Abstracts
Abstract
There is an increased focus on the assessment of student learning, particularly as postsecondary institutions are orienting towards principle-based assessment policies and practices. We conducted a conceptual review of the literature to identify the purposes, practices, and discourses surrounding the assessment of student learning. The review of 34 publications offers valuable insights into the assessment landscape, emphasizing the shift towards approaches such as the assessment for learning, assessment as learning and empowerment, and learning-oriented assessments. A few emergent themes included authentic assessment practices, engaging students as partners in assessment, online and digital assessment strategies, strengthening feedback pathways, supporting student and educator mental health and well-being, academic integrity, generative artificial intelligence, and ethical, inclusive, and equitable assessment. We invite instructors and educational leaders to consider contemporary purposes, practices, and discourses for the assessment of student learning and explore ways to enhance assessment processes and practices in their respective institutional contexts.
Keywords:
- Assessment Purposes,
- Assessment Practices,
- Assessment Discourses,
- Assessment of Student Learning,
- Assessment Principles
Appendices
Bibliography
- *Alabidi, S., Alarabi, K., Alsalhi, N. R., & Mansoori, M. A. (2023). The dawn of ChatGPT: Transformation in science assessment. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2023(106), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2023.106.019
- *Boud, D. (2020). Challenges in reforming higher education assessment: A perspective from afar. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 26(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.17088
- *Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
- *Bourke, R. (2018). Self-assessment to incite learning in higher education: Developing ontological awareness. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 827–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1411881
- *Braun, H. (2019). Performance assessment and standardization in higher education: A problematic conjunction? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12274
- Corbin, T., Dawson, P., & Liu, D. (2025). Talk is cheap: Why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GenAI. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(7), 1087–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2503964
- *Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K-A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.3.02
- *Curtis, N., & Anderson, R. (2021). A framework for developing student-faculty partnerships in program-level student learning outcomes assessment (Occasional Paper No. 53). National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED615257.pdf
- *Dison, L., & Padayachee, K. (2022). Possibilities for long-term shifts in higher education assessment praxis: Reflecting on COVID-19 as a stimulus for change. South African Journal of Higher Education, 36(4), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-4-5193
- *Efu, S. I. (2019). Exams as learning tools: A comparison of traditional and collaborative assessment in higher education. College Teaching, 67(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2018.1531282
- *Elkhoury, E., Ali, A., & Sutherland-Harris, R. (2023). Exploring faculty mindsets in equity-oriented assessment. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(5), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.5.13
- *Gleeson, J., & Fletcher, G. (2022). Indigenous perspectives on inclusive assessment: Knowledge, knowing, and the relational. In R. Ajjawi, J. Tai, D. Boud, & T. Jorre de St Jorre (Eds.), Assessment for inclusion in higher education (pp. 41–51). Routledge.
- *Heil, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2023). Online assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Online Learning, 27(1), 187–218. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3398
- *Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence for assessment and feedback to enhance student success in higher education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722
- *Hortigüela Alcalá, D., Palacios Picos, A., & López Pastor, V. (2019). The impact of formative and shared or co-assessment on the acquisition of transversal competences in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 933–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1530341
- *Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Boud, D. (2021). The quality of assessment tasks as a determinant of learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1828268
- *Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., Boud, D., Rotsaert, T., Brown, S., Salinas Salazar, M.L., & Hilda Mar Rodríguez Gómez. (2020). The future of assessment in higher education. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 26(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.17323
- *Jankowski, N. A., & Baker, G. R. (2023). Demanding space for equity in the assessment of student learning. In Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 55(4), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2023.2213569
- Jankowski, N. A., & Slotnick, R. C. (2015). The five essential roles of assessment practitioners. Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness, 5(1), 78–100. https://doi.org/10.5325/jasseinsteffe.5.1.0078
- *Jones, E., Priestley, M., Brewster, L., Wilbraham, S. J., Hughes, G., & Spanner, L. (2021). Student wellbeing and assessment in higher education: The balancing act. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1782344
- *Joughin, G., Dawson, P., & Boud, D. (2017). Improving assessment tasks through addressing our unconscious limits to change. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1221–1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1257689
- *Jurāne-Brēmane, A. (2023). Digital assessment in technology-enriched education: Thematic review. Education Sciences, 13(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050522
- *Kaur, A., Noman, M., & Nordin, H. (2017). Inclusive assessment for linguistically diverse learners in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(5), 756–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1187250
- Kennedy, M. M. (2007). Defining a literature. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07299197
- Lindstrom, G., & Taylor, L. (2016). Guiding principles for assessment in postsecondary education: An evidence-based approach. Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning, University of Calgary. https://taylorinstitute.ucalgary.ca/sites/default/files/uploaded-documents/resources/course-design/Principles%20of%20Assessment%20Long% 20FINAL.pdf
- *Lister, K., Andrews, K., Buxton, J., Douce, C., & Seale, J. (2023). Assessment, life circumstances, curriculum and skills: Barriers and enablers to student mental wellbeing in distance learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076985
- *López Pastor, V., & Sicilia Camacho, A. (2017). Formative and shared assessment in higher education. Lessons learned and challenges for the future. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1083535
- *Manis, A. A., McKenna, L. W., & Sculthorp, S. (2022). Systematic assessment of learning in higher education: A comprehensive approach within curriculum design. Educational Research Quarterly, 46(1), 33–45.
- McGill University. (n.d.). What’s changed? https://www.mcgill.ca/assessment-for-learning/pasl/changes
- *McMorran, C., Ragupathi, K., & Luo, S. (2017). Assessment and learning without grades? Motivations and concerns with implementing gradeless learning in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1114584
- *Medland, E. (2016). Assessment in higher education: Drivers, barriers and directions for change in the UK. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.982072
- *Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023). A review of assessment for learning with artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 1–11.
- *Montenegro, E. (2021). Focus on students and equity in assessment to improve learning. In N. A. Jankowski, G. R. Baker, E. Montenegro, & K. Brown-Tess (Eds.), Student-focused learning and assessment: Involving students in the learning process in higher education (pp. 187–209). Peter Lang.
- *Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151
- Nieminen, J. H., & Yang, L. (2024). Assessment as a matter of being and becoming: Theorising student formation in assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 49(6), 1028–1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2257740
- *Tan, C. P., Howes, D., Tan, R. K. W., & Dancza, K. M. (2022). Developing interactive oral assessments to foster graduate attributes in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2020722
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC). (2015). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to action. https://nctr.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Calls_to_Action_English2.pdf
- University of Calgary Teaching and Learning. (n.d.). Assessment principles. https://teaching-learning.ucalgary.ca/resources-educators/assessment-principles
- University of Saskatchewan. (2023). Academic courses policy on class delivery, examinations, and assessment of student learning. https://policies.usask.ca/policies/academic-affairs/academic-courses.php#Principles
- *Weleschuk, A., Dyjur, P., & Kelly, P. (2019). Online assessment in higher education. Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning, University of Calgary. https://taylorinstitute.ucalgary.ca/sites/default/files/TI%20Guides/Online%20Assessment%20Guide-2019-10-24.pdf
- *Williams, P. (2023). AI, analytics and a new assessment model for universities. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101040
- *Winstone, N. E., & Boud, D. (2022). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 656–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687
- *Ylonen, A., Gillespie, H., & Green, A. (2018). Disciplinary differences and other variations in assessment cultures in higher education: Exploring variability and inconsistencies in one university in England. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 1009–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1425369
(*) Identifies publications included in the conceptual review.

