Abstracts
Abstract
This article explores how contemporary Swedish childhoods are constructed through analysis of 5,933 children’s drawings and conversations about their living conditions and leisure time. Four constructions are identified: scheduled, isolated, digital, and restricted childhoods. These reflect how structural inequalities, material conditions, and place shape children’s opportunities, participation, and agency. While digital spaces offer new forms of belonging, economic and spatial disparities continue to limit children’s participation and well-being. The study highlights the need for educators and policymakers to recognize children’s diverse realities in an emerging class-based society and to promote more just and equitable conditions for all children.
Keywords:
- Childhoods,
- children’s drawings,
- agency,
- structure,
- place
Appendices
Bibliography
- Alanen, L. (2000). Childhood as a generational condition: Towards a relational theory of childhood. In J. Olesen, N. de Coninck-Smith, F. Mouritsen, & J. Qvortrup (Eds.), Research in childhood: Sociology, culture, & history. A collection of papers (pp. 11–29). University of Southern Denmark.
- Allelin, M., Kallifatides, M., Sjöberg, S., & Skyrman, V. (2018). Välfärdsmodellens omvandling: det privata kapitalets utvidgning i den offentliga sektorn [The transformation of the welfare model: The expansion of private capital in the public sector]. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-26517
- Archard, D. (2014). Children: Rights and childhood. Routledge.
- Arnseth, H. C., & Silseth, K. (2015). Tracing learning and identity across sites: Tensions, connections, and transformations in and between everyday and institutional practices. In O. Erstad & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age (pp. 23–38). Cambridge University Press.
- Behtoui, A., Hertzberg, F., & Neergaard, A. (Eds.). (2020). Ungdomars fritidsaktiviteter: deltagande, möjligheter och konsekvenser [Youth leisure activities: Participation, opportunities, and outcomes]. Studentlitteratur.
- Borg, A.-L. (2024). Trygga och otrygga platser: En etnografisk studie om våld och utsatthet bland barn i fritidshem [Safe and unsafe places: An ethnographic study on violence and vulnerability among children in after-school care] [PhD thesis, University of Gothenburg]. GUPEA. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/items/8e5b295a-009c-41d5-ad77-9231b22d2287
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 844–860). Springer.
- Children’s Ombudsman. (2018). Utanförskap, våld och kärlek till orten: Barns röster om att växa upp i utsatta kommuner och förorter [Exclusion, violence, and love for the neighborhood]. Barndombudsmannen.
- Christensen, P., & James, A. (2008). Introduction. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (pp. 1–9). Routledge.
- Corsaro, W. A. (2018). The sociology of childhood. SAGE.
- Fernqvist, S. (2013). En erfarenhet rikare? En kvalitativ studie av barns strategier och barnfattigdomens villkor i välfärdsstaten [A richer experience? A qualitative study of children’s strategies and child poverty] [PhD thesis, Uppsala University]. Avhandlingar. https://www.avhandlingar.se/avhandling/797666c39a/
- Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended (D. Macey, Trans.). Picador. (Original work published 1975)
- Gardesten, J., Ackesjö, H., & Wernholm, M. (2023). Den problematiska fritiden 2.0. Fritidshemmets kompensatoriska uppdrag i socioekonomiskt utsatta områden [The problematic leisure time 2.0: The compensatory mission of school-age educare in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas]. Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk og kritikk, 9. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v9.5573
- Gilman, R., & Huebner, S. (2003). A review of life satisfaction research with children and adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.192.21858
- Halldén, G. (2005). Barns inflytande över barndomen [Children’s influence over childhood]. Sociologisk Forskning 42(4), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.42.19347
- Harju, A. (2008). Barns vardag med knapp ekonomi: En studie om barns erfarenheter och strategier [Children’s everyday lives in economic hardship: A study of children’s experiences and coping strategies] [PhD thesis, Växjö Universitet]. DiVA. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A205824&dswid=-2386
- Harju, A., & Sjölander, J. (2019). Drömmar och röster: en antologi om barns och ungas livsvillkor i Malmö [Dreams and voices: An anthology about children’s and young people’s living conditions in Malmö]. In A. Harju & J. Sjölander (Eds.), Drömmar och röster—en antologi om barns och ungas livsvillkor i Malmö [Dreams and voices: An anthology about children’s and young people’s living conditions in Malmö] (pp. 9–13). Malmö University Publications in Urban Studies, 24.
- Ito, M., Odgers, C., Schueller, S., Cabrera, J., Conoway, E., Cross, R., & Hernandez, M. (2020). Social media and youth wellbeing: What we know and where we could go. C. L. Alliance. https://clalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Social-Media-and-Youth-Wellbeing-Report.pdf
- James, A. P., & James, A. L. (2008). Key concepts in childhood studies. SAGE.
- Jenks, C. (1996). Childhood. Routledge.
