Abstracts
Abstract
How can assessment be reimagined to better support student creativity, critical thinking, and well-being? This paper argues that innovative, pluralistic strategies offer powerful, but often underutilized, pathways for deep learning in higher education. Drawing on examples from interdisciplinary university classrooms, it demonstrates how creative formats such as photography, food-making, visual arts, and performance enable students to showcase their understanding in culturally relevant, multimodal, and intellectually rigorous ways. Grounded in educational pluralism, Universal Design for Learning, and equity-focused pedagogy, the paper contends that creative assessments need not replace conventional methods; rather, they can complement and strengthen them by broadening what counts as valid evidence of learning. The paper also addresses common misconceptions about creative assessment—including concerns about consistency, scalability, and disciplinary fit—and illustrates how transparent guidelines, scaffolded preparation, and choice can uphold fairness while expanding student agency. By reframing assessment—both formative and summative—as a relational and meaning-making practice, the authors invite educators to see creativity not as an exception, but as an integral dimension of inclusive, high-quality teaching. Ultimately, this paper offers both conceptual framing and practical strategies for reimagining assessment as a space of justice, care, and shared intellectual discovery.
Keywords:
- creative assessment,
- educational pluralism,
- deep learning,
- student-centered pedagogy
Appendices
Bibliography
- Abegglen, S., Aparicio-Ting, F. E., Arcellana-Panlilio, M., Behjat, L., Brown, B., Clancy, T. L., DesJardine, P., Din, C., Dyjur, P., Ferreira, C., Hughson, E. A., Kassan, A., Klinke, C., Kurz, E., Neuhaus, F., Pletnyova, G., Paul, R. M., Peschl, H., Peschl, R., & Squance, R. T. (2021). Incorporating universal design for learning in disciplinary contexts in higher education. (Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning, University of Calgary. https://taylorinstitute.ucalgary.ca/UDL
- Alencar, E. M., Fleith, D. M., & Pereira, N. (2017). Creativity in higher education: Challenges and facilitating factors. Temas em Psicologia, 25(2), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2017.2-09
- Beltrano, N. (2023). Call and response: Inquiry-based learning as a critical pedagogy in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning to promote transformation and transformational leadership. Imagining SoTL, 3(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl678
- Benedict, R. (1935). Patterns of culture. Routledge.
- Boal, A. (2014). Theatre of the oppressed (C. A. McBride, Trans.). In R. Caines & A. Heble (Eds.), The improvisation studies reader (pp. 79–86). Routledge. (Original work published 1979).
- Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (Eds.). (2007). Introduction: Assessment for the longer term. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 3–13). Routledge.
- Chen, J., & Singh, C. K. S. (2024). A systematic review on deep learning in education: Concepts, factors, models, and measurements. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 7(1), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.54097/gzk2yd38
- Chotitham, S., Wongwanich, S., & Wiratchai, N. (2014). Deep learning and its effects on achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3313–3316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.754
- de Koning, A. J., McArdle, J. F., Choudhary, A., & Saggar, M. (2023). Disrupting the traditional learning paradigm: Place-based learning as a transformational space. Imagining SoTL, 3(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl679
- Global Centre for Pluralism (2020). Who we are. https://www.pluralism.ca/who-we-are/#what-is-pluralism
- Grant, K., Fedoruk, L., & Nowell, L. (2021). Conversations and reflections on authentic assessment. Imagining SoTL, 1, 146–162. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl532
- Hamilton, M., & McCollum, B. (2024). Moving from “good” to “great” SoTL: The importance of describing your research epistemological and ontological traditions in your SoTL scholarship. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.31
- Kelly, M. (2022). Signature pedagogies: A cautionary tale. Imagining SoTL, 2(1),10–18. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl599
- Masaiti, G., Kakupa, P., & Mupeta, S. (2023). Re-imagining assessment in higher education: Creating alternative pathways for inclusive and democratic assessments in Zambian higher education institutions. SOTL in the South, 7(3), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v7i3.384
- Pauls, M., Hoa, N., & Nelson, F. (2024). Learning about trauma online: What works and what is? Imagining SoTL, 4(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl694
- Plucker, J. A., & Diegoli, R. (2024). Implementing transformational creativity in higher education. In R. J. Sternberg, & S. Karami (Eds.), Transformational creativity (pp. 231–244). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51590-3_16
- Popovic, C., Kim, A. S. N., Saleh, S. A. F., & Farrugia, L. (2021). Turning the tables: Involving undergrads as researchers in SoTL. Imagining SoTL, 1, 99–115. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl531
- Rae, J. (2023). Connecting for creativity in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 48, 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09609-6
- Ross, J. N., Dey, P., Baffour, E., Abdellatiff, Y., Tjan, E., Guadagnolo, D., Laliberte, N., & Rawle, F. (2022). Visualizing the power and privilege of failure in higher education. Imagining SoTL, 2(2), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl609
- Rozanski, C. (2026). Theatre assessment instructions and rubric. University of Calgary PRISM. https://hdl.handle.net/1880/123879
- Saggar, M. C., McArdle, J., de Koning, A., & Choudhary, A. (2023). Designing effective experiential curriculum: The experiential learning map. Imagining SoTL, 3(2), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl693
- Stawnychko, L. (2024). Transformative pathways: Fostering leadership skills through reflective undergraduate education. Imagining SoTL, 5(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl787
- Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2022). Assessment for inclusion: Rethinking contemporary strategies in assessment design. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(2), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2057451
- Trail, S. (n.d.). Social Justice Sewing Academy. https://www.sjsacademy.org/

