduate level. Asia pacific journal of education, 45(1), 260-277.
- Kaya, F., & Yağız, O. (2023). Developing and evaluating an online professional development model on academic writing conventions and norms in English. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231212786.
- Khlaif, Zuhair N.., Mousa, Allam., Hattab, M.., Itmazi, J.., Hassan, Amjad A., Sanmugam, Mageswaran., & Ayyoub, Abedalkarim. (2023). The Potential and Concerns of Using AI in Scientific Research: ChatGPT Performance Evaluation. JMIR Medical Education , 9 . http://doi.org/10.2196/47049
- Kim, J., Yu, S., Lee, S. S., & Detrick, R. (2025). Students’ prompt patterns and its effects in AI-assisted academic writing: Focusing on students’ level of AI literacy. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1-18.
- Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225
- Lee, D., & Palmer, E. (2025). Prompt engineering in higher education: a systematic review to help inform curricula. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00503-7
- Lilia, R., & Elena, T. (2022). An in-depth glimpse into research on academic writing. Journal of Language and Education, 8(2 (30)), 5-16.
- Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., and Neubig, G. (2023). Pre-train, prompt, and predict: a systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM Computer. Survey. 55, 1–35. doi: 10.1145/3560815
- Lunrasri, Y. ., Tangdhanakanond, K. ., & Pasiphol, S. . (2022). Effects of prompting type and learning achievement on reading literacy of ninth graders. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(2), 369‒378. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/258495
- Miyazoe, T. Effective Prompts for EFL Writers: Leveraging ChatGPT for Writing Aid.
- Mohamed Ali El Deen, A. A. M., & Abdelwahab Mahmoud, M. M. (2025). Instructional Technology and Learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL): Insights Into Digital Literacy From Saudi Environment. Theory & Practice in Language Studies (TPLS), 15(2).
- Moundas, M., White, J., & Schmidt, D. C. (2024). Prompt patterns for structured data extraction from unstructured text. In Proceedings of the 31st Pattern Languages of Programming (PLoP) Conference (Columbia River Gorge, WA).
- Mzwri, K., & Turcsányi-Szabo, M. (2025). The Impact of Prompt Engineering and a Generative AI-Driven Tool on Autonomous Learning: A Case Study. Education Sciences, 15(2), 199.
- Nazari, M., & Saadi, G. (2024). Developing effective prompts to improve communication with ChatGPT: a formula for higher education stakeholders. Discover Education, 3(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00122-w
- Olea, C., Tucker, H., Phelan, J., Pattison, C., Zhang, S., Lieb, M., ... & White, J. (2024, June). Evaluating persona prompting for question answering tasks. In Proceedings of th e 10th international conference on artificial intelligence and soft computing, Sydney, Australia.
- Pally, M. (2001). Skills development in'sustained'content-based curricula: Case studies in analytical/critical thinking and academic writing. Language and Education, 15(4), 279-305.
- Paltridge, B. (2004). Academic writing. Language teaching, 37(2), 87-105. doi:10.1017/S0261444804002216
- Perkins, M, Roe, J., Postma, D., McGaughran, J., Vietnam, D Hickerson . (2023). Detection of GPT-4 Generated Text in Higher Education: Combining Academic Judgement and Software to Identify Generative AI Tool Misuse. Journal of Academic Ethics , 22 , 89-113 . http://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09492-6
- Rad, Hanieh Shafiee., & Jafarpour, A.. (2022). Effects of Well-being, Grit, Emotion Regulation, and Resilience Interventions on L2 Learners’ Writing Skills. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 39, 228–247. http://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2022.2096517
- Ronanki, K., Cabrero-Daniel, B., Horkoff, J., & Berger, C. (2023, November 7). Requirements Engineering using Generative AI: Prompts and Prompting Patterns. arXiv.Org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.03832
- Raheem, B. R., Anjum, F., & Ghafar, Z. N. (2023). Exploring the profound impact of artificial intelligence applications (Quillbot, Grammarly and ChatGPT) on English academic writing: A systematic review. International Journal of Integrative Research (IJIR), 1(10), 599–622.