- Kampmann, J. (2003). Barndomssociologi—fra marginaliseret provokatør til mainstream leverandør [The sociology of childhood: From marginalized provocateur to mainstream provider]. Dansk Sociologi, 14(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.22439/dansoc.v14i2.362
- Kampmann, J. (2014). Young children as learners. In G. B. Melton, A. Ben-Arieh, J. Cashmore, G. S. Goodman, & N. K. Worley (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of child research (pp. 136–152). SAGE.
- Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. University of California Press.
- Lee, N. M. (2001). Childhood and society: Growing up in an age of uncertainty. Open University Press.
- Loudon, F. M., Boyle, B., & Larsson-Lund, M. (2022). Children’s experiences of play in digital spaces: A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 17(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272630
- Massey, D. (2005). For space. SAGE.
- Nelson, K. Z. (2024). Anmält saknat! Ett strukturellt perspektiv på barndom [Reported missing! A structural perspective on childhood]. Barn, 42(1–2), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.23865/barn.v42.6165
- Pearce, A., Dundas, R., Whitehead, M., & Taylor-Robinson, D. (2019). Pathways to inequalities in child health. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 104, 998–1003. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314808
- Penn, H. (2012). Childcare markets: Do they work? In E. Lloyd & H. Penn (Eds) Childcare markets: Can they deliver an equitable service? (pp. 19–42). Policy Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781847429339.003.0002
- Powell, M. (2007). Understanding the mixed economy of welfare. Policy Press.
- Prout, A. (2011). Taking a step away from modernity: Reconsidering the new sociology of childhood. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.4
- Prout, A., & James, A. (1997). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise, and problems. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood (pp. 7–33). Routledge.
- Qvortrup, J. (2009). Childhood as a structural form. In J. Qvortrup, W. A. Corsaro, & M.-S. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 21–33). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Rönnlund, M., & Tollefsen, A. (2016). Rum: Samhällsvetenskapliga perspektiv [Space: Social science perspectives]. Liber.
- Save the Children. (2024). Missing out: barns och ungas erfarenheter av ekonomiska svårigheter. [Missing out: Children’s and young people’s experiences of financial hardship]. Author.
- Save the Children. (2025). En ny verklighet: Rädda barnens barnfattigdomsrapport Sverige 2025 [A new reality: Save the Children’s child poverty report in Sweden 2025]. Author.
- Scarpa, S. (2016). Looking beyond the neighbourhood: Income inequality and residential segregation in Swedish metropolitan areas, 1991–2010. Urban Geography, 37(7), 963–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1123448
- Sernhede, O., Hammarén, N., Lunneblad, J., & Unhoo, S. (2024). Mellan resignation och framtidstro: Livsvillkor och lärande hos förortens unga [Between resignation and hope: Youth living conditions and learning in suburban areas]. Natur & Kultur.
- Sims, M. (2017). Neoliberalism and early childhood. Cogent Education, (4)1, 1365411. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1365411
- Sixtensson, J. (2018). Härifrån till framtiden: Om gränslinjer, aktörskap och motstånd i tjejers vardagsliv [From here to the future: On boundaries, agency, and resistance in girls’ everyday lives] [PhD thesis, Malmö University]. Libris. https://libris.kb.se/g0s83rqs1624nv9
- Sixtensson, J. (2019). Att navigera i ett villkorat stadsrum. Malmötjejer om (o)tillhörighet, rörelsemönster och platsskapande [Navigating a conditioned urban space: Malmö girls on (non)belonging, movement patterns, and place-making]. In A. Harju & J. Sjölander (Eds.), Drömmar och röster: en antologi om barns och ungas livsvillkor i Malmö [Dreams and voices: An anthology about children’s and young people’s living conditions in Malmö] (pp. 113–122). Malmö University Publications in Urban Studies, 24.
- Swedish City Missions. (2024). Fattigdomsrapporten [The poverty report]. Swedish City Missions.
- Swedish National Agency for Education. (2025). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class, and school-age educare: Lgr22 (3rd ed.). https://www.skolverket.se/sok-publikationer/publikationsserier/styrdokument/2024/curriculum-for-compulsory-school-preschool-class-and-school-age-educare---lgr22
- Swedish Research Council. (2024). Good research practice. Author.
- The Lancet Regional Health—Europe. (2023). Sweden’s economic inequality gap is widening and worrying. The Lancet Regional Health—Europe, 26. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(23)00028-5/fulltext
- United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child
- Wang, V., & Edwards, S. (2016). Strangers are friends I haven’t met yet: A positive approach to young people’s use of social media. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(9), 1204–1219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1154933
- Warming, H. (2020). Childhood prism research: An approach for enabling unique childhood studies contributions within the wider scholarly field. Children’s Geographies, 20(3), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2020.1787952
- Warming, H., Galløe, L., Carlsen, R., & Rasmussen, S. R. (2019). Beasts, victims, or competent agents: The positioning of children in research literature on manipulation. Childhood, 26(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568218803429
- Wernholm, M. (2019). Children’s shared experiences of participating in digital communities. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13(4), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2018-04-04
- Wernholm, M. (2025). Challenging the discourse on children’s screen time: School-age educare educators’ analyses of children’s out-of-school use of digital technologies. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2025.2600993