- Schulhoff, S., Ilie, M., Balepur, N., Kahadze, K., Liu, A., Si, C., ... & Resnik, P. (2024). The prompt report: A systematic survey of prompting techniques. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06608, 5.
- Shi, Q., Luzuriaga, K., Allison, J. J., Oztekin, A., Faro, J. M., Lee, J. L., ... & Zai, A. H. (2025). Transforming Informed Consent Generation Using Large Language Models: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Medical Informatics, 13(1), e68139.
- Sillat, Linda Helene., Tammets, Kairit., & Laanpere, M. (2021). Digital Competence Assessment Methods in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences . http://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080402
- Schmidt, D. C., Spencer-Smith, J., Fu, Q., & White, J. (2024). Towards a catalog of prompt patterns to enhance the discipline of prompt engineering. ACM SIGAda Ada Letters, 43(2), 43-51.
- Schmidt, D. C., Spencer-Smith, J., Fu, Q., & White, J. (2023). Cataloging prompt patterns to enhance the discipline of prompt engineering. URL: https://www. dre. vanderbilt. edu/schmidt/PDF/ADA_Europe_Position_Paper. pdf [accessed 2023-09-25].
- Shyr, C., Grout, R. W., Kennedy, N., Akdas, Y., Tischbein, M., Milford, J., ... & Harris, P. A. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence to summarize abstracts in lay language for increasing research accessibility and transparency. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 31(10), 2294-2303.
- Sun, W., Yan, Y., & Li, Q. How Do College Students Engage with Genai and Teacher Feedback on L2 Writing? Insights from a Mixed-Methods Study. Insights from a Mixed-Methods Study.
- Thonney, T. (2011). Teaching the conventions of academic discourse. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 38(4), 348-362.
- Tzirides, A. O. O., Zapata, G., Kastania, N. P., Saini, A. K., Castro, V., Ismael, S. A., ... & Kalantzis, M. (2024). Combining human and artificial intelligence for enhanced AI literacy in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100184
- Van Wyk, M. M. (2024). Is ChatGPT an opportunity or a threat? Preventive strategies employed by academics related to a GenAI-based LLM at a faculty of education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 7(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.15
- Wallbank, A. J. (2023, April 28). Prompt engineering as an academic skill: A model for effective ChatGPT interactions. Times Higher Education: Campus resources for academics and university staff. https://www.timeshighereducation. com/campus/prompt-engineering-academic-skill-model- effective-ChatGPT-interaction
- Wang, Y. (2024). Reviewing the usage of ChatGPT on L2 students’ English academic writing learning. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 30, 173–178. Wang, X., Li, C.,
- Wang, C., & Wang, Z. (2025). Investigating L2 writers' critical AI literacy in AI-assisted writing: An APSE model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 67, 101187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101187
- Wang, Z., Bai, F., Luo, H., Zhang, J., Jojic, N., Xing, E. P., & Hu, Z. (2023, October 25). PromptAgent: Strategic planning with language models enables expert-level prompt optimization. arXiv.Org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.16427
- White, J., Fu, Q., Hays, S., Sandborn, M., Olea, C., Gilbert, H., ... & Schmidt, D. C. (2023). A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11382.
- White, J., Hays, S., Fu, Q., Spencer-Smith, J., & Schmidt, D. C. (2024). Chatgpt prompt patterns for improving code quality, refactoring, requirements elicitation, and software design. In Generative ai for effective software development (pp. 71-108). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
- Xiao, F., Zhu, S., & Xin, W. (2025). Exploring the landscape of generative AI (ChatGPT)-powered writing instruction in English as a foreign language education: A scoping review. ECNU Review of Education, 20965311241310881. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241310881
- Yamin, M., Setiawan, S., & Anam, S. U. (2023). Enhancing critical thinking to foster students' analytical capacity in academic writing. International Journal of Language Studies, 17(1).
- Yan, D. (2025). Feedback seeking abilities of L2 writers using ChatGPT: a mixed method multiple case study. Kybernetes, 54(7), 3757-3781. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241307297

